%0 Journal Article %A Sean Ekins %A Mark Vandenbranden %A Barbara J. Ring %A Jennifer S. Gillespie %A Tian J. Yang %A Harry V. Gelboin %A Steven A. Wrighton %T Further Characterization of the Expression in Liver and Catalytic Activity of CYP2B6 %D 1998 %J Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics %P 1253-1259 %V 286 %N 3 %X Previous studies in this laboratory have determined the lack of specificity of several antibody and substrate probes of CYP2B6. The goals of the current study were to examine the expression of CYP2B6 in a bank of human liver microsome (HLM) samples using a new specific monoclonal antibody (MAb 49-10-20) and to further characterize the substrate specificity of CYP2B6. A 100-fold variability in expression of immunodetectable CYP2B6 was demonstrated in a bank of 19 HLM samples (0.7 pmol/mg protein to 71.1 pmol/mg protein) using MAb 49-10-20. CYP2B6 levels were found to significantly (P < .0001) correlate with S-mephenytoin N-demethylation to nirvanol (r2 = 0.89), 7-hydroxy-4-trifluoromethylcoumarin formation (r2 = 0.81) and several markers of CYP3A levels and activity. The relationships between nirvanol formation and CYP3A levels or activity were found to depend on two HLM samples. Km (apparent) values were generated for benzyloxyresorufin O-deethylation (1.3 μM), benzphetamineN-demethylation (93.4 μM), 3-cyano 7-ethoxycoumarinO-deethylation (71.3 μM), midazolam 1′-hydroxylation (46.1 μM) and 4-chloromethyl-7-ethoxycoumarin O-deethylation (33.7 μM) using expressed CYP2B6. Testosterone 16β-hydroxylation by expressed CYP2B6 resulted in atypical kinetics characteristic of substrate activation. The data best fit the Hill equation with aKm (apparent) of 50.5 μM and an nof 1.3 (n = number of sites bound by activator). In conclusion, the highly specific MAb 49-10-20 was used to provide further confirmation that S-mephenytoinN-demethylation to nirvanol is a CYP2B6 selective probe. Finally, some, but not all substrates of CYP2B6 demonstrate autoactivation. The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics %U https://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/jpet/286/3/1253.full.pdf