Estimation of Transplacental and Nonplacental Diphenhydramine Clearances in the Fetal Lamb: The Impact of Fetal First-Pass Hepatic Drug Uptake1

Abstract

Previous estimates of maternal and fetal placental and nonplacental clearances in pregnant sheep using a two-compartment open model have revealed higher values of fetal placental clearance (CLfm) compared to the maternal placental clearance (CLmf) for most drugs. This includes the antihistamine diphenhydramine (DPHM), which also has the highest weight-corrected fetal nonplacental clearance (CLfo) among the drugs studied. This study was designed to determine the reasons for this CLfm − CLmf difference and to identify the sites of high CLfo for DPHM. DPHM and a stable isotope-labeled analog, [2H10]DPHM, were simultaneously infused to steady state to the mother and fetus, respectively, in five pregnant sheep. CLmf, CLfm, CLmo and CLfo averaged 50.3 ± 13.2, 214.4 ± 30.8, 36.6 ± 1.9 and 109.8 ± 22.3 ml/min−1/kg−1, respectively. By measuring diphenylmethoxyacetic acid and [2H10]diphenylmethoxyacetic acid levels in samples obtained from our previous study of fetal hepatic first-pass DPHM uptake, the hepatic first-pass extraction ratio of the drug from umbilical venous blood was estimated to be 0.44 ± 0.05. This can account for virtually all of CLfo. Fetal hepatic first-pass uptake of maternally derived DPHM in the paired infusion study reduces the fetal/maternal plasma DPHM concentration ratio and results in significant underestimation of CLmf. When the CLmf estimate is corrected for this factor and for maternal-fetal DPHM plasma protein binding differences, its value approaches CLfm. Fetal hepatic first-pass uptake may also be a factor in the underestimation of CLmf for most of the other drugs. Conversely, a lower value of CLmf compared with CLfm provides evidence for significant fetal hepatic uptake of these compounds.

Footnotes

  • Send reprint requests to: Dr. Dan W. Rurak, B.C. Institute for Child and Family Health, 950 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, B.C., Canada V5Z 4H4.

  • 1 This project was supported by Medical Research Council of Canada Program Grant PG-11120.

  • 2 S.K. is the recipient of a University of British Columbia Graduate Fellowship.

  • 3 G.R.T. was supported by a Medical Research Council of Canada Studentship.

  • 4 D.W.R. is the recipient of an Investigatorship award from the British Columbia Children’s Hospital Foundation.

  • 5 J.D. Gordon, K.W. Riggs, F.S. Abbott and D.W. Rurak, unpublished data.

  • 6 S. Kumar, G.R. Tonn, J.E. Axelson, D.W. Rurak and F.S. Abbott, unpublished observations.

  • 7 S. Kumar, F.S. Abbott, J.E. Axelson and D.W. Rurak, unpublished observations.

  • Abbreviations:
    DPHM
    diphenhydramine
    [2H10]DPHM
    deuterium-labeled diphenhydramine
    DPMA
    diphenylmethoxyacetic acid
    [2H10]DPMA
    deuterium-labeled diphenylmethoxyacetic acid
    CLmm
    maternal total body clearance
    CLff
    fetal total body clearance
    CLmf
    maternal-to-fetal transplacental clearance
    CLfm
    fetal-to-maternal transplacental clearance
    CLmo
    maternal nonplacental clearance
    CLfo
    fetal nonplacental clearance
    AUC
    area under the plasma concentration-vs.-time curve
    MA
    maternal femoral artery
    MV
    maternal femoral vein
    FA
    fetal femoral artery
    UV
    umbilical vein
    TV
    fetal lateral tarsal vein
    CA
    fetal carotid artery
    Cmss
    maternal plasma steady-state DPHM concentration after maternal administration
    Cfss
    fetal plasma steady-state DPHM concentration after maternal administration
    Cmss
    maternal plasma steady-state [2H10]DPHM concentration after fetal administration
    Cfss
    fetal plasma steady-state [2H10]DPHM concentration after fetal administration
    Qum
    umbilical blood flow
    ER
    fetal hepatic extraction ratio for DPHM present in umbilical blood
    F
    fetal systemic availability for DPHM present in umbilical blood
    GFR
    glomerular filtration rate
    GC-MS
    gas chromatography-mass spectrometry
    LOQ
    limit of quantification
    • Received July 22, 1996.
    • Accepted April 8, 1997.
« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents