Skip to main content
Log in

Effects associated with double-blind omission of buprenorphine/naloxone over a 98-h period

  • Original Investigation
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rationale

Buprenorphine has a long duration of action that allows less than daily dosing for opioid dependence, but pharmacologic characterization of buprenorphine’s duration of effects over multiple days is incomplete.

Objectives

This study assessed opioid blockade and spontaneous withdrawal effects of buprenorphine/naloxone (B/N) over a 98-h period.

Materials and methods

Residential opioid-dependent volunteers (n = 8) were maintained, in randomized sequence, on each of three different daily sublingual B/N doses (8/2, 16/4, 32/8 mg). After 2 weeks on each maintenance dose, participants underwent challenge sessions on each weekday for 1 week. Challenges consisted of within-session, ascending dose administration of IM hydromorphone (H: 0, 6, and 12 mg). During that week, active B/N dose was given only on Monday; double-blind placebo was administered on the remaining weekdays. Thus, these sessions assessed the extent of both opioid blockade and spontaneous withdrawal at 2, 26, 50, 74, and 98 h after the last active B/N dose.

Results

All three maintenance doses provided substantial but incomplete blockade against opioid agonist effects for 98 h. The extent of blockade diminished steadily but modestly over this time and did not differ as a function of B/N maintenance dose. In general, participants did not report marked spontaneous opioid withdrawal, although mild withdrawal effects were observed as time since the last active B/N dose increased. However, withdrawal did not differ as a function of B/N maintenance dose.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that B/N doses greater than 8/2 mg provide minimal incremental value in terms of opioid blockade and withdrawal suppression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amass L, Bickel WK, Higgins ST, Badger GJ (1994) Alternate-day dosing during buprenorphine treatment of opioid dependence. Life Sci 54:1215–1228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APA (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (text revision), 4th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickel WK, Stitzer ML, Bigelow GE, Liebson IA, Jasinski DR, Johnson RE (1988) Buprenorphine: dose-related blockade of opioid challenge effects in opioid dependent humans. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 247:47–53

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel WK, Amass L, Crean JP, Badger GJ (1999) Buprenorphine dosing every 1, 2, or 3 days in opioid-dependent patients. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 146:111–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boas RA, Villiger JW (1985) Clinical actions of fentanyl and buprenorphine. The significance of receptor binding. Br J Anaesth 57:192–196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser HF, Van Horn GD, Martin WR, Wolbach AB, Isbell H (1961) Methods for evaluating addiction liability. (A) “Attitude” of opiate addicts toward opiate-like drugs, (B) A short-term “direct” addiction test. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 133:371–387

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fudala PJ, Jaffe JH, Dax EM, Johnson RE (1990) Use of buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid addiction. II. Physiologic and behavioral effects of daily and alternate-day administration and abrupt withdrawal. Clin Pharmacol Ther 47:525–534

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RR, Bigelow GE, Liebson I (1983) Differential effects of diazepam and pentobarbital on mood and behavior. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40:865–873

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gross A, Jacobs EA, Petry NM, Badger GJ, Bickel WK (2001) Limits to buprenorphine dosing: a comparison between quintuple and sextuple the maintenance dose every 5 days. Drug Alcohol Depend 64:111–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris DS, Jones RT, Welm S, Upton RA, Lin E, Mendelson J (2000) Buprenorphine and naloxone co-administration in opiate-dependent patients stabilized on sublingual buprenorphine. Drug Alcohol Depend 61:85–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JL, Zacny JP (2000) Comparing the subjective, psychomotor, and physiological effects of intravenous hydromorphone and morphine in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 152:31–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jasinski DR (1977) Assessment of the abuse potentiality of morphine-like drugs (methods used in man). In: Martin WR (ed) Drug addiction I. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 197–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RE, Eissenberg T, Stitzer ML, Strain EC, Liebson IA, Bigelow GE (1995) Buprenorphine treatment of opioid dependence: clinical trial of daily versus alternate-day dosing. Drug Alcohol Depend 40:27–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RE, Strain EC, Amass L (2003) Buprenorphine: how to use it right. Drug Alcohol Depend 70:S59–S77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb L, Himmelsbach CK (1938) Clinical studies of drug addiction. III. A critical review of the withdrawal treatments with method of evaluating abstinence syndromes. Am J Psychiatry 94:759–799

