![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
METABOLISM, TRANSPORT, AND PHARMACOGENOMICS
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas (A.Z., S.B., A.G.-Z., G.P.M., A.R.-P.); Arkansas Public Health Laboratory, Arkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, Arkansas (C.F.L., N.C.M., V.-H.L., J.H.M.); and Drug Discovery and Development Technology Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland (M.F.)
Received August 8, 2007; accepted October 4, 2007.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Variations in hepatic metabolism are thought to be a major determinant for warfarin response variations. Warfarin is readily oxidized via hepatic cytochrome P450s to produce 4'-, 6-, 7-, 8-, and 10-hydroxywarfarin. The monohydroxylated derivatives have little anticoagulation activity and are excreted through urine. (S)-Warfarin is predominantly metabolized via CYP2C9 to produce 6- and 7-hydroxywarfarin (Rettie and Tai, 2006
). (R)-Warfarin is thought to be predominantly metabolized via CYP1A2, CYP3A4, CYP2C9, CYP2C18, and CYP2C19. CYP1A2 and/or CYP2C19 primarily produce 6-, 7-, and 8-hydroxywarfarin, whereas CYP3A4, CYP2C9, and CYP2C18 produce 4'- and 10-hydroxywarfarin (Rettie and Tai, 2006
) in the presence of (R)-warfarin. Despite having a vast understanding of warfarin metabolism via cytochrome P450 oxidation, little progress has been made in developing more efficacious anticoagulant drugs or therapeutic strategies that reduce adverse side effects associated with warfarin administration.
Glucuronidation is one of the main phase II metabolic pathways whereby xenobiotics, such as drugs and natural compounds present in the diet, are biotransformed into polar conjugates. These conjugates are more water-soluble than the parent compounds and are easily excreted in bile or urine. The reaction is mediated by a family of enzymes, UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), that catalyze the transfer of glucuronic acid (GlcUA) from UDP-GlcUA, to a wide range of structurally unrelated molecules bearing hydroxyl, carboxyl, amine, or thiol groups (Mackenzie et al., 2005
). In humans, up to 20 different UGT isoforms belonging to the subfamilies 1 and 2 have been characterized following expression of their corresponding cDNA in heterologous cells (Ritter, 2000
). Studies have shown that these isoforms present distinct, but frequently overlapping, substrate specificities (Radominska-Pandya et al., 1999
). It is known that warfarin, as well as the monohydroxylated derivatives of warfarin, can be potential substrates for phase II conjugating enzymes (Jansing et al., 1992
; Guo et al., 2006
). However, human data are very limited with regard to warfarin and hydroxywarfarin conjugation.
The primary goal of this study is to elucidate which human hepatic and extrahepatic UGTs have the potential to conjugate warfarin and/or the primary hydroxylated metabolites of warfarin. Data show that glucuronidation of hydroxylated warfarin derivatives is catalyzed by several UGT1A isoforms. These reactions are controlled by both hepatic and extrahepatic pathways, as well as specific substrate-enzyme interactions. Future studies continuing to describe these pathways may enhance our ability to reduce warfarin toxicity and develop new anticoagulant therapies.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Human Liver and Recombinant UGT Isoform Incubations. HLM (50 µg) or UGT recombinant membrane protein (5 µg) were incubated in 100 µM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4/5 mM MgCl2/5 mM saccharolactone with 100 to 2000 µM substrate, in a total volume of 30 µl. Substrates were added in dimethyl sulfoxide with a final concentration of 2%, and controls omitting substrates were run with each assay. No additional detergents or other activators used in the incubations. Reactions were started by the addition of UDP-GlcUA (4 mM) and incubated for up to 180 min at 37°C. The rate of glucuronidation of hydroxywarfarin was linear for up to 3 h (data not shown). The reactions were stopped by addition of 40 µl of ethanol. Each sample was centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 8 min to spin down the protein, and 60 µl of the supernatant was transferred to an autosampler vial for analysis as described above. All incubations were performed in duplicate, and corresponding error was calculated.
Recombinant Cytochrome P450 Incubations. Recombinant CYP2C9 was expressed from human CYP2C9 (Arg144) cDNA using a baculovirus expression system. Microsomes also contained cDNA-expressed human cytochrome P450 reductase and human cytochrome b5. CYP2C9 (50 pmol) was incubated in 400 µl of a Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, containing 1.3 mM NADP+, 3.3 mM MgCl2, 3.3 mM glucose 6-phosphate, and 0.4 U/ml glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase with 100 µM(S)-warfarin. Some incubations also contained 100 µM 8-hydroxywarfarin. All cytochrome P450 reactions were incubated for 60 min at 37°C. Reactions were terminated by the addition of 400 µl of ethanol. Protein was pelleted by centrifugation, and supernatant was transferred to autosampler vials and stored at –80°C before analysis.
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-UV/Vis Analysis. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods were elaborated for the initial separation and identification of warfarin glucuronides. Analyses were performed using an HP 1050 HPLC system equipped with a UV-Vis diode array detector. Instrument operation and data acquisition were controlled through the Agilent ChemStation software package (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Samples were separated using a Supelcosil LC-18 (25 cm x 4.6 mm, 5 mm) column warmed to 37°C. The solvent system consisted of 0.1% acetic acid in water (A) and methanol (B) at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The separation of warfarin and metabolites was achieved using the following elution gradient: 100% A (5 min), linear gradient from 100% A to 100% B (5–25 min), and 100% B (25–30 min). The column was then re-equilibrated at initial conditions for 10 min between runs. The elution of each warfarin metabolite was monitored at 313 nm. Primary standards for the glucuronidated monohydroxylated warfarin metabolites were not available; therefore, product concentrations were semiquantified using the responses for external standards of each warfarin substrate. It has been shown previously that the addition of the glucuronic acid moiety does not alter the extinction coefficients from that of the unreacted substrate (Doerge et al., 2000
). A minimum detection limit (0.3 nmol ± 9.6% relative standard deviation) was determined by measuring 3 times the S.D. of the 7-hydroxwarfarin low level standard (1 nmol). Detection limit studies were conducted with eight independent analyses conducted over 4 days.
|
|
|
|
Enzyme Kinetics. Kinetic parameters and Vmax and Km values, were determined by incubating the UGT membrane protein (5 µg) in the presence of varying concentrations of substrate (100–2000 µM) at a fixed concentration of UDP-GlcUA (4 mM) for 90 min. All other conditions were identical to those of the screening experiments. Assuming Michaelis-Menten kinetics, the parameters were determined using Prism4 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).
Statistics. Cytochrome P450 inhibition studies were analyzed by analysis of variance and tested for significance using a p value of <0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Neither enantiomerically pure isoform of warfarin served as a direct substrate for human UGTs (Fig. 1). This is important new information indicating that native warfarin biotransformation is exclusively dependent on the oxidative metabolism catalyzed by P450s. Two other monohydroxylated warfarin derivatives, 4'- and 10-hydroxy, showed very little or no activity with any isoform under experimental conditions tested (Fig. 1). The two major products of CYP2C9 metabolism, 6- and 7-hydroxywarfarin, were glucuronidated by UGT1A1, -1A3, and -1A10 and to a lesser extent -1A8 (Fig. 1). UGT1A10 glucuronidated both 6- and 7-hydroxywarfarin with similar efficiency (
0.04 µM/mg protein/min). 7-Hydroxywarfarin was a slightly better substrate for UGT1A1 (
0.06 µM/mg protein/min), but this isoform's activity toward 6-hydroxywarfarin was lower (<0.01 µM/mg protein/min). UGT1A3 and -1A8 also glucuronidated 7-hydroxywarfarin with low efficiency (
0.005 µM/mg protein/min). 8-Hydroxywarfarin seemed to be the best substrate for glucuronidation (Fig. 1). UGT 1A1, -1A3, -1A8, 1A9, and -1A10 showed activity with 8-hydroxywarfarin, with UGT1A10 showing the highest activity (>0.6 µM/mg protein/min). This compound was also a very good substrate for UGT1A8 and -1A9 (
0.1 µM/mg protein/min). UGT1A1 and -1A3 had much lower activity toward 8-hydroxywarfarin (<0.05 µM/mg protein/min, respectively). Human recombinant UGT1A4, 1A6, 1A7, and 2B7 did not show any measurable activity toward any substrate tested (Fig. 1).
Kinetic Analysis. Kinetic analyses revealed UGT1A10 universally accepted the racemic 6-, 7-, and 8-hydroxywarfarins as substrates, whereas the remaining UGTs were more selective (Fig. 2; Table 2). Despite variations in the Vmax and Km values, the UGT1A10 catalytic efficiencies toward the 6- and 7-hydroxylated warfarins were similar, whereas the efficiency toward 8-hydroxywarfarin was approximately 10-fold higher (Table 2). Compared with UGT1A10, 7-hydroxywarfarin glucuronidation by UGT1A1 was 4-fold more efficient due to a higher Vmax and lower Km (Table 2). The turnover rates for 8-hydroxywarfarin by UGT1A8 and UGT1A9 were similar, although UGT1A9 displayed a 2-fold lower Km, resulting in a more efficient enzyme toward this substrate (Table 2).
|
|
|
Hydroxywarfarin glucuronides demonstrated a propensity to undergo in-source fragmentation during MS/MS analysis. MRM experiments (data not shown) and neutral loss studies (data not shown) were designed to assess whether additional metabolites were formed but not identified during product ion scans (Fig. 3). Neither study identified major glucuronidated metabolites other than those observed in product ion scans (Fig. 3). MRM studies showed a small degree of in-source fragmentation.
Cytochrome P450 Warfarin Product Inhibition Study. To begin assessing the physiological significance of hydroxywarfarin glucuronidation, 6-hydroxylase activity of CYP2C9 was measured with (S)-warfarin (100 µM) in the presence and absence of 8-hydroxywarfarin (100 µM). Reaction rates were approximately 6.0 ± 4.7 pmol product/nmol P450/min (mean ± S.D.) in the absence of 8-hydroxywarfarin. The addition of 8-hydroxywarfarin (100 µM) significantly inhibited this reaction by approximately 85% (Fig. 6, A and B).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies support the finding that biotransformation by human UGTs is exclusively dependent on oxidative metabolism catalyzed by P450s. Isolated rat hepatocytes as well as in vivo rodent models produce glucuronides of hydroxywarfarin metabolites (Jansing et al., 1992
; Guo et al., 2006
). There is also one report indicating that hydroxywarfarin glucuronides are excreted in human urine (Kaminsky and Zhang, 1997
), which is consistent with our unpublished observations showing that hydroxywarfarin glucuronides are a major metabolite excreted in human urine.
Of all the specific UGTs examined in the current study, the extrahepatic isoform, UGT1A10, exhibits the highest glucuronidation activity toward the largest number of monohydroxylated warfarin derivatives tested. UGT1A10 glucuronidates 4'-, 6-, 7-, and 8-hydroxywarfarin at relatively high metabolic rates. UGT1A8, another extrahepatic isoform, has a similar metabolic capacity but exhibits more enzyme substrate specificity compared with the reactivity of UGT1A10. UGT1A8 only metabolizes 7- and 8-hydroxywarfarin. Of the hepatic UGTs tested, UGT1A1 and -1A9 are the only isoforms shown to be involved in the glucuronidation of hydroxywarfarins. It is noteworthy that UGT1A9 metabolizes 8-hydroxywarfarin with the highest efficiency as measured by Vmax/Km. UGT1A1 metabolized all three substrates, including the highly efficient glucuronidation of 7-hydroxywarfarin. Even though the extrapolation of Km and Vmax values derived in this study to in vivo processes is difficult, the reported metabolic parameters are comparable and/or much higher than values stated in previous reports measuring warfarin oxidation rates catalyzed by P450s (Rettie et al., 1992
; Kaminsky et al., 1993
; Sullivan-Klose et al., 1996
; Zhang et al., 1999
). This comparison as well as the fact that these products are known to be excreted in human urine (Kaminsky and Zhang, 1997
) suggests that hydroxywarfarin conjugation via UGTs is important for human detoxification and excretion.
