Skip to main content
Log in

Cell kill kinetics and cell cycle effects of taxol on human and hamster ovarian cell lines

  • Original Articles
  • Taxol, Cell Cycle, Ovarian Cells
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Taxol is a clinically active anticancer drug, which exerts its cytotoxicity by the unique mechanism of polymerizing tubulin monomers into microtubules and stabilizing microtubules. Our studies with ovarian (hamster CHO and human A2780) cells showed that taxol is a phase-specific agent that is much more cytotoxic to mitotic cells than interphase cells. First, the dose-survival pattern of taxol resembled that of other phase-specific agents, in which cell-kill reached a plateau at a certain concentration. This suggests that the asynchronous cell population consists of a taxol-sensitive (presumably mitotic) fraction and a taxol-resistant fraction. Second, the cells were more responsive to increased exposure time than to increased dose above the plateau concentration. Third, in both asynchrounous and synchronous cultures taxol was much more cytotoxic to mitotic than interphase (G1, S and G2) cells. Fourth, the taxol concentration needed to kill cells corresponded to the dose needed to block cells in mitosis. Although taxol blocked cells in mitosis, the mitotic block was of short duration. Cells escaped the mitotic block, without cytokinesis, and entered the next round of DNA synthesis to form multinucleated polyploid cells. Taxol was 15-to 25-fold more toxic to A2780 (human ovarian carcinoma) cells compared to CHO cells. This difference in sensitivity correlated with a higher intracellular taxol concentration in A2780 as compared to CHO as determined by either an ELISA assay or by [H3]-taxol uptake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhuyan BK (1970) The action of streptozotocin on mammalian cells. Cancer Res 30:2017

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bhuyan BK, Scheidt LG, Fraser TJ (1972) Cell cycle phase specificity of antitumor agents. Cancer Res 32:398–407

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhuyan BK, Newell KA, Crampton SL, von Hoff DD (1982) CC1065 (NSC 298223), a most potent antitumor agent: Kinetics of inhibition of growth, DNA synthesis and cell survival. Cancer Res 42:3532

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bhuyan BK, Crampton SL, Adams EG (1983) Cell cycle effects of CC1065. Cancer Res 43:4227

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bhuyan BK, Smith KS, Adams EG, Wallace TL, Von Hoff DD, Li LH (1992) Adozelesin (U-73975), a potent new alkylating agent: Cell-kill kinetics and cell cycle effects. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 30:348–354

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown T, Hovlini K, Weiss G, Cagnola J, Koeller J, Rizzo J, Craig J, Phillips J, Von Hoff DD (1991) A phase I trial of taxol given by 6 h intravenous infusion. J Clin Oncol 9:1261

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bruce WR, Mecker BE, Valeriotte FA (1966). Comparison of the sensitivity of normal hematopietic and transformed lymphoma colony forming cells to chemotherapeutic agents administered in vivo. J Natl Cancer Inst 37:233–245

    Google Scholar 

  8. Citardi M, Rowinsky EK, Schaefer KL, Donehower RC (1990) Sequence-dependent cytotoxicity between cisplatin and the antimicrotubule agents taxol and vincristine. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 31:410

    Google Scholar 

  9. Creasey WA (1968) Modifications in biochemical pathways produced by the vinca alkaloids. Cancer Chemother Res 52:501

    Google Scholar 

  10. Crissman HA, Kissane RJ, Wanek PL, Oka MS, Steinkamp JA (1977) Flow-systems analysis and characterization of protein contents and proliferating kinetics in ascites and solid tumors. In: Neiburg HE (ed) Third International Symposium on Detection and Prevention of Cancer, pp 79–90. Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holmes FA, Walters RS, Theriault RL, Forman AD, Newton LK, Raber MN, Buzdar AU, Frye DK, Hortobagyi GN (1991) Phase II trial of taxol, an active drug in the treatment of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 83:1797

    Google Scholar 

  12. Howard SMH, Theologides A, Sheppard JR (1980) Comparative effects of vindesine, vinblastine, and vincristine on mitotic arrest and hormonal response of L1210 leukemia cells. Cancer Res 40:2695

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jordan MA, Himes RH, Wilson L (1985) Comparison of the effect of vinblastine, vincristine, vindesine, and vinepidine on microtubule dynamics and cell proliferation in vitro. Cancer Res 45:2741

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jordan MA, Thrower D, Wilson L (1991) Mechanism of inhibition of cell proliferation by vinca alkaloids. Cancer Res 51:2212

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kung AL, Sherwood SW, Schimke RT (1990) Cell line specific differences in the control of cell cycle progression in the absence of mitosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 87:9553–9557

    Google Scholar 

  16. Legha SS, Ring S, Papadopulos N, Raber M, Benzamin RS (1990) A phase II trial of taxol in metastatic melanoma. Cancer 65:2478

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lopes NM, Adams EG, Bhuyan BK (1991) Cell-kill kinetics and cell cycle effects of taxol on human and hamster ovarian cell lines. Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 32:330

    Google Scholar 

  18. Madoc-Jones H, Mauro F (1968) Interphase action of vinblastine and vincristine: Differences in their lethal action through the mitotic cycle of cultured mammalian cells. J Cell Physiol 72:185

    Google Scholar 

  19. Manfredi JJ, Parnes J, Horwitz SB (1982) Taxol binds to cellular microtubules. J Cell Biol 94:688

    Google Scholar 

  20. McGuire WP, Rowinsky EK, Rosenshein NB, Grumbine CG, Ettinger DS, Armstrong DK, Donehower RC (1989) Taxol: a unique antineoplastic agent with significant activity in advanced ovarian epithelial neoplasms. Ann Intern Med 111:273

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peterson DF, Anderson EC, Tobey R (1968) Mitotic cells as a source of synchronized cultures. Methods Cell Physiol 3:347

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roberts JR, Allison DC, Donehower RC, Rowinsky EK (1990) Development of polyploidization in taxol-resistant human leukemic cells in vitro. Cancer Res 50:710–716

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rowinsky EK, Donehower RC, Jones RJ, Tucker RW (1988) Microtubule changes and cytotoxicity in leukemic cell lines treated with taxol. Cancer Res 48:4093–4100

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rowinsky EK, Cazenave LA, Donehower RC (1990) Taxol: a novel investigational antimicrotubule agent. J Natl Cancer Inst 82:1247

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schiff PB, Horwitz SB (1980) Taxol stabilizes microtubules in mouse fibroblast cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 77:1561

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schiff PB, Horwitz SB (1981) Taxol assembles tubulin in the absence of exogenous guanosine 5′-triphosphate or microtubule-associated proteins. Biochemistry 20:3247

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schiff PB, Fant J, Horwitz SB (1979) Promotion of microtubule assembly in vitro by taxol. Nature 22:665

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wani MC, Taylor HL, Wall ME, Coggon P, McPhail AT (1971) Plant antitumor agents. VI. The isolation and structure of taxol, a novel antileukemic and antitumor agent fromTaxus brevifolia. J Am Chem Soc 93:2325

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lopes, N.M., Adams, E.G., Pitts, T.W. et al. Cell kill kinetics and cell cycle effects of taxol on human and hamster ovarian cell lines. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 32, 235–242 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00685842

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00685842

Keywords

Navigation