![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR
Department of Cell Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom (P.J.B., G.B.W.); Screening and Compound Profiling (A.W.) and Neurology and Gastrointestinal Centre of Excellence for Drug Discovery (N.B.D.), GlaxoSmithKline, New Frontiers Science Park, Harlow, United Kingdom
Received October 10, 2007; accepted January 4, 2008.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
q/11 and G
i G-proteins, and NmU binds essentially irreversibly, preventing signaling to repetitive applications of NmU. However, it is unclear whether these properties reflect those of endogenously expressed NmU receptors or how these properties influence the functional consequences of NmU receptor signaling. Here, we have explored the signaling by rat NmU receptors expressed endogenously in cultured rat colonic smooth muscle cells and explore the functional consequence of this signaling by investigating the NmU-mediated contraction of ex vivo rat colonic smooth muscle preparations. We demonstrate that endogenous rat NmU receptors couple to both G
q/11 and G
i G-proteins. Furthermore, we show complex patterns of Ca2+ signaling, including oscillations, and provide evidence of essentially irreversible binding of NmU to smooth muscle cells. Challenge of either circular or longitudinal rat isolated colonic smooth muscle preparations with NmU resulted in robust contractions. Stimulation was direct, and paradoxically, repetitive applications of NmU mediated repetitive contractions with no evidence of desensitization, highlighting a major discrepancy in the behavior of NmU in single cells and in intact tissues. The reason for this discrepancy is presently unknown.
The identification of a human (h) orphan G-protein-coupled receptor as a specific target for NmU [human neuromedin U-receptor 1 (hNmU-R1)] (Fujii et al., 2000
; Hedrick et al., 2000
; Howard et al., 2000
; Kojima et al., 2000
; Raddatz et al., 2000
; Shan et al., 2000
; Szekeres et al., 2000
) and the subsequent identification of an additional receptor [human neuromedin U-receptor 2 (hNmU-R2)] (Hosoya et al., 2000
; Howard et al., 2000
; Raddatz et al., 2000
; Shan et al., 2000
) has enabled progress in understanding the cellular signaling mediated by NmU receptor activation. Receptors of both human and rodent origin mediate phosphoinositide hydrolysis and cellular Ca2+ signaling dependent upon activation of G
q/11 (Fujii et al., 2000
; Hedrick et al., 2000
; Hosoya et al., 2000
; Howard et al., 2000
; Kojima et al., 2000
; Raddatz et al., 2000
; Shan et al., 2000
; Szekeres et al., 2000
; Brighton et al., 2004b
). Both human receptors also activate extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (Brighton et al., 2004b
), and there is evidence for inhibition of adenylyl cyclase (Hosoya et al., 2000
; Brighton et al., 2004b
). Indeed, we have shown direct activation of G
i (Brighton et al., 2004b
). Intriguingly, both recombinantly expressed human receptors bind NmU in an essentially irreversible manner, internalizing the ligand rapidly after agonist addition. The consequence of this is that repetitive application of NmU, even when separated by extensive washing with physiological solutions, does not evoke repetitive Ca2+ signaling (Brighton et al., 2004b
), and this property may have important implications for the physiological actions of NmU. Initial studies with smooth muscle cells isolated and cultured from rat stomach fundus suggested that NmU may also bind essentially irreversibly to endogenously expressed receptors (Brighton et al., 2004b
). However, with our understanding of NmU-mediated signaling derived predominantly from recombinant systems and an understanding that the cellular background can influence receptor properties, we have now examined the signaling of NmU receptors expressed endogenously in rat colonic smooth muscle cells. In particular, this has allowed an assessment of the relationship between single-cell signaling and functional responses in intact, isolated colonic smooth muscle.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-actin- and secondary fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-tagged goat anti-mouse antibodies were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd., and the fluorescence protecting mounting medium was supplied by Dako North America Inc. (Carpinteria, CA). Fluo-3-acetoxymethyl ester was supplied by TEF Labs (Austin, TX), and fluo-4-acetoxymethyl ester and Pluronic F-127 were from Invitrogen. Biocoat 384-well black-walled clear-bottomed microtiter plates were from BD Biosciences (Bedford, MA). Lipofectamine Plus was purchased from Invitrogen. Brilliant black was supplied by Molecular Devices (Wokingham, UK). Male Wistar rats were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Margate, Kent, UK). Tetrodotoxin (TTX) was supplied by Tocris (Bristol, UK). Porcine (p) NmU-8 and rat (r) NmU-23 were obtained from Bachem Ltd. (St. Helens, UK), and hNmU-25 and Cy3B-pNmU-8 (see Materials and Methods) were made at GlaxoSmithKline (Harlow, UK). 125I-Labeled human neuromedin U-25 (2000 Ci/mmol) was from Amersham Biosciences (Amersham, UK). All other chemicals and reagents were supplied by either Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd. or Fisher Scientific (Loughborough, UK). Molecular biology reagents were from BD Biosciences Clontech (Palo Alto, CA).
Dissociation and Culture of Rat Colonic Smooth Muscle Cells
Adult male Wistar rats (<300 g) were handled in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986. After culling, a midline, frontal incision was made in the stomach, and a 1.5- to 2-cm portion of the distal colon was removed. Cells were then isolated using an adaptation of a previously described method (Dart and Standen, 1993
). In brief, tissue was washed, diced in dissociation buffer (137 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.44 mM Na2HPO4, and 4.2 mM NaHCO3, pH 7.4), and subject to enzymatic digestion in dissociation buffer with papain (16.5 units/ml) and dithiothreitol (3.2 mM) (35°C, 30 min) followed by collagenase type F (1.65 units/ml) and hyaluronidase (165 units/ml) (35°C, 45–60 min). Tissue pieces were washed and dissociated by mechanical sheer through fire-polished glass Pasteur pipettes. Cells were collected by centrifugation (500g, 3 min, room temperature) and either resuspended in buffer for immediate experimentation [Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate (KHB); 10 mM HEPES, 4.2 mM NaHCO3, 11.7 mM D-glucose, 1.18 mM MgSO4.7H2O, 1.18 mM KH2PO4, 4.69 mM KCl, 118 mM NaCl, 1.29 mM CaCl2.2H2O, 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin, pH 7.4] or alternatively resuspended and cultured in Medium 231 supplemented with 5% SMGS, streptomycin (50 µg/ml), penicillin (50 IU/ml), and gentamycin (50 µg/ml) at 37°C/5% CO2. Cells for either immediate experimentation or culture were added to six-well plates containing uncoated, sterile 25-mm glass coverslips. Where cells were cultured, these were not passaged.
Culture of HEK 293 Cells and Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells
HEK 293 Cells. HEK 293 cells were cultured exactly as described previously (Brighton et al., 2004b
). The generation and characterization of stable cell lines expressing hNmU-R1 or hNmU-R2 has also been reported previously (Brighton et al., 2004b
).
Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells. These cells were generously provided by the Department of Biochemistry, University of Leicester and were routinely cultured in Medium 199 with Glutamax supplemented with 20% fetal calf serum, streptomycin (50 µg/ml), penicillin (50 IU/ml), heparin (2.4 IU/ml), and Endothelial Cell Growth Supplement (50 µg/ml) in 75-cm2 flasks at 37°C in a 95% air/5% CO2 environment.
Staining of
-Actin
Immunocytochemistry. Rat colonic smooth muscle cells were cultured on glass coverslips for up to 15 days as described above. Cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (without Mg2+ or Ca2+), permeabilized, and fixed by incubation with 100% methanol (10 min, –20°C). Cells were then washed a further three times as above. The
-actin primary antibody was diluted 1:500 (42 µg protein/ml) in PBS containing 10% goat serum (v/v) and incubated with cells overnight at 4°C. Cells were then washed and incubated with FITC-tagged goat anti-mouse antibody [diluted 1:200 (23 µg protein/ml) in PBS/10% goat serum] for 2 h at room temperature in the dark before being washed and fixed onto glass slides with a fluorescence-protecting mounting medium. Slides were left to dry before being sealed with clear nail varnish and stored at 4°C until imaging.
Imaging. Slides were mounted onto the stage of an UltraVIEW confocal microscope with a 40x oil-immersion objective lens and excited at 488 nm using a Kr/Ar laser. Emitted light was collected above 510 nm, and images were captured using a charge-coupled device camera.
Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells. At the time of assay (passage 10), human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were cultured onto 1% gelatin-coated 25-mm glass coverslips and incubated overnight. HUVECs were stained with
-actin and imaged by confocal microscopy exactly as described above.
HEK 293 Cells. HEK 293 cells were cultured onto poly-D-lysinecoated 25-mm coverslips and stained exactly as described above.
Generation of cDNA Encoding Rat NmU Receptors and Transient Expression in HEK 293 Cells
cDNA encoding either rNmU-R1 or rNmU-R2 was subcloned into EcoRI and EcoRI/HindIII restriction sites, respectively, of the mammalian expression vector pCDN (Aiyar et al., 1994
). Plasmids were purified using BD Biosciences Clontech MaxiPrep kits according to the manufacturer's instructions, adjusted to 1 µg/µl, and transfected into HEK 293 cells for transient expression of receptors using Lipofectamine Plus according to the manufacturer's instructions using 1 µg of DNA for each centimeter squared of cell culture surface area.
Measurement of Intracellular Ca2+ Signaling
Single-Cell Ca2+ Imaging in Rat Colonic Smooth Muscle Cells. Single-cell Ca2+ confocal imaging of cultured rat colonic smooth muscle cells was performed using a PerkinElmer UltraVIEW confocal microscope (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Beaconsfield, Bucks, UK) and was based on a protocol previously used for HEK 293 cells (Brighton et al., 2004b
). In brief, rat colonic smooth muscle cells, either acutely isolated or cultured for 7 to 9 days, were loaded with 5 µM fluo-3-acetoxymethyl ester and 0.044% (w/v) Pluronic F-127 for 30 min at room temperature diluted in KHB. These parameters gave an even cytosolic loading of smooth muscle cells suitable for single-cell Ca2+ imaging (data not shown). For imaging, coverslips were mounted onto the stage of an Olympus IX50 inverted microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and maintained at 37°C using a Peltier heated coverslip holder. The field of cells was excited using a 488-nm laser line, and the emitted fluorescence was captured at wavelengths >505 nm, with images collected at 1-s intervals. Analysis was carried out using software supplied by the manufacturer (PerkinElmer Imaging Suite), with raw fluorescence data exported to Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) and expressed as F/Fo (fluorescence/basal fluorescence) for each cell. In experimental protocols requiring a wash step, the chamber was perfused with KHB at a rate of 5 ml/min at 37°C (unless otherwise stated), which rapidly replaced the chamber volume of 500 µl. Where required, experiments were performed in the nominal absence of Ca2+ by the exclusion of 1.29 mM CaCl2.2H2O from KHB.
