JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on July 27, 2007; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.107.126680


0022-3565/07/3231-398-405$20.00
JPET 323:398-405, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.107.126680v1
323/1/398    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liou, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, J.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liou, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, J.-Y.

CHEMOTHERAPY, ANTIBIOTICS, AND GENE THERAPY

A Novel Oral Indoline-Sulfonamide Agent, N-[1-(4-Methoxybenzenesulfonyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-indol-7-yl]-Isonicotinamide (J30), Exhibits Potent Activity against Human Cancer Cells in Vitro and in Vivo through the Disruption of Microtubule

Jing-Ping Liou, Kuo-Shun Hsu, Ching-Chuan Kuo, Chi-Yen Chang, and Jang-Yang Chang

College of Pharmacy, Taipei Medical University (J.-P.L.), Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China; National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes (K.-S.H., C.-C.K, C.-Y.C., J.-Y.C.), Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China; and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China (J.-Y.C.)

Received June 5, 2007; accepted July 26, 2007.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We have previously synthesized a series of 7-aroylaminoindoline-1-sulfonamides as a novel class of antitubulin agents. Here we show that one of these new compounds, N-[1-(4-methoxybenzenesulfonyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-indol-7-yl]-isonicotinamide (J30), is potently effective against various resistant and nonresistant cancer cell lines despite the status of multidrug resistance, multidrug-resistance associated protein, or other resistance factors in vitro. J30 inhibits assembly of purified tubulin by strongly binding to the colchicine-binding site. Western blot and immunofluorescence experiments demonstrate that J30 depolymerizes microtubules in the KB cell line, resulting in an accumulation of G2/M phase cells. Further studies indicate that J30 causes cell cycle arrest, as assessed by flow analyses and the appearance of MPM-2 (a specific mitotic marker), and is associated with up-regulation of cyclin B1, phosphorylation of Cdc25C, and dephosphorylation of Cdc2. J30 also causes Bcl-2 phosphorylation, cytochrome c translocation, and activation of the caspase-9 and caspase-3 cascades. These findings suggest that the J30-mediated apoptotic signaling pathway depends on caspases and mitochondria. Finally, we show that oral administration of J30 significantly inhibits tumor growth in NOD/scid mice bearing human oral, gastric, and drug-resistant xenografts. Together, our results suggest that J30 has potential as a chemotherapeutic agent for treatment of various malignancies.


One of the most successful classes of antitumor drugs targets microtubules, the principal components of the cytoskeleton that are important in cell division, organelle transport, cytokinesis, maintenance of cell morphology, and signal transduction (Jordan and Wilson, 2004Go). There are two categories of antitubulin compounds used to target highly proliferating malignant cells. The microtubule depolymerizing agents, such as vinca alkaloids and colchicinoids, inhibit tubulin polymerization. The microtubule polymerizing agents, such as taxanes and epothilones, promote or stabilize the tubulin polymer form (Pellegrini and Budman, 2005Go). Recent studies suggest that the inhibitory effects of these drugs are due to their interruption of microtubule dynamics rather than to alteration of microtubule polymer mass. The disruption of microtubule dynamics leads to arrest of growing cells in metaphase/anaphase, causing apoptotic cell death or nonapoptotic slow cell death (Mollinedo and Gajate, 2003Go).

Taxanes and vinca alkaloids have been in clinical use for a long time, but these drugs have many drawbacks (Attard et al., 2006Go). First, drug resistance, caused by mutations and/or expression of different tubulin isotypes, limits the widespread use of antitubulin agents. Drug resistance may also be caused by overexpression of drug efflux pumps, including the multidrug resistance (MDR) P-glycoprotein (Pgp) or multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP). Second, most drugs (e.g., paclitaxel) in clinical use require intravenous injection with a long-term remedial course, causing patients to suffer mentally and physically and reducing the patients' quality of life. Third, although taxanes are effective against ovarian, lung, breast, bladder, and hematological cancers, they are ineffective against solid tumors such as gastric, liver, and colorectal carcinomas. Fourth, peripheral neuropathy is a common adverse effect of antitubulin drugs, and this limits the tolerable dose. Many researchers are currently working to develop new antitubulin drugs that are less vulnerable to resistance, can be given orally, have broad spectrum efficiency, and cause minimal neurotoxicity (Bacher et al., 2001Go; Beckers et al., 2002Go; Tahir et al., 2003Go; Kuo et al., 2004Go; Aneja et al., 2006aGo,bGo).

The sulfonamides have been in clinical use for several decades. Different classes of sulfonamides have antibacterial, diuretic, antidiabetic, antithyroid, antihypertensive, or antiviral activities (Drews, 2000Go). Recently, many structurally novel sulfonamide derivatives have shown substantial antitumor activity (Scozzafava et al., 2003Go). For instance, HMN-214 arrests cells in the G2/M phase and exhibits antitumor activity. The antitumor activity is mediated by cytotoxicity, via polo-like kinase disturbance, and by MDR1 down-regulation, via binding to the B-subunit of the essential transcription factor NF-Y (Tanaka et al., 2003Go). Two other sulfonamides, E7070 and E7010, are regarded as breakthroughs in the discovery of new sulfonamides with strong antineoplastic ability (Yoshino et al., 1992Go; Owa et al., 1999Go). E7070 is in a class of novel cell cycle inhibitors that block cell cycle progression at multiple points, although its target mechanism remains unclear (Van Kesteren et al., 2002Go). E7010 reversibly binds to the colchicine-binding site of tubulin and arrests cells in the mitotic phase (Yoshimatsu et al., 1997Go). Both compounds display antitumor activity against rodent and human tumor xenografts and are currently undergoing phase I/II clinical trials (Smyth et al., 2005Go; Fox et al., 2006Go).

