Table 2

Affinities of selected PGs competing for specific [3H]PGF binding to BCLM membranes

CompoundFP Receptor Affinity (Ki, nM)
16-Phenoxy-PGF 22  ± 5 (6)
Cloprostenol31  ± 3 (9)
17-Phenyl-PGF 59  ± 8 (5)
PHXA8598  ± 11 (8)
Fluprostenol100  ± 12 (5)
PGF 119  ± 9 (25)
Enprostil1,000  ± 230 (3)
17-Phenyl-PGE2 1,413  ± 549 (4)
PGD2 2,500  ± 760 (3)
Sulprostone2,500  ± 350 (3)
PGE2 3,400  ± 710 (3)
Latanoprost (PHXA41)4,200  ± 790 (12)
UF-0215,900  ± 710 (4)
U466198,900  ± 140 (3)
S-103322,000  ± 2,600 (5)
GR63799X30,000  ± 3,000 (3)
PGE1 40,000  ± 11,000 (5)
ZK11818269,000  ± 19,000 (4)
PGI2 86,000  ± 29,000 (4)
BWA868C86,000  ± 12,000 (4)
8-Iso-PGF 120,000  ± 26,000 (8)
  • Data are mean ± S.E.M. from 3 to 25 independent experiments as shown in parentheses. Note: all PGs listed, apart from GR63799X and latanoprost (which are esters), are the free acid forms of the compounds. For reference, the IC50/Ki values for PGF competing for [3H]PGF binding to homogenates/membranes of corpora lutea from different species have ranged from 30 to 50 nM (Powell et al., 1975; Rao, 1976; Lin and Rao, 1977; Goh and Kishino, 1994).