Population Ca2+ Signaling Using a Fluorometric Imaging Plate Reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA). HEK 293 cells were cultured in 175-cm2 flasks until 60 to 70% confluent. Vectors containing cDNA for either the rNmU-R1 or rNmU-R2 were transiently transfected into HEK 293 cells using Lipofectamine Plus transfection reagent as described above and cultured for 24 h. These were then seeded into black-walled, clear-bottomed, 384-well plates at a density of 50 000 cells/well and cultured for a further 24 h. Ca2+ measurements used a "no-wash" brilliant-black procedure. Cells were loaded with 2 µM fluo-4-acetoxymethyl ester diluted in Tyrode's buffer (145 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM D-glucose, 1.2 mM MgCl2, 1.5 mM CaCl2.2H2O, 2.5 mM probenecid, and 250 µM brilliant black) for 1 h at 37 °C and 95% air/5% CO2 before assay. Analysis of changes in [Ca2+]i using a fluorescence imaging plate reader (FLIPR) was performed exactly as described previously (Brighton et al., 2004b
).
Determination of G-Protein Activation
Rat colonic smooth muscle cells were dissociated and cultured in 175-cm2 flasks for 7 to 9 days. Cells were then harvested, membranes were prepared, and G-protein activation was determined as described previously (Akam et al., 2001
; Brighton et al., 2004b
). In brief, membranes were challenged for 10 min with 10 nM hNmU-25 in the presence of [35S]GTP
S followed by specific immunoprecipitation of G
i(1–3) and G
q/11 subunits and the subsequent determination of associated radioactivity.
Generation and Imaging of Fluorescently Labeled NmU
The methods used for the generation and imaging of Cy3B-pNmU-8 (an N-terminally conjugated fluorescent analog of pNmU-8) for use with cultured rat smooth muscle cells was identical to that described previously for HEK 293 cells with stable expression of either hNmU-R1 or hNmU-R2 (Brighton et al., 2004b
).
NmU-Mediated Contraction of the Rat Isolated Distal Colon
Isolation of the Rat Distal Colon. Male Wistar rats (<300 g) were culled in accordance with Schedule 1 of the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986. A midline incision was made, and 2 to 3 cm of the distal colon was removed and placed immediately into Krebs' buffer (121.5 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 1.2 mM KH2PO4, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 25 mM NaHCO3, 5.6 mM glucose, pH 7.4) pre-equilibrated with 5% CO2/95% O2 for 15 min at room temperature. The tissue was washed in Krebs' buffer and opened longitudinally by sharp dissection. Submucosa and mucosa were removed by gentle peeling and sharp dissection, and full-wall thickness preparations of rat distal colon were achieved by cutting tissue strips (approximately 15 x 6 mm) parallel to either circular muscle or longitudinal muscle as required.
Contractile Studies. Tissues were suspended between two parallel platinum ring recording electrodes in 5-ml tissue baths containing Krebs' buffer continually bubbled with 5% CO2/95% O2 at 37°C. Tissues were equilibrated for 60 min, during which time the bath solution was changed once every 15 min. Test agents (agonists, antagonists, and inhibitors; see below) were applied directly to the tissue bath, and tension was measured using a Pioden dynamometer UF1 force-displacement transducer (LCM Systems, Newport, Isle of Wight, UK). Initial analysis of contractile responses to a maximally effective concentration of carbachol (100 µM) demonstrated optimal contractions of both circular and longitudinal muscle when the tissue was suspended under 1g tension (data not shown), and all subsequent experiments were carried out under these conditions. Where indicated, experiments were performed in the presence of 1 µM atropine and/or following 5 µM TTX 15-min pretreatment.
Isolated tissue contraction data were acquired and analyzed using MP100 hardware and AcqKnowledge software (BIOPAC Systems, Inc., Goleta, CA). The effects of NmU on resting muscle tension were expressed as a percentage of the contractile response mediated by 100 µM carbachol.
