JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on December 5, 2005; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.092916


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.105.092916v1
316/3/1282    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Summerfield, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jeffrey, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Summerfield, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jeffrey, P.


Received for publication July 27, 2005.
Revised December 1, 2005.
Accepted for publication December 1, 2005.

Improving the In Vitro Prediction of In Vivo CNS Penetration: Integrating Permeability, Pgp Efflux and Free Fractions in Blood and Brain

Scott Summerfield 1*, Alexander J. Stevens 1, Leanne Cutler 1, Maria del Carmen Osuna 1, Beverley Hammond 1, Sac-Pham Tang 1, Anne Hersey 1, David J. Spalding 1, Phil Jeffrey 1

1 GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: scott.g.summerfield{at}gsk.com

Abstract

This work examines the inter relationship between the unbound drug fractions in blood and brain homogenate, passive membrane permeability, Pgp efflux ratio and cLogP in determining the extent of CNS penetration observed in vivo. The present results demonstrate that compounds often considered to be Pgp substrates in rodents (efflux ratio > 5 in MDR-MDCK cells) with poor passive permeability may still exhibit reasonable CNS penetration in vivo, i.e. where the unbound fractions and non-specific tissue binding act as a compensating force. In these instances, the efflux ratio and in vitro blood-brain partition ratio (Kbb) may be used to predict the in vivo blood-brain ratio. This relationship may be extended to account for the differences in CNS penetration observed in vivo between mdr1a/b wild type and knockout mice. In some instance cross-species differences that might initially appear to be related to differing transporter expression can be rationalised from knowledge of unbound fractions alone. The results presented in this manuscript suggest that the information exists to provide a coherent picture of the nature of CNS penetration in the Drug Discovery setting, allowing the focus to be shifted away from understanding CNS penetration toward the more important aspect of understanding CNS efficacy.


Key words: Pgp, blood-brain barrier, efflux, equilibrium dialysis, free-fraction, non-specific binding


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. G. Summerfield, K. Read, D. J. Begley, T. Obradovic, I. J. Hidalgo, S. Coggon, A. V. Lewis, R. A. Porter, and P. Jeffrey
Central Nervous System Drug Disposition: The Relationship between in Situ Brain Permeability and Brain Free Fraction
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2007; 322(1): 205 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
J. C. Kalvass, T. S. Maurer, and G. M. Pollack
Use of Plasma and Brain Unbound Fractions to Assess the Extent of Brain Distribution of 34 Drugs: Comparison of Unbound Concentration Ratios to in Vivo P-Glycoprotein Efflux Ratios
Drug Metab. Dispos., April 1, 2007; 35(4): 660 - 666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.