Opposite effects of midazolam and β-carboline-3-carboxylate ethyl ester on the release of dopamine from rat nucleus accumbens measured by in vivo mudialysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2999(94)90301-8Get rights and content

Abstract

This report describes the effects of midazolam and β-carboline-3-carboxylate ethyl ester (β-CCE) on extracellular concentrations of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens of freely moving rats measured by in vivo mudialysis. The two compounds had opposite effects, midazolam (0.075 and 0.15 mg/kg i.v.) dose dependently decreasing, and β-CCE (3 and 10 mg/kg i.p.) dose dependently increasing, dialysate concentrations of dopamine. Flumazenil (6 μg/kg i.v.) did not affect the efflux of dopamine but it prevented the effects of both midazolam and β-CCE on dopamine efflux. N6-Cyclohexyladenosine (0.1, and 1 mg/kg i.p.), a seletive adenosine A1 agonist, dose dependently increased the efflux of dopamine. This effect was blocked by 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (25 mg/kg i.p.), a selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, a dose which given alone did not affect dopamine efflux; responses to midazolam were not affected. 3,7-Dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine (1 and 3 mg/kg i.p.), a selective adenosine A2 receptor antagonist, did not mimic the effects of β-CCE. The results suggest that midazolam and β-CCE modulate dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens by an action at the benzodiazepine binding site associated with the GABAA receptor complex.

References (43)

  • P.F. Morgan et al.

    Benzodiazepine inhibition of adenosine uptake is not prevented by benzodiazepine antagonists

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1983)
  • P.F. Morgan et al.

    Inhibition of adenosine accumulation by a CNS benzodiazepine antagonist (Ro 15-1788) and a peripheral benzodiazepine receptor ligandd (Ro 05-4864)

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (1983)
  • E. Ongini et al.

    Intrinsic and antagonistic effects of beta-carboline FG-7142 on behavioral and EEG actions of benzodiazepines and pentobarbital in cats

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1983)
  • E. Petersen et al.

    Proconflict effect of benzodiazepine inverse agonists and other inhibitors of GABA function

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1984)
  • J.W. Phillis et al.

    Benzodiazepine interaction with adenosine systems explains some anomalies in GABA hypothesis

    Trends Pharmacol. Sci.

    (1988)
  • J.W. Phillis et al.

    Inhibition of adenosine uptake into rat brain synaptosomes by prostaglandins, benzodiazepines and other centrally active compounds

    Gen. Pharmacol.

    (1983)
  • M.S. Reid et al.

    Differential modulation of striatal dopamine release by intranigral injection of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), dynorphin A and substance P

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1988)
  • M. Santiago et al.

    The role of GABA receptors in the control of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons: dual probe mudialysis study in awake rats

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (1992)
  • T.W. Seale et al.

    3.7-Dimethyl-1-propargylxanthine: a potent and selective in vivo antagonist of adenosine analogues

    Life Sci.

    (1988)
  • E.F. Sperber et al.

    Intranigral GABAergic drugs effects on striatal dopamine activity

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1989)
  • K. Takada et al.

    Discriminative and aversive properties of beta-carboline-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester, a benzodiazepine receptor inverse agonist, in rhesus monkeys

    Life Sci.

    (1986)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Hooked on benzodiazepines: GABA<inf>A</inf> receptor subtypes and addiction

      2011, Trends in Neurosciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Indeed, subcutaneous acute or chronic (twice a day for 14 days) injections of midazolam decreased extracellular DA concentrations in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) (as measured 40 min after the injection). Similar results were obtained in rats when midazolam [52] or flurazepam [53] was locally injected into the NAc. However, in this latter case, because the drug is restricted to the NAc, GABAARs of VTA cells are not potentiated, which could explain this result.

    • Biological substrates of reward and aversion: A nucleus accumbens activity hypothesis

      2009, Neuropharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      While on the surface this finding might appear to invalidate our working hypothesis, electrophysiological evidence suggests that co-activation of D1 and D2 receptors on NAc neurons can, under some conditions, cause a reduction in their membrane excitability that is not seen in response to either agonist alone (O'Donnell and Grace, 1996). In addition, more work is needed to study the behavioral effects of intra-NAc microinfusions of GABA agonists; historically, this work has been hindered by poor solubility of benzodiazepines – which are known to be addictive (Griffiths and Ator, 1980) despite their tendency to decrease dopamine function in the NAc (Wood, 1982; Finlay et al., 1992: Murai et al., 1994) – and the relatively small number of researchers who use brain microinjection procedures together with models of reward. Still other ways of testing our hypothesis would be to study the effects of manipulations in brain areas downstream of D2 receptor-containing MSNs.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text