Data Analysis
Concentration-response curves were fitted by a four-parameter logistic equation using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). All data are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. Both mean and representative data were performed to an n of three or more as indicated. Where appropriate, individual n numbers relate to the number of animals used.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
-actin, a smooth muscle cell phenotype marker (Skalli et al., 1988
-actin staining had lost most of its filamentous characteristic (Fig. 2, e and f). Omission of the
-actin primary antibody when processing cells at 9 days resulted in no visible staining, and neither HEK 293 cells nor cultured HUVECs showed
-actin staining (data not shown). Smooth muscle cells cultured for between 7 and 9 days were used in subsequent experiments.
|
S to immunoprecipitated G
q/11 (Fig. 3a) or G
i(1–3) (Fig. 3b) increased by
4- and
3-fold over basal, respectively, upon activation with 10 nM hNmU-25. Nonspecific binding using 10 µM GTP
S was
40 to 50% of basal (unstimulated) [35S]GTP
S binding (Fig. 3).
|
3–6-fold over basal) and rapid (<5s) elevations of [Ca2+]i. The rapid initial elevations in [Ca2+]i were followed by a sustained but lower (1–2-fold over basal) signal where oscillations were seen in approximately 20 to 30% of cells. Oscillatory patterns were seen with hNmU-25 at both 100 nM and 1 µM (data not shown). The magnitude of the initial response to either rNmU-23 or hNmU-25 was unaffected by the removal of extracellular Ca2+, whereas the sustained signal was abolished (data not shown). In addition, pretreatment of cells for 10 min with 1 µM thapsigargin abolished all NmU-mediated responses (data not shown). The pEC50 values for the peak Ca2+ responses were 8.94 ± 0.42 and 8.64 ± 0.58 for hNmU-25 and rNmU-23, respectively (Fig. 4c).
|
Lack of Repetitive NmU-Mediated Ca2+ Signaling in Cultured Rat Colonic Smooth Muscle Cells. Following challenge of cells with either 10 nM rNmU-23 or hNmU-25, the sustained [Ca2+]i elevation or oscillatory behavior was unaffected by washing with KHB for 3 min. Furthermore, after a KHB perfusion for 3 min, reapplication of the same analog of NmU (10 nM) did not influence the [Ca2+]i (Fig. 5, a and b). Extending the wash with KHB to 12 min had no impact on the inability of the second addition of NmU to alter [Ca2+]i (data not shown). Challenge of naive cells with either 10 nM rNmU-23 or hNmU-25 also prevented the alternate ligand eliciting a [Ca2+]i response on the same cells after perfusion with agonist-free KHB for 2 min (data not shown).
|
Ca2+ signaling in cultured smooth muscle cells was also evoked by the application of 100 µM UTP to activate endogenous P2Y nucleotide receptors. UTP rapidly (<5 s) increased [Ca2+]i to between 4- and 10-fold over basal (Fig. 5c). Washing the cells by perfusion of the chamber with agonist-free KHB for >3 min after application of 100 µM UTP allowed a reapplication of 100 µM UTP to evoke a second Ca2+ response, albeit 30 to 50% of the magnitude of the initial response (Fig. 5c).
Binding of a Fluorescently Labeled NmU Analog to Cultured Rat Colonic Smooth Muscle Cells. The inability of a second addition of NmU to evoke a Ca2+ response after an initial challenge with NmU and a wash with buffer suggests either desensitization or an inability to remove receptor-bound NmU. As an approach to determine whether washing was sufficient to remove receptor-bound NmU, we used pNmU-8 with an N-terminally conjugated fluorophore, Cy3B (Cy3B-pNmU-8) (Brighton et al., 2004b
). Based on Ca2+ responses in a FLIPR assay, Cy3B-pNmU-8 was equipotent with unlabeled pNmU-8, hNmU-25, and rNmU-23 against transiently expressed rNmU-R1 (Fig. 6a; Table 1) and rNmU-R2 (Fig. 6b; Table 1), indicating the validity of using Cy3B-pNmU-8 against endogenously expressed rat NmU receptors.
|
|
Addition of 10 nM Cy3B-pNmU-8 to cultured rat colonic smooth muscle cells at 12°C resulted in the immediate plasma membrane localization of fluorescence (Fig. 7a, i and ii). No fluorescence was observed following 10 nM Cy3B-pNmU-8 addition to either wild-type HEK 293 cells or HUVECs (data not shown). Furthermore, the fluorescence associated with the membranes of cultured smooth muscle cells was abolished by pretreatment with 1 µM unlabeled hNmU-25 (data not shown). These data are consistent with the binding of Cy3B-pNmU-8 to NmU receptors expressed recombinantly in HEK 293 cells (Brighton et al., 2004b
) and indicate that Cy3B-pNmU-8 is able to bind to NmU receptors endogenously expressed in cultured colonic smooth muscle cells. The membrane-associated fluorescence could also not be removed by continual perfusion of KHB (12°C) for up to 12 min (Fig. 7b, i and ii) or by 1 µM hNmU-25 when it was applied 1 min following Cy3B-NmU-8 at 12°C (Fig. 7c, i and ii), highlighting the essentially irreversible nature of the binding.
|
At 37°C (in contrast to 12°C), addition of Cy3B-pNmU-8 again resulted in the immediate appearance of membrane fluorescence. However, after approximately 180 to 240 s, fluorescence associated with the plasma membrane had been largely lost, and fluorescence was almost exclusively punctate within the cell (Fig. 7d, i and ii).
