Brief communicationCocaine self-administration is increased by both D1 and D2 dopamine antagonists
References (8)
- et al.
The D1 dopamine receptor antagonist SCH23390 increases cocaine self-administration in the rat
Neurosci. Lett.
(1987) Effects of a D1 and a D2 dopamine antagonist on the self-administration of cocaine and piribedil by rhesus monkeys
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(1986)- et al.
The effects of a D1 and a D2 dopamine antagonist on behavior maintained by cocaine or food
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(1989) A rodent model for nicotine self-administration
Cited by (123)
Dopamine D1 and D3 receptor polypharmacology as a potential treatment approach for substance use disorder
2018, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsCitation Excerpt :The D1-like receptor antagonist, SCH 23390, and partial agonist, SKF 38393, have been shown to reduce BSR (Nakajima and O’Regan, 1991) while the D1-like receptor agonists, SKF 82958 and A77636, to facilitate BSR (Carr et al., 2001; Gilliss et al., 2002; Lazenka et al., 2016; Ranaldi and Beninger, 1994). In drug self-administration studies, D1-like receptor antagonists SCH 23390, A69024 and SCH 39166 increase cocaine intake, but high doses of the antagonists decrease responding in rats and monkeys (Barrett et al., 2004; Britton et al., 1991; Caine and Koob, 1994; Caine et al., 1999; Corrigall and Coen, 1991a; Hubner and Moreton, 1991; Koob et al., 1987). A higher rate of cocaine intake under the treatment of SCH 23390 has been associated with a greater increase in DA oxidation current (i.e., a measure of extracellular DA concentration) in the NAcc.
The Clockδ19 mutation in mice fails to alter the primary and secondary reinforcing properties of nicotine
2013, Drug and Alcohol DependenceCitation Excerpt :For example, DA D1 receptors (D1R) play a critical role in Pavlovian learning and Pavlovian-incentive learning (Di Chiara, 2002; Hyman, 2005), but the infusion of DA D1R antagonists into the NAcc core has no effect on the acquisition of nicotine CPP (Spina et al., 2006), but blocks the acquisition of cocaine CPP in rats (Baker et al., 1998). Furthermore, both peripheral and central administration of the D1R antagonist SCH-23390 has been demonstrated to decrease nicotine self-administration in rodents (Corrigall and Coen, 1991b; David et al., 2006; Stairs et al., 2010), but in general increases cocaine self-administration (Caine and Koob, 1994; Corrigall and Coen, 1991a; Koob et al., 1987; Stairs et al., 2010). Thus, contrasting effects of nicotine and cocaine associated with DA-mediated reinforcement and motivation may underlie the differences seen here and those reported for cocaine CPP and SA.
Obesity-resistant S5B rats showed greater cocaine conditioned place preference than the obesity-prone OM rats
2010, Physiology and BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Conceivably BC efficacy is affected by specific genetic differences inherent between the two strains which remain to be defined. This disruption of CPP is supportive of prior studies that have shown that selective DA agonists can disrupt cocaine self-administration [34–36] and CPP [37–39]. Thus, BC as shown in the present study to reduce cocaine preference should warrant further investigation with respect to clinical application, perhaps limited to only a relatively high dose.
Gestational treatment with methylazoxymethanol (MAM) that disrupts hippocampal-dependent memory does not alter behavioural response to cocaine
2009, Pharmacology Biochemistry and BehaviorDevelopmental lead exposure alters methamphetamine self-administration in the male rat: Acquisition and reinstatement
2008, Drug and Alcohol DependenceDrug Discovery and Development for Reward Disorders: Views from Government
2008, Animal and Translational Models for CNS Drug Discovery