In Figs. 1, 7, 8, and 9 of the above article [Shetty HU, Zoghbi SS, Siméon FG, Liow J-S, Brown AK, Kannan P, Innis RB, and Pike VW (2008) J Pharmacol Exp Ther 327:727-735], the 1,3-thiazole ring incorrectly shows a 5-substituent (R1), which should be in the 4-position as shown below.
The online version of this article has been corrected in departure from the print version.
The authors regret this error and apologize for any confusion or inconvenience it may have caused.
- The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics