JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on July 16, 2007; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.107.124859


0022-3565/07/3231-210-216$20.00
JPET 323:210-216, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.107.124859v1
323/1/210    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Messadi-Laribi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Richer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Messadi-Laribi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Richer, C.

CARDIOVASCULAR

Tissue Kallikrein Is Involved in the Cardioprotective Effect of AT1-Receptor Blockade in Acute Myocardial Ischemia

Erij Messadi-Laribi, Violaine Griol-Charhbili, Anne Pizard, Marie-Pascale Vincent, Didier Heudes, Pierre Meneton, François Alhenc-Gelas, and Christine Richer

INSERM U652/U872, Paris, France (E.M.-L., V.G.-C., A.P., M.-P.V., D.H., P.M., F.A.-G., C.R.); Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France (E.M.-L., V.G.-C., C.R.); and Université de Paris-Descartes, Paris, France (D.H., P.M., F.A.-G.)

Received April 24, 2007; accepted July 13, 2007.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors limit infarct size in animal models of myocardial ischemia reperfusion injury. This effect has been shown to be due to inhibition of bradykinin degradation rather than inhibition of angiotensin II formation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether angiotensin AT1 receptor blockade by losartan or its active metabolite EXP3174 protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice and whether this protection is mediated by the kallikrein kinin system. We subjected anesthetized mice to 30 min of coronary artery occlusion followed by 3 h of reperfusion and evaluated infarct size immediately after reperfusion. Losartan (Los) or EXP3174 [2-n-butyl-4-chloro-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yI)methyl]imidazole-5-carboxylic acid] were administered 5 min before starting reperfusion at dosages determined by preliminary studies of blood pressure effect and inhibition of angiotensin pressor response. Compared with saline, both drugs significantly reduced myocardial infarct size by roughly 40% (P < 0.001). Pretreatment of mice with the selective AT2 receptor antagonist PD123,319 [S-(+)-1-([4-(dimethylamino)-3-methylphenyl]methyl)-5-(diphenylacetyl)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo(4,5-c)pyridine-6-carboxylic acid] did not affect infarct size in the absence of losartan but abolished the reduction in infarct size provided by losartan. In tissue kallikrein gene-deficient mice (TK–/–), losartan no longer reduced infarct size. Pretreatment of wild-type mice with the B2 receptor antagonist icatibant reproduced the effect of TK deficiency. We conclude that AT1 receptor blockade provides cardioprotection against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury through stimulation of AT2 receptors. Kallikrein and B2 receptor are major determinants of this cardioprotective effect of losartan. Our results support the hypothesis of a coupling between AT2 receptors and kallikrein during AT1 receptor blockade, which plays a major role in cardioprotection.


Myocardial ischemia followed by reperfusion of the ischemic tissue results in myocardial damage (Hearse and Bolli, 1992Go). In patients with acute myocardial ischemia, ischemia-reperfusion injury is believed to play a role in the expansion of myocardial necrosis. Moreover, because coronary desobstruction by thrombolytic agents or perluminal angioplasty is widely applied in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, ischemia-reperfusion injury (IR) has also relevance to therapeutics. Pharmacological agents that exert cardioprotective effects in experimental ischemia-reperfusion injury thus have potential clinical applications. The renin angiotensin system (RAS) is activated during cardiac ischemia and may contribute to myocardial damage (Sato et al., 2000Go). Therefore, RAS inhibitors have been used as cardioprotective agents in IR. Clinical and experimental studies have shown that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) are able to limit infarct size (Ertl et al., 1982Go; Dickstein and Kjekshus, 2002Go). However, several lines of evidence indicate that the protective effects of ACEIs in ischemia-reperfusion injury are the result of the protection of endogenous kinins from degradation rather than inhibition of Ang II formation (Martorana et al., 1990Go; Liu et al., 1996Go; Griol-Charhbili et al., 2005Go). With regard to AT1 receptor (AT1R) blockers (ARBs), their cardioprotective effect is not universally recognized in the setting of IR. Liu et al. (1996Go) failed to demonstrate infarct size reduction by losartan after IR in rats, and Harada et al. (1998Go) could not provide evidence of any significant infarct size reduction in mice deficient in AT1A receptor subtype. In contrast, it has been reported that losartan reduced infarct size after IR in rats (Lee et al., 1997Go; Ozer et al., 2002Go) or in pigs (Schwarz et al., 1997Go).

The aim of this study was to investigate the cardioprotective effectiveness of losartan and its active metabolite EXP3174 in an in vivo model of IR in mice, focusing on infarct size reduction. In addition, we attempted to determine whether the kallikrein kinin system contributes to the effect of AT1R blockade by losartan in IR by comparing the effect of losartan in tissue kallikrein (TK) gene-deficient mice (TK–/–) and in their wild-type littermates (TK+/+). Tissue kallikrein is a serine protease synthesized in many organs, including the heart and arteries (Nolly et al., 1994Go; Bergaya et al., 2001Go; Meneton et al., 2001Go). TK plays an important role through kinin release in endothelial function in arteries and participates in arterial adaptation to blood flow (Bergaya et al., 2001Go; Azizi et al., 2005Go). We recently showed that TK plays a critical role in the cardioprotective effect of ACEIs in acute myocardial ischemia (Griol-Charhbili et al., 2005Go). By taking advantage of genetically engineered mice deficient in TK and kinins, we ascertained the role of TK in the cardioprotection elicited by AT1R blockade in IR


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
The TK gene-deficient mice were generated in our laboratory as described previously (Meneton et al., 2001Go). The mouse mutants have been backcrossed on a C57BL/6 genetic background (Charles River Laboratories, L'Arbresle, France) for over 10 generations before heterozygous crossing to obtain the mutated TK–/– mice and their wild-type littermates used in the experiments (Trabold et al., 2002Go).

