Abstract
The unmasking of the low concentration effect of angiotensin II (AII) was identified within the concentration ranges of 10(-13) to 10(-11) M of AII by PD 121981 (5-diphenylacetyl-1-(4-methoxy-3-methylbenzyl)- 4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]-pyridine-6-carboxylic acid) and 10(-12) to 3 x 10(-10) M of AII by CGP 42112 (nicotinic acid-Tyr-(N alpha-benzyl-oxycarbonyl-Arg)Lys-His-Pro-IIe-OH), AT2 antagonists, in association with the ordinary contraction curve, i.e., high concentration effect (at 3 x 10(-10)-10(-6) M of AII), in the rabbit abdominal aorta. Thus, they showed clear biphasic features of AII-induced contraction curves. However, this was not the case for angiotensin I and angiotensin III. This PD 121981-evoked low concentration effect of AII was selectively inhibited by DuP 753 (0.01-1 nM), dithiothreitol (10 and 100 microM), pertussis toxin (50 and 300 ng/ml, for 2 hr), nifedipine (1 and 10 microM) and 8-(diethylamino)octyl 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoate hydrochloride (1 and 3 microM), which suggests the receptors were the AT1 subtype. However, the high concentration effect of AII was not affected by these drugs within the concentration ranges used in the present studies. These myographic results were almost consistent with the features of the intracellular Ca++ changes. Thus, it was concluded that the receptors that mediate the low concentration effect of AII belong to the AT1 subtype. However, the current study did not determine the mechanism by which PD 121981 and CGP 42112 evoked the up-regulation of the AT1 receptors.
JPET articles become freely available 12 months after publication, and remain freely available for 5 years.Non-open access articles that fall outside this five year window are available only to institutional subscribers and current ASPET members, or through the article purchase feature at the bottom of the page.
|