![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received for publication October 19, 2004.
Revised February 24, 2005.
Accepted for publication February 28, 2005.
This study was designed (1) to examine the effects of blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability (quantified as permeability-surface area product, PS), unbound fraction in plasma (fu,plasma) and brain tissue (fu,brain) on the time to reach equilibrium between brain and plasma and (2) to investigate the drug discovery strategies to design and select compounds that can rapidly penetrate the BBB and distribute to the site of action. The pharmacokinetics of seven model compounds: caffeine, CP-141938, fluoxetine, NFPS, propranolol, theobromine, and theophylline in rat brain and plasma after subcutaneous administration was studied. The in vivo logPS and logfu,brain calculated using a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model correlates with in situ logPS (R2 = 0.83) and in vitro logfu,brain (R2 = 0.69), where the in situ PS and in vitro fu,brain was determined using in situ brain perfusion and equilibrium dialysis using brain homogenate, respectively. The time to achieve brain equilibrium can be quantitated with a proposed parameter, intrinsic brain equilibrium half-life [t1/2eq,in = Vbln2/(PS·fu,brain), where Vb is the physiological volume of brain). The in vivo logt1/2eq,in does not correlate with in situ logPS (R2 < 0.01) but correlates inversely with log(PS·fu,brain) (R2 = 0.85). The present study demonstrates that rapid brain equilibration requires a combination of high BBB permeability and low brain tissue binding. A high BBB permeability alone cannot guarantee a rapid equilibration. The strategy to select compounds with rapid brain equilibration in drug discovery should identify compounds with high BBB permeability and low nonspecific binding in brain tissue.
Key words:
blood-brain barrier, brain penetration, drug discovery, nonspecific binding, permeability, pharmacokinetics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X. Liu, C. Chen, and B. J. Smith Progress in Brain Penetration Evaluation in Drug Discovery and Development J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2008; 325(2): 349 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Fornaro, D. Li, J. Pan, and J. Belik Prenatal Exposure to Fluoxetine Induces Fetal Pulmonary Hypertension in the Rat Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., November 15, 2007; 176(10): 1035 - 1040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Summerfield, K. Read, D. J. Begley, T. Obradovic, I. J. Hidalgo, S. Coggon, A. V. Lewis, R. A. Porter, and P. Jeffrey Central Nervous System Drug Disposition: The Relationship between in Situ Brain Permeability and Brain Free Fraction J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2007; 322(1): 205 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Liu, B. J. Smith, C. Chen, E. Callegari, S. L. Becker, X. Chen, J. Cianfrogna, A. C. Doran, S. D. Doran, J. P. Gibbs, et al. Evaluation of Cerebrospinal Fluid Concentration and Plasma Free Concentration As a Surrogate Measurement for Brain Free Concentration Drug Metab. Dispos., September 1, 2006; 34(9): 1443 - 1447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Becker and X. Liu EVALUATION OF THE UTILITY OF BRAIN SLICE METHODS TO STUDY BRAIN PENETRATION Drug Metab. Dispos., May 1, 2006; 34(5): 855 - 861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Summerfield, A. J. Stevens, L. Cutler, M. del Carmen Osuna, B. Hammond, S.-P. Tang, A. Hersey, D. J. Spalding, and P. Jeffrey Improving the in Vitro Prediction of in Vivo Central Nervous System Penetration: Integrating Permeability, P-glycoprotein Efflux, and Free Fractions in Blood and Brain J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2006; 316(3): 1282 - 1290. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||