Table 2

Treatment effects during the first 2 h2-a

WakeNREMREMLMALMA IntensityWake BoutsBody Temp
nMeanS.E.MeanS.E.MeanS.E.nMeanS.E.nMeanS.E.nMeanS.E.nMeanS.E.
MOD 3001056.91.22.71.10.50.211131.316.682.510.371073.011.011−0.230.07
Vehicle2030.51.026.10.83.40.42089.24.7202.490.15206.51.1200.010.04
MOD 1001250.02.88.92.41.10.511116.511.1102.450.261228.94.511−0.020.06
Vehicle2030.41.026.00.83.60.42093.84.6202.510.14205.90.920−0.010.04
MOD 30936.52.221.52.02.00.41186.310.192.420.26910.62.511−0.070.07
Vehicle2031.00.925.60.83.40.42085.55.2202.510.16205.80.920−0.050.04
METH 1.0955.51.23.81.00.70.213250.48.784.710.22727.26.4120.550.07
Vehicle2031.01.225.90.93.10.32087.26.4202.500.16205.70.920−0.000.04
METH 0.51053.91.14.80.71.30.512200.810.193.740.23922.03.0100.290.08
Vehicle2030.81.025.90.83.30.32080.55.9202.190.16205.90.920−0.030.03
ANOVA Main effect across treatment groupsSignificant Contrasts (P < .05)
vs. VehicleBetween “Comparable” Doses
MODMETHMETH 0.5 vs.MODAF 100METH 1.0 vs. MODAF 300
301003000.51.0
Wake:F[9,149] = 64.36, P < .0001.0089.0001.0001.0001.0001
LMA: F[9,157] = 50.60, P < .0001.0482.0003.0001.0001.0001.0001
LMA intensity: F[9,143] = 11.15, P < .0001.0001.0001.0001.0001
NREM sleep: F[9,149] = 74.79, P < .0001.0176.0001.0001.0001.0001.0280
REM sleep: F[9,149] =  9.20, P < .0001.0237.0001.0001.0009.0001
Wake bouts: F[9,149] = 38.43, P < .0001.0001.0001.0006.0001.0001
Tb: F[9,154] = 16.41, P < .0001.0008.0001.0001.0002.0001
  • 2-a MOD, modafinil; METH, methamphetamine; (Values with MOD and METH are stated in milligrams per kilogram i.p.) Tb, body temperature; –, P > .05.