Article
Menthol and nonmenthol cigarettes and smoke exposure in black and white women

https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(95)02034-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Purposes of this investigation were to compare smoke constituent exposure (CO and nicotine boosts) and smoking topography parameters between black and white women, and between women regularly using menthol or nonmenthol cigarettes. A two-factor factorial design with a sample of 37 women stratified by race and menthol or nonmenthol cigarette use was implemented. There were significant main and interaction effects of race and menthol/nonmenthol use on CO boost. Black women had a mean CO boost of 10.1 ppm vs. 7.2 ppm for white women, while women using nonmenthol cigarettes had a higher CO boost (mean = 10.6 ppm) compared to those regularly using menthol cigarettes (mean = 6.5 ppm). White menthol smokers had the lowest CO boost of all subgroups. There was a trend for black women to have higher nicotine boost than white women (21.4 ng/ml vs. 15.9 ng/ml). Black women had nonsignificantly higher puff volumes compared to white women (mean = 48.4 vs. 43.5 ml), while nonmenthol smokers had nonsignificantly higher puff volumes than menthol smokers (mean = 48.5 vs. 42.7 ml). Lower CO boost with mentholated cigarettes suggests factors beyond mentholation may affect elevated smoke constituent exposure among black women.

References (43)

  • K. Naito et al.

    The effect of l-menthol stimulation of the major palatine nerve on nasal patency

    Larynx

    (1991)
  • R. Nemeth-Coslett et al.

    Effects of cigarette rod length on puff volume and carbon monoxide delivery in cigarette smokers

    Drug Alcohol Depend.

    (1985)
  • R. Nil et al.

    Effects of single doses of alcohol and caffeine on cigarette smoke puffing behavior

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1984)
  • C. Pomerleau et al.

    Relationship between nicotine tolerance questionnaire scores and plasma cotinine

    Addict. Behav.

    (1990)
  • F. Sant'Ambrogio et al.

    Menthol in the upper airway depresses ventilation in newborn dogs

    Respir. Physiol.

    (1992)
  • K. Ahijevych et al.

    Factors associated with nicotine dependence among African American women cigarette smokers

    Res. Nurs. Health

    (1993)
  • K. Ahijevych et al.

    Patterns of cigarette consumption and cotinine levels among African American women smokers

    Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.

    (1994)
  • Don't let your dreams go up in smoke

    (1990)
  • K. Cummings et al.

    Cigarette advertising and racial differences in cigarette brand preference

    Public Health Rep.

    (1987)
  • M. Hariharan et al.

    A high-performance liquid chromatographic method for routine simultaneous determination of nicotine and cotinine in plasma

    Clin. Chem.

    (1988)
  • R. Harris et al.

    Race and sex differences in lung cancer risk associated with cigarette smoking

    Int. J. Epidemiol.

    (1993)
  • Cited by (70)

    • Racial disparities in intensity of smoke exposure and nicotine intake among low-dependence smokers

      2021, Drug and Alcohol Dependence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Meanwhile, the established high prevalence of menthol cigarette smokers in Black relative to white smokers–-which was also observed in our sample—has led to speculation that menthol increases the risk of smoking-related disease in Black smokers by weakening the effects of irritants in tobacco smoke, allowing smokers to inhale each cigarette with greater intensity (Strasser et al., 2013). However, there have been mixed conclusions regarding the effects of mentholated cigarettes on puff topography and nicotine intake (e.g., Ahijevych et al., 1996; Jarvik et al., 1994; Lawrence et al., 2011; Richardson, 1997; (Strasser et al., 2013). Regardless of menthol status, Blacks in our sample had higher levels of nicotine intake per cigarette than whites, and this was consistent with past findings (Ross et al., 2016a,b; St. Helen et al., 2019a,b).

    • Custom mentholation of commercial cigarettes for research purposes

      2014, Toxicology Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Laboratory-based studies have also yielded mixed results because of compliance issues that require established menthol or nonmenthol cigarette smokers to use the opposite cigarette style for the extended periods necessary to compare classic measures of toxicity [7]. For example, when comparing biomarkers of exposure between menthol and nonmenthol smokers (e.g., cotinine, carbon monoxide [CO]), some studies showed decreased levels, some increased, and some no difference [4,17–23]. The reason for this may be that commercial cigarettes are so highly engineered that there are many significant differences between menthol and nonmenthol cigarettes other than menthol levels.

    • Lack of effect of menthol level and type on smokers' estimated mouth level exposures to tar and nicotine and perceived sensory characteristics of cigarette smoke

      2012, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Puff volumes were reported in six studies. A decrease in puff volume with mentholated cigarettes was reported in four of the studies, three of which were significant (Nil and Battig, 1989; Jarvik et al., 1994; McCarthy et al., 1995) and one not significant (Ahijevych et al., 1996). One study reported similar puff volumes for menthol and non-menthol cigarettes (Miller et al., 1994) and one reported a significant increase in puff volume associated with menthol cigarettes (Ahijevych and Parsley, 1999).

    • Menthol smoking in relation to time to first cigarette and cotinine: Results from a community-based study

      2012, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore we further examined this relationship in relation to the biological uptake of nicotine. While some previous studies have shown that menthol smokers have higher cotinine levels (Clark et al., 1996; Caskey et al., 1993; Ahijevych and Garrett, 2004) most data including our previous report from this study found no differences (Wagenknecht et al., 1990; Ahijevych et al., 1996; Muscat et al., 2009a; Heck, 2009; Signorello et al., 2009; Caraballo et al., 2011). None of these studies considered how menthol may vary by TTFC, which itself is highly associated with increased cotinine (Muscat et al., 2009b; Etter et al., 1999).

    • A survey of mouth level exposure to cigarette smoke in the United States

      2011, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Puff volumes were reported in six studies. A decrease in puff volume with mentholated cigarettes was reported in four studies, three of which were statistically significant (Nil and Battig, 1989; Jarvik et al., 1994 and McCarthy et al., 1995) and one statistically insignificant (Ahijevych et al., 1996). One study reported similar puff volumes for menthol and non-menthol cigarettes (Miller et al., 1994) and one reported a significant increase in puff volume associated with menthol cigarettes (Ahijevych and Parsley, 1999).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text