NmU-Mediated Contraction of Rat Isolated Colon. In the absence of electrical stimulation, 1 µM (a maximally effective concentration; see below) of rNmU-23 mediated a contraction of either circular or longitudinal rat distal colon muscle strips maintained under 1g tension (Fig. 8, a and b). NmU induced a biphasic response characterized by an initial rapid contraction followed by a more sustained contraction on which there were repetitive twitches that did not reduce in magnitude (approximately 20–30% of initial contraction for circular muscle preparations and 40–60% for longitudinal preparations) and were maintained for at least 4 h. NmU-mediated contractions of either circular or longitudinal muscle strips were unaffected by the presence of either atropine (1 µM, 15-min pretreatment) or TTX (5 µM, 15-min pretreatment) (data not shown), suggesting a direct effect of NmU on smooth muscle. In contrast, atropine abolished contractions in response to carbachol (1–100 µM), and TTX abolished electrically stimulated, nerve-mediated responses (see Dass et al., 2003
) (data not shown). Stimulation of muscle strips with 1 µM hNmU-25 evoked similar responses to those mediated by 1 µM rNmU-23 (see below).
|
Repetitive NmU-Mediated Contractions of Rat Isolated Colon. Following the stimulation of either circular or longitudinal colonic smooth muscle preparations with rNmU-23 (1 µM) for up to 4 h, washing the strips with buffer followed by a second addition of rNmU-23 (1 µM) resulted in a contraction that was 90 to 100% of the response mediated by the first addition (Fig. 8, a and b). Similar results were obtained using hNmU-25 (1 µM) for both additions (data not shown). In these experiments, the protocol consisted of a 30-min interval between NmU additions with two complete replacements of buffer at 0 and 15 min. Using this interval and wash protocol, rNmU-23 (1 µM) repetitively (at least five times) contracted both circular and longitudinal smooth muscle preparations with no reductions in the amplitude of the response (Fig. 9, a and b). Similar results were obtained using hNmU-25 (1 µM) (data not shown). In these experiments, muscle strips were initially challenged with 100 µM carbachol to provide a reference for subsequent contractions.
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although very few freshly isolated cells adhered sufficiently well to image, in the very small number that did, NmU evoked aCa2+ response, and the cells contracted, rounded up, and detached from the substratum. Culture of smooth muscle cells results in rapid phenotypic changes that result in a loss of contractility, most likely as a consequence of the loss of key contractile proteins including smooth muscle myosin light-chain kinase (Ma et al., 1998
). Despite this, contractile stimuli can often evoke Ca2+ signaling in cultured smooth muscle cells. Here, we have exploited the lack of contractile responses to allow imaging of Ca2+ transients in cultured cells, particularly to allow repetitive challenges with agonist. Cells were used at a time in culture (7–9 days) at which staining for the smooth muscle marker
-actin was present.
In these cells, NmU mediated a robust transient elevation of [Ca2+]i, consistent with its contractile activity in smooth muscle. The initial Ca2+ response was often followed by asynchronous oscillatory Ca2+ signals, and although the role of such oscillations in smooth muscle cells is poorly understood (Savineau and Marthan, 2000
), they do point to roles of NmU in aspects of cell function other than contraction. Here, we demonstrate directly that NmU receptors expressed endogenously in colonic smooth muscle cells couple to both G
q and G
i. This is consistent with the coupling of recombinantly expressed human NmU receptors, which also elevate [Ca2+]i and inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation with similarly high potency via G
q and G
i, respectively (Brighton et al., 2004b
). Although we have not explored the signaling consequences of G
I coupling in smooth muscle cells, previous studies have suggested that G
i can contribute significantly to agonist-mediated contractile events (Spitzbarth-Régrigny et al., 2000
), and this would be consistent with offsetting cAMP-mediated relaxation. Although there are clearly exceptions, peripheral tissue generally expresses NmU-R1, whereas NmU-R2 is generally expressed within the central nervous system, suggesting that the NmU receptor involved here is likely to be NmU-R1 (see Brighton et al., 2004a
). Although this remains to be established specifically for the rat colon, this is also consistent with studies on the gastrointestinal tract in NmU-R1 (Prendergast et al., 2006
) and NmU-R2 (Dass et al., 2007
) knockout mice.
Challenge of cultured smooth muscle cells with UTP evoked aCa2+ response, most likely through activation of P2Y nucleotide receptors. Furthermore, after removal of UTP by perfusion of buffer, the readdition of UTP was able to evoke another Ca2+ response, albeit somewhat reduced, which is consistent with a partial desensitization of the receptors. Using this protocol, NmU was unable to evoke a Ca2+ response on a second challenge. Although it is possible this results from a full desensitization of the receptors, this would also be entirely consistent with an essentially irreversible binding of NmU, which we have shown with recombinantly expressed human NmU receptors. Indeed, here, using a fluorescently labeled NmU (Cy3B-pNmU-8), we show that once bound at the plasma membrane, NmU cannot be removed by washing the cells with a standard physiological salt solution. The rapid internalization of fluorescence in smooth muscle cells following addition of Cy3B-pNmU-8 is also consistent with high-affinity binding, which presumably requires an intracellular mechanism (low pH and/or proteolysis) to remove the ligand from its receptor. However, to date, little is known about the processing and potential recycling of NmU receptors.
