TABLE 3

Comparison of mean triglyceride (TG) transport and drug transport rates in lymph of dogs and rats after oral coadministration of MU or halofantrine with different lipid loads

Species/DrugFormulation or Lipid LoadMaximum Rate of TG Transport in LymphTotal TG Transported in Lymph over 8/10 hMaximum Rate of Drug Transport in Lymph per Gram TGTotal Drug Transported in Lymph per Gram Lymph TG over 8/10 h
mg/h g mg drug/g TG mg drug/g TG
Dog
    MU0 g of lipid (fasted)4611.40.270.07
5 g of lipid7454.10.940.19
7.5 g of lipid13745.21.120.45
10 g of lipid27917.01.510.62
15 g of lipid210111.70.930.25
34 g of lipid501520.450.770.23
    HalofantrineaME/LC (fasted)8503.412.294.2
ME/MC (fasted)1780.95.142.8
PEG melt (fasted)N.M.0.54.812.6
PEG melt (34 g of lipid)N.M.32.66.211.7
Ratb
    MULipid-free2.880.0170.550.16
4 mg of OA + LPC + BS3.180.0170.520.11
4 mg of CO/PGL + LPC + BS3.410.0201.250.15
40 mg of CO/PGL in Tween5.720.0281.030.41
40 mg of OA + LPC + BS9.940.0340.600.52
40 mg of OA in Tween10.220.0410.770.38
100 mg of lipid predose16.970.0720.560.32
  • N.M., not measured.

  • a Data reproduced from Khoo et al. (2003). ME/LC, long-chain triglyceride microemulsion; LC/MC, medium-chain triglyceride microemulsion; PEG melt, lipid-free amorphous PEG 600 solid dispersion.

  • b For abbreviations refer to Fig. 6.