It is very interesting that UGT1A8 and 1A10 react readily with hydroxywarfarin metabolites. UGT1A8 and 1A10 are known to be primarily expressed in human stomach and intestine and are thought to be important for detoxifying xenobiotics (Strassburg et al., 1997
; Cheng et al., 1999
; Fisher et al., 2001
). Data presented in this report are consistent with published reports studying extrahepatic P450 oxidation of warfarin. For example, CYP2C19 is known to be expressed in human intestine and is known to specifically produce 8-hydroxywarfarin in the presence of (R)-warfarin (Rettie and Tai, 2006
). The current study shows that 8-hydroxywarfarin is one of the primary metabolites of warfarin glucuronidated by UGT1A8 and UGT1A10. This suggests that UGTs expressed in human intestine work in concert with CYP2C19 to preferentially detoxify and remove (R)-warfarin. Perhaps intestinal glucuronidation of (R)-warfarin oxidation products contributes to the lower efficacy of this enantiomer (Breckenridge, 1977
; Chan et al., 1994
; Pitsiu et al., 2003
).
|
Assignment of product regiochemistry is not as straight-forward for the 6-, 7-, and 8-hydroxywarfarin glucuronides. The presence of two reactive hydroxyl groups on the coumarin skeleton (Fig. 5) limits MS/MS spectral information because potential fragment ions have the same mass regardless of which hydroxyl group (4- or 6-, 7-, or 8-hydroxy) is glucuronidated. The lack of UGT activity with warfarin, (R)-warfarin, (S)-warfarin, and 10-hydroxywarfarin (Fig. 1; Jansing et al., 1992
) suggests that the hydroxyl group located at the C4-position is sterically hindered and less reactive with human UGTs. Information provided by these structure comparisons suggests that glucuronidation is occurring at the C6-, C7-, and C8-positions. Figure 7 shows a representative scheme indicating which UGTs act on specific hydroxylated warfarin metabolites and where it is thought that this action takes place in humans.
Although it is widely recognized that oxidation by P450s inactivates warfarin, this is the first report suggesting that variations in UGT loci and metabolism need to be considered as important variables while adjusting warfarin dosing algorithms. Our in vitro data showing significant inhibition (approximately 85%) of CYP2C9 catalytic activity toward (S)-warfarin in the presence of 8-hydroxywarfarin highlight the potential importance of this pathway. Thus, CYP2C9 inhibition would be avoided by removing the P450 products through UGT-mediated conjugation with glucuronic acid. Alternatively, it is possible that hydroxywarfarin glucuronides may inhibit P450 activity. Glucuronides inhibiting P450 activity is a relatively new concept and is considered an unexpected phenomenon (Ogilvie et al., 2006
). One can also speculate that glucuronidation of warfarin derivatives produces biologically active glucuronides, like the 6-O-glucuronide of morphine (Ritter, 2000
). Interactions between glucuronides and specific transporters are another potentially mitigating but unexplored factor in the clearance of these compounds.
This report characterizes human UGTs associated with warfarin metabolism and provides vital information that will be necessary to fully explore the importance of this metabolic pathway. UGT deficiency due to epigenetic factors and/or polymorphisms could significantly alter the glucuronidation of warfarin metabolites and result in a compromised capacity for warfarin metabolism. Overall, these in vitro studies provide insight for understanding the phase II metabolic pathways that glucuronidate cytochrome P450 warfarin metabolites and facilitate their excretion. This study shows that UGT activity is controlled through specific P450 oxidations as well as specific enzyme substrate mechanisms. Future studies assessing potential stereochemical effects, UGT polymorphisms, and/or epigenetic factors may provide insight in developing better anticoagulant treatment options.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.
ABBREVIATIONS: UGT, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase; GlcUA, glucuronic acid; HLM, human liver microsome; HPLC, high-performance liquid chromatography; LC, liquid chromatography; MS/MS, tandem mass spectrometry; MRM, multiple reaction monitoring; P450, cytochrome P450.