We have synthesized a new class of 7-aroylaminoindoline-1-benzenesulfonamides and screened them for their ability to inhibit tumor cell growth (Chang et al., 2006Go). We found one of these novel compounds, namely J30 (Fig. 1), shows strong antiproliferative activity against human tumor cell lines, as well as the ability to overcome drug resistance, and, of note, it is orally bioavailable. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the molecular mechanism of J30, to investigate the effects of J30 on cellular signaling pathways and triggers of apoptosis, and to examine its antitumor efficacy in vivo.


Figure 1
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Chemical structure of J30.

 


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Chemicals and Antibodies. Camptothecin (CPT), colchicine, etoposide (VP16), paclitaxel (Taxol), and vincristine were purchased from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO). Antibodies were obtained from following companies: {alpha}-tubulin (Sigma Chemical); BclII, Cdc2, Cdc25C, cyclin B1, cytochrome c, and horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA); phosphospecific MPM-2 (Upstate Biotechnology, Charlottesville, VA); COX IV (Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Beverly, MA); poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) (Severigen, Gaithersburg, MD); and fluorescent isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated secondary antibody (Ancell Corporation, Bayport, MN). Medium and reagents of cell culture were acquired from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). Microtubule-associated protein (MAP)-rich tubulin and biotin-labeled tubulin were from Cytoskeleton, Inc. (Denver, CO). [3H]Colchicine, [3H]paclitaxel, [3H]vinblastine, and streptavidin-labeled poly(vinyl toluene) scintillation proximity assay (SPA) beads were purchased from GE Healthcare (Piscataway, NJ). Other chemicals not specified were from Sigma-Aldrich or Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) with standard analytical or higher grade.

Cell Cultures. Human cancer cell lines (A498, KB, MKN45, HT29, HONE1, H460, DBTRG, TSGH, and Hep3B) used in this study were procured from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD) and grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium, minimal essential medium, or RPMI 1640 medium. Resistant cell lines KB-Vin10, KB-7D, KB-S15, and HONE1-CPT30 were maintained in medium containing an additional 10 nM vincristine, 7 µM VP16, 50 nM paclitaxel, and 100 nM CPT, respectively. All cell cultures were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 2 µM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin and incubated in a humidified atmosphere (95% air and 5% CO2) at 37°C. KB-Vin10 and KB-S15 were cell lines resistant against vincristine and paclitaxel, respectively, and both overexpressed the MDR drug efflux protein. KB-7D cells were VP16-resistant cells and overexpressed MRP. HONE1-CPT30 cells have a mutation at topoisomerase I (E418K), resulting in camptothecin resistance. All resistant cell lines were incubated in the drug-free medium for 3 days before harvesting for the growth inhibition assay.

Growth Inhibition Assay. In vitro growth inhibition was assessed with the methylene blue assay (Finlay et al., 1984Go). In brief, exponentially growing cells were seeded into 24-well culture plates at a density of 8000 to 20,000 cells/ml/well (depending on the doubling time of the cell line) and allowed to adhere overnight. Cells were incubated with various concentrations of drugs for 72 h. Then, we measured A595 of the resulting solution from 1% N-lauroylsarcosine exaction. The 50% growth inhibition (IC50) was calculated on the basis of the A595 of untreated cells (taken as 100%). The values shown are the means and SEs of at least three independent experiments performed in duplicate.

In Vitro Microtubule Polymerization Assay. This assay was conducted in a 96-well UV microplate, as described previously (Chang et al., 2003Go). MAP-rich tubulin (0.24 mg) was mixed with various concentrations of drugs and incubated at 37°C in 120 µlof reaction buffer [100 mM PIPES, pH 6.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM GTP, and 1% (v/v) dimethyl sulfoxide]. A350 was monitored every 30 s for 30 min, using the PowerWave X Microplate Reader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT). The augmentation in A350 nm indicated the increase in tubulin polymerization. One hundred percent polymerization was defined as the area under the curve of the untreated control. The IC50 was defined as the concentration at which microtubule polymerization was inhibited by 50%, calculated using nonlinear regression.

Tubulin Competition-Binding Scintillation Proximity Assay. This assay was performed in a 96-well plate (Tahir et al., 2000Go, 2001Go, 2003Go). In brief, [3H]colchicine, [3H]paclitaxel, or [3H]vinblastine sulfate (final concentration, 0.08, 0.16, or 0.25 µM, respectively) was mixed with the test compound and special long-chain biotin-labeled tubulin (0.5 µg for the colchicine and paclitaxel binding assay and 1.0 µg for the vinblastine binding assay) and then incubated in 100 µl of reaction buffer (80 mM PIPES, pH 6.8, 1 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM GTP) for 2h at 37°C. Streptavidin-labeled SPA beads (80, 160, and 200 µg for the colchicine, paclitaxel, or vinblastine binding assay, respectively) were added to each reaction mixture. Then the radioactive counts were directly measured by a scintillation counter and the inhibition constant (Ki) was calculated using the Cheng-Prusoff equation (Cheng and Prusoff, 1973Go).

Measurement of in Vivo Microtubule Assembly. We used an established method to measure soluble (depolymerized) and assembled (polymerized) tubulin (Blagosklonny et al., 1995Go). After treatment, KB cells were collected, lysed with 200 µl of lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM orthovanadate, 0.5% NP-40, and 20 µg/ml each of proteinase inhibitors aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin), and centrifuged at 12,000g at 4°C for 10 min. This yielded soluble tubulin dimers in the supernatant and polymerized microtubules in the pellet. Equal amounts of the two fractions (on a protein basis) were partitioned by SDS-PAGE. Immunoblots were probed with {alpha}-tubulin monoclonal antibody and secondary HRP-conjugated antibody. The blots were developed using an Enhanced Chemiluminescence reagent kit (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA) followed by development on Kodak Bio-MAX MR film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY).

Immunofluorescence Microscopy. Cells attached to poly(L-lysine)-coated coverslips were treated with drugs for 24 h. Cells were fixed in methanol/acetone (1:1 v/v) at–20°C for 1 h and then washed with PBST for 5 min. Nonspecific sites were blocked by incubating with 5% skim milk in PBST for 1 h. A mouse monoclonal antibody against {alpha}-tubulin was diluted 1:500 in blocking solution and incubated for 2 h. Cells were washed with PBST twice (10 min each) to remove excess antibody and then probed with FITC-conjugated secondary antibody (1:200) for 1 h at room temperature. The images of {alpha}-tubulin with FITC staining were captured with an Olympus BX50 fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Dulles, VA).

Cell Cycle Analysis. Cell cycle progression was monitored using DNA flow cytometry. After drug treatment, cells were trypsinized, washed with PBS, and fixed in 80% ethanol at–20°C for 1 h. The fixed cells were stained with 50 µg/ml RNase and 50 µg/ml propidium iodide at room temperature in the dark for 20 min. The DNA content was determined by a fluorescence-activated cell sorting IV flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ). For each analysis, 10,000 cells were counted, and the percentage of cells in each phase was calculated using ModFit LT software (Verity Software House, Topsham, ME).

Western Blot Analysis. After treatment, cell pellets were collected and lysed in a buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM dithiothreitol, 2 mM Na3VO4, 0.25 mM PMSF, 10 mM NaF, 0.5% NP-40, and 20 µg/ml each of proteinase inhibitors aprotinin, leupeptin, and pepstatin). Lysates were centrifuged at 12,000g for 15 min, and the supernatants were collected and quantified. Equal amounts of lysate (on a protein basis) were then differentiated by SDS-PAGE, blotted on polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, conjugated with various specific primary antibodies, and then probed with appropriate secondary antibodies. The immunoreactive bands were detected by the enhanced chemiluminescence method and visualized on Kodak Bio-MAX MR film.

Apoptosis Studies. The early stages of apoptosis were monitored by annexin V-fluorescein (apoptotic cell marker) and PI (necrotic cell marker) double staining. The staining method was used according to the manufacturer's staining kit (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN). Cells were analyzed on a FACSVantage flow cytometer (BD Biosciences), using 488 nm as the excitation wavelength, a 515-nm bandpass filter for detection of fluorescein fluorescence, and a 600-nm cutoff filter for detection of PI fluorescence. For each determination, 10,000 events were measured.

Caspase Activity Assay. Caspase activities were measured with a Fluorometic Assay Kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) or the Fluorometric CaspACE Assay System (Promega, Madison, WI) that detects cleavage of specific fluorogenic peptide substrates. The fluorescence of the cleaved substrate was determined with a Victor 1420 Multilabel Counter (Wallac, Turku, Finland).

Preparation of Mitochondrial and Cytosolic Fractions. Cells were gently homogenized with a Dounce homogenizer in a buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2,1mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 50 µg/ml leupeptin, 50 µg/ml pepstatin, and 250 mM sucrose). The homogenate was centrifuged at 750g for 5 min at 4°C to remove unbroken cells and nuclei. Then, the supernatant was centrifuged at 16,000g for 20 min at 4°C. The pellet from this step was saved as the mitochondrial fraction, and the supernatant was subjected to further ultracentrifugation at 100,000g for 1 h at 4°C to eliminate trace membrane contamination. The 100,000g supernatant was saved as the cytoplasmic fraction. For immunoblotting, proteins of the two fractions were separated using 12% SDS-PAGE, followed by electroblotting onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. Cytochrome c was detected by a monoclonal antibody at a dilution recommended by the manufacturer (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.). Secondary goat anti-mouse HRP-labeled antibody was detected by enhanced chemiluminescence. beta-Actin and COX IV were probed as the internal control of the cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions, respectively.

