JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on January 24, 2006; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.094334


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.105.094334v1
317/1/402    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dalton, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, J.
Right arrow Articles by Dalton, J. T.


Received for publication September 8, 2005.
Revised January 19, 2006.
Accepted for publication January 20, 2006.

Preclinical pharmacology of a nonsteroidal ligand for androgen receptor mediated imaging of prostate cancer

Jun Yang 1, Casey E Bohl 1, Vipin A Nair 2, Suni M Mustafa 2, Seoung Soo Hong 2, Duane D Miller 2, James T. Dalton 1*

1 The Ohio State University 2 The University of Tennessee

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: dalton.1{at}osu.edu

Abstract

Proper management of prostate cancer patients is highly dependent on the spread of the disease. High expression levels of the androgen receptor (AR) in prostate tumor offer a target for identifying cancer metastasis. We investigated the use of nonsteroidal AR ligands for receptor-mediated imaging as a diagnostic tool for prostate cancer staging. Compound S-26 was identified from a series of iodinated ether-linked derivatives of bicalutamide due to its high AR binding affinity of 3.3 nM (which is similar to testosterone and about 25% of the binding affinity of dihydrotestosterone) in an in vitro competitive binding assay using rat prostate cytosol. Further, S-26 exhibited a greater binding affinity (Ki=4.4 nM) in a whole cell binding assay using COS-7 cells transfected with human AR than testosterone (Ki=32.9 nM) and dihydrotestosterone (Ki=45.4 nM). We also confirmed that sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), a plasma protein that binds steroids with high affinity, does not bind with S-26. Co-transfection studies with the estrogen, progesterone, and glucocorticoid receptor indicated that S-26 does not cross-react with other members of the steroid hormone receptor family. The nonsteroidal structure, high AR binding affinity, specificity, and lack of binding to SHBG indicate that S-26 exhibits favorable properties for further development as an imaging agent for prostate cancer.


Key words: Imaging, Prostate cancer, SARM, Staging, androgen receptor, metastases





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.