Cerebrospinal Fluid Bioavailability and Pharmacokinetics of Bupivacaine and Lidocaine after Intrathecal and Epidural Administrations in Rabbits Using Microdialysis

  1. Rozenn Clement,
  2. Jean-Marc Malinovsky,
  3. Pascal Le Corre,
  4. Gilles Dollo,
  5. Francois Chevanne and
  6. Roger Le Verge
  1. Laboratoire de Pharmacie Galénique et Biopharmacie, Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Université de Rennes, Rennes Cedex, France
     
    Next Section

    Abstract

    The aim of this work was to study the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine (BUP) and lidocaine (LID) administered separately in rabbits using microdialysis with retrodialysis calibration. Microdialysis probe and catheters were inserted under control of the view in the intrathecal or epidural spaces. The epidural disposition of BUP and LID after epidural administration of low (0.69 μM) and high (6.9 μM) doses was studied. Then, the intrathecal and plasma dispositions after separate intrathecal (0.2 μM) and epidural administration (6.9 μM) were investigated. The CSF binding of BUP and LID was linear in a range from 50 to 500 μg/ml, and the mean unbound CSF fraction at a concentration of 100 μg/ml was 39.3 ± 2.3% for BUP and 75.8 ± 7.7% for LID. Epidural and intrathecal disposition of BUP and LID showed a biexponential decline. After epidural administration, the CSF concentrations of BUP and LID were much higher than those in plasma. After intrathecal administration, the plasma concentrations were below the limit of quantitation. Although the absorption rate of BUP appeared higher than that of LID, the mean CSF bioavailability of epidural BUP and LID was 5.5 and 17.7%, respectively. The unexpectedly higher CSF bioavailability of LID, the less lipophilic drug, may result from the difference in the processes competing for drug epidural removal.

    Epidural and intrathecal local anesthetics, opioids, and α2adrenergic agonists (i.e., clonidine) are commonly used during the postoperative period to relieve pain. Opioids and clonidine act by receptor binding at the spinal level and at the systemic level after absorption in the systemic circulation and subsequent brain distribution. In contrast, local anesthetics act by inhibition of nerve influx transmission only at the spinal level, but their systemic absorption after epidural administration is significant and leads to systemic adverse effects such as cardiac and neurologic toxicities.

    After epidural administration, these drugs need to cross the spinal meninges (i.e., dura mater and arachnoid mater) to reach their site of action. However, if the spinal disposition of opioids and clonidine has been studied extensively, the spinal disposition of local anesthetics has been investigated poorly. This has been done only once for local anesthetics (Wilkinson and Lund, 1970), and frequently for opioids (Nordberg et al., 1983, Gourlay et al., 1987, Hansdottir et al., 1991, 1995; Taverne et al., 1992) and clonidine (Eisenach et al., 1993, 1995). The distribution of these agents in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been studied after repeated intrathecal punctures or insertion of indwelling intrathecal catheters to withdraw CSF. These studies demonstrated a rather low CSF bioavailability lower than 4% for pethidine, morphine, and sufentanil and 14% for clonidine. Moreover, a relationship between CSF concentration and analgesic effect has been described for clonidine (Eisenach et al., 1993).

    Using experimental ex vivo models, authors have studied extensively the permeability of dura mater (Moore et al., 1982, McEllistrem et al., 1993) or meninges (Bernards and Hill, 1990) to different drugs. They showed that a simple passive diffusion mechanism is likely. Relationships between permeability and different physicochemical properties were studied but the results appeared controversial depending on the models (dura alone or all meninges) and on the nature of meninges (humans or animals). However, these ex vivo models do not take into account the gradient of pressure existing between epidural and intrathecal spaces, the meningeal surface area in contact with solution injected epidurally, uptake by epidural venous blood vessels, and uptake into epidural tissues such as epidural fat.

    Given the paucity of data on local anesthetics, excepting ex vivo studies, in vivo investigations thus are strongly required to understand the spinal disposition of these drugs and to study the in vivo drug release from drug delivery systems for local anesthetics currently investigated to improve the clinical and toxicological features of these drugs (Boogaerts et al., 1995, Le Corre et al., 1995,Fréville et al., 1996). We recently validated the use of microdialysis coupled to HPLC to study the intrathecal disposition of bupivacaine (BUP) in rabbits (Clément et al., 1998). This technique, allowing measurement of drug concentrations without removing CSF, also permits access to concentrations of local anesthetics in the epidural space, where it is impossible to withdraw any epidural fluid because of cephalad and caudal spread of the solution injected epidurally (Paul et al., 1989). The aim of this study was to investigate the spinal disposition of lidocaine (LID) and bupivacaine after epidural and intrathecal administration in awake rabbits.

    Previous SectionNext Section

    Materials and Methods

    Chemicals.

    Local anesthetics (bupivacaine, etidocaine, lidocaine, and ropivacaine) were supplied by Astra (Astra Pain Control, Sweden). A Ringer’s solution (8.6 g/liter NaCl, 0.33 g/liter KCl, 0.3/liter CaCl2, 2H2O) was used as perfusion fluid. All other reagents were of analytical grade.

    Animals.

    The study was approved by the Committee of Laboratory Investigation and Animal Care of our institution and performed in accordance with French Ministry of Agriculture laws and guidelines for laboratory animal experiments. Experiments were performed on female New Zealand albino rabbits, weighing 3.0 ± 0.3 kg, housed individually in standard cages with free access to food and water. Animals were fasted the night before the experiment.

    Animal Preparation.

    After catheterization of a marginal vein of ear, anesthesia was induced with 25 mg of 2.5% thiopental. Insertion of spinal and vascular catheters was performed under epidural procaine anesthesia and light sedation, maintained with i.v. 1% thiopental (5–10 mg). The technique of epidural anesthesia was described elsewhere (Malinovsky et al., 1997). In the supine position, the femoral area was dissected surgically and an arterial 20-gauge catheter was inserted via the femoral artery. The catheter was heparinized and then closed until blood sampling.

    Then, with the rabbit in prone position, the back was incised between the spinous process of L5 and L6 vertebrae after soft surgical dissection of the flavum ligamentum. If the area appeared to be not large enough to introduce spinal catheters for local anesthetic administration and microdialysis probe, a small laminectomy was performed. Under control of the view, the catheters were inserted either in epidural or intrathecal space after surgical incision of meninges. Catheters inserted for administration of local anesthetics were flushed previously using 0.9% sodium chloride. When catheters for local anesthetic administration and microdialysis probe were not placed in the same space, they were inserted to put the tip of catheter opposite to the tip of the probe.

    Microdialysis Conditions.

    Microdialysis sampling was performed using a CMA/102 microinjection pump coupled to a microdialysis probe CMA/120 (membrane length, 10 mm; 0.5-mm outer diameter; molecular mass cut-off, 20 kDa; CMA Microdialysis, Sweden). Microdialysis samples were collected every 2 min during a 1-min interval. The in vitro study of the kinetics of probe response showed that a lag time of 3 min was necessary to obtain the experimental drug concentration (data not shown). Hence, in all the in vivo experiments the first experimental drug concentration considered was that measured at 3 min. Dialysates (sample volume = 1 μl) were collected in vials containing 100 μl of etidocaine (1 μg/ml), and a 50-μl aliquot was injected onto the chromatograph.

    Microdialysis Calibration.

    Retrodialysis, using ropivacaine as internal standard (IS), was applied to calibrate the microdialysis probes. This calibration technique is based on the principle that the relative loss (RL) of a carefully chosen internal standard, added to the perfusate, is related to the relative recovery (RR) of the substance of interest (SI) (Scheller and Kolb, 1991). The K factor values, defined as the ratio RLIS/RLSI, were used to determine the extracellular concentration of the compounds of interest according to C = Cdialysate × K/RLIS (Deleu et al., 1995). The validation of the calibration was assessed by comparing retrodialysis with the zero-net flux method, where the recovery is estimated from dialysate concentrations in a wide range of concentrations while maintaining the extracellular concentration at steady state (Wang et al., 1993).

    To validate retrodialysis using ropivacaine as internal standard for lidocaine, the following experiments were performed.

    1. The probe, placed in a solution of LID (10 μg/ml), was perfused with a solution containing ropivacaine (100 μg/ml) and varying concentrations of LID (5, 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 μg/ml). The RL of ropivacaine was determined and compared with the RR values of LID obtained by using the zero-net flux method. Because of the systemic toxicity of LID, precluding the steady-state concentrations to be obtained, the comparison between the two methods was performed in vitro. These experiments showed a good agreement between the RL of ropivacaine (RL = 0.44 ± 0.03) and the RR value of LID (RR = 0.48 ± 0.09).

    2. The probe, placed in a Ringer’s solution, was perfused with a solution containing LID (100 μg/ml) and ropivacaine (100 μg/ml), and the K factor was determined in vitro. Immediately after probe insertion in the subarachnoidal space of rabbits, an in vivo calibration with determination of K factor was achieved over a period of 30 min. The LID K factors determined in vitro and in vivo were 1.01 ± 0.05 and 1.09 ± 0.08, respectively.

    As shown previously (Clément et al., 1998), ropivacaine can be used as an internal standard to study the disposition of BUP (RL ropivacaine = 0.54 ± 0.05, RR BUP estimated by zero-net flux method; RR = 0.56 ± 0.08, Kin vitro = 1.06 ± 0.04, Kin vivo = 0.87 ± 0.03).

    After in vivo calibration, the probe was perfused throughout the experiment at a flow rate of 1 μl/min with a Ringer’s solution containing ropivacaine (100 μg/ml). The lag time between the end of the calibration and the beginning of the experiment was 60 min. During the experiment, RL of ropivacaine was determined in each sample and used to correct the dialysate concentrations.

    Evaluation of Unbound Fraction of BUP and LID in CSF.

    CSF samples (between 1.5 and 2 ml) were withdrawn from the cisterna magna by puncture through the atlanto-occipital membrane in six rabbits. Individual CSF samples from three rabbits were divided in two aliquots for the separate evaluation of BUP and LID binding at a concentration of 100 μg/ml. CSF samples from three rabbits were pooled and then divided in two aliquots for the separate evaluation of BUP and LID binding at the following concentrations: 50, 100, 250, and 500 μg/ml. The binding was studied using microdialysis by spiking a CSF aliquot either with BUP or LID.

    Chromatographic Analysis of BUP and LID.

    The separation and quantification of the local anesthetics in the dialysate (CSF, epidural samples) or in plasma samples were carried out using a HPLC method with UV absorbance detection (λ = 205 nm). Dialysate samples were injected immediately onto the chromatographic system. The blood samples were centrifuged and plasma was stored frozen until analysis. BUP and LID in plasma were extracted from plasma before analysis by HPLC according to a previously published method (Le Guevello et al., 1993). The limit of quantification of BUP and LID was 3 μg/ml and 1.5 μg/ml in dialysate and 4 ng/ml and 2 ng/ml in plasma, respectively.

    The chromatographic system consisted of a Waters model 6000A pump (Waters, Milford, MA) equipped with a Waters model 717 automatic injector, an LDC Milton Roy model Spectromonitor 3100 variable-wavelength detector (LDC Milton Roy, Riviera Beach, FL), and a Delsi model Enica 21 integrator (Delsi, Suresne, France). The analytical chromatographic column was a Lichrospher RP-B Merck (length, 125 mm; internal diameter, 3 mm). The flow rate was 0.5 ml/min, and the temperature was maintained at 30°C. The mobile phase consisted of a mixture of acetonitrile and 0.01 M sodium dihydrogenphosphate, pH 2.1.

    Study Design.

    CSF disposition of local anesthetics only has been studied in each animal either after intrathecal administration or after epidural administration because meningeal puncture with a needle diameter size larger than 0.4 mm (equivalent to the hole made with the 24-gauge needle) significantly increases the flux of local anesthetics through meninges (Bernards et al., 1994).

    In a first part, we investigated in three animals the epidural disposition of BUP and LID after separate epidural administration. Equimolar low doses (0.69 μM, 0.200 mg of BUP, and 0.162 mg of LID) and high doses (6.9 μM, 2.00 mg of BUP, and 1.62 mg of LID) were administered in 30 s under a volume of 1 ml. A series of nine concentration-time profiles was obtained for both BUP and LID. Epidural sampling was achieved every 2 min over 45 min.

    In a second part, we investigated in six animals the intrathecal disposition of BUP and LID after separate intrathecal administration. Equimolar doses (0.2 μM, 0.060 mg of BUP, and 0.049 mg of LID) were administered in 30 s under a volume of 0.1 ml. A series of six and four concentration-time profiles was obtained for BUP and LID, respectively. Intrathecal sampling was achieved every 2 min over the 30 first min and then every 4 min over the following 24 min. Blood sampling (1.5 ml) was achieved in each animal according to the following schedule: before administration and then at 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 7, 11, and 15 min.

    In a third part, we investigated in nine animals the intrathecal and plasma disposition of BUP and LID after separate epidural administration. Equimolar doses (6.9 μM, 2 mg of BUP, and 1.62 mg of LID) were administered in 30 s under a volume of 1 ml. A series of seven intrathecal concentration-time profiles and five plasma concentration-time profiles was obtained for BUP and LID, respectively. Intrathecal sampling was achieved every 2 min over the 30 first min and then every 4 min over the following 24 min. Blood sampling (1.5 ml) was achieved in each animal according to the following schedule: before administration and then at 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 21, 29, 45, and 55 min.

    Pharmacokinetic Analysis.

    Intrathecal- and epidural-population pharmacokinetic parameters of BUP and LID were determined using the statistical pharmacokinetic software P-Pharm (version 1.5; Innaphase, Champs sur Marne, France). Intrathecal concentration data after intrathecal administration and epidural concentration data after epidural administration were fitted according to a biexponential model. Intrathecal concentration data after epidural administration were fitted according to a triexponential model. The distribution of the random effect was assumed as normal, and the residual error variance was assumed as heteroscedastic (in proportion to the squared value of the predictions). Initial population parameter estimates were derived from the mean of the individual parameter values obtained by using a stripping algorithm. Individual parameters for each data set (Bayesian estimates) were obtained from the current population parameters and the individual data.

    The maximum total plasma concentration, the maximum free epidural and intrathecal concentration (Cmax), and the corresponding time (T max) were derived from raw data. Areas under CSF concentration-time curves from the time of drug administration up to the last sampling point (AUClast) were computed by the linear trapezoidal rule by using a noncompartmental model with the software package WinNonlin (version 1.1; Scientific Consulting Inc., Apex, NC). Because both epidural and intrathecal administrations were not performed in the same animals, a mean CSF bioavailability (Fcsf) was determined by the following: Fcsf = (mean AUCcsf-epi/epidural dose)/(mean AUCcsf-it/intrathecal dose).

    Statistics.

    All data are presented as mean ± S.D. Student’s t test was used to compare individual means. AP value less than .05 was considered as statistically significant.

    Previous SectionNext Section

    Results

    Epidural Microdialysis after Epidural Administration.

    The individual epidural concentration-time profiles of BUP and LID after equimolar epidural administration (low and high doses) are presented in Fig. 1. The values of pharmacokinetic parameters after the administration of the high doses of BUP and LID are listed in Table 1. Pharmacokinetic modeling was achieved only after the administration of the high dose (i.e., the dose used in the intrathecal evaluation after epidural administration) because too few data were obtained in the terminal elimination phase after the administration of the low dose. The epidural concentration-time curves showed a biphasic decline with an apparent terminal elimination phase occurring earlier for BUP.

    Figure 1
    View larger version:
    Figure 1

    Measured and population-predicted epidural concentrations of bupivacaine (left) and lidocaine (right) after separate epidural administration of equimolar low dose (bottom, 0.69 μM: 0.2 mg of BUP and .162 mg of LID) and high dose (top, 6.9 μM: 2 mg of BUP and 1.62 mg of LID) in rabbits.

    View this table:
    Table 1

    Epidural pharmacokinetic parameters (mean ± S.D.) of BUP and LID after separate epidural administration of equimolar dose (6.9 μM: 2 mg of BUP and 1.62 mg of LID) in rabbits

    The high-dose to low-dose ratio of maximum unbound epidural concentration (Cmax-epi) averaged 13 and 11 for BUP and LID, respectively. The ratio between Cmax-epi and the corresponding concentration of the injected solution (Cinj) was 26.5 ± 10.3% and 35.3 ± 14.5% (P = .32) after the administration of low and high doses of BUP, respectively. After the administration of low and high doses of LID, this ratio averaged 54.1 ± 25.2% and 60.5 ± 17.3% (P = .70), respectively. These data showed that the ratio was not dependent on the injected dose but was dependent on the drug injected (P= .007). During the terminal apparent elimination phase, the level of epidural concentration of BUP and LID after the high dose was about 10 times higher than those obtained after the low dose in accordance with the difference in dosing.

    Intrathecal Microdialysis after Intrathecal Administration.

    Individual CSF concentrations of BUP and LID after equimolar intrathecal administration are illustrated by Fig.2 and show a biexponential decline. The pharmacokinetic parameters are presented in Table2. The concentrations of BUP and LID in plasma were beyond the limits of detection during the intrathecal experiment. The AUClast/area under CSF concentration-time curves from the time of drug administration to infinity (AUCinf) ratio of intrathecal BUP (87.8%) and LID (91.7%) indicated that the sampling period was long enough to obtain a suitable description of the CSF disposition of these drugs.

    Figure 2
    View larger version:
    Figure 2

    Measured and population-predicted intrathecal concentrations of bupivacaine (top) and lidocaine (bottom) after separate intrathecal administration of equimolar dose (0.2 μM: 0.060 mg of BUP and .049 mg of LID) in rabbits.

    View this table:
    Table 2

    Intrathecal pharmacokinetic parameters (mean ± S.D.) of BUP and LID after separate intrathecal administration of equimolar dose (0.2 μM: 0.060 mg of BUP and 0.049 mg of LID) in rabbits

    Intrathecal and Plasma Disposition after Epidural Administration.

    Figure 3 shows the individual CSF concentrations of BUP and LID after administration of an epidural equimolar dose. The CSF pharmacokinetic parameters are presented in Table 3. The AUClast/AUCinf ratio of intrathecal BUP (85.5%) and LID (95.3%) indicated that the sampling period was long enough to obtain a suitable description of the CSF disposition of these drugs. The mean total plasma Cmax of BUP was slightly higher than that of LID (2.23 ± 1.25 μM versus 1.24 ± 0.41 μM,P = .13). The T max of BUP was significantly lower than that of LID (1.6 ± 1.5 min versus 3.8 ± 1.1 min, P < .05).

    Figure 3
    View larger version:
    Figure 3

    Measured and population-predicted intrathecal concentrations of bupivacaine (top) and lidocaine (bottom) after separate epidural administration of equimolar dose (6.9 μM: 2 mg of BUP and 1.62 mg of LID) in rabbits.

    View this table:
    Table 3

    Intrathecal pharmacokinetic parameters (mean ± S.D.) of BUP and LID after separate epidural administration of equimolar dose (6.9 μM: 2 mg of BUP and 1.62 mg of LID) in rabbits

    The CSF concentrations of BUP and LID were much higher than those in plasma. After epidural administration, the mean ratios between CSF and plasma Cmax of BUP and LID were about 450 and 880, respectively. The mean CSF bioavailability of epidural BUP and LID was 5.5 and 17.7%, respectively.

    Unbound Fraction of BUP and LID in CSF.

    The unbound fractions at the concentrations of 50, 100, 250, and 500 μg/ml were 39.4, 39.5, 39.7, and 43.7% for BUP and 80.0, 76.3, 79.4, and 73.8% for LID, respectively. The mean unbound fractions of BUP and LID, at a concentration of 100 μg/ml, were 39.3 ± 2.3% and 75.8 ± 7.7% (n = 4), respectively.

    Previous SectionNext Section

    Discussion

    At present, the evaluation of CSF disposition of drugs has been achieved only by using classical CSF sampling methods, i.e., repeated punctures or sampling through a catheter. The main methodological drawback of these methods is that sampling of CSF may interfere with CSF dynamics and disturb the disposition of intrathecally administered drugs. To minimize this problem, sampling frequency has been lowered, precluding suitable pharmacokinetic analysis, especially for drugs displaying rapid disposition steps. This point is of interest because numerous drugs used in anesthetic practice have a high lipophilicity and may have rapid kinetics. Hence, for such studies, microdialysis sampling strategy appears of paramount interest. However, the evaluation of the disposition of drugs in CSF might have some limitations because drug diffusion in CSF is not fast and uniform (Rigler et al., 1991) as it can be seen in blood, even though there is slow fluid dynamics in the intrathecal space.

    Microdialysis technique, allowing measurement of unbound drug concentrations, leads to the determination of unbound pharmacokinetic parameters of the pharmacologically active fraction of drugs. However, we have established that there is a drug binding in CSF that was linear for BUP and LID in the concentration range studied. The mean unbound fraction of BUP was 2 times lower than that of LID. A lowest unbound fraction of BUP in plasma also has been established compared with LID. However, the plasma protein binding of BUP (Denson et al., 1984) and LID (McNamara et al., 1981) is nonlinear in humans. This difference in the binding pattern may be apparent and may result from the high difference (25- to 100-fold) in drug concentration between plasma and CSF studies and/or from species difference in binding.

    The microdialysis technique also permitted us to describe the disposition of BUP and LID in the epidural space. After epidural administration, Cmax-epi was lower than Cinj for both drugs and doses. There was also a difference in Cmax-epi between BUP and LID (i.e., difference in Cmax-epi/Cinjratio between BUP and LID), which may be explained by a differential diffusion into epidural fat (Rosenberg et al., 1986). Furthermore, the assumption of a higher distribution of BUP within the epidural space is supported by the 4-fold difference in intercompartmental clearance (CLI) between BUP and LID, which was close to statistical significance (P = .06). The higher epidural elimination clearance (CLE) of BUP in comparison with LID suggested a more significant uptake of BUP into the systemic circulation and/or into the CSF.

    After intrathecal administration of BUP and LID, we showed that the CSF disposition of both drugs displayed a biphasic pattern as described for clonidine in sheep (Castro and Eisenach, 1989) and sufentanil (Hansdottir et al., 1991), morphine, meperidine (Sjöström et al., 1987b), and neostigmine (Shafer et al., 1998) in humans. The biphasic pattern should result from different processes involved in the uptake of intrathecally injected drugs: 1) diffusion along the concentration gradient from CSF through the pia mater into the most superficial portions of the spinal cord (Greene, 1983); 2) access to the deeper areas of the spinal cord through the spaces of Virchow-Robin, which are extensions of the subarachnoid space accompanying the blood vessels penetrating the spinal cord from the pia mater (Greene, 1983); 3) drug diffusion through the arachnoid and dura mater and subsequent diffusion in the epidural space (Cohen, 1968); and 4) uptake into the blood vessels of the pia and dura mater (Vandenabeele et al., 1996).

    We found a higher intrathecal CLE of LID compared with BUP, which is in agreement with the faster systemic uptake of LID after intrathecal administration compared with BUP in humans (Burm et al., 1983). If the CLE of LID from intrathecal and epidural spaces were close, BUP showed a lower intrathecal CLE. In contrast to what was observed in the epidural space, CLI values of BUP and LID in the intrathecal space were very close and lower than the epidural CLI, highlighting the influence of the epidural fat in epidural drug disposition, especially for BUP. After epidural and intrathecal administrations, the intrathecal apparent elimination half-lives of BUP were close, in contrast to LID, which displayed an unexpected lower intrathecal apparent elimination half-life after epidural administration. It should be noticed that, in contrast to BUP, the CSF concentration profiles of LID were different after intrathecal and epidural administration, the terminal phase occurring later after epidural administration. Moreover, the concentration profiles of LID in CSF after epidural administration and in epidural sites are similar, indicating that the CSF kinetic disposition of LID was influenced by the epidural disposition of this drug, in contrast to BUP.

    In the current study, we have estimated the CSF bioavailability of BUP and LID after epidural administration, and our data can be compared to those in the literature. The CSF bioavailability of BUP and LID were higher than those of lipophilic and hydrophilic opioids and close to that reported for clonidine (Table 4). In the current study, the diffusion rate through the meninges (estimated by T max-csf) was close to that observed for sufentanil in dogs, but much more rapid than the data usually reported (Table 4). The current investigation showed that the CSF bioavailability of LID, the less lipophilic agent, was around three-times higher than that of BUP.

    View this table:
    Table 4

    Fcsf and T max-csf of drugs after epidural administration published previously

    After epidural administration, drug epidural disposition results from three uptake competing processes: 1) through meninges into CSF, 2) through capillary vessels into systemic circulation, and 3) into epidural fat. Using an ex vivo model, Bernards and Hill (1990)suggested that permeability of BUP and LID through spinal monkey meninges was not different. However, the 4-fold difference in absorption rate constant between BUP and LID was not unexpected, considering the high lipophilicity of BUP. Furthermore, this may suggest that in vitro models should not accurately reflect the in vivo situation because of the relative complexity of the processes involved in the drug disposition in the epidural and intrathecal spaces.

    Although differences in plasma concentrations between two drugs are dependent not only on diffusion but also on distribution and elimination, our data suggested that BUP diffuses more rapidly than LID into systemic circulation (T max 2 times lower for BUP) and suggested that the amount of BUP diffusing into systemic circulation was higher than that of LID (Cmax 2 times higher for BUP). Indeed, after i.v. administration of LID (4 mg/kg) (Doherty et al., 1995) and BUP (0.6 mg/kg) (Fréville et al., 1996) in rabbits, the mean apparent volume of distribution (Vdβ) of BUP was larger than that of LID (12.4 liters versus 9.4 liters). This would explain, in part, the difference in CSF bioavailability observed after epidural administration and was supported by the fact that epidural clearance of BUP was higher than that of LID. Moreover, this is supported by the fact that an increase in spinal effects of BUP and, to a lesser extent, of LID is observed when a vasoconstrictor such as epinephrine is added after epidural administration (Covino and Wildsmith, 1998).

    The second process, which could explain the difference in CSF bioavailability, is the higher partitioning of BUP into epidural fat compared with LID (Rosenberg et al., 1986).

    The CSF bioavailability of LID and BUP found in rabbits can be related to the clinical practice of anesthesia in humans. Indeed, the mean doses used epidurally and intrathecally are 440 mg and 90 mg for LID and 140 mg and 15 mg for BUP (Tucker and Mather, 1998), leading to ratios of epidural doses to intrathecal doses of around 5 for LID and 9 for BUP, i.e., to a clinically based bioavailability of approximately 20% for LID and 10% for BUP.

    This first in vivo investigation of the spinal disposition of local anesthetics in animals has several pharmacological implications. Although CSF drug concentrations usually are considered as free drug concentrations, because protein CSF concentrations are very low, we have shown that there is a drug binding in CSF fluid. The investigation of the drug binding for local anesthetics in the human CSF should be performed and may explain the large variability of effect after their intrathecal administration, especially for BUP. Even if the diffusion rate through meninges of BUP was higher than that of LID, our investigation showed a higher CSF bioavailability for LID that should result from a difference in the epidural disposition of these drugs. Furthermore, such a model should be of interest to define the basis of the development of drug delivery systems for local anesthetics currently investigated to improve the clinical and toxicological features of epidural local anesthetics.

    Previous SectionNext Section

    Footnotes

    • Send reprint requests to: Dr. Pascal Le Corre, Laboratoire de Pharmacie Galénique et Biopharmacie, Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques, Université de Rennes 1, 35043 Rennes Cedex, France. E-mail:Pascal.le-corre{at}univ-rennes1.fr

    • Abbreviations:
      CSF
      cerebrospinal fluid
      BUP
      bupivacaine
      LID
      lidocaine
      RL
      relative loss
      RR
      relative recovery
      Cmax
      maximum total plasma concentration
      Cmax-epi
      maximum unbound epidural concentration
      Tmax
      peak plasma concentration time
      Tmax-csf
      peak CSF concentration time
      AUClast
      area under CSF concentration-time curves from the time of drug administration up to the last sampling point
      AUCcsf-it
      area under the unbound CSF concentration-time curve up to the last sampling point after intrathecal administration
      AUCcsf-epi
      area under the unbound CSF concentration-time curve up to the last sampling point after epidural administration
      AUCinf
      area under CSF concentration-time curves from the time of drug administration to infinity
      K10
      elimination rate constant
      K12 and K21
      distribution rate constants
      Ka
      absorption rate constant
      V1
      initial volume of distribution
      Vss
      steady-state volume of distribution
      Fcsf
      CSF bioavailability
      Cinj
      drug concentration of the solution injected
      CLE
      elimination clearance
      CLI
      intercompartmental clearance
      • Received July 10, 1998.
      • Accepted January 7, 1999.
    Previous Section
     