Although the ability of NmU to mediate smooth muscle contraction is not in doubt, there appear to be both species and tissue differences, which include variation along the length of the gastrointestinal tract (Prendergast et al., 2006
; Dass et al., 2007
) and even differences between longitudinal and circular smooth muscle (Maggi et al., 1990
). Of relevance to the present study are the observations that NmU mediates contraction of canine (Westfall et al., 2001
) and human colon (Jones et al., 2006
) but not colon from rat, guinea pig, or mouse (Benito-Orfila et al., 1991
; Prendergast et al., 2006
). The lack of a direct effect of NmU on contraction of mouse colon has been supported by a recent study, although it did potently enhance electrically stimulated, nerve-evoked contractions, possibly through prejunctional effects within the enteric ganglia (Dass et al., 2007
). Such an effect is consistent with the regulation of peristalsis by NmU, demonstrated in mouse and guinea pig colon (Dass et al., 2007
). The ability of NmU to evoke contraction of rat colon in the present study is somewhat in contrast to the findings in rodents. It is worthy to note that similar differences have been reported previously, with NmU either not contracting (Benito-Orfila et al., 1991
) or contracting (Prendergast et al., 2006
) rat ileum. Interestingly, in the latter study, NmU contracted longitudinal but not circular ileal muscle. The reasons for variation between the present and past studies are unclear.
In the present study, NmU-mediated contractions of circular and longitudinal smooth muscle preparations were equivalent, independent of either neuronal or muscarinic receptor activity, and were of only slightly less magnitude than those mediated by carbachol. Following an initial contraction evoked by a maximally effective concentration of NmU, the exchange of buffer in the organ bath enabled a second application to evoke a contraction of equivalent magnitude. This lack of functional desensitization was apparent irrespective of the interval between applications and at least with a 30-min interval allowed noncumulative concentration-response curves to be constructed with individual tissue strips. The potency of NmU (pEC50 values, 7.5–7.8) is consistent with its potency in other gastrointestinal smooth muscle preparations of the rat (pEC50 values, 6.4–8.4; Prendergast et al., 2006
).
A clear paradox in the present study is the ability of NmU to mediate repetitive contractions of colonic smooth muscle strips but an inability to mediate repetitive Ca2+ transients in cultured colonic smooth muscle cells. It is worthy to note that these two preparations are clearly very different, which may complicate interpretation. Moreover, the cells and tissues have undergone different preparative procedures. In particular, the isolated cells have undergone both an enzymatic digestion and subsequent period of culture. Thus, it is possible that NmU receptors or any critical accessory proteins expressed in cultured smooth muscle cells differ in some way from those expressed in intact tissue and thereby account for differences in NmU receptor function. However, a lack of repetitive responses is consistent with the apparently irreversible binding of NmU to its receptors, whether endogenously expressed as in the present study or recombinantly expressed (Brighton et al., 2004b
). The ability of NmU to mediate a contraction following an initial challenge with NmU and subsequent wash suggests additional factors regulate NmU signaling in intact tissue compared with isolated cells. It is unlikely that this is accounted for by differences in affinity of NmU for its receptors but could include mechanisms such as the recruitment of a pool of receptors initially inaccessible to ligand or the rapid internalization of receptor followed by ligand dissociation and recycling of receptors. It is also conceivable that a large receptor reserve, coupled with a lack of equilibrium binding and relatively low receptor occupancy after short periods of exposure to NmU, allow previously unoccupied receptors to mediate contraction in the experimental paradigm used. An alternative hypothesis is that the proteolytic degradation of NmU either in the immediate vicinity of the receptors or even when bound to receptors may play a crucial part in the removal of ligand, allowing subsequent additions to provoke responses. The in silico digestion of NmU (http://www.expasy.org/tools/peptidecutter/) indicates many cleavage sites within hNmU-25 and rNmU-23. Furthermore, rat uterine membranes efficiently degrade 125I-rNmU-23 (Nandha et al., 1993
) and modification of the N-terminal of porcine NmU-8 to give aminopeptidase resistance increases its contractile activity on chickencrop smooth muscle (Sakura et al., 1995
). The degradation of NmU may also account for its paradoxically relatively low potency on tissue contractile responses (pEC50 values of 6.4–8.4 in this study and Prendergast et al., 2006
) compared with its affinity for NmU receptors (subnanomolar) (Fujii et al., 2000
; Raddatz et al., 2000
; Szekeres et al., 2000
; Brighton et al., 2004b
). Although the proteolysis of neuropeptides is a typical event in the regulation of their concentration and the termination of signaling, it remains to be established whether such a process is involved in regulating the cellular signaling and physiology of NmU.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.
ABBREVIATIONS: NmU, neuromedin U; h, human; hNmU-R1, human neuromedin U receptor 1; hNmU-R2, human neuromedin U receptor 2; SMGS, smooth muscle growth supplement; FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; TTX, tetrodotoxin; pNmU-8, porcine NmU-8; hNmU-25, human neuromedin U-25; Cy3B-pNmU-8, porcine Cy3B-neuromedin U-8; KHB, Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate; HEK, human embryonic kidney; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelial cell; rNmU-R1, rat neuromedin U receptor 1; rNmU-R2, rat neuromedin U receptor 2; FLIPR, fluorescence imaging plate reader; rNmU-23, rat neuromedin U-23; CCh, carbachol; FALGPA, N-[3-(2-furyl)acryloyl)]-Leu-Gly-Pro-Ala.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Gary B. Willars, Department of Cell Physiology and Pharmacology, Medical Sciences Building, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK. E-mail: gbw2{at}le.ac.uk
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aiyar N, Baker E, Wu HL, Nambi P, Edwards RM, Trill JJ, Ellis C, and Bergma DL (1994) Human AT1 receptor is a single-copy gene-characterisation in a stable cell-line. Mol Cell Biochem 131: 75–86.[CrossRef][Medline]
Akam EC, Challiss RAJ, and Nahorski SR (2001) Gq/11 and Gi/o activation in CHO-cells expressing human muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: dependence on agonist as well as receptor-subtype. Brit J Pharmacol 132: 950–958.[CrossRef][Medline]
Benito-Orfila MA, Domin J, Nandha KA, and Bloom SR (1991) The motor effect of neuromedin-U on rat stomach in vitro. Eur J Pharmacol 193: 329–333.[CrossRef][Medline]
Brighton PJ, Szekeres PG, and Willars GB (2004a) Neuromedin U and its receptors; structure function and physiological roles. Pharmacol Rev 56: 231–248.
