JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on October 8, 2003; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.103.057299


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.103.057299v1
307/3/969    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mager, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Abernethy, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mager, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Abernethy, D. R.


Received for publication July 18, 2003.
Revised August 14, 2003.
Accepted for publication August 22, 2003.

Simultaneous Modeling of Abciximab Plasma Concentrations and Ex Vivo Pharmacodynamics in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angioplasty

Donald E. Mager 1, Mary A. Mascelli 2, Neal S. Kleiman 3, Desmond J. Fitzgerald 4, Darrell R. Abernethy 1*

1 National Institute on Aging 2 Centocor Inc. 3 Baylor College of Medicine 4 The Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland

* Address correspondence to: E-mail: abernethyd{at}grc.nia.nih.gov

Abstract

An integrated structural pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model was developed for the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist abciximab administered to patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. PK/PD data, in the form of plasma abciximab concentrations and ex vivo platelet aggregation in the presence of 20 µM adenosine diphosphate, were obtained from two previously conducted clinical studies. Study 1 consisted of patients who were given abciximab as a single intravenous injection of 0.25mg/kg (n=32). Patients in Study 2 received an identical bolus dose, followed by a 36-hour infusion at 0.125µg/kg/min (n=15). The PK component of the final model included drug-receptor binding, non-specific distribution, and linear systemic clearance, whereas the PD module assumed that ex vivo dynamics were controlled by free plasma drug concentration. Mean PK/PD data from both studies were fitted simultaneously using nonlinear regression. PK profiles from both studies show rapidly decreasing plasma abciximab concentrations at early time points, but with extended terminal disposition phases. The maximum effect (Emax=83.6%) was achieved rapidly and gradually returned to baseline values, although inhibition could be measured long after abciximab concentrations dropped below the detection limit. The final model well described the resulting PK/PD profiles and allowed for parameter estimation with relatively small coefficients of variation. Simulations were conducted to assess predicted receptor-occupancy and effects of selected parameters on PK/PD profiles. Models such as the one developed in this study demonstrate how drug binding to pharmacological targets may influence the PK of certain drugs, and also provide a suitable paradigm for defining the PK/PD relationships of similar compounds.


Key words: abciximab, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor, mathematical modeling, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, target-mediated drug disposition





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] --
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.