JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on March 9, 2007; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.106.116830


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.106.116830v1
321/3/1127    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solinas, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Solinas, M.
Right arrow Articles by Goldberg, S. R.


Received for publication November 13, 2006.
Revised March 6, 2007.
Accepted for publication March 6, 2007.

Nicotinic facilitation of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) discrimination involves endogenous anandamide

Marcello Solinas 1*, Maria Scherma 2, Gianluigi Tanda 3, Carrie E. Wertheim 2, Walter Fratta 4, Steven R. Goldberg 5

1 CNRS6187 2 NIDA/NIH 3 National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, DHHS 4 University of Cagliari 5 NIDA/IRP, NIH, DHHS

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: marcello.solinas{at}univ-poitiers.fr

Abstract

Systemic administration of the main active ingredient in cannabis, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), alters extra-cellular levels of acetylcholine in several brain areas, suggesting an involvement of the cholinergic system in the psychotropic effects of cannabis. Here, we investigated whether drugs acting at either nicotinic or muscarinic receptors can modulate the discriminative effects of THC. In rats that had learned to discriminate effects of 3 mg/kg intraperitoneal (i.p.) injections of THC from injections of vehicle, the nicotinic agonist nicotine (0.1-0.56 mg/kg subcutaneous) and the muscarinic agonist pilocarpine (0.3-3 mg/kg i.p.) did not produce THC-like effects but they both potentiated the discriminative effects of low doses of THC (0.3-1 mg/kg). Neither the nicotinic antagonist mecamylamine, (1-5.6 mg/kg i.p.) nor the muscarinic antagonist scopolamine (0.01-0.1 mg/kg i.p.) altered the discriminative effects of THC, but they blocked the potentiation of THC's discriminative effects by nicotine and pilocarpine, respectively. The cannabinoid CB1 antagonist rimonabant (1 mg/kg i.p) reversed nicotine- but not pilocarpine-induced potentiation of THC discrimination suggesting that nicotine potentiation is, at least in part, mediated by release of endogenous cannabinoids in the brain. In addition, when metabolic degradation of the endogenous cannabinoid anandamide was blocked by the fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) inhibitor URB-597 (0.3 mg/kg i.p.), nicotine, but not pilocarpine, produced significant THC-like discriminative effects that were antagonized by rimonabant. Our results suggest that nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors modulate the discriminative effects of THC by fundamentally different mechanisms. Nicotinic, but not muscarinic, modulation of THC discrimination involves elevations in endogenous levels of anandamide.


Key words: THC, addiction, behavior, endocannabinoid, muscarinic receptors, nicotinic receptors





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.