Preclinical Toxicology (Subacute and Acute) and Efficacy of a New Squalenoyl Gemcitabine Anticancer Nanomedicine

  1. L. Harivardhan Reddy,
  2. Pierre-Emmanuel Marque,
  3. Catherine Dubernet,
  4. Sinda-Lepêtre Mouelhi,
  5. Didier Desmaële and
  6. Patrick Couvreur
  1. Université Paris-Sud XI, Faculté de Pharmacie, Unité Mixte de Recherche Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 8612, Institut Fédératif de Recherche 141, Châtenay-Malabry Cedex, France (L.H.R., C.D., P.C.); Medsqual, Paris Biotech, Paris, France (P.-E.M.); and Université Paris-Sud XI, Faculté de Pharmacie, Unité Mixte de Recherche Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 8076 Biocis, Châtenay-Malabry Cedex, France (S.-L.M., D.D.)
  1. Address correspondence to:
    Dr. Patrick Couvreur, Université Paris-Sud XI, Faculté de Pharmacie, Unité Mixte de Recherche Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 8612, Institut Fédératif de Recherche 141, 92296 Châtenay-Malabry Cedex, France. E-mail: patrick.couvreur{at}u-psud.fr

Abstract

This study investigates 1) the anticancer efficacy of a new squalenoyl prodrug of gemcitabine (SQgem) in nanoassembly form compared with gemcitabine at equitoxic doses and 2) the subacute and acute preclinical toxicity of these compounds. The toxicity studies revealed that SQgem nanoassemblies, like gemcitabine, were toxic, and they led to dose-dependent mortality after daily i.v. injections for 1 week, irrespective of the route of administration. However, a 4- to 5-day spaced dosing schedule (injections on day 0, 4, 8, and 13) was proved to be safer in terms of weight loss and hematological and other toxicity. Using this spaced dosing schedule, SQgem nanoassemblies exhibited impressive anticancer activity in mice bearing L1210 leukemia because this treatment led to 75% long-term survivors. In contrast, at equitoxic doses, neither free gemcitabine nor cytarabine led to longterm survivors and all the mice of these groups died of the disease. Further toxicity studies performed at lethal doses by blood and serum analysis and organ weight determinations revealed that the hematological toxicity was the dose-limiting toxicity in both SQgem nanoassemblies and gemcitabine, whereas probable gastrointestinal toxicity was also associated with free gemcitabine. The SQgem nanoassemblies did not display hepatotoxicity, which is one of the clinically encountered toxicities of gemcitabine. To summarize, these preclinical studies demonstrated that the toxicological profile of new squalenoyl gemcitabine nanomedicine was not distinct from that of the parent gemcitabine, whereas it was much more potent than gemcitabine at equitoxic doses and cytarabine at clinically relevant doses. These data support the candidature of SQgem for clinical trials.

Footnotes

  • This study was supported by Agence Nationale de la Recherche Grant SYLIANU and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Grant Ingénieur de valorization. L.H.R. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from Université Paris-Sud.

  • Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.

  • doi:10.1124/jpet.107.133751.

  • ABBREVIATIONS: SQgem, squalenoyl gemcitabine; MTD, maximal tolerated dose(s); wt, wild type; MST, median survival time; ILS, increase in life span; Gem, gemcitabine; T/U, treated/untreated; RBC, red blood cells(s); HCT, hematocrit.

    • Received October 30, 2007.
    • Accepted February 6, 2008.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents