TABLE 2

Summary of comparisons between phenyl ring substituted N-1,2-diol and respective N-methyl analog

CompoundPhenyl Ring SubstituentConfiguration of the N-1,2-DiolVMAT2 [3H]DA Uptake (K-i)Selectivity for VMAT over DAT or SERTN-Methyl AnalogVMAT2 [3H]DA Uptake (Ki)Ratio of VMAT2 Uptake for the N-1,2-Diol Relative to the N-Methyl AnalogRatio of VMAT2 Uptake for the N-1,2-Diol Relative to Lobelane
μMμM
LobelaneN.A.N.A.0.06715.6N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.
GZ-745ANo changeR0.193.16Lobelane0.0672.842.84
GZ-745BNo changeS0.861.2612.812.8
GZ-794ANaphthaleneR0.0339.39GZ-258Ca0.091a0.360.49
GZ-794BNaphthaleneS0.0802.000.881.19
GZ-796ABiphenylR0.796.70GZ-272Ca0.034a23.211.8
GZ-796BBiphenylS2.251.1366.233.6
GZ-790A3-MethoxyR0.1422.4GZ-261Ca0.030a4.672.09
GZ-790B3-MethoxyS0.5212.817.37.76
GZ-792A2-MethoxyR0.192.71GZ-273Ca0.026a7.312.84
GZ-792B2-MethoxyS0.791.1930.411.8
GZ-793A4-MethoxyR0.02949.7GZ-252Ca0.015a1.930.43
GZ-793B4-MethoxyS0.1818.9122.69
GZ-797A3,4-Methylene DioxyR0.1613.1GZ-250Ca0.043a3.722.39
GZ-797B3,4-Methylene DioxyS0.762.9017.711.3
GZ-791A3-FlouroR0.191.32GZ-275Ca0.093a2.042.84
GZ-791B3-FlouroS1.030.6011.115.4
GZ-795A2,4-DichloroR0.1415.4GZ-260Ca0.016a8.752.09
GZ-795B2,4-DichloroS0.09020.75.631.34
  • N.A., not applicable.

  • a Data taken from Nickell et al., 2011.