Table 1

Receptor binding properties of TIPP, DPDPE, and ICI-174864 in the absence or presence of GppNHp/NaCl in GH3DORT membranes or in digitonin-permeabilized cells

GH3DORTTIPPDPDPEICI-174864
KiUncoupled/Coupled RatioKiUncoupled/Coupled RatioKiUncoupled/Coupled Ratio
nM nM nM
Membranes
 −GppNHp/NaCl (coupled)3.02 ± 0.1614.5 ± 2.22304 ± 73.2
+GppNHp/NaCl (uncoupled)1.16 ± 0.111-150 0.384418 ± 51.21-150 28.818.8 ± 3.81-150 0.062
Permeabilized
 −GppNHp/NaCl (coupled)4.77 ± 1.3913.2 ± 5.6680 ± 46.1
+GppNHp/NaCl (uncoupled)0.42 ± 0.091-150 0.088379 ± 61.11-150 28.783.8 ± 5.461-150 0.123

Competitive inhibition of [3H]diprenorphine binding (1.0 nM) in GH3DORT membranes or in permeabilized cells by TIPP, DPDPE, or ICI-174864 (10−12–10−5 M) in the presence or absence of GppNHp (25 μM) and NaCl (100 mM) was performed as described under Experimental Procedures. Affinity (Ki) values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. and were calculated from IC50 values derived from complete concentration-effect curves using the Cheng-Prusoff equation (see Figs.1 and 5). The Kd for diprenorphine used to calculate the Ki values in membranes was 0.71 ± 0.04 nM (−GppNHp/NaCl) and 1.06 ± 0.14 nM (+GppNHp/NaCl). TheKd for diprenorphine in permeabilized cells was 1.29 ± 0.11 nM (−GppNHp/NaCl) and 0.93 ± 0.10 nM (+GppNHp/NaCl). Data for each value presented represent three separate experiments performed in duplicate.

  • 1-150  Significantly different from corresponding −GppNHp/NaCl (coupled)(P < 0.05, Student's t test).