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling W, Wesson DR (2003) Clinical efficacy of buprenorphine: comparisons to methadone and placebo. Drug Alcohol Depend 70:S49–S57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod D, Griffiths RR, Bigelow GE, Yingling J (1982) An automated version of the digit symbol substitution test (DSST). Behav Res Methods Instrum 14:463–466

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuay HJ, Moore RA (1995) Buprenorphine kinetics in humans. In: Cowan A, Lewis JW (eds) Buprenorphine: combatting drug abuse with a unique opioid. Wiley, New York, pp 137–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry NM, Bickel WK, Badger GJ (1999) A comparison of four buprenorphine dosing regimens in the treatment of opioid dependence. Clin Pharmacol Ther 66:306–314

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petry NM, Bickel WK, Badger GJ (2001) Examining the limits of the buprenorphine interdosing interval: daily, every-third-day and every-fifth-day dosing regimens. Addiction 96:823–834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reitan RM (1958) Validity of the trail making test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills 8:271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen MI, Wallace EA, McMahon TJ, Pearsall HR, Woods SW, Price LH, Kosten TR (1994) Buprenorphine: duration of blockade of effects of intramuscular hydromorphone. Drug Alcohol Depend 35:141–149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schottenfeld RS, Pakes J, O’Connor P, Chawarski M, Oliveto A, Kosten TR (2000) Thrice-weekly versus daily buprenorphine maintenance. Biol Psychiatry 47:1072–1079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schuh KJ, Walsh SL, Stitzer ML (1999) Onset, magnitude and duration of opioid blockade produced by buprenorphine and naltrexone in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 145:162–174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stoller KB, Bigelow GE, Walsh SL, Strain EC (2001) Effects of buprenorphine/naloxone in opioid-dependent humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 154:230–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strain EC, Preston KL, Liebson IA, Bigelow GE (1992) Acute effects of buprenorphine, hydromorphone and naloxone in methadone-maintained volunteers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 261:985–993

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strain EC, Preston KL, Liebson IA, Bigelow GE (1993) Precipitated withdrawal by pentazocine in methadone-maintained volunteers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 267:624–634

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strain EC, Preston KL, Liebson IA, Bigelow GE (1995) Buprenorphine effects in methadone-maintained volunteers: effects at two hours after methadone. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 272:628–638

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strain EC, Walsh SL, Preston KL, Liebson IA, Bigelow GE (1997) The effects of buprenorphine in buprenorphine-maintained volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 129:329-338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strain EC, Stoller K, Walsh SL, Bigelow GE (2000) Effects of buprenorphine versus buprenorphine/naloxone tablets in non-dependent opioid abusers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 148:374–383

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strain EC, Walsh SL, Bigelow GE (2002) Blockade of hydromorphone effects by buprenorphine/naloxone and buprenorphine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 159:161–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh SL, Preston KL, Stitzer ML, Cone EJ, Bigelow GE (1994) Clinical pharmacology of buprenorphine: ceiling effects at high doses. Clin Pharmacol Ther 55:569–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh SL, June HL, Schuh KJ, Preston KL, Bigelow GE, Stitzer ML (1995) Effects of buprenorphine and methadone in methadone-maintained subjects. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 119:268–276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported by US Public Health Service Scientist Development Award K02 DA00332 and R01 DA08045 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric C. Strain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Correia, C.J., Walsh, S.L., Bigelow, G.E. et al. Effects associated with double-blind omission of buprenorphine/naloxone over a 98-h period. Psychopharmacology 189, 297–306 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-006-0571-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-006-0571-4

Keywords

Navigation