JPET Introducing ALZET?ew Model 2006 Pump

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on August 24, 2005; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.090860


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.105.090860v1
315/3/1158    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Tew, K. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tucker, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Tew, K. D.


Received for publication June 15, 2005.
Revised August 23, 2005.
Accepted for publication August 23, 2005.

Evaluation of Lipophilins as Determinants of Tumor Cell Response to Estramustine

Jody M. Tucker 1, Zhanna Lipatova 2, Vladimir Beljanski 1, Danyelle M. Townsend 1, Kenneth D. Tew 1*

1 MUSC 2 University of Illinois at Chicago

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: tewk{at}musc.edu

Abstract

Estramustine administered orally as estramustine phosphate (EMP) remains a major tool in hormone refractory prostate cancer chemotherapy. The presence of estramustine binding protein, prostatin, in prostate tissue may be a determinant of response to treatment. Lipophilins are secretory proteins with homology to prostatin. RT-PCR was performed to estimate expression patterns of lipophilins A, B and C in human biopsies and cell lines resistant to estramustine. Although lipophilin A was not expressed in prostate tissue, both lipophilins B and C were expressed in normal and tumor prostate without significant differences. For lipophilin C, a somatic mutation (T to C transition at positions 409 and 412) was found in human tumor samples and absent in normal prostate tissue. No consistent response to EMP was observed in EGFP-tagged lipophilin C transfected PC3 cells compared to parental controls. Among these EGFP-lipophilin C clones, no direct correlation between response to EMP treatment (IC50 values) and EGFP expression was observed (p = 0.73). Lipophilin C mRNA levels did not vary significantly between wild type and estramustine-resistant cells in prostate (DU145 and PC3) and ovarian (SKOV3) cancer cell lines. Overall, these results suggest that lipophilins are not specific determinants of estramustine efficacy.


Key words: Emcyt, cancer therapy, estramustine, lipophilin, prostate cancer, prostatins





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.