TABLE 1

Mean EC50 values and Emax values for different IP receptor agonists in cAMP accumulation assays determined in human PASMC or T-REx-HEK-high hIP and T-REx-HEK-low hIP cells

PASMC–cAMPaHEK–high hIPbHEK–low hIPb
EC50 (σg)Emax (S.D.)EC50EmaxEC50Emax
ACT-333679214 nM (1.1)56% (5%)29 nM (26 nM, 33 nM)97% (95%, 98%)277 nM (270 nM, 285 nM)45% (51%, 39%)
SelexipagND29% (6%)813 nM (790 nM, 837 nM)85% (85%, 84%)NDND
Beraprost94 nM (1.1)104% (7%)8.6 nM (8.4 nM, 8.9 nM)89% (91%, 86%)135 nM (119 nM, 153 nM)93% (90%, 96%)
Iloprost16 nM (1.1)100% (0%)0.53 nM (0.42 nM, 0.67 nM)100% (100%, 100%)10 nM (7.8 nM, 13 nM)100% (100%, 100%)
Treprostinil107 nM (1.1)107% (4%)11 nM (11 nM, 12 nM)96% (97%, 95%)264 nM (200 nM, 348 nM)108% (110%, 106%)
  • Emax, maximal efficacy compared with that of iloprost; σg, geometric standard deviation; ND, not determined; S.D., arithmetic standard deviation.

  • a For PASMC, EC50 values were derived using the individual curve-intrinsic maxima, and their geomean is shown. For Emax, arithmetic mean is shown; n = 3 measurements.

  • b For HEK cells, EC50 values were derived using the individual curve–intrinsic maxima. Shown is the geometric mean with individual values in brackets. Emax: Shown are the arithmetic means, with individual values in brackets (n = 2 measurements).