JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on June 2, 2006; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.106.106377


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.106.106377v1
319/2/507    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Negus, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Borsook, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Negus, S. S.
Right arrow Articles by Borsook, D.


Received for publication April 19, 2006.
Revised June 1, 2006.
Accepted for publication June 1, 2006.

Preclinical Assessment of Candidate Analgesic Drugs: Recent Advances and Future Challenges

S. Stevens Negus 1*, Todd W. Vanderah 2, Michael R. Brandt 3, Edward J. Bilsky 4, Lino Becerra 5, David Borsook 5

1 Harvard Medical School 2 University of Arizona 3 Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development 4 University of New England 5 McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: negus{at}mclean.harvard.edu

Abstract

In analgesic drug development, preclinical procedures are widely used to assess drug effects on pain-related behaviors. These procedures share two principal components: (1) a manipulation intended to produce a pain-like state in the experimental subject, and (2) measurement of behaviors presumably indicative of that pain state. Drugs can then be evaluated for their ability to attenuate pain-related behaviors. In the simplest procedures, the pain state is produced by delivery of an acute noxious stimulus (e.g. a warm thermal stimulus), and the primary dependent measures focus on withdrawal responses or other nocifensive behaviors that increase in rate, frequency or intensity in response to the noxious stimulus. This approach has been refined in two ways. First, new methods have been developed to induce more clinically relevant pain states. In particular, pain requiring clinical intervention is often associated with inflammation or neuropathy, and novel procedures have emerged to model these conditions and their ability to produce hypersensitive pain states such as allodynia and hyperalgesia. Second, studies are incorporating a broader array of pain-related behaviors as dependent measures. For example, pain not only stimulates nocifensive behaviors, but also suppresses many adaptive behaviors such as feeding or locomotion. Measures of pain-suppressed behaviors can provide new insights into the behavioral consequences of pain and the effects of candidate analgesics. In addition, functional magnetic resonance imaging has emerged as a non-invasive tool for investigating changes in neural activity associated with pain and analgesia. Integration of these complementary approaches may improve the predictive validity of analgesic drug development.


Key words: analgesia, antinociception, drug development, nociception, pain, preclinical





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.