TABLE 2

Efficacy for stimulation of [3H]IP, internalization, and down-regulation of wild-type and mutant GRP receptors

Stimulation of increases in [3H]IP was determined as described in Fig. 2. The efficacy of [3H]IP stimulation is expressed as the fold increase over basal in total cellular [3H]IP determined as described in Fig. 2 legend. Internalization was assessed as described in Fig. 4 and is expressed as the percentage of total saturable bound 125I-[Tyr4]Bn that was not removed by acid-stripping. t80 is the time in minutes that was needed for internalizing 80% of maximal calculated as described under Materials and Methods. Down-regulation is expressed as the percentage of decrease in the receptor number (Bmax) of cells pretreated with 10 nM Bn compared with control cells processed in parallel. Wild-type GRP-R were down-regulated 61 ± 3% compared with cells not treated with 10 nM Bn. Data are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. of at least three separate experiments and for each experiment each point was determined in duplicate.


GRP-R

[3H]IP

Internalization

Down-Regulation
Fold Increase over Basal
Maximal % Internalized
t80 (min)
Percentage of Wild Type
Wild-type 10 9.6 ± 2.6 47 ± 2 5.7 ± 0.3 100
Wild-type 9 10.1 ± 1.4 46 ± 3 4.6 ± 0.8 100
A142S 6.0 ± 1.1* 43 ± 2 5.7 ± 0.7 64 ± 5*
I143A 2.6 ± 0.5* 45 ± 3 7.0 ± 0.6 52 ± 7*
V144A 4.2 ± 0.2* 40 ± 4 5.4 ± 1.2 84 ± 7
R145A 8.6 ± 2.6 62 ± 3* 6.3 ± 0.1 106 ± 6
P146A 7.3 ± 1.4 48 ± 1 4.7 ± 0.1 80 ± 8
M147A 1.9 ± 0.8** 42 ± 1 9.5 ± 1.2* 42 ± 12**
D148A 5.0 ± 0.6* 49 ± 2 4.5 ± 0.2 123 ± 23
IM143.147AA 1.1 ± 0.3** 25 ± 3* 12.6 ± 2.9* 0 ± 0**
VM144.147AA
2.0 ± 0.9*
38 ± 4*
8.5 ± 1.5*
62 ± 7**
  • * p < 0.05

  • ** p < 0.01, compared with wild-type GRP-R.