Address correspondence to: Jeffery H. Moran, Arkansas Public Health Laboratory, Arkansas Department of Health, 201 South Monroe Street, Little Rock, AR 72205. E-mail: Jeffery.Moran{at}arkansas.gov
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bauer KA (2006) New anticoagulants. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 450–456.
Breckenridge AM (1977) Interindividual differences in the response to oral anticoagulants. Drugs 14: 367–375.[Medline]
Chan E, McLachlan A, O'Reilly R, and Rowland M (1994) Stereochemical aspects of warfarin drug interactions: use of a combined pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. Clin Pharmacol Ther 56: 286–294.[Medline]
Cheng Z, Radominska-Pandya A, and Tephly TR (1999) Studies on the substrate specificity of human intestinal UDP-glucuronosyltransferases 1A8 and 1A10. Drug Metab Dispos 27: 1165–1170.
Coffman BL, Rios GR, King CD, and Tephly TR (1997) Human UGT2B7 catalyzes morphine glucuronidation. Drug Metab Dispos 25: 1–4.
Doerge DR, Chang HC, Churchwell MI, and Holder CL (2000) Analysis of soy isoflavone conjugation in vitro and in human blood using liquid chromatographymass spectrometry. Drug Metab Dispos 28: 298–307.
Fisher MB, Paine MF, Strelevitz TJ, and Wrighton SA (2001) The role of hepatic and extrahepatic UDP-glucuronosyltransferases in human drug metabolism. Drug Metab Rev 33: 273–297.[CrossRef][Medline]
Guo Y, Weller P, Farrell E, Cheung P, Fitch B, Clark D, Wu SY, Wang J, Liao G, Zhang Z, et al. (2006) In silico pharmacogenetics of warfarin metabolism. Nat Biotechnol 24: 531–536.[CrossRef][Medline]
He M, Korzekwa KR, Jones JP, Rettie AE, and Trager WF (1999) Structural forms of phenprocoumon and warfarin that are metabolized at the active site of CYP2C9. Arch Biochem Biophys 372: 16–28.[CrossRef][Medline]
Heimark LD and Trager WF (1985) Stereoselective metabolism of conformational analogues of warfarin by beta-naphthoflavone-inducible cytochrome P-450. J Med Chem 28: 503–506.[CrossRef][Medline]
Hirsh J, Dalen J, Anderson DR, Poller L, Bussey H, Ansell J and Deykin D (2001) Oral anticoagulants: mechanism of action, clinical effectiveness, and optimal therapeutic range. Chest 119: 8S–21S.[CrossRef][Medline]
Holbrook AM, Pereira JA, Labiris R, McDonald H, Douketis JD, Crowther M, and Wells PS (2005) Systematic overview of warfarin and its drug and food interactions. Arch Intern Med 165: 1095–1106.
Holford NH (1986) Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin: understanding the dose-effect relationship. Clin Pharmacokinet 11: 483–504.[Medline]
Jansing RL, Chao ES, and Kaminsky LS (1992) Phase II metabolism of warfarin in primary culture of adult rat hepatocytes. Mol Pharmacol 41: 209–215.[Abstract]
Kaminsky LS, de Morais SM, Faletto MB, Dunbar DA, and Goldstein JA (1993) Correlation of human cytochrome P4502C substrate specificities with primary structure: warfarin as a probe. Mol Pharmacol 43: 234–239.[Abstract]
Kaminsky LS and Zhang ZY (1997) Human P450 metabolism of warfarin. Pharmacol Ther 73: 67–74.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kurkela M, Garcia-Horsman JA, Luukkanen L, Morsky S, Taskinen J, Baumann M, Kostiainen R, Hirvonen J, and Finel M (2003) Expression and characterization of recombinant human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs). UGT1A9 is more resistant to detergent inhibition than other UGTs and was purified as an active dimeric enzyme. J Biol Chem 278: 3536–3544.