All animals had unrestricted access to standard chow (A03; Scientific Animal Food and Engineering, Augy, France) and drinking water, and they were housed at constant room temperature (24 ± 1°C) with a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle. All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources (1996Go).

Measurement of Systemic Blood Pressure and Vascular Reactivity
We initially conducted a vascular reactivity study to determine the dose of losartan to use, taking into account its hypotensive effect and its potency to block Ang II pressor responses. Anesthetized (60 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital) mice (body weight, 25–35 g) were placed on a thermally controlled heating pad (37 ± 1°C). After tracheotomy, a catheter was inserted into the left carotid artery for blood pressure recordings. After a 10-min stabilization period, blood pressure and heart rate were continuously recorded (MP100, Biopac systems; Cerom, Paris, France). The blood pressure response to norepinephrine (1 µg/kg) was first determined as a control. The maximal blood pressure changes triggered by increasing doses of angiotensin I (Ang I, 0.3–30 µg/kg) at 1 µl/g body weight bolus injected at 5-min intervals via a catheter inserted into the jugular vein then were measured. Vascular reactivity to Ang I was assessed in TK+/+ or TK–/– mice to examine whether it was influenced by the genotype. Wildtype mice were treated with losartan at different dosages (1, 5, 8, or 10 mg/kg), with EXP3174 (0.4 mg/kg), with ramiprilat (50 µg/kg), or with saline (1 µl/g, control). The maximal hypotensive effects of the different drugs were determined, and then vascular reactivity to increasing doses of Ang I of the pretreated mice was assessed as described previously in untreated animals. The maximal hypotensive effect of 8 mg/kg losartan was also determined in TK–/– mice. For analyzing pressor responses, area under curves (AUCs) versus log dose of Ang I were calculated in each mouse according to the trapezoidal rule and averaged within each experimental group.

In Vivo Mouse Model of Myocardial Infarction
Surgical Preparation. Mice were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital (60 mg/kg i.p.). Additional doses of pentobarbital were administered during the protocol when maintaining anesthesia was required. The animals were intubated and ventilated with 100% oxygen (200 µl per breath at a rate of 170 breaths/min), using a Harvard rodent ventilator (model 845; Harvard Apparatus, Les Ulis, France). Drugs were administered via a catheter inserted into the jugular vein. Body temperature was monitored with a rectal probe connected to a digital thermometer and maintained at 37°C using a heating pad. The electrocardiogram (ECG) was recorded throughout the experiments on a Gould TA240 recorder (ECG Biotach; Gould Instruments, Cleveland, OH). A left thoracotomy was performed to expose the heart, and the pericardium was removed. The left anterior descending coronary artery was occluded with an 8.0 prolene suture, 2 mm from the tip of the left atrium for 30 min. Successful coronary occlusion was verified by the development of a pale color in the distal myocardium and by S-T segment elevation and QRS-complex widening on the ECG. After 30 min of sustained ischemia, the blood flow was restored by loosening the suture. Successful reperfusion was confirmed when the bright red color of the left ventricle (LV) and a normal ECG were restored. The lungs were then reinflated by increasing positive end expiratory pressure, and the chest was closed. Reperfusion was maintained for a 3-h period, and the animals were kept on the heating pad throughout the experiment (Griol-Charhbili et al., 2005Go).

Experimental Protocols. All animals were subjected to the same myocardial IR injury. To assess the role of kallikrein in AT1R blockade, groups of animals of each genotype (TK+/+ or TK–/–) received either saline (control) or the ARB Los (8 mg/kg) or its active metabolite, EXP3174 (EXP, 0.4 mg/kg), given as an i.v. bolus 5 min before reperfusion.

To assess the role of the B2 receptors in losartan effect, TK +/+ mice were pretreated with the B2 receptor antagonist icatibant (500 µg/kg i.v.) 5 min before the onset of ischemia. Five minutes before reperfusion, one group received saline, and the other group received 8 mg/kg losartan. A control group received losartan in the absence of icatibant pretreatment.

To investigate the role of AT2R, two additional experimental groups of TK+/+ mice were subjected to IR. The mice were pretreated with PD123,319 (10 mg/kg i.v. bolus 5 min before starting ischemia): one group receiving losartan and the other receiving saline 5 min before starting reperfusion. In an ancillary experiment designed to assess the blood pressure effect of PD123,319, either alone or in association with losartan, TK+/+ mice were pretreated with PD123,319 (10 mg/kg i.v.), and then one group received saline and the other group received losartan (8 mg/kg) 5 min after PD123,319. Blood pressure was recorded in these mice up to 30 min, and the maximal blood pressure variations were determined. In a fourth set of experiments designed to study angiotensin II receptor mRNAs in the hearts, we used eight additional experimental groups: four groups of TK+/+ mice and four groups of TK–/– mice submitted to IR or sham operation, each with and without saline or losartan (8 mg/kg).

Measurement of Infarct Size. After 3 h of reperfusion, the chest was reopened, and the coronary artery was reoccluded. Evans Blue (5%) solution (0.5 ml) was then injected as a bolus into the jugular vein to delineate the area at risk (AR), which remained unstained by the Evans Blue solution. The heart was excised, and the LV was isolated, weighed, and sliced into four transverse pieces from base to apex, the first cutter blade positioned at the site of the coronary occlusion. The slices were weighed, and color digital images of both sides of each slice were obtained with a DC120 zoom digital camera (Kodak Digital Science, Rochester, NY) connected to a microscope (Leica MZ 75; Leica Microsystems, Rueil-Malmaison, France), using the Adobe Photoshop software. The slices were then incubated at 37°C with buffered 1% 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) solution for 20 min. Viable myocardium, which contained dehydrogenases, reacted with TTC and was stained brick red, whereas any necrotic tissue remained unstained due to the lack of active enzymes. The tissue sections were then fixed in a buffered 10% formalin solution for 24 h before being photographed again to delineate the infarct size (IS) (Griol-Charhbili et al., 2005Go).

The cross-sectional area, the lumen area, the AR (unstained by Evans Blue), and the IS (unstained by TTC) of the LV were outlined on each color image and quantified by a blinded observer using the Scion Image software (Scion Image for Windows; Scion Corporation, Frederick, MD). The absolute weights of AR and IS were then calculated for each slice. The sum of the absolute weight values of AR and IS of the three ischemic slices of each heart was calculated and expressed as a percentage of the total weight of the slice. The ratio of IS to AR was calculated from these absolute weight evaluations and expressed as a percentage of AR.

Quantification of Angiotensin Receptors mRNAs in the Left Ventricle. AT1R and AT2R mRNA was studied by real-time PCR in the hearts from wild-type mice in basal conditions (shamoperated) or after IR, pretreated or not with losartan. At the end of reperfusion or sham operation, the hearts were quickly excised and preserved in the RNAlater solution (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX). Left ventricles were dissected, and total RNAs were isolated using RNAe-asy extraction kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA). First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed on 5 µg of total RNAs using random hexamers (Superscript III first strand; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). cDNA synthesis reactions were stored at –20°C to be used for real-time PCR.

Real-time PCR was carried out in a 7000 Sequence Detector (ABI Prism) and the TaqMan PCR core reagent kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using 18S as an internal control. References for TaqMan probes for 18S, AT1R, and AT2R are available upon request. Conditions were as follows: 1 cycle of 95°C for 10 min and then 40 cycles of 94°C for 10 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s and a final cooling step at 10°C. The relative quantification of gene expression was analyzed according to the 2-{Delta}Ct method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001Go).

Drugs
Ramiprilat and the selective B2-receptor antagonist icatibant (HOE140, registered as JEO49) were kindly provided by Dr. J. Punter (Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany); losartan and EXP3174 were kindly provided by Merck Inc. (Rahway, NJ). PD123,319, a specific AT2R antagonist (Bumpus et al., 1991Go), was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).

Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as means ± S.E.M. Comparisons between genotypes and between treatments in each genotype were performed by one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc analysis using the JMP software system (JMP; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). For RAS blockade evaluation, the Ang I dose-response (variations in mean arterial pressure (MAP) expressed in absolute values) curves obtained in the different experimental groups were compared by ANOVA for repeated measurements with the Greenhouse-Geisser adjustment (Ludbrook, 1994Go). AUCs for pressor responses versus log dose Ang I were compared by ANOVA. Values of P < 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Effects of Losartan on Blood Pressure and Vascular Reactivity to Pressor Agents. Mean baseline values for body weight, blood pressure, or heart rate of mice assigned to the various experimental groups are presented in Table 1. In TK+/+ mice, losartan, EXP 3174, and ramiprilat, at the doses used, significantly decreased blood pressure; however, the maximal hypotensive responses to these drugs, occurring between 10 and 20 min, were less than 15% in all cases and did not significantly differ from the response observed in the control group receiving only saline (Fig. 1A). In TK–/– mice, the blood pressure-lowering effect of losartan was not altered compared with TK+/+. MAP after losartan was the same in Los-TK+/+ (45.4 ± 2.1 mm Hg, n = 11) and in Los-TK–/– (45.4 ± 3.2 mm Hg, n = 8).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 Baseline characteristics of TK+/+ and TK-/- mice in the six experimental groups in the vascular reactivity study

Data are mean ± S.E.M.

 

Figure 1
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Vascular reactivity in TK+/+ and TK–/– mice. A, maximal hypotensive responses in TK+/+ mice after saline (1 µl/g), Los (8 mg/kg), EXP3174 (EXP, 0.4 mg/kg), or ramiprilat (Ram, 50 µg/kg). B, maximal pressor responses to Ang I in control TK–/– ({blacktriangleup}), control TK+/+ ({triangleup}), and TK+/+ after pretreatment by losartan (8 mg/kg) ({circ}), EXP3174 (0.4 mg/kg) (x), or ramiprilat (50 µg/kg) ({square}). C, area under curve absolute increase in MAP x log dose Ang I (AUC) in control TK–/– ({blacksquare}), control TK+/+ ({square}), TK+/+ pretreated by losartan (1, 5, 8, and 10 mg/kg) (Figure 1), EXP3174 (0.4 mg/kg) (Figure 1), or ramiprilat (50 µg/kg) (Figure 1). {Delta}MAP, absolute variation of arterial blood pressure. Data are mean ± S.E.M. For n, see Table 1. For losartan (1, 5, or 10 mg/kg), n = 3–8 in each group. *, p < 0.001 versus control TK+/+;{dagger}, p < 0.05 versus ramiprilat (50 µg/kg); §, p < 0.01 versus losartan (8 mg/kg).

 

Pressor responses (absolute variations) to norepinephrine were similar in TK+/+ (+37.3 ± 3.5 mm Hg) and TK–/– mice (+34.6 ± 4.6 mm Hg). The increases in blood pressure triggered by Ang I were similar in TK–/– and TK+/+ mice. The pressor effect of Ang I was reduced in wild-type mice pretreated with losartan, EXP3174, or ramiprilat compared with untreated mice (Fig. 1, B and C). The inhibition of Ang I-pressor responses by losartan was dose-dependent, as documented by the comparison of the AUCs (Fig. 1C). Losartan (8 mg/kg) appeared to significantly block Ang I responses compared with saline and be equipotent to 50 µg/kg ramiprilat (Fig. 1B). EXP3174 (0.4 mg/kg) also suppressed the pressor effect of Ang I and was more effective than losartan or ramiprilat (Fig. 1B).

Effect of Losartan on Infarct Size. Role of the Kallikrein Kinin System. Mean values for body weight, LV weight, AR/LV ratio, or heart rate of TK+/+ or TK–/– mice receiving either saline or the different investigated drugs are presented in Table 2. In all groups, heart rate remained unchanged throughout the IR experiments, and AR/LV ratios did not differ among the different experimental groups. After IR, IS in saline-treated mice averaged 38.9 ± 3.3% AR in TK+/+ mice and 38.4 ± 2.3% AR in TK–/– mice, with no difference between genotypes (Fig. 2A).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 2 Characteristics of TK+/+ and TK-/- mice in the 10 experimental groups subjected to ischemia-reperfusion experiments

Data are mean ± S.E.M.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Effect of losartan on infarct size after ischemia-reperfusion injury: the role of the kallikrein kinin system. A, role of tissue kallikrein. IS/AR was measured in TK+/+ or TK–/– mice receiving saline, losartan (8 mg/kg), or EXP3174 (0.4 mg/kg) 5 min before reperfusion. Data are mean ± S.E.M. For n, see Table 2. *, p < 0.001 versus control TK+/+;§, p < 0.05 versus losartan-TK+/+;{dagger}, p < 0.001 versus EXP3174-TK+/+. B, role of B2 receptors. IS/AR was measured in TK+/+ mice receiving icatibant (500 µg/kg) (n = 5), losartan (8 mg/kg) (n = 4), or icatibant (500 µg/kg) + losartan (8 mg/kg) (n = 6). Data are mean ± S.E.M. *, p < 0.001 versus icatibant-TK+/+;§, p < 0.05 versus losartan-TK+/+.

 

Losartan and EXP3174 both exhibited cardioprotection in TK+/+ mice and reduced IS/AR to a similar extent (–41%, both p < 0.001) (Fig. 2A). In contrast, in TK–/– mice, the cardioprotective effect of losartan (–15%, not significant versus control TK–/–) was dramatically reduced compared with TK+/+ mice (p < 0.05 versus Los-TK+/+), and the cardioprotective effect of EXP3174 was abolished (p < 0.001 versus EXP-TK+/+) (Fig. 2A).

In wild-type mice, the B2 receptor antagonist icatibant alone had no effect on IS. It largely suppressed the cardioprotective effect of losartan. In the presence of icatibant, losartan reduced IS by only 12% (not significant versus icatibant), whereas in the absence of icatibant, losartan reduced IS by 40% (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2B).

Effect of AT2R Blockade on Infarct Size. In wild-type mice, blockade of AT2R by PD123,319 had no effect on IS (Fig. 3). However, the cardioprotective effect of losartan was suppressed by pretreatment with the AT2R antagonist (PD-Los-TK+/+, IS/AR = 33.6 ± 2.6% versus Los-TK+/+, IS/AR = 23.1 ± 1.6%, p < 0.01) (Fig. 3). Infarct size of TK–/– mice treated by losartan was similar to that of wild-type mice treated with PD123,319 + losartan (Los-TK–/–, 32.5 ± 2.8% versus PD-Los-TK+/+, 33.6 ± 2.6%) (Figs. 2A and 3).


Figure 3
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Effect of losartan on infarct size after ischemia-reperfusion injury: the role of AT2 receptor. IS/AR was measured in TK+/+ mice receiving saline, losartan (8 mg/kg), PD123,319 (10 mg/kg), or PD123,319 (10 mg/kg) + losartan (8 mg/kg). Data are mean ± S.E.M. For n, see Table 2. *, p < 0.001 versus control TK+/+,§, p < 0.01 versus losartan-TK+/+.

 
PD123,319 had no effect on arterial pressure in wild-type mice. MAP was 62.0 ± 2.1 mm Hg in mice receiving PD123,319 versus 65.6 ± 1.4 mm Hg in mice receiving saline. When injected before losartan, PD123,319 did not significantly alter the maximal blood pressure-lowering effect of losartan (saline + losartan, MAP = 50.2 ± 2.4 mm Hg versus PD123,319 + losartan, MAP = 46.0 ± 3.4 mm Hg).

Effect of Losartan on Angiotensin Receptors mRNAs in the Left Ventricle. AT1 receptor mRNAs were readily detected and quantified by real-time PCR in mice heart. The level of AT1 receptor mRNA was increased by IR injury. Losartan suppressed this induction (Fig. 4). AT2R mRNA level was at or below the detection limit of our method and could not be accurately quantified.


Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Effect of losartan on the expression of AT1R mRNA in TK+/+ after sham operation (Sham) or after IR after saline or after pretreatment with losartan (8 mg/kg). Data are means ± S.E.M. n = 3–8 per group. *, p < 0.001 versus Sham saline-TK+/+;$, p < 0.001 versus IR saline-TK+/+.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Our study shows that losartan and its active metabolite EXP3174 reduce IS after acute coronary occlusion/reperfusion in mice. We show that this effect is mediated by the AT2R. Furthermore, we demonstrated for the first time that the IS-limiting effect of AT1R blockade involves TK.

When coronary artery is occluded, the cardiac oxygen supply/demand imbalance and subsequent cardiac dysfunction reduces cardiac output causing reflex vasoconstriction, which in turn increases heart work and worsens the cardiac condition. Besides an increase in sympathetic tone and the release of catecholamines, an activation of the RAS occurs, resulting in increased Ang II formation. Increased amounts of Ang II have been measured in the coronary effluent from postischemic myocardium (Sato et al., 2000Go). Ang II elicits coronary vasoconstriction by activation of postsynaptic AT1R as well as presynaptic AT1R inducing catecholamine release that could exacerbate ischemic injury. Cardiac AT1R gene expression increased after IR in our experimental conditions, contrary to Xu et al. (2002Go) who observed a decrease in AT1R mRNA, but consistent with other observations of cardiac AT1R induction in IR (Sun and Weber, 1994Go; Yang et al., 1997Go). The induction of AT1R may contribute to the increase in coronary vascular resistance and cardiac dysfunction. In this context, several studies investigated the effects of AT1R blockade in myocardial IR, but the results are not consistent across these studies. Losartan or its active metabolite EXP3174 did not reduce IS after myocardial IR in vivo in rabbits (Hartman, 1995Go), rats (Liu et al., 1996Go), or dogs (Richard et al., 1993Go). Moreover, Harada et al. (1998Go) could not prove any IS reduction in AT1a receptor-deficient mice after IR injury. In contrast, it has been reported that losartan reduced IS after IR in rats in vivo (Lee et al., 1997Go; Ozer et al., 2002Go) or in vitro (Sato et al., 2000Go; Flynn and Akers, 2003Go) or in pigs in vivo (Schwarz et al., 1997Go). In the present study, using an in vivo mouse model of IR, we showed that AT1R blockade by losartan largely reduced IS after IR. We used dosages of losartan or EXP3174, its active metabolite (Wong et al., 1990Go) that we had documented in preliminary experiments to be able to block the pressor responses to Ang I while inducing only a modest decrease in blood pressure, similar to the decrease induced by ramiprilat (50 µg/kg), which provided the same level of cardioprotection in this model (Griol-Charhbili et al., 2005Go). Discrepancy among published studies may be explained by differences in species, drug dosage, experimental conditions, and the extent of AT2 receptor activation. Indeed, selective AT2R blockade by PD123,319 (Bumpus et al., 1991Go; Bivalacqua et al., 1999Go) totally blocked the losartan-induced cardioprotection. As AT1R blockade activates renin secretion by the kidney, our data suggest that increased Ang II level and subsequent stimulation of AT2R are responsible for the cardioprotection afforded by losartan. The activation of AT2R has not always been considered as resulting in cardioprotection (Lévy, 2004Go), but consistent with our observation, it has been proposed that AT2R activation plays a role in the cardioprotective effect of ARBs in acute myocardial ischemia (Jalowy et al., 1998Go). In humans, this mechanism could be even more important, because the relative abundance of AT2R compared with AT1R in the heart seems to be higher than in rodents (Wharton et al., 1998Go).

Because we observed that PD123,319, administered at a dose that blocks AT2 receptors and has no significant effect on arterial blood pressure in agreement with Bivalacqua et al. (1999Go), had no cardioprotective effect in the absence of losartan, we propose that in the presence of a functional renal AT1R, angiotensin II levels, while increased during IR, remain too low to trigger AT2-mediated cardioprotection. Another hypothesis is that any cardioprotective effect of AT2 stimulation is counterbalanced by deleterious AT1-mediated effects in the setting of AT1R induction. We were unable to quantify accurately AT2R mRNA in mouse heart by our real-time PCR technique because of a low level of gene expression. Limited information is available on AT2R gene expression in normal heart and in acute cardiac ischemia, but AT2R mRNA levels have been found by several techniques to be very low compared with AT1R or even undetectable (Yang et al., 1997Go; Bivalacqua et al., 1999Go). However, because PD123,319 had a dramatic effect on IS in losartan-treated mice, the AT2R was present in the heart of our mice, although it may have had a low turnover; this receptor clearly plays a role in cardioprotection. A peripheral hemodynamic effect of PD123,319 influencing IS seems unlikely because of the lack of effect of this compound on blood pressure.

We observed that the cardioprotective effect of AT1R blockade by losartan was abolished in TK-deficient mice, despite a similar blood pressure-lowering effect of losartan in TK+/+ and TK–/– mice. The AT1R is normally functional in these mice (Fig. 1), and the AT2R is also present (Bergaya et al., 2004Go). This observation shows that the cardioprotective effect of AT2R stimulation in IR requires the presence of TK. Previous studies, using kinin B2 receptor (B2R) blockers, have documented a functional coupling between AT2R and B2R during AT1R blockade mediating, at least in part, the pharmacological effect of AT1R blockers in the kidney (Siragy et al., 2000Go), heart (Sato et al., 2000Go), and arteries (Gohlke et al., 1998Go). The cardioprotective effects of B2 receptor stimulation in cardiac ischemia have been well documented (Oldenburg et al., 2004Go). The mechanism of the AT2R-B2R coupling has been proposed to be related to receptor heterodimerization (Abadir et al., 2006Go), to stimulation of kinin production by unidentified kininogenases (Sun and Weber, 1994Go; Yang et al., 1997Go) triggered by AT2R activation (Siragy et al., 2000Go), or to potentiation of kinin action secondary to AT2R-mediated ACE down-regulation (Hunley et al., 2000Go). Our data cast some light on this question by showing that TK is required for the cardioprotective effect of AT2R stimulation in cardiac ischemia. TK can either directly activate the B2R (Hecquet et al., 2000Go) or release kinins, which in turn activate B1 and B2 receptors. The cardioprotective effect of losartan was suppressed by the B2R antagonist icatibant. This observation shows that B2R rather than B1R is involved in the cardioprotective effect of losartan in acute myocardial ischemia as that for ACE inhibitors (Griol-Charhbili et al., 2005Go). However, it cannot distinguish between direct or kinin-mediated B2R activation by kallikrein, because both actions are antagonized by icatibant (Hecquet et al., 2000Go). In favor of a mechanism related to kinin release, however, is the observation of increased kinin concentration in the kidney and coronary effluent of losartan-treated rats (Sato et al., 2000Go; Siragy et al., 2000Go) or in plasma of losartan-treated human subjects (Campbell et al., 2005Go). The present data indicate that TK rather than other kinin-forming enzymes, including plasma kallikrein, is responsible for the AT2-mediated kinin formation in the ischemic heart. Our study further documents the importance of the tissue kallikrein-kinin pathway in cardioprotection in acute cardiac ischemia. A role for kallikrein has also been established for the cardioprotection afforded by ischemic preconditioning (Griol-Charhbili et al., 2005Go) and for the cardioprotective effects of ACEIs, whereas in this latter case, AT2R activation is not involved (Griol-Charhbili et al., 2005Go). Induction of B1R and B2R occurs in the heart in IR (Tschöpe et al., 2000Go; Griol-Charhbili et al., 2005Go); however, the physiological mechanisms by which kinins protect the myocardium are not yet all fully understood. One plausible hypothesis would be that kallikrein and kinins exert their cardioprotective effect, at least in part, through acute flow-dependent vasodilatation (Bergaya et al., 2001Go), which could improve the myocardial blood supply. Indeed, in the carotid, this vasodilatory effect has been shown to be strongly reduced in TK-deficient mice (Bergaya et al., 2001Go). In addition, several cardiac and vascular signaling mechanisms triggered by kinins can result in the production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, which triggers cardioprotection (Oldenburg et al., 2004Go).

Drug administration was performed after coronary occlusion and before reperfusion, suggesting a clinical relevance of AT1R blockade in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. Furthermore, haploid insufficiency in TK activity occurs in human as the result of an amino acid mutation and affects 5 to 7% of Caucasian subjects and 14% of black subjects (Slim et al., 2002Go; Azizi et al., 2005Go). The data obtained in TK-deficient mice suggest that these partially TK-deficient subjects may be resistant to the cardioprotective effect of AT1R blockade or ACE inhibition, a hypothesis that can be tested in clinical studies.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank L. Perret for excellent technical assistance in genotyping the mice.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported by INSERM, the Facultéde Médecine Paris-Sud 11, and the National Research Agency (Grant ANR-05-PCOD-027). E.M.-L. and V.G.-C. were supported by a fellowship from the Ministère de la Recherche et de la Technologie.

This study was performed in the European Vascular Genomics Network, a network of excellence supported by the European Community's Sixth Frame-work Program for Research Priority 1, "Life Sciences, Genomics and Biotechnology for Health" (Contract number LSHM-CT-2003-503254).

V.G.-C. and A.P. contributed equally to this work.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/jpet.107.124859.

ABBREVIATIONS: IR, ischemia-reperfusion injury; RAS, renin angiotensin system; ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ACEI, angiotensinconverting enzyme inhibitor; AT1R, AT1 receptor; AT2R, AT2 receptor; ARB, AT1 receptor blocker; TK, tissue kallikrein; TK–/–, tissue kallikrein-deficient mice; TK+/+, wild-type littermates; AUC, area under curve; TTC, 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride; IS, infarct size; AR, area at risk; LV, left ventricle; ANOVA, analysis of variance; MAP, mean arterial pressure; B1R, B1 receptor; B2R, B2 receptor; EXP3174, 2-n-butyl-4-chloro-1-[(2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)biphenyl-4-yI)methyl]imidazole-5-carboxylic acid; Ang II, angiotensin II; Los, losartan; ECG, electrocardiogram; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; HOE140, icatibant; PD123,319, S-(+)-1-([4-(dimethylamino)-3-methylphenyl]methyl)-5-(diphenylacetyl)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-1H-imidazo(4,5-c)pyridine-6-carboxylic acid.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Christine Richer-Giudicelli, INSERM U652/872, 15 rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75270 Paris, France. E-mail: christine.richer-giudicelli{at}u-psud.fr


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

Abadir PM, Periasamy A, Carey RM, and Siragy HM (2006) Angiotensin II type 2 receptor-bradykinin B2 receptor functional heterodimerization. Hypertension 48: 316–322.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Azizi M, Boutouyrie P, Bissery A, Agharazii M, Verbeke F, Stern N, Bura-Riviere A, Laurent S, Alhenc-Gelas F, and Jeunemaitre X (2005) Arterial and renal consequences of partial genetic deficiency in tissue kallikrein activity in humans. J Clin Invest 115: 780–787.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bergaya S, Hilgers RH, Meneton P, Dong Y, Bloch-Faure M, Inagami T, AlhencGelas F, Levy BI, and Boulanger CM (2004) Flow-dependent dilation mediated by endogenous kinins requires angiotensin AT2 receptors. Circ Res 94: 1623–1629.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bergaya S, Meneton P, Bloch-Faure M, Mathieu E, Alhenc-Gelas F, Levy BI, and Boulanger CM (2001) Decreased flow-dependent dilation in carotid arteries of tissue kallikrein-knockout mice. Circ Res 88: 593–599.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bivalacqua TJ, Dalal A, Champion HC, and Kadowitz PJ (1999) Role of AT(1) receptors and autonomic nervous system in mediating acute pressor responses to ANG II in anesthetized mice. Am J Physiol 277: E838 –E847.[Medline]

Bumpus FM, Catt KJ, Chiu AT, DeGasparo M, Goodfriend T, Husain A, Peach MJ, Taylor DG, Jr. and Timmermans PB (1991) Nomenclature for angiotensin receptors. A report of the Nomenclature Committee of the Council for High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension 17: 720–721.[Free Full Text]

Campbell DJ, Krum H, and Esler MD (2005) Losartan increases bradykinin levels in hypertensive humans. Circulation 111: 315–320.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dickstein K and Kjekshus J (2002) Effects of losartan and captopril on mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients after acute myocardial infarction: the OPTIMAAL randomised trial. Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist losartan. Lancet 360: 752–760.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ertl G, Kloner RA, Alexander RW, and Braunwald E (1982) Limitation of experimental infarct size by an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor. Circulation 65: 40–48.[Free Full Text]

Flynn JD and Akers WS (2003) Effects of the angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor antagonist losartan on functional recovery of isolated rat hearts undergoing global myocardial ischemia-reperfusion. Pharmacotherapy 23: 1401–1410.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gohlke P, Pees C, and Unger T (1998) AT2 receptor stimulation increases aortic cyclic GMP in SHRSP by a kinin-dependent mechanism. Hypertension 31: 349–355.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Griol-Charhbili V, Messadi-Laribi E, Bascands JL, Heudes D, Meneton P, Giudicelli JF, Alhenc-Gelas F, and Richer C (2005) Role of tissue kallikrein in the cardioprotective effects of ischemic and pharmacological preconditioning in myocardial ischemia. FASEB J 19: 1172–1174.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Harada K, Komuro I, Hayashi D, Sugaya T, Murakami K, and Yazaki Y (1998) Angiotensin II type 1a receptor is involved in the occurrence of reperfusion arrhythmias. Circulation 97: 315–317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hartman JC (1995) The role of bradykinin and nitric oxide in the cardioprotective action of ACE inhibitors. Ann Thorac Surg 60: 789–792.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hearse DJ and Bolli R (1992) Reperfusion induced injury: manifestations, mechanisms, and clinical relevance. Cardiovasc Res 26: 101–108.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hecquet C, Tan F, Marcic BM, and Erdos EG (2000) Human bradykinin B(2) receptor is activated by kallikrein and other serine proteases. Mol Pharmacol 58: 828–836.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hunley TE, Tamura M, Stoneking BJ, Nishimura H, Ichiki T, Inagami T, and Kon V (2000) The angiotensin type II receptor tonically inhibits angiotensin-converting enzyme in AT2 null mutant mice. Kidney Int 57: 570–577.[Medline]

Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources (1996) Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 7th ed. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, Commission on Life Sciences, National Research Council, Washington DC.

Jalowy A, Schulz R, Dorge H, Behrends M, and Heusch G (1998) Infarct size reduction by AT1-receptor blockade through a signal cascade of AT2-receptor activation, bradykinin and prostaglandins in pigs. J Am Coll Cardiol 32: 1787–1796.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lee YM, Peng YY, Ding YA, and Yen MH (1997) Losartan attenuates myocardial ischemia-induced ventricular arrhythmias and reperfusion injury in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Am J Hypertens 10: 852–858.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lévy BI (2004) Can angiotensin II type 2 receptors have deleterious effects in cardiovascular disease? Implications for therapeutic blockade of the reninangiotensin system. Circulation 109: 8–13.[Free Full Text]

Liu YH, Yang XP, Sharov VG, Sigmon DH, Sabbath HN, and Carretero OA (1996) Paracrine systems in the cardioprotective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury in rats. Hypertension 27: 7–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Livak KJ and Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25: 402–408.[CrossRef][Medline]

Ludbrook J (1994) Repeated measurements and multiple comparisons in cardiovascular research. Cardiovasc Res 28: 303–311.[Free Full Text]

Martorana PA, Kettenbach B, Breipohl G, Linz W, and Scholkens BA (1990) Reduction of infarct size by local angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition is abolished by a bradykinin antagonist. Eur J Pharmacol 182: 395–396.[CrossRef][Medline]

Meneton P, Bloch-Faure M, Hagege AA, Ruetten H, Huang W, Bergaya S, Ceiler D, Gehring D, Martins I, Salmon G, et al. (2001) Cardiovascular abnormalities with normal blood pressure in tissue kallikrein-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 2634–2639.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Nolly H, Carbini LA, Scicli G, Carretero OA, and Scicli AG (1994) A local kallikreinkinin system is present in rat hearts. Hypertension 23: 919–923.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Oldenburg O, Qin Q, Krieg T, Yang XM, Philipp S, Critz SD, Cohen MV, and Downey JM (2004) Bradykinin induces mitochondrial ROS generation via NO, cGMP, PKG, and mitoKATP channel opening and leads to cardioprotection. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 286: H468 –H476.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ozer MK, Sahna E, Birincioglu M, and Acet A (2002) Effects of captopril and losartan on myocardial ischemia-reperfusion induced arrhythmias and necrosis in rats. Pharmacol Res 45: 257–263.[CrossRef][Medline]

Richard V, Ghaleh B, Berdeaux A, and Giudicelli JF (1993) Comparison of the effects of EXP3174, an angiotensin II antagonist and enalaprilat on myocardial infarct size in anaesthetized dogs. Br J Pharmacol 110: 969–974.[Medline]

Sato M, Engelman RM, Otani H, Maulik N, Rousou JA, Flack JE 3rd, Deaton DW, and Das DK (2000) Myocardial protection by preconditioning of heart with losartan, an angiotensin II type 1-receptor blocker: implication of bradykinin-dependent and bradykinin-independent mechanisms. Circulation 102: III346 – III351[Medline]

Schwarz ER, Montino H, Fleischhauer J, Klues HG, vom Dahl J, and Hanrath P (1997) Angiotensin II receptor antagonist EXP 3174 reduces infarct size comparable with enalaprilat and augments preconditioning in the pig heart. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 11: 687–695.[CrossRef][Medline]

Siragy HM, de Gasparo M, and Carey RM (2000) Angiotensin type 2 receptor mediates valsartan-induced hypotension in conscious rats. Hypertension 35: 1074–1077.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Slim R, Torremocha F, Moreau T, Pizard A, Hunt SC, Vuagnat A, Williams GH, Gauthier F, Jeunemaitre X, and Alhenc-Gelas F (2002) Loss-of-function polymorphism of the human kallikrein gene with reduced urinary kallikrein activity. JAm Soc Nephrol 13: 968–976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Sun Y and Weber KT (1994) Angiotensin II receptor binding following myocardial infarction in the rat. Cardiovasc Res 28: 1623–1628.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Trabold F, Pons S, Hagege AA, Bloch-Faure M, Alhenc-Gelas F, Giudicelli JF, Richer-Giudicelli C, and Meneton P (2002) Cardiovascular phenotypes of kinin B2 receptor- and tissue kallikrein-deficient mice. Hypertension 40: 90–95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Tschöpe C, Heringer-Walther S, and Walther T (2000) Regulation of the kinin receptors after induction of myocardial infarction: a mini-review. Braz J Med Biol Res 33: 701–708.[Medline]

Wharton J, Morgan K, Rutherford RA, Catravas JD, Chester A, Whitehead BF, De Leval MR, Yacoub MH, and Polak JM (1998) Differential distribution of angiotensin AT2 receptors in the normal and failing human heart. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 284: 323–336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wong PC, Price WA Jr., Chiu AT, Duncia JV, Carini DJ, Wexler RR, Johnson AL, and Timmermans PB (1990) Nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonists. XI. Pharmacology of EXP3174: an active metabolite of DuP 753, an orally active antihypertensive agent. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 255: 211–217.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Xu Y, Kumar D, Dyck JR, Ford WR, Clanachan AS, Lopaschuk GD, and Jugdutt BI (2002) AT(1) and AT(2) receptor expression and blockade after acute ischemia-reperfusion in isolated working rat hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 282: H1206 –H1215.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yang BC, Phillips MI, Ambuehl PE, Shen LP, Mehta P, and Mehta JL (1997) Increase in angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression immediately after ischemia-reperfusion in isolated rat hearts. Circulation 96: 922–926.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.107.124859v1
323/1/210    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Messadi-Laribi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Richer, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Messadi-Laribi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Richer, C.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition