![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received for publication November 9, 2005.
Revised February 28, 2006.
Accepted for publication March 1, 2006.
Accumulated evidence suggests that cross-talk between the pregnane X receptor (PXR) and the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) results in shared transcriptional activation of CYP2B and CYP3A genes. Although most data implies symmetrical cross-regulation of these genes by rodent PXR and CAR, the actual selectivities of the corresponding human receptors are unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the symmetry of human (h) PXR and hCAR cross-talk by comparing the selectivites of these receptors for CYP2B6 and CYP3A4. Human hepatocyte studies revealed non-selective induction of both CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 by hPXR activation, but marked preferential induction of CYP2B6 by selective hCAR activation. Gel shift assays demonstrated that hPXR exhibited strong and relatively equal binding to all functional response elements in both CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 genes, while hCAR displayed significantly weak binding to the CYP3A4 proximal ER6 motif. In cell-based transfection assays, hCAR displayed greater activation of CYP2B6 reporter gene expression compared with CYP3A4 with constructs containing both proximal and distal regulatory elements. Furthermore, in agreement with binding observations, transfection assays using promoter constructs containing repeats of CYP2B6 DR4 and CYP3A4 ER6 motifs revealed an even greater difference in reporter activation by hCAR. In contrast, hPXR activation resulted in less discernible differences between CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 reporter gene expression. These results suggest asymmetrical cross-regulation of CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 by hCAR but not hPXR in that hCAR exhibits preferential induction of CYP2B6 relative to CYP3A4 due to its weak binding and functional activation of the CYP3A4 ER6.
Key words:
CYP2B6, CYP3A4, Human Constitutive Androstane Receptor, Human Pregnane X Receptor, Human hepatocytes, Regulation
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. A. Fahmi, S. Boldt, M. Kish, R. S. Obach, and L. M. Tremaine PREDICTION OF DRUG-DRUG INTERACTIONS FROM IN VITRO INDUCTION DATA: Application of the Relative Induction Score Approach Using Cryopreserved Human Hepatocytes Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 2008; 36(9): 1971 - 1974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Li, T. Chen, J. D. Stanton, T. Sueyoshi, M. Negishi, and H. Wang The Peripheral Benzodiazepine Receptor Ligand 1-(2-Chlorophenyl-methylpropyl)-3-isoquinoline-carboxamide Is a Novel Antagonist of Human Constitutive Androstane Receptor Mol. Pharmacol., August 1, 2008; 74(2): 443 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Hariparsad, B. A. Carr, R. Evers, and X. Chu Comparison of Immortalized Fa2N-4 Cells and Human Hepatocytes as in Vitro Models for Cytochrome P450 Induction Drug Metab. Dispos., June 1, 2008; 36(6): 1046 - 1055. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Kharasch, D. Mitchell, R. Coles, and R. Blanco Rapid Clinical Induction of Hepatic Cytochrome P4502B6 Activity by Ritonavir Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., May 1, 2008; 52(5): 1663 - 1669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Richert, G. Tuschl, C. Viollon-Abadie, N. Blanchard, A. Bonet, B. Heyd, N. Halkic, E. Wimmer, H. Dolgos, and S. O. Mueller Species Differences in the Response of Liver Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes to (S)-4-O-Tolylsulfanyl-2-(4-trifluormethyl-phenoxy)-butyric Acid (EMD 392949) in Vivo and in Vitro Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2008; 36(4): 702 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Healan-Greenberg, J. F. Waring, D. J. Kempf, E. A. G. Blomme, R. G. Tirona, and R. B. Kim A Human Immunodeficiency Virus Protease Inhibitor Is a Novel Functional Inhibitor of Human Pregnane X Receptor Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2008; 36(3): 500 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Faucette, T.-C. Zhang, R. Moore, T. Sueyoshi, C. J. Omiecinski, E. L. LeCluyse, M. Negishi, and H. Wang Relative Activation of Human Pregnane X Receptor versus Constitutive Androstane Receptor Defines Distinct Classes of CYP2B6 and CYP3A4 Inducers J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., January 1, 2007; 320(1): 72 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||