Skip to main content
Log in

Three-choice discrimination in pigeons is based on relative efficacy differences among opioids

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Rationale: Drug discrimination assays can provide important information on receptor selectivity and relative efficacy to guide the classification and characterization of opioid agonists. Objectives: A three-choice discrimination was established among high efficacy opioid agonist morphine, low efficacy opioid agonist nalbuphine, and saline to examine the conditions under which differences in relative efficacy might serve as a basis for stimulus control. Methods: Seven White Carneau pigeons were trained to discriminate among 5.6 mg/kg nalbuphine, 3.2 mg/kg morphine, and saline under fixed ratio 30 (FR30) schedules of food reinforcement. Substitution and antagonism experiments were then conducted with µ, κ, and δ opioids and naltrexone, respectively and the percent responding appropriate to the training stimuli was determined. Results: Low, intermediate, and high doses of morphine produced ≥80% saline-, ≥60% nalbuphine-, and ≥96% morphine-appropriate responding, respectively. Low and high doses of nalbuphine produced ≥80% saline- and nalbuphine-appropriate responding, respectively. In substitution tests, low doses of fentanyl and etorphine produced partial nalbuphine-appropriate responding (20–60%) and high doses produced ≥60–80% morphine-appropriate responding. Intermediate doses of buprenorphine and dezocine produced ≥60–80% nalbuphine-appropriate responding and high doses produced ≥80% morphine-appropriate responding. The lower efficacy agonists butorphanol, nalorphine, and levallorphan produced ≥40–80% nalbuphine-appropriate responding. The κ agonists spiradoline and U50,488 produced approximately ≥50% nalbuphine-appropriate responding whereas d-amphetamine, saline, and δ agonists BW373U86 and SNC 80 produced ≥80% saline-appropriate responding. Naltrexone produced ≥80% saline-appropriate responding and reversed the stimulus effects of morphine and nalbuphine. Conclusions: The discrimination between morphine and nalbuphine in pigeons is predominantly based on the relative efficacy differences between morphine, a higher-efficacy µ agonist and nalbuphine, a lower-efficacy µ agonist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, E.A., Picker, M.J. & Dykstra, L.A. Three-choice discrimination in pigeons is based on relative efficacy differences among opioids. Psychopharmacology 155, 389–396 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130100714

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002130100714

Navigation