Brighton PJ, Szekeres PG, Wise A, and Willars GB (2004b) Signalling and ligand binding by recombinant neuromedin U receptors: evidence for dual coupling to G
q/11 and G
i and an irreversible ligand-receptor interaction. Mol Pharmacol 66: 1544–1556.
Cao CQ, Yu XH, Dray A, Filosa A, and Perkins MN (2003) A pro-nociceptive role of neuromedin U in adult mice. Pain 104: 609–616.[CrossRef][Medline]
Chu CP, Jin QH, Kunitake T, Kato K, Nabekura T, Nakazato M, Kanagawa K, and Kannan H (2002) Cardiovascular actions of central neuromedin U in conscious rats. Regul Peptides 105: 29–34.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dart C and Standen NB (1993) Adenosine-activated potassium current in smooth-muscle cells isolated from the pig coronary-artery. J Physiol 471: 767–786.
Dass NB, John AK, Bassil AK, Crumbley CW, Shehee WR, Maurio FP, Moore GBT, Taylor CM, and Sanger GJ (2007) The relationship between the effects of short-chain fatty acids on intestinal motility in vitro and GPR43 receptor activation. Neurogastroent Motil 19: 66–74.[CrossRef][Medline]
Dass NB, Munonyara M, Bassil AK, Hervieu GJ, Osbourne S, Corcoran S, Morgan M, and Sanger GJ (2003) Growth hormone secretagogue receptors in rat and human gastrointestinal tract and the effects of ghrelin. Neurosci 120: 443–453.[CrossRef][Medline]
Fujii R, Hosoya M, Fukusumi S, Kawamata Y, Habata Y, Hinuma S, Onda H, Nishimura O, and Fujino M (2000) Identification of neuromedin U as the cognate ligand of the orphan G-protein-coupled receptor FM-3. J Biol Chem 275: 21068–21074.
Gardiner SM, Compton AM, Bennett T, Domin J, and Bloom SR (1990) Regional hemodynamic-effects of neuromedin-U in conscious rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 258: R32–R38.
Hanada R, Nakazato M, Murakami N, Sakihara S, Yoshimatsu H, Toshinai K, Hanada T, Suda T, Kangawa K, Matsukura S, et al. (2001) A role for neuromedin U in stress response. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 289: 225–228.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hedrick JA, Morse K, Shan LX, Qiao XD, Pang L, Wang S, Laz T, Gustafson EL, Bayne M, and Monsma FJ (2000) Identification of a human gastrointestinal tract and immune system receptor for the peptide neuromedin U. Mol Pharmacol 58: 870–875.
Hosoya M, Moriya T, Kawamata Y, Ohkubo S, Fujii R, Matsui H, Shintani Y, Fukusumi S, Habata Y, Hinuma S, et al. (2000) Identification and functional characterization of a novel subtype of neuromedin U receptor. J Biol Chem 275: 29528–29532.
Howard AD, Wang RP, Pong SS, Mellin TN, Strack A, Guan XM, Zeng ZZ, Williams DL, Feighner SD, Nunes CN, et al. (2000) Identification of receptors for neuromedin U and its role in feeding. Nature 406: 70–74.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ivanov TR, Lawrence CB, Stanley PJ, and Luckman SM (2002) Evaluation of neuromedin U actions in energy homeostasis and pituitary function. Endocrinology 143: 3813–3821.
Jethwa PH, Small CJ, Smith KL, Seth A, Darch SJ, Abbott CR, Murphy KG, Todd JF, Ghatei MA, and Bloom SR (2005) Neuromedin U has a physiological role in the regulation of food intake and partially mediates the effects of leptin. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 289: E301–E305.
Jones NA, Morton MF, Prendergast CE, Powell GL, Shankley NP, and Hollingsworth SJ (2006) Neuromedin U stimulates contraction of human long saphenous vein and gastrointestinal smooth muscle in vitro. Regul Pept 136: 109–116.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kojima M, Haruno R, Nakazato M, Date Y, Murakami N, Hanada R, Matsuo H, and Kangawa K (2000) Purification and identification of neuromedin U as an endogenous ligand for an orphan receptor GPR66 (FM3). Biochem Biophys Res Commun 276: 435–438.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ma X, Wang Y, and Stephens NL (1998) Serum deprivation induces a unique hypercontractile phenotype of cultured smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 274: C1206 –C1214.
