QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jpet.107.129171v1 324/1/224    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Alier, K. A. Articles by Smith, P. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Alier, K. A. Articles by Smith, P. A.

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY

Intrathecal Administration of Proteinase-Activated Receptor-2 Agonists Produces Hyperalgesia by Exciting the Cell Bodies of Primary Sensory Neurons

Department of Pharmacology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (K.A.A., J.A.E., P.L.S., P.A.S.); Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada (N.C., L.C., K.C., N.V.); and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, Spring House, Pennsylvania (P.A.-G.)

Received July 24, 2007; accepted October 3, 2007.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Proteinase-activated receptors (PARs) are a family of G-protein-coupled receptors that are activated by endogenous serine proteinases that cleave the N-terminal domain of the receptor unmasking a "tethered ligand" sequence. Trypsin and other agonists at PAR₂ act on peripheral nerves to augment the transfer of nociceptive information. We tested whether PAR₂ agonists also exert a spinal pronociceptive effect by i.t. administering the selective ligand, Ser-Leu-Ile-Gly-Arg-Leu-NH₂ (SLI-GRL). This produced thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia in rats and mice and augmented mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia seen in the formalin inflammatory pain test. Effects of SLIGRL were abrogated in PAR₂-deficient mice and were not seen with the inactive control peptide, Leu-Arg-Gly-Ile-Leu-Ser-NH₂. Surprisingly, electrophysiological studies, using whole-cell recording from rat substantia gelatinosa neurons, failed to demonstrate an increase in excitatory transmission or neuronal excitability following treatment with SLIGRL or trypsin. In fact, the actions of trypsin were consistent with a decrease in dorsal horn excitability. SLIGRL and trypsin did, however, depolarize and increase the excitability of large, medium and small primary afferent, dorsal root ganglion neurons. The effects were associated with an increase in conductance at hyperpolarized potentials and a decrease in conductance at depolarized potentials. PAR₂-like immunoreactivity was found in DRG but not in spinal dorsal horn. These results suggest that activation of DRG neuron cell bodies may account for the pronociceptive actions of i.t. applied PAR₂ agonists. They also imply that pathophysiological release of PAR₂-activating proteases in the vicinity of DRG neurons may produce profound effects on nociceptive processing in vivo.

Intraplantar injection of PAR₂ agonists in rats causes marked and sustained hyperalgesia. This and other work strongly implicates PAR₂ in peripheral inflammatory pain (Hoogerwerf et al., 2001; Vergnolle et al., 2001; Fiorucci and Distrutti, 2002; Dai et al., 2004). Although PAR₂ agonists have also been reported to release substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide from peripheral and spinal cord tissues (Vergnolle et al., 2001) and to augment capsaicin-induced neuropeptide release in spinal cord (Amadesi et al., 2004), the possibility that PAR₂ agonists act directly within the spinal cord to produce pronociceptive effects remains to be established. We have therefore directly applied PAR₂ agonists to the spinal cord via the i.t. route in vivo and examined their effects in various pain models. We have used whole-cell recording from DRG and dorsal horn (substantia gelatinosa) neurons to elucidate the underlying mechanism of the effects that we observed.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
All experimental protocols were approved by the Health Sciences Animal Welfare Committee of the University of Alberta and the Animal Care Committee of the University of Calgary. They were performed in accordance with the guidelines established by the Canadian Council on Animal Care and the Committee for Research and Ethical Issues and are in concordance with the guidelines of the International Association for the Study of Pain.

Behavioral Experiments: Intrathecal and Intraplantar Injections. Male Wistar rats (175–200 g) were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (Montreal, Quebec, Canada). The rats had free access to food and water and were housed under constant temperature and light cycle. PAR₂-deficient mice and wild-type littermates used in the control experiments were originally obtained from Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical (Springhouse, PA). Both were bred at the University of Calgary Animal Care Facility and maintained as stable lines. Genotyping of animals was undertaken on a regular basis (three to four times per year) to verify their genetic profile. C57BL6 mice were purchased from Charles River Laboratories for the formalin experiments.

The PAR₂-activating peptide, SLIGRL, or the control peptide, Leu-Arg-Gly-Ile-Leu-Ser-NH₂ (LRGILS), were administered i.t. as described previously (Vergnolle et al., 2001) at the L4 to L5 region, in a total volume of 5 µl. For i.t. injections, the animals were held by the pelvic girdle, and a 25-gauge needle connected to a 25-µl Hamilton syringe was inserted between L4 and L5, into the subarachnoidal space. The placement of the needle was verified by the elicitation of a tail-flick movement. The syringe was kept in place for few seconds after the injection.

In animals treated with formalin, the i.t. injections of peptides or saline were performed 10 min before the intraplantar injection of formalin. Formalin (5%) was diluted in saline and injected into the mouse hindpaw in a total volume of 10 µl as described previously (Vergnolle et al., 2001).

Behavioral Experiments: Measures of Nociception. Nociceptive responses to a thermal stimulus were evaluated in rats and mice, using a plantar test apparatus (Stoelting, Chicago, IL), measuring paw withdrawal latency in response to a radiant heat stimulus. Nociceptive responses to a mechanical stimulus were evaluated in rats hindpaws, using a Ugo Basile (Milan, Italy) analgesy meter, measuring nociceptive flexion reflex in response to increasing weight (Asfaha et al., 2002). In mice, mechanical nociception was evaluated using three von Frey filaments of different size and bending forces as described previously (Amadesi et al., 2004). The filaments were applied for 1 to 2 s, a minimum of three times randomly among the tested animals. A score was assigned based on the animal's response: 0, no movement; 1, removal of the paw; and 2, removal of the paw and vocalization, licking or holding of the paw. Mechanical nociceptive score was expressed as a percentage of the maximal score that would be obtained for the number of tests at each time-point. Before all experiments, baseline measures of nociception were recorded (time 0) for all assays, and nociception was then measured again at different time-points after treatments.

Thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia were defined as a significant increase in withdrawal latency and nociceptive threshold or score, respectively. Mechanical allodynia was observed in mice when nociceptive score values > 0 were recorded using the smallest size von Frey filament (3.61), which under basal conditions did not provoke any nociceptive response.

Electrophysiological Experiments on Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons. Sprague-Dawley rats, aged 18 to 26 days old, were anesthetized with 1.5 g/kg i.p. urethane. Laminectomy was performed under sterile conditions with carbogen-saturated dissection solution. The fourth, fifth, and sixth lumbar dorsal root ganglions (DRGs) were harvested with the aid of a dissection microscope. Dissection solution used throughout the DRG removal process contained 118 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.3 mM MgSO₄, 1.2 mM NaH2PO₄, 5 mM MgCl₂, 25 mM D-glucose, 26 mM NaHCO₃, and 1.5 mM CaCl₂. DRGs were then enzymatically dissociated while shaking in a water bath at 35°C for 40 min. Digestion media was prepared in 6 ml of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) with GlutaMAX (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing 0.5 mg/ml trypsin (Sigma), 1 mg/ml collagenase (Sigma), and 0.1 mg/ml deoxyribonuclease I (Sigma). Soybean trypsin inhibitor (Worthington Biochemicals, Lakewood, NJ), at a concentration high enough to neutralize 2 times the amount of trypsin present in the digestion medium, was dissolved in 1.5 ml of DMEM and added to the digestion medium after the 40 min of incubation. After trituration, the dissociated cells were plated in sterile 3.5-cm polystyrene culture dishes (Nalge Nunc International, Rochester, NY). Cells were allowed to adhere to culture dishes for 2 min before 2 ml of culture medium was added to each dish. The culture medium used was made up in DMEM, including: 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen), 10% horse serum (Invitrogen), 100 units/ml penicillin (Invitrogen), 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen), and 5 ng/ml mouse nerve growth factor 2.5S (Alomone Labs, Jerusalem, Israel). Culture medium was changed every 48 h. Experiments were done at room temperature (20°C) on neurons that had been maintained for 2 to 4 days in a tissue culture incubator at 37.0°C with 6% CO₂. Standard whole-cell recordings were made using an Axoclamp 2A amplifier in current-clamp mode or an Axopatch 1B amplifier in voltage-clamp mode. Borosilicate glass patch electrodes had a DC resistance of 4 to 6 M for action potential (AP) recordings. Data were acquired and analyzed using pClamp 5.5 software, and final figures were produced using Origin 7.0 (Origin-Lab Corporation, Northampton, MA). The cells were continuously superfused with carbogen-saturated extracellular solution. For all recordings, the external solution contained the following: 127 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.2 mM NaH₂PO₄, 1.3 mM MgSO₄, 26 mM NaHCO₃, 25 mM D-glucose, and 2.5 mM CaCl₂. Internal pipette solution contained: 130 mM D-gluconic acid, 10 mM EGTA, 4 mM Mg-ATP, 0.3 mM Na-GTP, 10 mM HEPES, and 2 mM CaCl₂. The pH was adjusted to 7.2 with 1 M KOH. Single action potentials were generated using 20-ms depolarizing current pulses. In current-clamp recordings, changes in conductance were measured by means of 200-ms, 0.1-nA hyperpolarizing current pulses applied through the recording electrode at 2 Hz. Conductance changes in voltage clamp were measured from I-V relationships derived from slow ramp commands from –110 to +40 mV. Excitability was monitored by injecting depolarizing current ramps and observing the latency to discharge of the first action potential on the ramp. Drugs were applied by a rapid superfusion system constructed from 0.8-mm-diameter polyamide tubes, and flow was controlled by solenoid valves. The applicator tip was positioned within 100 µm of the neuronal cell under study. Each drug was applied for 30 s.

Electrophysiological Experiments on Spinal Cord Slices. These were carried out according to our previously published methods (Moran et al., 2004; Balasubramanyan et al., 2006). In brief, male Sprague-Dawley rats (15–42 days old) were deeply anesthetized with urethane (1.5 g/kg i.p.), and a dorsal incision was made from the base of the tail to the skull. The incision site was immediately irrigated with 2 ml of ice-cold oxygenated (95% O₂-5% CO₂) dissection solution containing 118 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 26 mM NaHCO₃, 1.3 mM MgSO₄, 1.2 mM NaH₂PO₄, 1.5 mM CaCl₂, 5 mM MgCl₂, 25 mM D-glucose, and 1 mM kynurenic acid. A laminectomy was performed extending from the thoracic to the sacral portions of the spinal cord. The spinal cord was removed from the vertebral column, and the ventral roots and all dorsal roots except L4 to L5 were cut. Transverse slices (300–500 µm) were cut using a Vibratome (TPI, St. Louis, MO). Slices were incubated in a holding chamber (Sakmann and Stuart, 1995) at 36°C for 1 h and subsequently stored at room temperature (22°C) in oxygenated dissection solution (see above, without 1 mM kynurenic acid).

Slices were placed in a circular glass-bottomed recording chamber and held in place with a U-shaped platinum wire frame with attached parallel nylon fibers. They were superfused at room temperature (22°C) with 95% O₂-5% CO₂ saturated artificial cerebrospinal fluid, which contained 127 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.2 mM NaH2PO₄, 26 mM NaHCO₃, 1.3 mM MgSO₄, 2.5 mM CaCl₂, and 25 mM D-glucose, pH 7.4. Spinal cord slices were viewed with a Zeiss Axioskop FS upright microscope (Carl Zeiss GmbH, Jena, Germany) equipped with infrared differential interference contrast optics. Whole-cell recordings from visually identified substantia gelatinosa neurons were made with an NPI SEC 05L amplifier (NPI Electronic, Tamm, Germany) in discontinuous single-electrode voltage-clamp or bridge-balance current-clamp mode. Switching frequencies were typically between 30 and 40 kHz. Signals were digitized between 5 and 10 kHz and filtered at 1 to 2 kHz. Patch pipettes were pulled from thin-walled borosilicate glass (TW-150F-4; WPI, Sarasota, FL). Pipettes for recording APs had resistances of 5 to 10 M when filled with an internal solution containing 130 mM potassium gluconate, 1 mM MgCl₂, 2 mM CaCl₂, 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM EGTA, 4 mM Mg-ATP, and 0.3 mM Na-GTP, pH 7.2 (290–300 mOsm). For some experiments recording synaptic currents, a Cs⁺-based internal solution containing 140 mM CsCl, 5 mM HEPES, 10 mM EGTA, 2 mM CaCl₂, 2 mM Mg-ATP, and 0.3 mM Na-GTP, pH 7.2 (290–300 mOsm) was used.

Data for I-V plots were obtained in voltage-clamp mode using incremental 10-mV, 800-ms commands. Current values were measured from the close-to-steady-state values attained at the end of these commands. As in DRG experiments, the excitability of substantia gelatinosa neurons was monitored by injecting depolarizing current ramps (60 pA/s) and observing the latency to discharge of the first action potential on the ramp (see also Balasubramanyan et al., 2006).

Spontaneous EPSCs (sEPSCs) were recorded at –70 mV, digitized at 5 kHz, and filtered at 1 kHz. Data were acquired for 3 min before, and 5 or 10 min after, superfusion of trypsin or peptides. Mini Analysis Program software (Synaptosoft, Decatur, GA) was used to distinguish sEPSCs and spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents from the baseline noise and to prepare cumulative probability plots or frequency histograms. Data were only included in the analysis if the series resistance was below 25 M and did not change by >20% during the course of an experiment. Spontaneous postsynaptic currents were detected automatically using an amplitude threshold of 10 pA and an area threshold of 15 femtocoloumbs. All detected events were then re-examined and visually accepted or rejected based on subjective visual examination. The Mini Analysis Program was used to further analyze the data and to generate figures. Approximately 50 events were used for analysis before and after agonist superfusion. Whenever possible, the first 50 events after 1 min of acquisition were used. In some cells, however, spontaneous activity was limited, so the whole 3-min acquisition period was used to provide data.

Immunohistochemistry. To localize PAR₂ in DRG and spinal cord sections, rats were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (200 mg/kg i.p.) and transcardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde in 100 mM PBS, pH 7.4. Spinal cord and DRG (T10-L5) were fixed overnight at 4°C, placed in 25% sucrose in PBS for 24 h at 4°C, embedded in ornithine carbamyl transferase compound (Miles, Elkhart, IN), and sectioned at 25 µm. A section of DRG neurons and spinal cord was adjacently fixed on each slide. Sections were washed in PBS containing 1 to 10% normal growth serum, 1% bovine serum albumin, and 0.3 to 0.5% Triton X-100 and incubated with primary antibodies to PAR₂ (goat; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, 1:200; or B5 antibody, 1:200, a generous gift from Dr. M.D. Hollenberg, University of Calgary) overnight at 4°C. Sections were washed and incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen Canada Inc., Burlington, ON, Canada; 1:1000, room temperature, 2 h). Sections were washed and mounted in Prolong (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). As a control for PAR₂ specificity, the primary antiserum was preincubated with the peptide used for immunization (10 µM) for 24 h at 4°C before staining. Confocal images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM-510 META confocal microscope using 10x and 20x objectives in the inverted configuration. For all confocal images, a regular phase transmission image was obtained. Images of stained and control cells were collected and processed identically.

Drugs and Chemicals. The PAR₂-activating peptide, SLIGRL, and the inactive control peptide, LRGILS, were obtained from the Peptide Synthesis Facility of the University of Calgary (Calgary, Alberta, Canada). The composition and purity of peptides were confirmed by HPLC analysis. Formalin was purchased from VWR (Mississauga, ON, Canada). All other chemicals were from Sigma (Oakville, ON, Canada). SLIGRL and LRGILS were dissolved in external solution that contained 0.1% bovine albumin (Sigma). Trypsin was also dissolved in external solution and molarities calculated assuming a molecular mass of 24 kDa.

