JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on October 3, 2006; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.106.106971


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.106.106971v1
320/1/64    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Akerman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Goadsby, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Akerman, S.
Right arrow Articles by Goadsby, P. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CAPSAICIN


Received for publication May 1, 2006.
Revised October 2, 2006.
Accepted for publication October 2, 2006.

Cannabinoid (CB1) receptor activation inhibits trigeminovascular neurons

Simon Akerman 1, Philip Holland 1, Peter James Goadsby 1*

1 Institute of Neurology, London

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: peterg{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk

Abstract

Migraine is a common and disabling neurological disorder that involves activation, or the perception of activation, of the trigeminovascular system. Cannabinoid receptors are present in brain and have been suggested to have an anti-nociceptive role. Here we determine the effect of cannabinoid receptor activation on neurons with trigeminovascular nociceptive input in the rat. Neurons in the trigeminocervical complex - trigeminal nucleus caudalis (TNC) and dorsal horn of the C1 region- were studied using extracellular electrophysiological techniques. Responses to both dural electrical stimulation and cutaneous facial receptive field activation of the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve, and the effect of cannabinoid agonists and antagonists were studied. Non-selective CB receptor activation, with WIN55,212 (1 mgkg-1, i.v) inhibited neuronal responses to A- (by 52%)and C-fiber (by 44 %) afferents, an effect that was blocked by the CB1 receptor antagonist, SR141716 (3 mgkg-1, i.v), but not the CB2 receptor antagonist, AM630 (3 mgkg-1, i.v). Anandamide (10 mgkg-1, i.v) was also able to inhibit both A- and C-fiber elicited trigeminocervical complex (TCC) firing, but only after TRPV1 receptor inhibition. Activation of cannabinoid receptors had no effect on cutaneous receptive fields when recording from TCC neurons. The data show that manipulation of CB1 receptors can affect the responses of trigeminal neurons with A- and C-fiber inputs from the dura mater. This may be a direct effect on neurons in the trigeminocervical complex itself, or an effect in discrete areas of the brain that innervate these neurons. The data suggest that CB receptors may have therapeutic potential in migraine, cluster headache or other primary headaches, although the potential hazards of psychoactive side-effects that accompany cannabinoid treatments may be complex to overcome.


Key words: WIN55,212, anandamide, cannabinoid, dura mater, migraine, trigeminocervical complex





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.