Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Synergistic antiherpetic effect of acyclovir and mycophenolate mofetil following keratoplasty in patients with herpetic eye disease: first results of a randomised pilot study

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The main reasons for graft failure following penetrating keratoplasty in patients with herpetic eye disease are recurrence of herpetic disease and allograft rejection. In a randomised trial the effect of systemic acyclovir and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) on these post-keratoplasty complications was evaluated.

Patients and methods

Patients with typical clinical findings of recurrent herpetic keratitis were enrolled in this single-centre study after contraindications to systemic immunosuppression were ruled out. In a prospective randomised trial 30 patients were treated in three groups. In group A patients received acyclovir 200 mg five times/day for 3 weeks. In group B patients were treated with acyclovir 200 mg five times/day for 1 year, and patients in group C received acyclovir 200 mg five times/day in combination with MMF 1 g twice daily for 1 year.

Results

In group A 3 patients experienced seven herpes recurrences. One patient had a moderate and one further patient a severe allograft rejection. In group B three severe allograft rejections were observed. Herpes recurrences did not occur while receiving acyclovir prophylaxis, but only once after the prophylaxis had been stopped. In group C no herpes recurrence was observed, and only two mild allograft rejections occurred while being under combined acyclovir—MMF therapy. Another mild and one moderate allograft rejection were observed after cessation of MMF.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate that systemic acyclovir protects the grafts from recurrences of herpetic disease as long as it is administered at efficient doses. Simultaneously administered mycophenolate mofetil does not trigger herpes recurrences and protects the graft from severe allograft rejections, but mild, less dangerous immune reactions may still occur while receiving MMF. The combination of systemic acyclovir and mycophenolate mofetil therefore is recommended for patients at high risk for herpes recurrence and allograft rejections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

References

  1. Alldredge OC, Krachmer JH (1981) Clinical types of corneal transplant rejection. Their manifestations, frequency, preoperative correlates, and treatment. Arch Ophthalmol 99:599–604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barney NP, Foster CS (1994) A prospective randomized trial of oral acyclovir after penetrating keratoplasty for herpes simplex keratitis. Cornea 13:232–236

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein RJ, Seedor JA, Dreizen NG, Stulting RD, Waring GO, Wilson LA et al. (1987) Penetrating keratoplasty for herpes simplex keratitis and keratoconus. Allograft rejection and survival. Ophthalmology 94:935–944

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Herpetic Eye Disease Study Group (2000) Oral acyclovir for herpes simplex virus eye disease: effect on prevention of epithelial keratitis and stromal keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol 118:1030–1036

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill JC (1989) The use of cyclosporine in high-risk keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 107:506–510

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hill JC (1995) Systemic cyclosporine in high-risk keratoplasty: long-term results. Eye 9 :422–428

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holbach LM, Bayer J, Seitz B, Rummelt C, Naumann GO (1993) Herpes-simplex Keratitis. Zur Langzeitprognose von Ersttransplantaten nach perforierender Keratoplastik. Ophthalmologe 90:698–702

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kersten A, Sundmacher R, Reinhard T (1997) Postoperative Komplikationen nach perforierender Keratoplastik in Herpesaugen. Differentialdiagnose, Therapie und prognostische Bedeutung. Ophthalmologe 94:889–896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Neyts J, Andrei G, De Clercq E (1998) The novel immunosuppressive agent mycophenolate mofetil markedly potentiates the antiherpesvirus activities of acyclovir, ganciclovir, and penciclovir in vitro and in vivo. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:216–222

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pleyer U, Weidle EG, Lisch W, Steuhl KP, Mohrle C, Richter U et al. (1990) Klinische Verlaufsformen immunologischer Transplantatreaktionen nach perforierender Keratoplastik. Fortschr Ophthalmol 87:14–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reinhard T, Hutmacher M, Sundmacher R (1997). Akute und chronische Immunreaktionen nach perforierender Keratoplastik mit normalem Immunrisiko. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 210:139–143

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reinhard T, Reis A, Bohringer D, Malinowski M, Voiculescu A, Heering P et al. (2001) Systemic mycophenolate mofetil in comparison with systemic cyclosporin A in high-risk keratoplasty patients: 3 years' results of a randomized prospective clinical trial. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 239:367–372

    Google Scholar 

  13. Reinhard T, Sundmacher R, Godehardt E, Heering P (1997). Systemische Cyclosporin-A-Prophylaxe nach Keratoplastiken mit erhöhtem Risiko für Immunreaktionen als einzigem erhöhten Risikofaktor. Ophthalmologe 94:496–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reis A, Reinhard T, Voiculescu A, Kutkuhn B, Godehardt E, Spelsberg H et al. (1999) Mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporin A in high risk keratoplasty patients: a prospectively randomised clinical trial. Br J Ophthalmol 83:1268–1271

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Severin M (1986) Immunreaktionen nach Keratoplastik. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 188:200–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sterk CC, Jager MJ, Swart-vd BM (1995) Recurrent herpetic keratitis in penetrating keratoplasty. Doc Ophthalmol 90:29–33

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sundmacher R (1983) Orale Acyclovir-Therapie virologisch nachgewiesener intraokularer Herpes simplex Virus Infektionen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 183:246–250

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sundmacher R (1984) Endotheliitis corneae. Begriffsbestimmung und klinische Abgrenzung. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 184:163–167

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sundmacher R (1994) Management of herpes simplex virus disease in the anterior segment of the eye. In: Bialasiewicz AA, Schaal KP (eds) Infectious diseases of the eye. Aealus Press, Buren, pp 199–213

  20. Sundmacher R (1996) Therapie der Viruserkrankungen des vorderen Augenabschnitts. In: Kampik A, Grehn F (eds) Das äussere Auge. Enke, Stuttgart, pp 121–126

  21. Sundmacher R, Wolff M (1993) Four years' experience with triple procedures in herpes-afflicted eyes. Ger J Ophthalmol 2:65–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tambasco FP, Cohen EJ, Nguyen LH, Rapuano CJ, Laibson PR (1999) Oral acyclovir after penetrating keratoplasty for herpes simplex keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol 117:445–449

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Mayer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mayer, K., Reinhard, T., Reis, A. et al. Synergistic antiherpetic effect of acyclovir and mycophenolate mofetil following keratoplasty in patients with herpetic eye disease: first results of a randomised pilot study. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 241, 1051–1054 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-003-0724-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-003-0724-7

Keywords

Navigation