Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intracortical excitability in patients with relapsing–remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We designed this study to investigate possible correlations between variables measuring primary motor cortex excitability detected by single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and the severity of clinical manifestations in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Thirty patients with MS in remission, 16 with relapsing–remitting (RR), 14 with secondary progressive disease (SP) and 17 healthy subjects participated in the study. In each subject, the central motor conduction time (CMCT) was calculated, and single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS at 3 and 10 ms interstimulus intervals was delivered over the primary motor cortex of the dominant hemisphere to measure the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), motor threshold (MTh), intracortical inhibition (ICI) and facilitation (ICF). Correlations were determined between the patients’ TMS findings and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (lesion load) and clinical features (expanded disability status scale, EDSS score). EDSS scores were significantly higher in SPMS than in RRMS patients. The MTh was significantly higher, and the MEP was significantly smaller in SPMS patients than in RRMS patients and control subjects. All patients had longer CMCTs than healthy subjects. In all patients, paired-pulse TMS elicited an inhibited test MEP at the 3-ms ISI and a facilitated test MEP at the 10 ms ISI. Post hoc analysis showed that ICI was significantly lower in SPMS patients than in those with RRMS and healthy subjects. EDSS scores correlated significantly with TMS measures (MEP, ICI, CMCT and MTh), but not with MRI lesion load. It was found that intracortical excitability as measured with TMS differs according to the clinical course of MS; it remains normal in patients with low EDSS scores and is altered in patients with high EDSS scores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berardelli A, Inghilleri M, Cruccu G, Fornarelli M, Accornero N, Manfredi M (1988) Stimulation of motor tract in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51:677–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boniface SJ (2001) Plasticity after acute ischaemic stroke studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71:713–715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Calabrese M, Atzori M, Bernardi V et al (2007) Cortical atrophy is relevant in multiple sclerosis at clinical onset. J Neurol 254:1212–1220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ciccarelli O, Brex PA, Thompson AJ, Miller DH (2002) Disability and lesion load in MS: a reassessment with MS functional composite score and 3D fast FLAIR. J Neurol 249:18–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caramia MD, Palmieri MG, Desiato MT et al (2004) Brain excitability changes in the relapsing and remitting phases of multiple sclerosis: a study with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 15:956–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Classen J, Schnitzler A, Binkofski F et al (1997) The motor syndrome associated with exaggerated inhibition within the primary motor cortex of patients with hemiparetic stroke. Brain 120:605–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Curra A, Modugno N, Inghilleri M, Manfredi M, Hallett M, Berardelli A (2002) Transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques in clinical investigation. Neurology 59:1851–1859

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dehmeshki J, Chard DT, Leary SM et al (2003) The normal appearing grey matter in primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a magnetisation transfer imaging study. J Neurol 250:67–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Facchetti D, Mai R, Micheli A et al (1997) Motor evoked potentials and disability in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Can J Neurol Sci 24:332–337

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fierro B, Salemi G, Brighina F et al (2002) A transcranial magnetic stimulation study evaluating methylprednisolone treatment in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 105:152–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fuhr P, Kappos L (2001) Evoked potentials for evaluation of multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol 112:2185–2189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Geurts GJ, Barkhof F (2008) Grey matter pathology in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 7:841–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grimaud J, Lai M, Thorpe J et al (1996) Quantification of MRI lesion load in multiple sclerosis: a comparison of three computer-assisted techniques. Magn Reson Imaging 14:495–505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hobart J, Kalkers N, Barkhof F, Uitdehaag B, Polman C, Thompson A (2004) Outcome measures for multiple sclerosis clinical trials: relative measurement precision of the expanded disability status scale and multiple sclerosis functional composite. Mult Scler 10:41–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Humm AM, Truffert A, Magistris MR, Rösler KM (2002) Central motor conduction in acute relapsing–remitting versus chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 249:I/101–I/102

    Google Scholar 

  16. Humm AM, Magistris MR, Truffert A, Hess CW, Rösler KM (2003) Central motor conduction differs between acute relapsing–remitting and chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Clin Neurophysiol 114:2196–2203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Humm AM, Z’Graggen WJ, Bühler R, Magistris MR, Rösler KM (2006) Quantification of central motor conduction deficits in multiple sclerosis patients before and after treatment of acute exacerbation by methylprednisolone. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:345–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kandler RH, Jarratt JA, Davies-Jones GA et al (1991) The role of magnetic stimulation as a quantifier of motor disability in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 106:31–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Khaleeli Z, Cercignani M, Audoin B et al (2007) Localized grey matter damage in early primary progressive multiple sclerosis contributes to disability. Neuroimage 37:253–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kidd D, Thompson PD, Day BL et al (1998) Central motor conduction time in progressive multiple sclerosis. Correlations with MRI and disease activity. Brain 121:1109–1116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kujirai T, Caramia MD, Rothwell JC et al (1993) Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol 471:501–519

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kurtzke JF (1983) Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33:1444–1452

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Liepert J, Mingers D, Heesen C, Baumer T, Weiller C (2005) Motor cortex excitability and fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Mult Scler 11:316–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lublin FD, Reingold SC (1996) Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on clinical trials of new agents in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 46:907–911

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mainero C, Inghilleri M, Pantano P et al (2004) Enhanced brain motor activity in patients with MS after a single dose of 3,4-diaminopyridine. Neurology 62:2044–2050

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Masek M, Vaneckova M, Krasensky J et al (2008) Secondary-progressive form of multiple sclerosis: MRI changes versus clinical status. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 29:461–466

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Oreja-Guevara C, Charil A, Caputo D et al (2006) Magnetization transfer magnetic resonance imaging and clinical changes in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 63:736–740

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rovaris M, Judica E, Gallo A et al (2006) Grey matter damage predicts the evolution of primary progressive multiple sclerosis at 5 years. Brain 129:2628–2634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmierer K, Irlbacher K, Grosse P, Röricht S, Meyer BU (2002) Correlates of disability in multiple sclerosis detected by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 59:1218–1224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sheean GL, Murray NMF, Rothwell JC, Miller DH, Thompson AJ (1997) An electrophysiological study of the mechanism of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Brain 120:299–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Talairach J, Tournoux P (1988) Coplanar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tassinari CA, Cincotta M, Zaccara G, Michelacci R (2003) Transcranial magnetic stimulation and epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol 114:777–798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vrenken H, Pouwels PJ, Geurts JJ et al (2006) Altered diffusion tensor in multiple sclerosis normal-appearing brain tissue: cortical diffusion changes seem related to clinical deterioration. J Magn Reson Imaging 23:628–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have reported no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurological Sciences, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Viale dell’Università, 30, 00185, Rome, Italy

    A. Conte, D. Lenzi, V. Frasca, E. Giacomelli, M. Gabriele, C. Marini Bettolo, E. Iacovelli, P. Pantano, C. Pozzilli & M. Inghilleri

  2. Neuromed Institute, Pozzilli (IS), Italy

    A. Conte

  3. Neurology and Neurophysiopathology Unit, S.Pertini Hospital, Rome, Italy

    F. Gilio

  4. S.Raffaele Institute, IRCCS, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Rome, Italy

    M. Inghilleri

Authors
  1. A. Conte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Lenzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. Frasca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. F. Gilio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. E. Giacomelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. M. Gabriele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. C. Marini Bettolo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. E. Iacovelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. P. Pantano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. C. Pozzilli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. M. Inghilleri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Inghilleri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conte, A., Lenzi, D., Frasca, V. et al. Intracortical excitability in patients with relapsing–remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 256, 933–938 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-5047-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-5047-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation