![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Received for publication December 5, 2002.
Revised January 15, 2003.
Accepted for publication May 22, 2003.
4
1/
4
7
Antagonist Differentiates Between the Low Affinity States
of
4
1 and
4
7:
Characterization of Divalent Cation-Dependence
An
4
1/
4
7 dual antagonist,
35S-compound 1, was used as a model ligand to
study the effect of divalent cations on the activation
state and ligand binding properties of
4
integrins. In the presence of 1 µM each
Ca++/Mg++, 35S-compound
1 bound to several cell lines expressing both
4
1 and
4
7, but BIO7662, a specific
4
1 antagonist, completely inhibited
35S-compound 1 binding, suggesting that
4
1 was responsible for the observed
binding. 35S-compound 1 bound RPMI-8866 cells
expressing predominantly
4
7 with a
KD of 1.9 nM in the presence of 1 mM
Mn++, and binding was inhibited only 29%
by BIO7662, suggesting that the probe is a potent
antagonist of activated
4
7. With
Ca++/Mg++, 35S-compound
1 bound Jurkat cells expressing primarily
4
1 with a KD of 18 nM. In contrast, the
binding of 35S-compound 1 to Mn++-
activated Jurkat cells occurred slowly, reaching
equilibrium by 60 min, and failed to dissociate within
another 60 min. The ability of four
4
1/
4
7 antagonists to block binding of
activated
4
1 or
4
7 to
vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) or mucosal
addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1),
respectively, or to 35S-compound 1 was
measured, and a similar rank order of potency was
observed for native ligand and probe. Inhibition of
35S-compound 1 binding to
4
1 in
Ca++/Mg++ was used to identify
nonselective antagonists among these four. These studies
demonstrate that
4
1 and
4
7
have distinct binding properties for the same ligand, and
binding parameters are dependent on the state of integrin
activation in response to different divalent cations.
Key words:
MAdCAM-1, VCAM-1, alpha4beta1, alpha4beta7, cation, integrin