Kuuranne T, Kurkela M, Thevis M, Schanzer W, Finel M, and Kostiainen R (2003) Glucuronidation of anabolic androgenic steroids by recombinant human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Drug Metab Dispos 31: 1117–1124.
Mackenzie PI, Walter Bock K, Burchell B, Guillemette C, Ikushiro S, Iyanagi T, Miners JO, Owens IS, and Nebert DW (2005) Nomenclature update for the mammalian UDP glycosyltransferase (UGT) gene superfamily. Pharmacogenet Genomics 15: 677–685.[Medline]
Ogilvie BW, Zhang D, Li W, Rodrigues AD, Gipson AE, Holsapple J, Toren P, and Parkinson A (2006) Glucuronidation converts gemfibrozil to a potent, metabolism-dependent inhibitor of CYP2C8: implications for drug-drug interactions. Drug Metab Dispos 34: 191–197.
O'Reilly RA, Aggeler PM, and Leong LS (1963) Studies on the coumarin anticoagulant drugs: the pharmacodynamics of warfarin in man. J Clin Invest 42: 1542–1551.[Medline]
Pitsiu M, Parker EM, Aarons L, and Rowland M (2003) A Bayesian method based on clotting factor activity for the prediction of maintenance warfarin dosage regimens. Ther Drug Monit 25: 36–40.[CrossRef][Medline]
Radominska-Pandya A, Czernik PJ, Little JM, Battaglia E, and Mackenzie PI (1999) Structural and functional studies of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases. Drug Metab Rev 31: 817–899.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rettie AE, Korzekwa KR, Kunze KL, Lawrence RF, Eddy AC, Aoyama T, Gelboin HV, Gonzalez FJ, and Trager WF (1992) Hydroxylation of warfarin by human cDNA-expressed cytochrome P-450: a role for P-4502C9 in the etiology of (S)-warfarin-drug interactions. Chem Res Toxicol 5: 54–59.[CrossRef][Medline]
Rettie AE and Tai G (2006) The pharmocogenomics of warfarin: closing in on personalized medicine. Mol Interv 6: 223–227.
Ritter JK (2000) Roles of glucuronidation and UDP-glucuronosyltransferases in xenobiotic bioactivation reactions. Chem Biol Interact 129: 171–193.[CrossRef][Medline]
Strassburg CP, Oldhafer K, Manns MP, and Tukey RH (1997) Differential expression of the UGT1A locus in human liver, biliary, and gastric tissue: identification of UGT1A7 and UGT1A10 transcripts in extrahepatic tissue. Mol Pharmacol 52: 212–220.
Sullivan-Klose TH, Ghanayem BI, Bell DA, Zhang ZY, Kaminsky LS, Shenfield GM, Miners JO, Birkett DJ, and Goldstein JA (1996) The role of the CYP2C9-Leu359 allelic variant in the tolbutamide polymorphism. Pharmacogenetics 6: 341–349.[Medline]
Wajih N, Sane DC, Hutson SM, and Wallin R (2005) Engineering of a recombinant vitamin K-dependent gamma-carboxylation system with enhanced gammacarboxyglutamic acid forming capacity: evidence for a functional CXXC redox center in the system. J Biol Chem 280: 10540–10547.
Yacobi A and Levy G (1977) Protein binding of warfarin enantiomers in serum of humans and rats. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 5: 123–131.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang H, LeCulyse E, Liu L, Hu M, Matoney L, Zhu W, and Yan B (1999) Rat pregnane X receptor: molecular cloning, tissue distribution, and xenobiotic regulation. Arch Biochem Biophys 368: 14–22.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. P. Miller, C. F. Lichti, A. K. Zielinska, A. Mazur, S. M. Bratton, A. Gallus-Zawada, M. Finel, J. H. Moran, and A. Radominska-Pandya Identification of Hydroxywarfarin Binding Site in Human UDP Glucuronosyltransferase 1A10: Phenylalanine90 Is Crucial for the Glucuronidation of 6- and 7-Hydroxywarfarin but Not 8-Hydroxywarfarin Drug Metab. Dispos., November 1, 2008; 36(11): 2211 - 2218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||