Statistics. All data are presented as mean ± S.E.M. Statistical significance in electrophysiological experiments was assessed by the Student's unpaired t test after passing a normality test. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov two-sample test was used to compare distributions of amplitudes and interevent intervals in neurons in acute slices. The withdrawal latency, nociceptive threshold, and nociceptive score data were analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance followed by a Dunnett's test. With all statistical analyses, distributions were considered statistically significant if p < 0.05

	Results

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Intrathecal Injection of PAR₂ Agonists Causes Allodynia and Hyperalgesia. Intrathecal injection of the PAR₂ agonist SLIGRL, but not the control peptide LRGILS, caused a decrease in withdrawal latency in response to a thermal stimulus, characteristic of thermal hyperalgesia both in rats (Fig. 1A) and in mice (Fig. 2A). Likewise, i.t. injection of SLIGRL, but not LRGILS, caused a significant decrease in nociceptive threshold in rats (Fig. 1B) and a significant increase in nociceptive score in mice (Fig. 2, B and C). This effect of the PAR₂ agonist is characteristic of mechanical hyperalgesia. Although mice did not respond to the smallest size von Frey filament (3.61) in basal conditions, the PAR₂ agonist SLIGRL, but not the control peptide LRGILS, injected i.t., caused a significant increase in nociceptive score characteristic of mechanical allodynia (Fig. 2B). The effects of SLIGRL on withdrawal latency and nociceptive score were completely abolished in PAR₂-deficient mice, demonstrating the specificity of SLIGRL as a PAR₂ agonist (Fig. 2, A–C).

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. Withdrawal latency (A) and nociceptive threshold (B) measured in rat hindpaws, before (time 0) and after i.t. injection of 10 µg of SLIGRL or LRGILS. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. *, significantly different from basal latency and threshold measured at time 0, for p < 0.05.

View larger version (12K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. Withdrawal latency (A) and nociceptive score (B and C) measured in PAR2-deficient (PAR2 –/–) or wild-type (PAR2 +/+) mouse hindpaws, before (time 0) and after i.t. injection of 1 µg of SLIGRL or LRGILS. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. *, significantly different from LRGILS, for p < 0.05.

Intrathecal Injection of PAR₂ Agonists Enhances Peripherally Induced Inflammatory Allodynia and Hyperalgesia. Intraplantar injection of formalin caused thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia characterized by a decrease in withdrawal latency in response to a thermal stimulus compared with basal measurements (Fig. 3A) and an increased nociceptive score in response to von Frey filament application (Fig. 3C). In addition, formalin intraplantar injection caused mechanical allodynia, as measured by a nociceptive response to the smallest size von Frey filament (3.61) (Fig. 3B). Both thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia as well as mechanical allodynia induced by formalin were enhanced by i.t. injection of the PAR₂ agonist SLIGRL compared with the effect of the control peptide LRGILS, as observed by a larger decrease in withdrawal latency and enhanced nociceptive scores to von Frey filament exposure (Fig. 3).

View larger version (10K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 3. Withdrawal latency (A) and nociceptive score (B and C) measured in mouse hindpaws, before (time 0) and after intraplantar injection of formalin in mice that have received (10 min before formalin) an i.t. injection of 1 µg of SLIGRL, LRGILS, or saline. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. *, significantly different from LRGILS; #, significantly different from basal latency/score measured at time 0, for p < 0.05.

View larger version (20K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 4. Effects of trypsin and PAR2 agonists on rat substantia gelatinosa neurons. A, effect of trypsin on sEPSCs. Note decrease in frequency and amplitude. B to I, cumulative probability plots to illustrate the effect of trypsin (21 µM), time, SLIGRL (10 µM), and LRGILS (10 µM) on SEPSC amplitude and interevent interval (reciprocal frequency). Note that trypsin, SLIGRL, and LRGILS decrease sEPSC amplitude, and trypsin and LRGILS decrease sEPSC frequency. Data in B to I obtained from approximately 50 events during 3-min recording in two to seven neurons that responded to agonists. J, characteristic firing pattern of a tonic neuron in response to depolarizing current command. K, characteristic firing pattern of a delay neuron in response to depolarizing current command. L and M, experiments to illustrate the lack of effect of 21 µM trypsin on spike latency in response to current ramps in tonic and delay cells, respectively. All data records in traces J to M are on the same time scale.

We also considered the possibility that trypsin and SLI-GRL may exert different effects on different types of substantia gelatinosa neuron. Substantia gelatinosa neurons may be classified according to their discharge pattern in response to depolarizing current pulses as "tonic," "phasic," "delay," "transient," and "irregular" neurons (Balasubramanyan et al., 2006). The need to classify neurons on the basis of their AP firing pattern precluded the use of Cs⁺-filled electrodes for this series of experiments. Many tonic neurons (Fig. 4J) may be GABAergic and inhibitory, whereas delay neurons (Fig. 4K) may be excitatory (Lu and Perl, 2003, 2005). However, SLIGRL or trypsin had little effect on spontaneous synaptic activity in identified tonic neurons (Table 1) but reduced sEPSC frequency and amplitude in 50% of delay cells. Trypsin failed to alter excitability of delay or tonic cells because first spike latency on a 60 pA/s ramp in the presence of trypsin was unchanged in both cell types (p > 0.4, n = 4 for delay cells and p > 0.2, n = 3 for tonic cells). Typical experiments illustrating spike latency experiments are shown in Fig. 4, L and M.

Thus, the tendency for trypsin and SLIGRL to depress excitatory synaptic transmission in substantia gelatinosa as well as the tendency of trypsin to reduce membrane excitability seem at odds with the observation that i.t. applied PAR₂ agonists have pronociceptive actions (Figs. 1, 2, 3). However, i.t. applied drugs likely have access to the DRG (Abram et al., 2006), so we next examined possible excitatory effects of trypsin, SLIGRL, and LRGILS on the cell bodies of primary afferent neurons.

Classification of DRG Cells. Because there is a reasonable correlation between AP shape and cell size of DRG neurons (Abdulla and Smith, 1997), "large" cells were defined as those with an AP duration <3 ms, "medium" cells had an AP duration of 3 to 5 ms, and "small" cells had an AP duration >5 ms (Fig. 5, A–C). Spike width was measured at 50% of the maximum amplitude. Both medium and small cells displayed a "hump" on the falling phase of their AP, whereas large cells did not.