Antitumor Activity in Vivo. The antitumor effect of J30 on human tumor xenografts was examined by s.c. inoculation of 2 x 106 cells in NOD/scid mice (purchased from the Laboratory Animal Center of Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan), fed under specific pathogen-free conditions and provided with sterile food and water ad libitum. When tumor volumes reached 100 to 150 mm3 (measured with calipers and estimated according to the equation [(major axis) x (minor axis)2 x 6/{pi}], animals were assigned into groups randomly and given either vehicle or oral J30 (dissolved in 0.5% methylcellulose in double-distilled H2O) 5 days/week for 2 weeks. Mouse body weight and tumor volume were measured three times per week.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Growth Inhibition of J30 against Human Cancer Cell Lines. We used the methylene blue assay to evaluate the antiproliferative effect of J30 on human cancer cells from several representative solid tumor cell lines: oral carcinoma (KB), nasopharyngeal carcinoma (HONE1), gastric cancer (TSGH and MKN45), kidney cancer (A498), liver cancer (Hep3B), colon cancer (HT29), lung cancer (H460), and glioblastoma multiforme (DBTRG). All cancer cell lines that we tested showed high susceptibility to J30, with IC50 values ranging between 15 and 20 nM. (Table 1) We further examined the efficacy of J30 against drug-resistant cell lines. Despite the high level of expression of drug-resistant efflux protein (MDR/Pgp or MRP) in KB-Vin10, KB-S15, and KB-7D cells, J30 showed similar cytotoxic efficacy between parental cells and these resistant sublines. J30 also displayed potent antigrowth activity against a topoisomerase I mutant (HONE1-CPT30) (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Growth inhibition of J30 against various human cancer cell lines

Each value represents the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Growth inhibition of J30 against drug-resistant cell lines

All resistant cell lines are maintained in drug-free medium for 3 days before seeding for growth inhibition assay. Each value represented the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments.

 


Figure 2
View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. J30 depolymerizes microtubule in vitro by binding to the colchicine-binding site. A, effect of J30 on in vitro tubulin polymerization. MAP-rich tubulins were incubated at 37°C in the absence [dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) control] or presence of drugs (colchicine or serial concentrations of J30). Absorbance at 350 nm was measured every 30 s for 30 min and is presented as the increased polymerized microtubule. B, the binding site of J30 on tubulin was examined by using a competition-binding scintillation proximity assay, as described under Materials and Methods. The 100% binding represented 3H-labeled ligand bound of the control group without tested compounds. The double-reciprocal plot indicates that J30 was a competitive inhibitor to the colchicine-binding site on tubulin. Each data point represents the mean ± S.D.

 

J30 Deploymerizes Microtubules in Vitro by Binding to the Colchicine-Binding Site. Next, we tested the ability of J30 to depolymerize the pure MAP-rich tubulins in vitro. The results (Fig. 2A) show that J30 inhibits polymerization of tubulin in a concentration-dependent manner, with an IC50 of 0.48 µM. J30 disrupted tubulin assembly almost completely at 2.5 µM. Based on our competition-binding scintillation proximity assay, we conclude that J30 does not reduce the specific SPA counts stimulated by conjugating the biotin-labeled tubulin with [3H]paclitaxel or with [3H]vinblastine, but J30 strongly competes with [3H]colchicine binding to tubulin. The inhibition constant of J30 (Ki, 0.2 µM) was much lower than that of colchicine (Ki, 1.8 µM) (Fig. 2B).

We also studied the effect of J30 on the dynamics of microtubule assembly at the cellular level. As shown in Fig. 3A, the polymerization of tubulin was increased in paclitaxel-treated cells compared with the control cells. Cells treated with J30 and cells treated with vincristine both showed a decreased amount of the polymer form of tubulin. Next, we used immunofluorescence microscopy to study the effect of J30 on the microtubule network. Compared with untreated KB controls, cells treated with paclitaxel produced shorter but denser microtubules (Fig. 3B, top middle) and cells treated with vincristine displayed a destroyed filament-like structure and reduced microtubule extent (Fig. 3B, top right). J30 caused changes similar to those of vincristine, in that the microtubule network shrank significantly at 20 nM and was disrupted thoroughly at 40 nM.


Figure 3
View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. A, J30 affects the dynamics of microtubule assembly toward depolymerization in vivo. KB cells were exposed to different compounds for 24 h. Cell pellets were lysed with lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 1 mM MgCl2, 2 mM EGTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM orthovanadate, 0.5% NP-40, and 20 µg/ml each of proteinase inhibitors aprotinin, leupeptin. and pepstatin). The polymer and free form of tubulins were separated by centrifugation at 12,000g at 4°C for 15 min, followed by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis and {alpha}-tubulin immunoblotting. B, immunohistochemistry of KB cells treated with 0.5 nM vincristine, 10 nM paclitaxel, or different concentrations of J30 for 24 h. Cells were fixed, labeled with FITC-conjugated mouse anti-tubulin antibody, and observed by Olympus-BX50 fluorescence microscope.

 

J30 Arrests the Cell Cycle in G2/M Phase by Consecutive Activation of Cdc2/Cyclin B1. We treated KB cells with varying concentrations of J30 for 24 h or a single concentration for 6 to 48 h to determine the influence of J30 on the cell cycle. The results (Fig. 4A) indicate that J30 caused collapse at the G1 phase, resulting in a dramatic increase in the number of cells in the G2/M phase. While the concentration was up to 40 nM, the percentage of cell numbers at G2/M reached a plateau. When the cells were treated with a higher concentration of J30, the cells in the G2/M cell stayed nearly the same and the sub-G1 population, which had less than diploid DNA content (indicative of apoptosis), increased slightly. Microtubule-inhibiting agents induce cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase and then trigger apoptosis. Thus, we performed annexin V-PI double staining in J30-treated cells to monitor phosphatidylserine exposure, a signal of early apoptosis. The populations of early apoptotic cells (annexin V+/PI) and late apoptotic cells (annexin V+/PI+) increased dramatically in a concentration-dependent manner after a 24-h treatment with J30 [from 0.39 to 52.9% (Fig. 4B, right bottom) and from 0.3 to 17.66% (Fig. 4B, right top)].


Figure 4
View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. J30 causes cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase via activation of the mitotic regulators, and subsequently induces cell apoptosis. A, the concentration (left panel, treatment for 24 h) and time (right panel, treatment with 40 nM) effect of J30 on cell cycle progressions of KB cells, using PI staining via flow cytometric analysis. B, annexin V-fluorescein (FL-1)/PI (FL-2) double staining of KB cells exposed to different concentrations of J30 for 24 h. Left bottom, annexin V/PI represents viable cells; right bottom, annexin V+/PI indicates early apoptotic cells; right top, annexin V+/PI+ indicates late apoptotic cells. C and D, influence of J30 on change of expressed and phosphorylated levels of key mitotic regulators. C, KB cells treated with various concentrations of J30 for 24 h. D, KB cells treated with 40 nM J30 for different times.

 

Next, we examined the signaling transduction pathway of G2/M arrest evoked by J30 treatment in KB cells by using immunoblotting analysis. As shown in Fig. 4, C and D, exposures to J30 (concentration of 40 nM for 24 h) caused an excessive elevation on the amount of MPM-2 phosphoepitope. The protein level gradually accumulated from 6 to 24 h in a time-dependent manner and coincided with the accumulation of cells in the G2/M phase. Activation of protein phosphatase Cdc25C became evident at 12 h with the emergence of a defined phosphorylated form. Cdc2 kinase, the downstream substrate of Cdc25C, was dephosphorylated at 24 h. Likewise, the quantity of cyclin B1 showed an increase at J30 concentrations of 20 to 160 nM (24 h of treatment). The increase was observed as early as at 6 h, and the up-regulation was maintained at least until 24 h.

J30 Causes Apoptosis through Caspase Activation, BclII Dephosphorylation, and Cytochrome c Translocation. We assessed the activity of caspase 3 and caspase 9 with their fluorogenic tetrapeptide substrates (Fig. 5A) to determine the mechanism of apoptosis. The enzymatic activities of caspase 3 and caspase 9 rose simultaneously after treatment of KB cells with J30, reaching maxima (5.3- and 6.5-fold compared with the controls, respectively) at 36 h. Our results also show that cleavage of PARP, a well-known substrate for caspase 3 cleavage that forms an 85-kDa fragment (Nicholson et al., 1995Go), appeared after the concentration of J30 exceeded 40 nM (Fig. 5B) and was concomitant with the increase in caspase 3 activity at 18 h (Fig. 5C). We also monitored cytochrome c translocation, a major event in mitochondria-mediated apoptosis. J30 induced a time-dependent translocation of cytochrome c from the mitochondria to the cytosol (Fig. 5D), as coincided with the appearance of the inactive phosphorylated form of BclII, which lost the guardian ability of mitochondria integrity (Fig. 5, B and C).


Figure 5
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. J30 induces caspase activation, downstream PARP cleavage, BclII dephosphorylation, and cytochrome C release. A, time course analysis of caspase enzyme activities induced by J30. The enzyme activities were determined by using Ac-DEVD-AMC (caspase-3 substrate) and LEHD-AFC (caspase-9 substrate) fluorogenic substrates. The relative activity unit was expressed as the ratio of experimental sample to control (without drug treatment). B and C, effect of J30 on BclII dephosphorylation and PARP cleavage. B, KB cells treated with various concentrations of J30 for 24 h. C, KB cells treated with 40 nM J30 for different times. D, relocation of cytochrome c after J30 treatment. At 0, 12, 18, and 24 h of 40 nM J30 treatment, KB cells were fractionated into the cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions, as described under Materials and Methods. Protein samples (20 µg) were separated by SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis using antibody against cytochrome c. beta-Actin and COX IV were stained as the internal control of cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions, respectively.

 
Efficacy of Oral J30 in Xenograft Mice. Next, we determined whether oral administration of J30 was effective against human tumors implanted in NOD/scid mice. Figure 6, A and B, shows that J30 inhibits tumor growth in a dose-dependent manner in KB and MKN45 xenograft mice. For KB, oral administration of J30 at 15 and 20 mg/kg (5 days/week) for 2 weeks caused tumor suppression of 31 and 49%, respectively (compared with controls) on day 26. We found a similar pattern of inhibition in MKN45-bearing mice, in which the tumor growth inhibitions were 27% at 15 mg/kg and 48% at 20 mg/kg on day 28. In addition, we examined the effect of J30 against the KB-Vin10 xenograft tumor, which is resistant to vincristine. We found that oral J30 exhibited significant antitumor activity against vincristine-resistant cells as well (41%) (Fig. 6C). In these animal models, we observed no significant morbidity and a body weight loss of <10%. These data clearly show that oral J30 effectively inhibits tumor growth in an in vivo murine model.


Figure 6
View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. In vivo antitumor activity of J30 in human oral (KB) (A), gastric (MKN45) (B) and drug-resistant (KB-Vin10) (C) xenograft models. After tumor size reached 100 to 150 mm3, mice received p.o. administration of 0, 15, or 20 mg/kg of J30 5 days/week for 2 consecutive weeks [QD5(2) x 2]. In KB-Vin10-bearing mice, vincristine (1 mg/kg) was administered i.v. once per week for 2 weeks [QD1(6) x 2] as the negative control. Tumor size and body weight were measured three times per week. Body weight is shown as the percentage of that on the day of first administration.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The microtubules are an attractive target for chemotherapeutic agents. This article presents experiments with a novel compound, J30, originally identified as the lead compound (from studies of structure-activity relationships) of a novel class of indoline-sulfonamide derivatives (Chang et al., 2006Go). Its predicted effectiveness is based on the structural analog of typical indoline agents that are known to depolymerize microtubules. Our results show that J30 has broad-spectrum ability at the nanomolar range to inhibit growth of various cancer cell lines, as well as drug-resistant sublines (Tables 1 and 2). It is noteworthy that it is more potent than any other sulfonamide derivatives reported to date (Scozzafava et al., 2003Go). Drug resistance is a serious problem that restricts the use of microtubule-interfering drugs for clinical therapy. J30 exerts a similar potency, regardless of the cell's MDR or MRP status (Table 2), suggesting that it is not a substrate of these efflux pumps. Moreover, J30 is also effective against cell lines that are resistant to other remedially used drugs, such as CPT and oxaliplatin (data not shown). However, whether J30 overcomes resistance induced by tubulin mutations and/or different isotype expressions still needs to be verified.

To clarify the molecular targets of J30, we examined whether it targets microtubules. Our data clearly demonstrate that J30 strongly depolymerizes microtubules by binding to the colchicine-binding site with a higher affinity than colchicine itself. Western blot and immunofluorescence microscopy, using the anti {alpha}-tubulin antibody, confirm that J30 depolymerizes microtubules and degrades the microtubule network in living cells. Like other agents that target microtubules, J30 induces a concentration- and time-dependent G2/M blockade, as indicated by flow analysis and expression of the MPM-2 epitope, a mitosis-specific marker (Fig. 4, C and D). Regulation of Cdc2 activity is controlled by cyclin B1 binding, phosphorylation of Thr161, and dephosphorylation of Tyr14 and Tyr15 by Cdc25C (Norbury and Nurse, 1992Go). Cdc25C itself is highly regulated by phosphorylation (Hutchins and Clarke, 2004Go). Blocking any of these steps may lead to cell cycle arrest and subsequent apoptosis. In this study, we found that treatment with 40 nM J30 for 24 h induces Cdc25C phosphorylation, abnormal cyclin B1 accumulation, Cdc2 dephosphorylation, and cell cycle arrest in the mitotic phase. J30 causes an early accumulation of cyclin B1 in paclitaxel-treated cells, similar to the observations of others (Ling et al., 1998Go). We also noticed that Cdc25C phosphorylation (which starts 6 h after J30 administration) precedes the appearance of Cdc2 dephosphorylation (first seen at 24 h after J30 administration). It is probably due to the complex multiple post-translational regulations of Cdc25C (Perdiguero and Nebreda, 2004Go). Taken together, these data suggest that J30 induces cell cycle arrest in the G2/M phase via constitutive activation of Cdc2/cyclin B1.

It is widely accepted that microtubule-interfering agents produce apoptosis by causing cell cycle arrest (Mollinedo and Gajate, 2003Go). In addition to the effect of J30 on the cell cycle, we found that it also provokes apoptosis, as indicated by an increase in the sub-G1 population and annexin V positivity (Fig. 4, A and B). Apoptotic signaling involves activation of intracellular caspases. Our results show that J30 increases the activity of caspase 9 and caspase3. Caspases are activated during apoptosis by two important pathways: 1) cross-linking of "death receptors" after extrinsic triggering and 2) release of apoptogenic factors from mitochondria after intrinsic signals (Chipuk and Green, 2005Go). Our results show that J30 evokes BclII hyperphosphorylation, losing its protective ability to maintain the mitochondrial membrane potential and permeability and subsequently resulting in the release of the proapoptotic protein cytochrome c into cytosol. When cytosolic cytochrome c meets procaspase 9, the apoptosome is formed, which in turn activates the downstream executioner caspase 3 that induces PARP cleavage. Therefore, we hypothesize that J30 triggers apoptosis via the intrinsic mitochondrial pathway.

Finally, we demonstrate that oral administration of J30 has significant therapeutic efficacy against human cervical (KB), gastric (MKN45), and drug-resistant (KB-Vin10) tumor xenografts in mice (Fig. 6). We observed no significant body weight loss during these experiments, suggesting that J30 may have insignificant side effects. Clearly, we must perform more detailed experiments to develop an optimal protocol for J30 administration. In addition to overcoming drug resistance in vivo, and distinct from several microtubule-interfering drugs used in cancer chemotherapy by intravenous injection (Mollinedo and Gajate, 2003Go), oral administration of J30 allows assessment of the benefits of chronic remedial regimens.

In conclusion, our data provide compelling evidence that the novel sulfonamide-based compound, J30, has broad-spectrum efficacy in vitro by triggering apoptosis and is effective against tumor xenografts in murine models. In addition, J30 is less vulnerable to drug resistance, at least that caused by MDR or MRP overexpression, and is effective when administered orally to mice. Our study indicates that J30 has potential as an antineoplastic drug for oral treatment of various malignancies and drug-resistant tumors.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported in part by grants from National Health Research Institutes, Taipei, Taiwan (NHRI Intramural Grant CA-095-PP-04), and the National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan (NSC 95-2752-B-400-001-PAE).

J.P.L. and K.S.H. contributed equally to this work.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/jpet.107.126680.

ABBREVIATIONS: MDR, multidrug resistance; Pgp, P-glycoprotein; MRP, multidrug-resistance associated protein; HMN-214, ((E)-4-{2-[2-(N-acetyl-N-[4-methoxybenzenesulfonyl]amino) stilbazole]}1-oxide), E7070, N-(3-chloro-7-indolyl)-1,4-benzenedisulfonamide; E7010, N-[2-[(4-hydroxyphenyl) amino]-3-pyridinyl]-4-methoxybenzenesulfonamide; J30, N-[1-(4-methoxy-benzenesulfonyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-indol-7-yl]-isonicotinamide, CPT, camptothecin; VP16, etoposide; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; PARP, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; FITC, fluorescent isothiocyanate; SPA, scintillation proximity assay; PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; NP-40, Nonidet P-40; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; PBST, phosphate-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20; PI, propidium iodide; NOD/scid mice, nonobese diabetic/severe combined immune-deficiency mice.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Jang-Yang Chang, National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, 7th Floor, No.161, Section 6, Ming-Chuan East Road, Taipei 114, Taiwan, R.O.C. E-mail: jychang{at}nhri.org.tw


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

Aneja R, Lopus M, Zhou J, Vangapandu SN, Ghaleb A, Yao J, Nettles JH, Zhou B, Gupta M, Panda D, et al. (2006a) Rational design of the microtubule-targeting anti-breast cancer drug EM015. Cancer Res 66: 3782–3791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Aneja R, Zhou J, Vangapandu SN, Zhou B, Chandra R, and Joshi HC (2006b) Drug-resistant T-lymphoid tumors undergo apoptosis selectively in response to an antimicrotubule agent, EM011. Blood 107: 2486–2492.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Attard G, Greystoke A, Kaye S, and De BJ (2006) Update on tubulin-binding agents. Pathol Biol (Paris) 54: 72–84.[Medline]

Bacher G, Nickel B, Emig P, Vanhoefer U, Seeber S, Shandra A, Klenner T, and Beckers T (2001) D-24851, a novel synthetic microtubule inhibitor, exerts curative antitumoral activity in vivo, shows efficacy toward multidrug-resistant tumor cells, and lacks neurotoxicity. Cancer Res 61: 392–399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Beckers T, Reissmann T, Schmidt M, Burger AM, Fiebig HH, Vanhoefer U, Pongratz H, Hufsky H, Hockemeyer J, Frieser M, et al. (2002) 2-Aroylindoles, a novel class of potent, orally active small molecule tubulin inhibitors. Cancer Res 62: 3113–3119.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Blagosklonny MV, Schulte TW, Nguyen P, Mimnaugh EG, Trepel J, and Neckers L (1995) Taxol induction of p21WAF1 and p53 requires c-raf-1. Cancer Res 55: 4623–4626.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chang JY, Hsieh HP, Chang CY, Hsu KS, Chiang YF, Chen CM, Kuo CC, and Liou JP (2006) 7-Aroyl-aminoindoline-1-sulfonamides as a novel class of potent antitubulin agents. J Med Chem 49: 6656–6659.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chang JY, Hsieh HP, Pan WY, Liou JP, Bey SJ, Chen LT, Liu JF, and Song JS (2003) Dual inhibition of topoisomerase I and tubulin polymerization by BPR0Y007, a novel cytotoxic agent. Biochem Pharmacol 65: 2009–2019.[CrossRef][Medline]

Cheng Y and Prusoff WH (1973) Relationship between the inhibition constant (K1) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 per cent inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem Pharmacol 22: 3099–3108.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chipuk JE and Green DR (2005) Do inducers of apoptosis trigger caspase-independent cell death? Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 268–275.[CrossRef][Medline]

Drews J (2000) Drug discovery: a historical perspective. Science 287: 1960–1964.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Finlay GJ, Baguley BC, and Wilson WR (1984) A semiautomated microculture method for investigating growth inhibitory effects of cytotoxic compounds on exponentially growing carcinoma cells. Anal Biochem 139: 272–277.[CrossRef][Medline]

Fox E, Maris JM, Widemann BC, Meek K, Goodwin A, Goodspeed W, Kromplewski M, Fouts ME, Medina D, Cho SY, et al. (2006) A phase 1 study of ABT-751, an orally bioavailable tubulin inhibitor, administered daily for 7 days every 21 days in pediatric patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 12: 4882–4887.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hutchins JR and Clarke PR (2004) Many fingers on the mitotic trigger: post-translational regulation of the Cdc25C phosphatase. Cell Cycle 3: 41–45.[Medline]

Jordan MA and Wilson L (2004) Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 253–265.[CrossRef][Medline]

Kuo CC, Hsieh HP, Pan WY, Chen CP, Liou JP, Lee SJ, Chang YL, Chen LT, Chen CT, and Chang JY (2004) BPR0L075, a novel synthetic indole compound with antimitotic activity in human cancer cells, exerts effective antitumoral activity in vivo. Cancer Res 64: 4621–4628.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ling YH, Tornos C, and Perez-Soler R (1998) Phosphorylation of Bcl-2 is a marker of M phase events and not a determinant of apoptosis. J Biol Chem 273: 18984–18991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mollinedo F and Gajate C (2003) Microtubules, microtubule-interfering agents and apoptosis. Apoptosis 8: 413–450.[CrossRef][Medline]

Nicholson DW, Ali A, Thornberry NA, Vaillancourt JP, Ding CK, Gallant M, Gareau Y, Griffin PR, Labelle M, and Lazebnik YA (1995) Identification and inhibition of the ICE/CED-3 protease necessary for mammalian apoptosis. Nature 376: 37–43.[CrossRef][Medline]

Norbury C and Nurse P (1992) Animal cell cycles and their control. Annu Rev Biochem 61: 441–470.[CrossRef][Medline]

Owa T, Yoshino H, Okauchi T, Yoshimatsu K, Ozawa Y, Sugi NH, Nagasu T, Koyanagi N, and Kitoh K (1999) Discovery of novel antitumor sulfonamides targeting G1 phase of the cell cycle. J Med Chem 42: 3789–3799.[CrossRef][Medline]

Pellegrini F and Budman DR (2005) Review: tubulin function, action of antitubulin drugs, and new drug development. Cancer Invest 23: 264–273.[Medline]

Perdiguero E and Nebreda AR (2004) Regulation of Cdc25C activity during the meiotic G2/M transition. Cell Cycle 3: 733–737.[Medline]

Scozzafava A, Owa T, Mastrolorenzo A, and Supuran CT (2003) Anticancer and antiviral sulfonamides. Curr Med Chem 10: 925–953.[CrossRef][Medline]

Smyth JF, Aamdal S, Awada A, Dittrich C, Caponigro F, Schoffski P, Gore M, Lesimple T, Djurasinovic N, Baron B, et al. (2005) Phase II study of E7070 in patients with metastatic melanoma. Ann Oncol 16: 158–161.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tahir SK, Han EK, Credo B, Jae HS, Pietenpol JA, Scatena CD, Wu-Wong JR, Frost D, Sham H, Rosenberg SH, et al. (2001) A-204197, a new tubulin-binding agent with antimitotic activity in tumor cell lines resistant to known microtubule inhibitors. Cancer Res 61: 5480–5485.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tahir SK, Kovar P, Rosenberg SH, and Ng SC (2000) Rapid colchicine competition-binding scintillation proximity assay using biotin-labeled tubulin. Biotechniques 29: 156–160.[Medline]

Tahir SK, Nukkala MA, Zielinski Mozny NA, Credo RB, Warner RB, Li Q, Woods KW, Claiborne A, Gwaltney SL, Frost DJ, et al. (2003) Biological activity of A-289099: an orally active tubulin-binding indolyloxazoline derivative. Mol Cancer Ther 2: 227–233.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tanaka H, Ohshima N, Ikenoya M, Komori K, Katoh F, and Hidaka H (2003) HMN-176, an active metabolite of the synthetic antitumor agent HMN-214, restores chemosensitivity to multidrug-resistant cells by targeting the transcription factor NF-Y. Cancer Res 63: 6942–6947.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Van Kesteren C, Beijnen JH, and Schellens JH (2002) E7070: a novel synthetic sulfonamide targeting the cell cycle progression for the treatment of cancer. Anticancer Drugs 13: 989–997.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yoshimatsu K, Yamaguchi A, Yoshino H, Koyanagi N, and Kitoh K (1997) Mechanism of action of E7010, an orally active sulfonamide antitumor agent: inhibition of mitosis by binding to the colchicine site of tubulin. Cancer Res 57: 3208–3213.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yoshino H, Ueda N, Niijima J, Sugumi H, Kotake Y, Koyanagi N, Yoshimatsu K, Asada M, Watanabe T, and Nagasu T (1992) Novel sulfonamides as potential, systemically active antitumor agents. J Med Chem 35: 2496–2497.[CrossRef][Medline]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Drug Metab. Dispos.Home page
H. Sun, C. Moore, P. M. Dansette, S. Kumar, J. R. Halpert, and G. S. Yost
Dehydrogenation of the Indoline-Containing Drug 4-Chloro-N-(2-methyl-1-indolinyl)-3-sulfamoylbenzamide (Indapamide) by CYP3A4: Correlation with in Silico Predictions
Drug Metab. Dispos., March 1, 2009; 37(3): 672 - 684.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.107.126680v1
323/1/398    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liou, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, J.-Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liou, J.-P.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, J.-Y.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition