Table 2

Parameter estimates (with CI95) obtained and calculated according to Fig. 3 from the effect of antagonists on stimulation-evoked tritium overflow

EmaxpEC50pEC50-corrpKb
Rauwolscine67 (52, 87) %8.01 (7.07, 8.69)7.848.70
Idazoxan73 (62, 84) %7.09 (6.80, 7.43)6.927.78
WB410148 (42, 56) %7.15 (6.84, 7.52)6.987.84
Phentolamine67 (57, 78) %6.76 (6.47, 7.05)6.597.45
Spiroxatrine69 (60, 82) %6.20 (5.88, 6.50)6.036.89
Corynanthine71 (53, 105) %5.42 (5.07, 5.73)5.256.11
Prazosin64 (42, 120) %5.46 (4.90, 5.90)5.296.15
SKF10407847 (35, 68) %5.71 (5.25, 6.15)5.546.40
ARC23936 (24, 54) %5.45 (4.91, 5.95)5.286.14

The estimates were obtained from the experiments of Fig. 2.Emax, maximum enhancement by the antagonist; pEC50, negative logarithm of EC50, derived from logistic curve fitting. The slope factor c was assumed to be 1. pEC50-corr corresponds to the 1.49-fold increase in EC50 as explained in the Discussion, and pKb = pEC50-corr + 0.87, according to Fig.3.