View larger version (15K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 5. Effects of PAR2 agonists on rat DRG neurons. Rat DRG cells were classified according to cell size and AP shape. A, "large" cells had an AP duration of <3 ms. B, "medium" cells had an AP duration of 3 to 5 ms. C, "small" cells had an AP duration of >5 ms. Both medium and small cells exhibit a hump on the falling phase of their AP. D to F, effects of trypsin SLIGRL on resting potential and lack of effect of LRGILS. Repetitive hyperpolarizing current pulses were passed through the recording electrode, producing a voltage change across the membrane, and thickness of the recording thus represents the voltage change. Because current is constant, and voltage is decreasing in the presence of SLIGRL and trypsin, both agonists appear to increase membrane conductance. G, comparison of the duration of trypsin responses (5.20 ± 0.93 min; n = 9) and SLIGRL responses (1.95 ± 0.56 min; n = 7; p < 0.02). H, trypsin-induced increase in excitability of a medium DRG neuron. Three depolarizing current ramps of increasing amplitude were injected into the neuron before (upper trace) and after (lower trace) application of trypsin. Note increased discharge of action potentials in the presence of trypsin. I, voltage-clamp experiment to examine conductance change produced by SLI-GRL. Traces are current responses to ramp commands from –110 to +40 mV before and after application of SLIGRL. Note that agonist increases conductance at potentials more negative than –40 mV but decreases conductance at potentials more positive than –20 mV.

Like trypsin, the synthetic activating peptide SLIGRL (10 µM) was capable of depolarizing all types of DRG cells, and coincidentally, 65% of cells (13 of 20) were affected. Responses to SLIGRL were seen in 7 of 12 large cells, three of five medium cells, and three of three small cells. Response amplitudes were 6.6 ± 2.1 mV for large cells, 2.7 ± 0.4 mV for medium cells, and 1.9 ± 0.2 mV for small cells. A typical response is illustrated in Fig. 5E. In this cell, SLIGRL reduced the amplitude of voltage responses to hyperpolarizing current pulses, an observation consistent with an increase in membrane conductance. The response to SLIGRL following a second application to the same cell was generally similar in amplitude and duration to the first. Unlike trypsin, SLIGRL never produced transient hyperpolarization of DRG neurons. The synthetic peptide LRGILS, the reverse sequence of SLIGRL, was used as a control. LRGILS (10 µM) failed to affect the membrane potential of seven of seven large cells and one of one medium cells (Fig. 5F).

Data from all cell types were pooled to compare the duration of depolarizing response between 42 µM trypsin (n = 9), 5.20 ± 0.93 min, and 10 µM SLIGRL (n = 7), 1.95 ± 0.56 min. The trypsin response was significantly longer than that produced by SLIGRL (p < 0.05; Fig. 5G).

After a 30-s exposure to 10 µM SLIGRL, some neurons also exhibited spontaneous action potential discharge at resting potential. To examine this phenomenon in more detail, neuronal excitability was examined in response to depolarizing current steps or ramps. Four of eight medium or large cells examined exhibited an increase in excitability in the presence of 42 µM trypsin. A typical experiment is illustrated in Fig. 5H. Before the application of trypsin, a series of depolarizing current ramps of increasing amplitude produces a modest discharge of action potentials. The most shallow current ramp fails to generate action potentials, and even with the steepest ramp, the latency to the first action potential is 300 ms. In contrast, in the presence of trypsin, an action potential is seen on the shallowest ramp, and the latency to the first action potential on the steepest ramp is reduced to 130 ms.

Conductance Changes in DRG Neurons in Response to PAR₂ Agonists. When studied under current clamp, depolarizing responses to trypsin were associated with an increase in conductance in two of two small cells and four of six large cells. Conductance appeared unchanged in the remaining two large cells and in three of three medium cells. Increased conductances were produced by SLIGRL in five of five large cells, one medium cell, and two of two small cells. Application of the reverse sequence peptide, LRGILS, did not change conductance in four of four large cells.

To examine conductance changes in more detail, cells were studied under voltage clamp. Voltage-ramp commands from –110 to +40 mV were used to establish current-voltage relationships before and during application of trypsin or SLIGRL. A typical voltage-clamp experiment is illustrated in Fig. 5I. Multiple downward deflections at positive voltages reflect unclamped action potentials. When studied under voltage clamp, SLIGRL responses usually involved an increase in conductance at voltages more negative than –40 mV and a decrease in conductance at voltages positive to –30 mV. Presumably, the latter effect, which was also seen with trypsin, reflects suppression of voltage-dependent K⁺ currents, which may in turn contribute to the increased excitability seen in the presence of trypsin (Fig. 5H). Careful examination of the voltage responses to current ramps in Fig. 5H is consistent with this possibility. Voltage responses to current ramps rise more rapidly in the presence of trypsin, indicating decreased conductance at depolarized voltages. The increase in conductance seen at hyperpolarized potentials under voltage clamp (Fig. 5I) would explain the increase in conductance often seen under current-clamp conditions (Fig. 5, D and E) because the hyperpolarizing current pulses passed throughout the response would assess conductance changes that are dominant at more negative voltages.

