Abstract
A variety of psychoactive substances (amphetamine, nicotine, scopolamine, apomorphine, lisuride, and MDMA) were tested to examine whether a proposed scaling hypothesis is appropriate for the description of the amount and the structure of rat locomotor paths recorded in the Behavioral Pattern Monitor (BPM). The analytical approach was based on the assumption that the scaling behavior of a few collective variables may characterize sufficiently changes in the animal's behavior induced by different drugs. The temporal scaling exponent α, describing the ratio of fast to slow responses in the BPM, sensitively reflected the different stimulant properties of the substances. The spatial scaling exponentd, which relates the average pathlength to the resolution used to measure consecutive responses, was found to discriminate substances that had been separated previously via qualitative descriptions. Several behavioral response categories emerged from comparisons of the locations of different drugs on a two-dimensionald-α plane. Scopolamine, MDMA, lisuride, and high doses of apomorphine increased α while decreasingd, whereas amphetamine, nicotine, and caffeine produced an increased α with no change or an increase ind. Stereotypies could be identified on the opposite ends of the spatial scaling exponent scale and were interpreted as reflecting two kinds of perseveration. These results suggest that scaling approaches can be used to assess quantitatively the state of the animal based on its locomotor behavior and that the exponents can serve as collective variables providing a macroscopic description based on the microscopic elements of behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams LM, Geyer MA (1982) LSD-induced alterations in locomotor patterns and exploration in rats. Psychopharmacology 77:179–185
Adams LM, Geyer MA (1985) Patterns of exploration in rats distinguish lisuride from lysergic acid diethylamide. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 23:461–468
Arnt J, Bogeso KP, Hyttel J, Meier E (1988) Relative dopamine D1 and D2 receptor affinity and efficacy determine whether dopamine agonists induce hyperactivity or oral stereotypy in rats. Pharmacol Toxicol 62:121–130
Berlyne DE (1960) Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. McGraw Hill, New York
Berridge KE, Fentress JC, Parr H (1987) Natural syntax rules control action sequences of rats. Behav Brain Res 23:59–68
Braun AR, Barone P, Chase TN (1986) Interaction of D1 and D2 dopamine receptors in the expression of dopamine agonist induced behaviors. In: Goldstein M, Fuxe K, Tabachnick I (eds) Central D1 dopamine receptors. (Plenum Press, New York London), pp 151–166
Carlsson A (1975) Receptor mediated control of dopamine metabolism. In: Usdin E, Snyder S (eds) Pre- and postsynaptic receptors. Dekker, New York, pp 49–63
Davis A, Jenner P, Marsden CD (1990) Differential ability of selective and non-selective dopamine agonists to induce climbing in the rat indicates the involvement of both D-1 and D-2 receptors in this behaviour. Psychopharmacology 100:19–26
Dixon WJ (1989) BMDP biomedical computer programs. University of Califonria Press, Los Angeles
Eilam D, Golani I, Szechtman H (1989) D2-agonist quinpirole induces perseveration of routes and hyperactivity but no perseveration of movements. Brain Res 490:255–267
Flicker C, Geyer MA (1982) Behavior during hippocampal microinfusions: I. Norepinephrine and diversive exploration. Brain Res Rev 4:79–103
Fung YK, Lau YS Receptor mechanism of nicotine-induced locomotor hyperactivity in chronic nicotine treated rats. Eur J Pharmacol 152:263–271
Geyer MA (1982) Variational and probabilistic aspects of exploratory behavior in space: four stimulant styles. Psychopharmacol Bull 18:48–51
Geyer MA (1990) Approaches to the characterization of drug effects on locomotor activity in rodents. In: Adler MW, Cowan A (eds) Testing and evaluation of drugs of abuse Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York, pp 81–99
Geyer MA, Russo PV, Masten VL (1986) Multivariate assessment of locomotor behavior: pharmacological and behavioral analyses. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 25:277–288
Geyer MA, Russo PV, Segal DS, Kuczenski R (1987) Effects of apomorphine and amphetamine on patterns of locomotor and investigatory behavior in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 28:393–399
Gold LH, Koob GF, Geyer MA (1988) The behavioral activity profiles of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and N-ethyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDE) in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 247:542–555
Griffiths RR, Woodson PP (1988) Reinforcing effects of caffeine in humans. J. Pharmacol Exp Ther 246:21–29
Harvey JA (1987) Behavioral pharmacology of central nervous stimulants. Neuropharmacology 26:887–892
Higushi T (1988) Approach to an irregular time series on the basis of fractal theory. Physica D 31:277–283
Jerome A, Sanberg PR (1987) The effects of nicotine on locomotor behavior in non-tolerant rats: a multivariate assessment. Psychopharmacology 93:397–340
Kelley AE, Winnock M, Stinus L (1986) Amphetamine, apomorphine and investigatory behavior in the rat: analysis of the structure and pattern of responses. Psychopharmacology 88:66–74
Kernan WJ, Mullenix PJ, Kent R (1988) Analysis of the time distribution and time sequence of behavioral acts. Int J Neurosci 19:1–17
Lat J (1965) The spontaneous exploratory reactions as a tool for psychopharmacological studies. A contribution towards a theory of contradictory results in psychopharmacology In: Mikhelson MY, Longo UG, Votava Z (ed) Pharmacology of conditioning, learning and retention Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 47–66
Ljungberg T, Enquist M (1987) Disruptive effects of low doses ofd-amphetamine on the ability of rats to organize behaviour into functional sequences. Psychopharmacology 93:146–151
Ljungberg T, Ungerstedt U (1976) Automatic registration of behaviour related to dopamine and noradrenaline transmission Eur J Pharmacol 36:181–188
Ljungberg T, Ungerstedt U (1977) A method for simultaneously recording of eight behavioral parameters related to monoamine neurotransmission. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 8:483–489
Lyon M, Robbins TW (1975) The action of central nervous system stimulant drugs: a general theory concerning amphetamine effects. In: Essman W, Valzelli L (eds) Current developments in psychopharmacology, Vol. 2. Spectrum, New York, pp 79–163
Mandelbrot B (1977) Fractals: form, chance and dimension. Freeman, San Francisco
Nickolson VJ (1981) Detailed analysis of the effects of apomorphine andd-amphetamine on spontaneous locomotor behaviour of rats as measured in a TV-based automated open- field system. Eur J Pharm 72:45–56
Norton S (1968) On the discontinuous nature of behavior. J Theoret Biol 21:229–243
Paulus MP, Geyer MA, Gold LH and Mandell AJ (1990) Application of entropy measures derived from the ergodic theory of dynamical systems to rat locomotor behavior. Proc Nat Acad Sci 87:723–727
Paulus MP, Geyer MA, Mandell AJ (1991) Statistical mechanics of a neurobiological dynamical system: The spectrum of local enhopies (S(α)) applied to cocaine-perturbed behaviour. Physica A.
Randrup A, Munkvad A (1967) Stereotyped activities produced by amphetamine in several animal species and man. Psychopharmacologia 11:300–310
Robbins TW (1977) A critique of the methods available for the measurement of spontaneous motor activity In: Iversen LL, Iversen SD, Snyder SH (eds) Handbook of psychopharmacology Vol 7. Plenum Press, New York, pp 37–82
Robbins TW, Sahakian BJ (1983) Behavioral effects of psychomotor stimulant drugs: clinical and neuropsychological implications. In: Creese I (ed) Stimulants: neurochemical, behavioral, and clinical perspectives. Raven Press, New York, pp 301–338
Sanberg PR, Zoloty SA, Willis R, Ticarich CD, Rhoads K, Nagy RP, Mitchell SG, Laforest AR, Jenks JA, Harkabus LJ, Gurson DB, Finnefrock JA, Bednarik EJ (1987) Digiscan activity: automated measurement of thigmotactic and stereotypic behavior in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 27:569–572
Scheel-Krueger J (1986) The syndrome of sedation and yawning behaviour in the rat is dependent on postsynaptic dopamine D-2 receptors. Psychopharmacology 89:S32
Schiorring E (1971) Amphetamine induced selective stimulation of certain behaviour items with concurrent inhibition of others in an open-field test with rats. Behaviour 29:1–17
Seeman P, Ulpian C (1988) Dopamine D1 and D2 receptor selectivities of agonists and antagonists. In: Goldstein M, Fuxe K, Tabachnick I (eds) Central D1 dopamine receptors. Plenum Press, New York, London, pp 55–63
Stahle L (1987) Pharmacological studies on behavioral changes induced by dopamine agonists in the rat: a multivariate approach. Stockholm, Department of Pharmacology, Karolinska Institut (Doctoral Thesis)
Stahle L Ungerstedt U (1989) Yawning and suppression of exploration in amphetamine-treated rats, incompatibility with the autoreceptor hypothesis. Psychopharmacology 97:553–560
Stern KN, Chait LD, Johanson CE (1989) Reinforcing and subjective effects of caffeine in normal human volunteers. Psychopharmacology 98:81–88
Stoff DM, Stauderman K, Wyatt RJ (1983) The time and space machine: continuous measurement of drug-induced behavior patterns in the rat. Psychopharmacology 80:319–324
Teitelbaum P, Szechtman H, Sirkin DW, Golani I (1982) Dimensions of movement, movement subsystems and local reflexes in the dopaminergic systems underlying exploratory locomotion. In: Spiegelstein MY, Levy A (eds) Behavioral models and the analysis of drug action. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, pp 357–385
White FJ (1987) D-1 dopamine receptor stimulation enables the inhibition of nucleus accumbens neurons by a D-2 receptor agonist. Eur J Pharmacol 135:101–105
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paulus, M.P., Geyer, M.A. A temporal and spatial scaling hypothesis for the behavioral effects of psychostimulants. Psychopharmacology 104, 6–16 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244547
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02244547