Maggi CA, Patacchini R, Giuliani S, Turini D, Barbanti G, Rovero P, and Meli A (1990) Motor response of the human isolated small-intestine and urinary-bladder to porcine neuromedin U-8. Brit J Pharmacol 99: 186–188.[Medline]
Malendowicz KA, Nussdorfer GG, Nowak KW, and Mazzocchi G (1993) Effects of neuromedin U-8 on the rat pituitary-adrenocortical axis. In Vivo 7: 419–422.[Medline]
Minamino N, Kangawa K, and Matsuo H (1985) Neuromedin-U-8 and neuromedin-U-25: novel uterus stimulating and hypertensive peptides identified in porcine spinal-cord. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 130: 1078–1085.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nakahara K, Hanada R, Murakami N, Teranishi H, Ohgusu H, Fukushima N, Moriyama M, Ida T, Kangawa K, and Kojima M (2004) The gut-brain peptide neuromedin U is involved in the mammalian circadian oscillator system. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 318: 156–161.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nakazato M, Hanada R, Murakami N, Date Y, Mondal MS, Kojima M, Yoshimatsu H, Kangawa K, and Matsukura S (2000) Central effects of neuromedin U in the regulation of energy homeostasis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 277: 191–194.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nandha KA, Benito-Orfila MA, Smith DM, and Bloom SR (1993) Characterization of the rat uterine neuromedin-U receptor. Endocrinology 133: 482–486.
Prendergast CE, Morton MF, Figueroa KW, Wu XD, and Shankley NP (2006) Species-dependent smooth muscle contraction to neuromedin U and determination of the receptor subtypes mediating contraction using NMU1 receptor knockout mice. Brit J Pharmacol 147: 886–896.[CrossRef][Medline]
Raddatz R, Wilson AE, Artymyshyn R, Bonini JA, Borowsky B, Boteju LW, Zhou SQ, Kouranova EV, Nagorny R, Guevarra MS, et al. (2000) Identification and characterization of two neuromedin U receptors differentially expressed in peripheral tissues and the central nervous system. J Biol Chem 275: 32452–32459.
Sakura N, Kurosawa K, and Hashimoto T (1995) Structure-activity-relationships of neuromedin-U: I. Contractile activity of dog neuromedin-U-related peptides on isolated chicken crop smooth-muscle. Chem Pharm Bull 43: 1148–1153.[Medline]
Savineau JP and Marthan R (2000) Cytosolic calcium oscillations in smooth muscle cells. News Physiol Sci 15: 50–55.
Shan LX, Qiao XD, Crona JH, Behan J, Wang S, Laz T, Bayne M, Gustafson EL, Monsma FJ, and Hedrick JA (2000) Identification of a novel neuromedin U receptor subtype expressed in the central nervous system. J Biol Chem 275: 39482–39486.
Skalli O, Gabbiani G, Babai F, Seemayer TA, Pizzolato G, and Schurch W (1988) Intermediate filament proteins and actin isoforms as markers for soft tissue tumor differentiation and origin: II. Rhabdomyosarcomas. Am J Pathol 130: 515–531.[Abstract]
Spitzbarth-Régrigny E, Petitcolin MA, Bueb JL, Tschirhart EJ, Atkinson J, and Capdeville-Atkinson C (2000) Pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi-proteins and intracellular calcium sensitivity of vasoconstriction in the intact rat tail artery. Brit J Pharmacol 131: 1337–1344.[CrossRef][Medline]
Szekeres PG, Muir AI, Spinage LD, Miller JE, Butler SI, Smith A, Rennie GI, Murdock PR, Fitzgerald LR, Wu HL, et al. (2000) Neuromedin U is a potent agonist at the orphan G-protein-coupled receptor FM3. JBiolChem 275: 20247–20250.
Westfall TD, McCafferty GP, Pullen M, Gruver S, Sulpizio AC, Aiyar VN, Disa J, Contino LC, Mannan IJ, and Hieble JP (2001) Characterisation of neuromedin U effects in canine smooth muscle. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 301: 987–992.[CrossRef]
Wren AM, Small CJ, Abbott CR, Jethwa PH, Kennedy AR, Murphy KG, Stanley SA, Zollner AN, Ghatei MA, and Bloom SR (2002) Hypothalamic actions of neuromedin U. Endocrinology 143: 4227–4234.
Yamashita K, Upadhyay S, Osada M, Hoque MO, Xiao Y, Mori M, Sato F, Meltzer SJ, and Sidransky D (2002) Pharmacologic unmasking of epigenetically silenced tumor suppressor genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Cell 2: 485–495.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yu XH, Cao CQ, Mennicken F, Puma C, Dray A, O'Donnell D, Ahmad S, and Perkins M (2003) Pro-nociceptive effects of neuromedin U in rat. Neuroscience 120: 467–474.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zeng HK, Gragerov A, Hohmann JG, Gragerov A, Hohmann JG, Pavlova MN, Schimpf BA, Xu H, Wu LJ, Toyoda H, et al. (2006) Neuromedin U receptor 2-deficient mice display differential responses in sensory perception, stress, and feeding. Mol Cell Biol 26: 9352–9363.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||