TABLE 3

Comparison of the mapping programs using LORE from pooled cohortsa to identify QTLs Strain means were computed over pooled cohorts 1 and 2, separately by sex.

Chr
Sex
WebQTL
R/qtl
QTL Cartographer
SNP or Marker
Mb
LOD
p Value
[1-LOD]
Marker
Mb
LOD
p Value
[1-LOD]
Marker
Mb
LOD
p Value
[1-LOD]
1 M rs13476091 123.6 2.6 <0.63 [113.9-136.7] D1Mit139 129 2.3 0.3 [107-157] D1Mit100 147 2.8 0.1 [142-157]
F rs13476134 138.2 4.1 <0.001 [132.4-151.2] D1Mit30 136 3.6 0.02 [107-175] D1Mit100 147 3.8 0.01 [141-175]
3 M rs13477466 143.4 3.4 <0.001 [137.8-149.6] D3Mit127 147 3.0 0.06 [136-156] D3Mit86 152 3.0 0.05 [150-156]
F rs3657112 147.3 3.0 <0.63 [145.6-149.6] D3Mit127 147 2.7 0.1 [136-156] D3Mit323 156 2.2 0.2 [147-162]
8 M N.S. N.S. D8Mit148 a 126 2.9 0.1 [120-telo]
F D8Mit47 106.1 2.2 <0.63 [100.6-113.0] D8Mit200 116 2.3 0.2 [104-telo] D8Mit120 a 120 3.5 0.02 [116-128]
14 M rs3677985 98.7 2.3 <0.63 [88.3-100.1] D14Mit228 92 2.4 0.2 [53-99] D14Mi97 111 2.9 0.1 [110-telo]
F rs13482325 91.4 2.3 <0.63 [74.1-95.4] N.S. D14Mit266 a 114 2.1 0.2 [99-telo]
18 M N.S. D18Mit128 91 2.4 0.2 [76-telo] D18Mit86 a 25 2.9 0.1 [20-26]
F N.S. N.S. D18Mit86 a 25 2.1 0.3 [22-32]
19
F
mCV23069037
51.9
2.1
<0.63
[51.6-55.1]
N.S.
D19Mit86
26
2.3
0.63
[21-29]

  • F, female; M, male

  • ↵ a This region did not reach the suggestive cut-off when sexes were pooled