View larger version (121K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 6. PAR2 immunoreactivity in rat DRG (A and B) and spinal cord (C and D). DRG photographs without fluorescence (A) or with a fluorescent lamp exposure (B); typical distribution of PAR2 on DRG neurons can be seen on the cell membrane of 62% of DRG neurons (arrows). Spinal cord photographs without fluorescence (C) or with exposure to a fluorescent lamp (D); no specific fluorescent staining is observed on spinal cord section, demonstrating a lack of PAR2 expression at the spinal cord level.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
We have found that i.t. applied PAR₂ agonists produce mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia and augment the thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia produced in an inflammatory pain model (Figs. 1, 2, 3). The lack of effect of the control peptide, LRGILS, and the absence of SLIGRL effects in knockout animals strongly supports the notion that activation of PAR₂ augments the transfer of nociceptive information. Although neither SLIGRL nor trypsin exert excitatory actions within the substantia gelatinosa per se (Fig. 4), the changes produced in DRG neurons (Fig. 5) are consistent with an increased excitation, which may in turn contribute to the pronociceptive action. This implies that i.t. applied drugs must have access to the cell bodies of sensory neurons within the DRG. At least two studies suggest this is likely to be the case. Abram et al. (2006) showed that fluorescein, which does not cross the blood-brain barrier, can be detected in rat DRG after i.t. injection. Earlier work had shown that even fluorescein-labeled proteins accessed the DRG when administered by this route (Klatzo et al., 1964).

PAR₂-induced mechanical allodynia may reflect activation of A fibers, whereas thermal and mechanical hyperalgesia may reflect activation of C-fibers. The ability of PAR₂ agonists to augment nociception in a variety of pain models may reflect their ability to increase the excitability of all types of DRG neurons (Fig. 5).

The presence of PAR₂ receptors in DRG neurons is confirmed and their absence from the spinal cord is suggested by our immunohistochemical studies (Fig. 6). To the best of our knowledge, there are no immunohistochemistry, immunoblot, or binding studies that demonstrate the presence of PAR₂ in the dorsal horn. This correlates with the inability of SLIGRL and trypsin to increase spontaneous synaptic events in our electrophysiological experiments (Fig. 4). These observations appear to contradict data from other functional studies that suggest that PAR₂ resides on the central terminals of primary afferent nerves (Fiorucci and Distrutti, 2002). The observation that SLIGRL releases SP from DRG neurons in culture (Steinhoff et al., 2000) may either reflect release from DRG cell bodies (Huang and Neher, 1996) or from neurites. In the latter case, it does not necessarily follow that PAR₂ receptors exist on the central terminals of primary afferent in vivo because the release in vitro (Steinhoff et al., 2000) may come from neurites analogous to peripheral nerve endings. It is already established that PAR₂ agonists release SP from peripheral nerve endings in vivo (Steinhoff et al., 2000). It has been shown, however, that PAR₂ agonists augment TRPV1-induced increase of SP from spinal cord slices that contain neither DRG neuron bodies nor peripheral nerve endings (Amadesi et al., 2004). One possible explanation for this effect is that activation of TRPV1 receptors promotes a rapid appearance of PAR₂ within the dorsal horn. We have preliminary electrophysiological and histochemical data to suggest this may be the case. One might therefore speculate that the appearance of PAR₂ is dependent upon the prior or constitutive activation of TRPV1 receptors. If this is so, it may explain why PAR₂ is found on peripheral nerve terminals and DRG cell bodies but not usually on the central terminals of primary afferents.

Because our electrophysiological studies were confined to the substantia gelatinosa, it could be argued that spinal pronociceptive actions of PAR₂ agonists reflect actions within deeper sensory lamina, such as laminae III and IV, which also receive sensory information from pain fibers. This is unlikely to be the case because these areas, like lamina II, fail to display PAR₂-like immunoreactivity (Fig. 6D).

Unlike PAR₂ agonists, PAR₁ and PAR₄ agonists attenuate nociception (Steinhoff et al., 2000; Vergnolle et al., 2003; Asfaha et al., 2007), and these effects may be mediated both centrally and peripherally (Asfaha et al., 2002). The occasional transient hyperpolarization of DRG neurons seen with trypsin, but not with the PAR₂ agonist SLIGRL, may reflect activation of PAR₁ or PAR₄. The depressant actions of trypsin on sEPSC amplitude and frequency in putative excitatory delay cells in substantia gelatinosa may be mediated by PAR₁ or PAR₄ (Vergnolle et al., 2003), whereas depressant effects of SLIGRL may reflect nonspecific actions because these were also seen with the control peptide inactive on PAR₂, LRGILS (Fig. 4).

