Table 4

Effect of pinacidil (5.0 μM) on the contractile response to oxotremorine-M in smooth muscle from wild-type and M2muscarinic receptor KO mice

IleumTracheaUrinary Bladder
Wild Type (n = 4)
E max(% control)4-a 125  ± 1180  ± 4.14-b 107  ± 6.4
 EC50 Shift (fold4-c 3.24-b 4.14-b 1.7
(0.50  ± 0.059)(0.62  ± 0.084)(0.22  ± 0.070)
M2 Receptor KO (n = 4)
E max (% control)4-b 137  ± 3.84-b 87  ± 4.4111  ± 9.5
 EC50 Shift (fold)4-c 2.24-a 4-b 3.94-b 1.5
(0.35  ± 0.055)(0.59  ± 0.070)(0.19  ± 0.070)

Mean values ± S.E.M. from four wild-type and four M2receptor knockout mice are shown.

  • 4-a Denotes theEmax value of oxotremorine-M measured in the presence of pinacidil divided by that measured in its absence, expressed as a percentage.

  • 4-b A significant effect of pinacicil relative to control. The probability values for these differences are as follows. Wild-type mice, effects of pinacidil on Emax in trachea, P = 0.016; EC50 shift in ileum and trachea, P = 0.0035 and 0.0052. M2 muscarinic receptor knockout mice, effects of pinacidil on Emax in ileum, P = 0.0022; EC50 shift in ileum and trachea, P = 0.0079 and 0.0035.

  • 4-c Denotes the EC50value of oxotremorine-M measured in the presence of pinacidil divided by that measured in its absence. The values in parentheses beneath each estimate represent the mean log shift values ± S.E.M.