TABLE 2

Binding affinities ([3H]HA competition binding assays) and functional data (steady-state GTPase assays) for benzimidazole- and thienopyrrol-derived H4R ligands

The pKbvalue in bold is significantly (P < 0.001) higher than the corresponding pEC50value.

CompoundR4R5R6R7pEC50aEfficacyapKbbpKic
Benzimidazol-Derivatives
    17HHHH5.91 ± 0.12−0.57 ± 0.046.71 ± 0.096.54 ± 0.04
    18HFHH6.32 ± 0.18−0.40 ± 0.036.80 ± 0.086.82 ± 0.05
    19HCF3HHn.a.n.a. (−0.05 ± 0.02)d5.89 ± 0.165.97 ± 0.05
    20HCH3HH5.80 ± 0.20−0.35 ± 0.045.42 ± 0.225.64 ± 0.04
    21HHHCH36.37 ± 0.13−0.51 ± 0.026.97 ± 0.116.75 ± 0.05
    22HHFCH36.99 ± 0.16−0.46 ± 0.037.18 ± 0.107.17 ± 0.03
Thienopyrrol-Derivatives
    23HH6.24 ± 0.19−0.29 ± 0.026.12 ± 0.156.38 ± 0.03
    24HCH36.55 ± 0.32−0.15 ± 0.027.52 ± 0.147.27 ± 0.05
    25ClCH37.37 ± 0.19−0.21 ± 0.027.11 ± 0.107.65 ± 0.05
  • n.a., neutral antagonist.

  • a Steady-state GTPase assay, inverse agonist mode, efficacy of THIO = –1.00.

  • b Steady-state GTPase assay, antagonist mode (with 100 nM HA).

  • c Radioligand competition assay with 10 nM [3H]HA, n = 3, duplicates.

  • d Mean ± S.E.M. of the effect of the highest concentration (100 μM).