Effects on DRG Cells. Even at supramaximal concentrations, the membrane depolarizations produced by trypsin and SLIGRL were of quite small amplitude and unlikely to depolarize DRG neurons to the threshold for action potential generation, although spontaneous action potentials did appear in a few of the cells studied. It is probably more relevant that the agonists affected voltage-gated channels that control action potential discharge when neurons are subject to other depolarizing stimuli. Thus, in a pathological situation, where DRG neurons may be depolarized by a host of pronociceptive substances such as neuropeptides, cytokines, or even low pH, the concomitant activation of PAR₂ receptors would facilitate action potential generation in response to depolarization. This, in turn, would lead to increased firing of fibers that synapse in the dorsal horn. A variety of voltage-gated K⁺ currents are activated by depolarization of DRG neurons (Gold et al., 1996). During the ramp commands used in our voltage-clamp experiments (Fig. 5I), most of the outward current at positive voltages probably flows through delayed rectifier and voltage-dependent Ca²⁺-sensitive K⁺ channels (BK channels) (Abdulla and Smith, 2001). Suppression of conductance at these voltages is more likely to reflect an action on delayed rectifier currents than on BK channels because PAR₂ agonists are known to elevate intracellular Ca²⁺ in DRG cells (Steinhoff et al., 2000). Moreover, PAR₂-induced depolarization was not blocked by Ca²⁺ channel blockers such as Mg²⁺ or Ni²⁺ (J. A. Endicott and P. A. Smith, unpublished data). Decreased K⁺ conductance is likely to contribute to the PAR₂-mediated increase in DRG excitability (Fig. 5H). Because PAR₂ receptors are known to modulate TRPV1 channel activity (Amadesi et al., 2004; Dai et al., 2004), it is possible that the inward current seen at negative voltages reflects activation of these channels. This would seem unlikely because TRPV1 channels are confined to a subset of small DRG neurons, yet PAR₂ agonists produced increased conductance in "large" and "medium" DRG neurons that do not express TRPV1 channels. Moreover, TRPV1 channels exhibit outward rather than inward rectification so that would be more available at positive rather than negative voltages (Raisinghani et al., 2005). Another possibility is that PAR₂ agonists affected H-currents. These nonselective cation currents that are activated by hyperpolarization are found in some DRG cells (Abdulla and Smith, 2001; Chaplan et al., 2003). However, PAR₂ agonists failed to affect H-currents activated by standard hyperpolarizing voltage protocols (P. Stemkowski, unpublished data). Thus, the channels underlying PAR₂-induced changes in conductance remain to be identified.

The observed overall 65% response rate of DRG neurons to PAR₂ agonists fits well with the report that approximately 60% of them display PAR₂ (Steinhoff et al., 2000). In trigeminal ganglion neurons, PAR₂ receptors are found on neurons that do not express tachykinins (Dinh et al., 2005). This and the present observation that PAR₂ depolarized large cells suggest that it is capable of affecting neurons that do not express tachykinins.

Significance of Findings. Our findings illustrate how selective stimulation of DRG neurons can produce hyperalgesia and underline the importance of DRG cell bodies as a site of action of i.t. applied drugs (Abram et al., 2006). Moreover, pathological or pharmacological excitation of DRG cell bodies is able to produce pain-like behavior in animal models. Although trypsin is regarded as the principal PAR₂-activating proteinase, other activators include mast cell tryptase, trypsinogen IV, and a trypsin-like proteinase known as P22 that was identified in brain slices (Sawada et al., 2000). Because mast cells are found in perivascular areas of the nervous system, including the sensory ganglia (Undem et al., 1993), mast cell tryptase is perhaps the most likely endogenous activator of PAR₂ in DRG (Vergnolle et al., 2001). Although the actions of endogenous PAR₂ agonists may be confined to DRG neurons, our findings suggest that such effects play a major role in nociceptive processing.

	Footnotes

 
This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/jpet.107.129171.

ABBREVIATIONS: PAR, proteinase-activated receptor; SLIGRL, PAR₂ ligand (SLIGRL-NH₂; Ser-Leu-Ile-Gly-Arg-Leu-NH₂); SP, substance P; LRGILS, reverse sequence (control) PAR₂ ligand (LRGILS-NH₂; Leu-Arg-Gly-Ile-Leu-Ser-NH₂); DRG, dorsal root ganglion; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; AP, action potential; EPSC, excitatory postsynaptic current; sEPSC, spontaneous EPSC; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TRPV, transient receptor potential vanilloid; I-V, current-voltage.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Peter Smith, Department of Pharmacology, University of Alberta, 9.75 Medical Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H7, Canada. E-mail: peter.a.smith{at}ualberta.ca

	References

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

Abdulla FA and Smith PA (1997) Ectopic ₂-adrenoceptors couple to N-type Ca²⁺ channels in axotomized rat sensory neurons. J Neurosci 17: 1633–1641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Abdulla FA and Smith PA (2001) Axotomy- and autotomy-induced changes in Ca²⁺ and K⁺ channel currents of rat dorsal root ganglion neurons. J Neurophysiol 85: 644–658.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Abram SE, Yi J, Fuchs A, and Hogan QH (2006) Permeability of injured and intact peripheral nerves and dorsal root ganglia. Anesthesiology 105: 146–153.[CrossRef][Medline]

Amadesi S, Nie J, Vergnolle N, Cottrell GS, Grady EF, Trevisani M, Manni C, Geppetti P, McRoberts JA, Ennes H, et al. (2004) Protease-activated receptor 2 sensitizes the capsaicin receptor transient receptor potential vanilloid receptor 1 to induce hyperalgesia. J Neurosci 24: 4300–4312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Asfaha S, Brussee V, Chapman K, Zochodne DW, and Vergnolle N (2002) Proteinase-activated receptor-1 agonists attenuate nociception in response to noxious stimuli. Br J Pharmacol 135: 1101–1106.[CrossRef][Medline]

Asfaha S, Cenac N, Houle S, Altier C, Papez MD, Nguyen C, Steinhoff M, Chapman K, Zamponi GW, and Vergnolle N (2007) Protease-activated receptor-4: a novel mechanism of inflammatory pain modulation. Br J Pharmacol 150: 176–185.[CrossRef][Medline]

