JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on October 13, 2005; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.092726


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.105.092726v1
316/2/572    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Landowski, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Amidon, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Landowski, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Amidon, G. L.


Received for publication July 20, 2005.
Revised October 5, 2005.
Accepted for publication October 5, 2005.

Nucleoside Ester Prodrug Substrate Specifity of Liver Carboxylesterase

Christopher P. Landowski 1, Philip L. Lorenzi 2, Xueqin Song 1, Gordon L. Amidon 1*

1 University of Michigan 2 NIH/NCI

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: glamidon{at}umich.edu

Abstract

Carboxylesterases are among the best characterized prodrug hydrolyzing enzymes involved in the activation of several therapeutic carbamate and ester prodrugs. The broad specificity of these enzymes makes them amenable for designing prodrugs. Porcine liver carboxylesterase 1 (pCES1) specificity for amino acid esters of three nucleoside analogs (floxuridine, gemcitabine, and 2-bromo-5,6-dichloro-1-({beta}-D-ribofuranosyl) benzimidazole) was evaluated to assess optimal structural preferences for prodrug design. The amino acid promoiety and the esterification site influenced carboxylesterase hydrolysis rates up to 1164-fold and the binding affinity up to 26-fold. CES1 exhibited high catalytic efficiency hydrolyzing prodrugs containing a phenylalanyl moiety, but was over 100-fold less efficient with valyl or isoleucyl prodrugs, regardless of the nucleoside or esterification site. CES1 catalytic efficiency was two-fold higher with 5' phenylalanyl monoesters than the corresponding 3' esters of floxuridine. This preference was reversed with phenylalanyl gemcitabine prodrugs, evident from a two-fold preference for 3' monoesters over 5' esters. The newly characterized esterase VACVase was several-hundred fold more efficient (up to 19,000-fold) than carboxylesterase in hydrolyzing amino acid esters, but similar in apparent binding affinity. The specific activities of the two enzymes with several amino acid ester prodrugs clearly suggest that initial hydrolysis rates are relatively low for prodrugs with isoleucyl, aspartyl, and lysyl promoieties for both enzymes compared to those with phenylanyl, valyl, prolyl, and leucyl progroups. The low relative hydrolysis rates of isoleucyl, aspartyl, and lysyl prodrugs may facilitate prolonged systemic disposition of the nucleoside analogs for improved therapeutic action.


Key words: esterase, kinetics, metabolism, nucleoside, prodrug, therapeutics





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.