Table 2

Effects of A-278637, WAY-133537, ZD6169, and nifedipine on unstable bladder contractions and cardiovascular parameters in obstructed pigs

CompoundDosenSuppression of Unstable ContractionsCardiovascular Parameters
Total AUC/30 minAUC/ContractionFrequencyAmplitudeDurationMean Arterial PressureHeart Rate
nmol/kg i.v.
VehiclePeriod 145  ± 88  ± 5−6  ± 54  ± 7−3  ± 92  ± 2−2  ± 5
Period 24−1  ± 77  ± 11  ± 102  ± 95  ± 33  ± 3−5  ± 4
A-27863734−26  ± 62-150 6  ± 2−31  ± 57  ± 4−2  ± 40  ± 4−5  ± 2
104−51  ± 42-150 −23  ± 5−35  ± 6−25  ± 10−4  ± 7−7  ± 8−3  ± 6
304−75  ± 112-150 −32  ± 18−68  ± 10−31  ± 18−3  ± 5−29  ± 42-150 −11  ± 4
WAY-133537303−14  ± 9−1  ± 9−13  ± 31  ± 41  ± 4−4  ± 3−4  ± 3
1003−28  ± 102-150 −11  ± 10−20  ± 4−7  ± 11−2  ± 3−20  ± 32-150 −13  ± 7
3003−90  ± 32-150 −30  ± 9−86  ± 6−28  ± 7−6  ± 7−38  ± 32-150 12  ± 4
ZD61691003−1  ± 4−1  ± 115  ± 162  ± 4−3  ± 12−2  ± 63  ± 8
3004−25  ± 42-150 −18  ± 3−8  ± 6−14  ± 42  ± 9−4  ± 2−14  ± 3
10004−46  ± 132-150 −20  ± 7−33  ± 12−16  ± 7−12  ± 4−21  ± 42-150 −8  ± 3
Nifedipine3049  ± 10−2  ± 511  ± 9−6  ± 54  ± 4−10  ± 38  ± 4
1005−24  ± 92-150 −32  ± 89  ± 10−26  ± 7−12  ± 4−29  ± 42-150 13  ± 42-150

Data expressed as mean ± S.E.M. percentage of change from predose control values shown in Table 1.

  • 2-150p ≤ 0.05 ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls multiple comparison; analysis applied only to AUC and MAP data because those parameters were the ones used to compare compounds.n, Number of animals tested.