JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on June 28, 2005; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.105.086165


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.105.086165v1
315/1/24    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Jose J.G. Marin
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Monte, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Marin, J. J.G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Monte, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Marin, J. J.G.


Received for publication March 11, 2005.
Revised June 21, 2005.
Accepted for publication June 21, 2005.

Pro-apoptotic effect on normal and tumor intestinal cells of cytostatic drugs with enterohepatic organotropism

Maria J. Monte 1, Maria R. Ballestero 1, Oscar Briz 1, Maria J. Perez 2, Jose J.G. Marin 1*

1 Dept. Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain 2 Research Unit, University Hospital, Salamanca, Spain

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: jjgmarin{at}usal.es

Abstract

The pro-apoptotic effect of cisplatin-bile acid derivatives Bamet-R2 and Bamet-UD2, developed to treat liver and intestinal tumors, was investigated in vitro using human enterohepatic cells HepG2 (hepatoblastoma), LS 174T (colon adenocarcinoma), and its cisplatin-resistant sub-line LS 174T/R. Uptake by wild-type tumor cells was higher for Bamets than for cisplatin. In LS 174T/R cells, CTR1 was down-regulated and MRP2 was up-regulated. Consequently, uptake and efflux of cisplatin, but not those of Bamets, were reduced and increased, respectively. The degree of necrosis (LDH release) induced by these three drugs was small and similar in all cell types. In contrast, pro-apoptotic effect (caspase-3 activity and DNA fragmentation) was Bamet-UD2>cisplatin>Bamet-R2 in HepG2 and LS 174T cells, but Bamet-UD2>Bamet-R2>>cisplatin in LS 174T/R cells. This effect was consistent with the ability of these compounds to form DNA-adducts (DNA-platination, changes in the DNA melting temperature and MspI-induced restriction sequence cleavage). Oral administration of Bamet-UD2 to mice induced mild apoptosis in the small intestine (ileum>duodenum), which was not severe enough to modify its structure or function as determined by water absorption and glycocholic acid uptake by in situ perfused ileum. These results indicate that Bamet-UD2 overcomes the resistance to cisplatin when this is due in part to enhanced ability of intestinal tumors to reduce intracellular cisplatin contents. Moreover, its strong pro-apoptotic versus its weak pro-necrotic effect together with its mild effect on normal tissues, including intestinal mucosa, may account for the high anti-tumor activity of Bamet-UD2 together with its very low toxicity.


Key words: Cancer, Chemotherapy, Drug targeting, Intestine, Liver, Transporters





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.