Balasubramanyan S, Stemkowski PL, Stebbing MJ, and Smith PA (2006) Sciatic chronic constriction injury produces cell-type specific changes in the electrophysiological properties of rat substantia gelatinosa neurons. J Neurophysiol 96: 579–590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Cenac N and Vergnolle N (2005) Proteases and protease-activated receptors (PARs): novel signals for pain. Curr Top Med Chem 5: 569–576.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chaplan SR, Guo HQ, Lee DH, Luo L, Liu C, Kuei C, Velumian AA, Butler MP, Brown SM, and Dubin AE (2003) Neuronal hyperpolarization-activated pacemaker channels drive neuropathic pain. J Neurosci 23: 1169–1178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dai Y, Moriyama T, Higashi T, Togashi K, Kobayashi K, Yamanaka H, Tominaga M, and Noguchi K (2004) Proteinase-activated receptor 2-mediated potentiation of transient receptor potential vanilloid subfamily 1 activity reveals a mechanism for proteinase-induced inflammatory pain. J Neurosci 24: 4293–4299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dinh QT, Cryer A, Dinh S, Trevisani M, Georgiewa P, Chung F, Geppetti P, Heppt W, Klapp BF, and Fischer A (2005) Protease-activated receptor 2 expression in trigeminal neurons innervating the rat nasal mucosa. Neuropeptides 39: 461–466.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fiorucci S and Distrutti E (2002) Role of PAR2 in pain and inflammation. Trends Pharmacol Sci 23: 153–155.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gold MS, Shuster MJ, and Levine JD (1996) Characterization of six voltage-gated K⁺ currents in adult rat sensory neurons. J Neurophysiol 75: 2629–2646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hollenberg MD (1999) Protease-activated receptors: PAR4 and counting: how long is the course? Trends Pharmacol Sci 20: 271–273.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hoogerwerf WA, Zou L, Shenoy M, Sun D, Micci MA, Lee-Hellmich H, Xiao SY, Winston JH, and Pasricha PJ (2001) The proteinase-activated receptor 2 is involved in nociception. J Neurosci 21: 9036–9042.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Huang LY and Neher E (1996) Ca²⁺-dependent exocytosis in the somata of dorsal root ganglion neurons. Neuron 17: 135–145.[CrossRef][Medline]

Klatzo I, Miguel J, Ferris PJ, Prokop JD, and Smith FM (1964) Observations on the passage of fluorescein labeled serum proteins (FSLP) from the cerebrospinal fluid. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 23: 18–24.[Medline]

Lu Y and Perl ER (2003) A specific inhibitory pathway between substantia gelatinosa neurons receiving direct C-fiber input. J Neurosci 23: 8752–8758.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lu Y and Perl ER (2005) Modular organization of excitatory circuits between neurons of the spinal superficial dorsal horn (laminae I and II). J Neurosci 25: 3900–3907.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Moran TD, Colmers WF, and Smith PA (2004) Opioid-like actions of neuropeptide Y in rat substantia gelatinosa: Y1 suppression of inhibition and Y2 suppression of excitation. J Neurophysiol 92: 3266–3275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Noorbakhsh F, Vergnolle N, Hollenberg MD, and Power C (2003) Proteinase-activated receptors in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 4: 981–990.[CrossRef][Medline]

Raisinghani M, Pabbidi RM, and Premkumar LS (2005) Activation of transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) by resiniferatoxin. J Physiol (Lond) 567: 771–786.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sakmann B and Stuart GJ (1995) Patch clamp recordings from the soma, dendrites and axons of neurons in brain slices, in Single-Channel Recordings (Sakmann B and Neher E eds) pp 199–211, Plenum, New York.

Sawada K, Nishibori M, Nakaya N, Wang Z, and Saeki K (2000) Purification and characterization of a trypsin-like serine proteinase from rat brain slices that degrades laminin and type IV collagen and stimulates protease-activated receptor-2. J Neurochem 74: 1731–1738.[CrossRef][Medline]

Steinhoff M, Buddenkotte J, Shpacovitch V, Rattenholl A, Moormann C, Vergnolle N, Luger TA, and Hollenberg MD (2005) Proteinase-activated receptors: transducers of proteinase-mediated signaling in inflammation and immune response. Endocr Rev 26: 1–43.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Steinhoff M, Vergnolle N, Young SH, Tognetto M, Amadesi S, Ennes HS, Trevisani M, Hollenberg MD, Wallace JL, Caughey GH, et al. (2000) Agonists of proteinase-activated receptor 2 induce inflammation by a neurogenic mechanism. Nat Med 6: 151–158.[CrossRef][Medline]

Undem BJ, Hubbard W, and Weinreich D (1993) Immunologically induced neuromodulation of guinea pig nodose ganglion neurons. J Auton Nerv Syst 44: 35–44.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vergnolle N, Bunnett NW, Sharkey KA, Brussee V, Compton SJ, Grady EF, Cirino G, Gerard N, Basbaum AI, Andrade-Gordon P, et al. (2001) Proteinase-activated receptor-2 and hyperalgesia: a novel pain pathway. Nat Med 7: 821–826.[CrossRef][Medline]

Vergnolle N, Ferazzini M, D'Andrea MR, Buddenkotte J, and Steinhoff M (2003) Proteinase-activated receptors: novel signals for peripheral nerves. Trends Neurosci 26: 496–500.[CrossRef][Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. Fujita, T. Liu, T. Nakatsuka, and E. Kumamoto Proteinase-Activated Receptor-1 Activation Presynaptically Enhances Spontaneous Glutamatergic Excitatory Transmission in Adult Rat Substantia Gelatinosa Neurons J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2009; 102(1): 312 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Linley, K. Rose, M. Patil, B. Robertson, A. N. Akopian, and N. Gamper Inhibition of M Current in Sensory Neurons by Exogenous Proteases: A Signaling Pathway Mediating Inflammatory Nociception J. Neurosci., October 29, 2008; 28(44): 11240 - 11249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jpet.107.129171v1 324/1/224    most recent Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Alier, K. A. Articles by Smith, P. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Alier, K. A. Articles by Smith, P. A.