    References

    1. ↵
      1. Bernards CM,
      2. Hill HF
      (1990) Morphine and alfentanil permeability through the spinal dura, arachnoid, and pia mater of dogs and monkeys. Anesthesiology 73:1214–1219.
      MedlineWeb of Science
    2. ↵
      1. Bernards CM,
      2. Kopacz DJ,
      3. Michel MZ
      (1994) Effect of needle puncture on morphine and lidocaine through the spinal meninges of the monkey in vitro. Anesthesiology 80:853–858.
      CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
    3. ↵
      1. Boogaerts JG,
      2. Lafont ND,
      3. Carlino S,
      4. Noel E,
      5. Raynal P,
      6. Goffinet G,
      7. Legros FJ
      (1995) Biodistribution of liposome-associated bupivacaine after extradural administration to rabbits. Br J Anaesth 75:319–325.
      Abstract/FREE Full Text
    4. ↵
      1. Burm AGL,
      2. Van Kleef JW,
      3. Gladines MB,
      4. Spierdijk J,
      5. Breimer DD
      (1983) Plasma concentrations of lidocaine and bupivacaine after subarachnoid administration. Anesthesiology 59:191–195.
      Medline
    5. ↵
      1. Castro MI,
      2. Eisenach JC
      (1989) Pharmacokinetics and dynamics of intravenous, intrathecal, and epidural clonidine in sheep. Anesthesiology 71:418–425.
      CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
    6. ↵
      1. Clément R,
      2. Malinovsky JM,
      3. Dollo G,
      4. Le Corre P,
      5. Chevanne F,
      6. Le Verge R
      (1998) In vitro and in vivo microdialysis calibration using retrodialysis for the study of the cerebrospinal distribution of bupivacaine. J Pharm Biomed Anal 17:665–670.
      CrossRefMedline
    7. ↵
      1. Cohen EN
      (1968) Distribution of local anesthetic agents in the neuraxis of the dog. Anesthesiology 79:1002–1005.
    8. ↵
      1. Cousins MJ,
      2. Bridenbaugh PO
      1. Covino BG,
      2. Wildsmith JAW
      (1998) Clinical pharmacology of local anesthetic agents. in Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Management of Pain, eds Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO (Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia), 3rd ed. pp 97–128.
    9. ↵
      1. Deleu D,
      2. Sarre S,
      3. Ebinger G,
      4. Michotte Y
      (1995) The effect of carbidopa and entacapone pretreatment on the L-dopa pharmacokinetics and metabolism in blood plasma and skeletal muscle in beagle dog: An in vivo microdialysis study. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 273:1323–1331.
      Abstract/FREE Full Text
    10. ↵
      1. Denson D,
      2. Coyle D,
      3. Thompson G,
      4. Myers J
      (1984) Alpha1-acid glycoprotein and albumin in human serum bupivacaine binding. Clin Pharmacol Ther 35:409–415.
      Medline
    11. ↵
      1. Doherty MM,
      2. Hughes PJ,
      3. Korszniak NV,
      4. Charman WN
      (1995) Prolongation of lidocaine-induced epidural anesthesia by medium molecular weight hyaluronic acid formulations: Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies in the rabbit. Anesth Analg 80:740–746.
      Abstract
    12. ↵
      1. Durant PA,
      2. Yaksh TL
      (1986) Distribution in cerebrospinal fluid, blood, and lymph of epidurally injected morphine and inulin in dogs. Anesth Analg 65:583–592.
      Abstract/FREE Full Text
    13. ↵
      1. Eisenach J,
      2. Deitweiler D,
      3. Hood D
      (1993) Hemodynamic and analgesic actions of epidurally administered clonidine. Anesthesiology 78:277–287.
      MedlineWeb of Science
    14. ↵
      1. Eisenach JC,
      2. Hood DD,
      3. Tuttle R,
      4. Shafer S,
      5. Smith T,
      6. Tong C
      (1995) Computer-controlled epidural infusion to targeted cerebrospinal fluid concentrations in humans: Clonidine. Anesthesiology 83:33–47.
      CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
    15. ↵
      1. Fréville JC,
      2. Dollo G,
      3. Le Corre P,
      4. Chevanne F,
      5. Le Verge R
      (1996) Controlled systemic absorption and increased anesthetic effect of bupivacaine following epidural administration of bupivacaine-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin complex. Pharm Res 13:1574–1578.
    16. ↵
      1. Gourlay GK,
      2. Cherry DA,
      3. Plummer JL,
      4. Armstrong PJ,
      5. Cousins MJ
      (1987) The influence of drug polarity on the absorption of opioid drugs into CSF and subsequent cephalad migration following lumbar epidural administration: Application to morphine and pethidine. Pain 38:297–305.
    17. ↵
      1. Greene NM
      (1983) Uptake and elimination of local anesthetics during spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg 62:1013–1024.
      FREE Full Text
    18. ↵
      1. Hansdottir V,
      2. Hedner T,
      3. Woestenborghs R,
      4. Nordberg G
      (1991) The CSF and plasma pharmacokinetics of sufentanil after intrathecal administration. Anesthesiology 74:264–269.
      MedlineWeb of Science
    19. ↵
      1. Hansdottir V,
      2. Woestenborghs R,
      3. Nordberg G
      (1995) The cerebrospinal fluid and plasma pharmacokinetics of sufentanil after thoracic and lumbar epidural administration. Anesth Analg 80:724–729.
      Abstract
    20. ↵
      1. Le Corre P,
      2. Estebe JP,
      3. Chevanne F,
      4. Mallédant Y,
      5. Le Verge R
      (1995) Spinal controlled delivery of bupivacaine from DL-lactic oligomer microspheres. J Pharm Sci 84:75–78.
      CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
    21. ↵
      1. Le Guevello P,
      2. Le Corre P,
      3. Chevanne F,
      4. Le Verge R
      (1993) High-performance liquid chromatographic determination of bupivacaine in plasma samples for biopharmaceutical studies and application to seven other local anesthetics. J Chromatogr 622:284–290.
      MedlineWeb of Science
    22. ↵
      1. Malinovsky JM,
      2. Bernard JM,
      3. Baudrimont M,
      4. Dumand JB,
      5. Lepage JY
      (1997) A chronic model for experimental investigation of epidural anesthesia in rabbit. Reg Anesth 22:80–85.
      MedlineWeb of Science
    23. ↵
      1. McEllistrem RF,
      2. Bennington RG,
      3. Roth SH
      (1993) In vitro determination of human dura permeability to opioids and local anaesthetics. Can J Anaesth 40:165–169.
      Medline
    24. ↵
      1. McNamara PJ,
      2. Slaughter RL,
      3. Pieper JA,
      4. Wyman MG,
      5. Lalka D
      (1981) Factors influencing serum protein binding of lidocaine in humans. Anesth Analg 60:395–400.
      Abstract/FREE Full Text
    25. ↵
      1. Moore RA,
      2. Bullingham RES,
      3. McQuay HJ,
      4. Hand CW,
      5. Aspel JB,
      6. Allen MC,
      7. Thomas D
      (1982) Dural permeability to narcotics: In vitro determination and application to extradural administration. Br J Anaesth 54:1117–1128.
      Abstract/FREE Full Text
    26. ↵
      1. Nordberg G,
      2. Hedner T,
      3. Mellstrand T,
      4. Borg L
      (1984) Pharmacokinetics of epidural morphine in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 26:233–237.
      CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
    27. ↵
      1. Nordberg G,
      2. Hedner T,
      3. Mellstrand T,
      4. Dahlström B
      (1983) Pharmacokinetics aspects of epidural morphine analgesia. Anesthesiology 58:545–551.
      MedlineWeb of Science
    28. ↵
      1. Paul DL,
      2. Wildsmith JAW
      (1989) Extradural pressure following the injection of two volumes of bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth 62:368–372.
      Abstract/FREE Full Text
    29. ↵
      1. Rigler ML,
      2. Drasner K
      (1991) Distribution of catheter-injected local anesthetic in a model of subarachnoid space. Anesthesiology 75:684–692.
      CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
    30. ↵
      1. Rosenberg PH,
      2. Kytta J,
      3. Alila A
      (1986) Absorption of bupivacaine, etidocaine, lignocaine and ropivacaine into n-heptane, rat sciatic nerve, and human extradural and subcutaneous fat. Br J Anaesth 58:310–314.
      Abstract/FREE Full Text
    31. ↵
      1. Scheller D,
      2. Kolb J
      (1991) The internal reference technique in microdialysis: A practical approach to monitoring dialysis efficiency and to calculating tissue concentration from dialysate samples. J Neurosci Methods 40:31–38.
      CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
    32. ↵
      1. Shafer SL,
      2. Eisenach JC,
      3. Hood DD,
      4. Tong C
      (1998) Cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intrathecal neostigmine methylsulfate in humans. Anesthesiology 89:1074–1088.
      CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
    33. ↵
      1. Sjostrom S,
      2. Hartvig P,
      3. Persson M,
      4. Tamsen A
      (1987a) Pharmacokinetics of epidural morphine and meperidine in humans. Anesthesiology 67:877–888.
      MedlineWeb of Science
    34. ↵
      1. Sjostrom S,
      2. Tamsen A,
      3. Persson M,
      4. Hartvig P
      (1987b) Pharmacokinetics of intrathecal morphine and meperidine in humans. Anesthesiology 67:889–895.
      MedlineWeb of Science
    35. ↵
      1. Taverne RHT,
      2. Ionescu TI,
      3. Nuyten STM
      (1992) Comparative absorption and distribution pharmacokinetics of intravenous and epidural sufentanil for major abdominal surgery. Clin Pharmacokinet 23:231–237.
      Medline
    36. ↵
      1. Cousins MJ,
      2. Bridenbaugh PO
      1. Tucker GT,
      2. Mather LE
      (1998) Physicochemical properties, absorption, and disposition of local anesthetic. in Neural Blockade in Clinical Anesthesia and Management of Pain, eds Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO (Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia), 2nd ed. pp 47–110.
    37. ↵
      1. Vandenabeele F,
      2. Creemers J,
      3. Lambrichts I
      (1996) Ultrastructure of the human spinal arachnoid mater and dura mater. J Anat 189:417–430.
    38. ↵
      1. Wang Y,
      2. Wong SL,
      3. Sawchuk RJ
      (1993) Microdialysis calibration using retrodialysis and zero-net flux: Application to a study of the distribution of zidovudine to rabbit cerebrospinal fluid and thalamus. Pharm Res 10:1411–1419.
      CrossRefMedlineWeb of Science
    39. ↵
      1. Wilkinson GR,
      2. Lund PC
      (1970) Bupivacaine levels in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid following peridural administration. Anesthesiology 33:482–486.
      Medline
    « Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents

    This Article

    1. JPET May 1, 1999 vol. 289 no. 2 1015-1021
    1. AbstractFree
    2. » Full Text
    3. Full Text (PDF)

    Classifications

    Responses

    1. Submit a response
    2. No responses published

    Navigate This Article

    Current Issue

    1. November 2009, 331 (2)
    1. Current Issue
    1. Alert me to new issues of JPET