![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received for publication December 30, 2004.
Revised February 12, 2005.
Accepted for publication February 14, 2005.
-Naltrexol, an Opioid Ligand with Less Inverse Agonist Activity Compared to Naltrexone and Naloxone in Opioid Dependent Mice
The mu opioid receptor (MOR) displays basal signaling activity, which appears to be enhanced by exposure to opioid agonists. This study assesses the in vivo pharmacology of the putative "neutral" antagonist 6
-naltrexol in comparison to other ligands with varying efficacy, such as naloxone, an inverse agonist in the opioid dependent state. ICR mice were used to generate full antagonist dose-response curves for naloxone, naltrexone, nalbuphine and 6
-naltrexol in blocking acute antinociceptive effects of morphine and precipitating opioid withdrawal in models of physical dependence. 6
-Naltrexol was roughly equipotent to naloxone and between 4.5 and 10-fold less potent than naltrexone in blocking morphine-induced antinociception and locomotor activity, showing that 6
-naltrexol enters the CNS. In contrast to naloxone and naltrexone, 6
-naltrexol precipitated only minimal withdrawal at high doses in an acute dependence model and was ~77-fold and 30-fold less potent than naltrexone and naloxone, respectively, in precipitating withdrawal in a chronic-dependence model. 6
-Naltrexol reduced the inverse agonist effects of naloxone in vitro and in vivo, as expected for a neutral antagonist. Therefore, the pharmacological effects of 6
-naltrexol differ markedly from those of naloxone and naltrexone in the opioid dependent state. A reduction of withdrawal effects associated with neutral MOR antagonists may offer advantages in treating opioid overdose and addiction.
Key words:
Addiction, Dependence, Morphine, Naloxone, Naltrexone, Opioid
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Sirohi, P. Kumar, and B. C. Yoburn {micro}-Opioid Receptor Up-Regulation and Functional Supersensitivity Are Independent of Antagonist Efficacy J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2007; 323(2): 701 - 707. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. D. Marczak, Y. Jinsmaa, T. Li, S. D. Bryant, Y. Tsuda, Y. Okada, and L. H. Lazarus [N-Allyl-Dmt1]-Endomorphins Are {micro}-Opioid Receptor Antagonists Lacking Inverse Agonist Properties J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 2007; 323(1): 374 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Wang, X. Sun, and W. Sadee Different Effects of Opioid Antagonists on {micro}-, {delta}-, and {kappa}-Opioid Receptors with and without Agonist Pretreatment J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2007; 321(2): 544 - 552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. H. Ko, M. F. Divin, H. Lee, J. H. Woods, and J. R. Traynor Differential in Vivo Potencies of Naltrexone and 6beta-Naltrexol in the Monkey J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., February 1, 2006; 316(2): 772 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||