![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CHEMOTHERAPY, ANTIBIOTICS, AND GENE THERAPY
Gene Therapy Program, Institute of Human Genetics, Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development (J.L.G., K.P.-P., D.S., A.D.K., N.V.S., R.S.M.) and Research Animal Resources (R.G.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Received June 7, 2007; accepted June 21, 2007.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One potential way to protect against MTX toxicity is by the expression of drug-resistant DHFR in normal drug-sensitive cells and tissues. MTXr-DHFR variants have been shown to mediate protection from antifolate toxicity when expressed in DHFR transgenic hematopoietic cells after transplantation (May et al., 1995
, 1996
; Morris et al., 1996
; James et al., 1997
, 2000
). Improved antifolate chemotherapy has also been shown in mice transplanted with DHFR transgenic marrow or with
-retrovirus-transduced marrow cells expressing drug-resistant DHFR (Mayer-Kuckuk et al., 2002
; Sweeney et al., 2003
). Selective expansion of tyrosine 22 (Tyr22) DHFR-transduced hematopoietic cells reported in murine and nonhuman primate models (Allay et al., 1997
; Persons et al., 2004
) also supports the potential utility of DHFR gene transfer for protection of normal cells during administration of chemotherapy using antifolates.
Gamma-retrovirus vectors transducing MTXr-DHFR cDNAs, sometimes in combination with other drug-resistance genes, have been evaluated extensively for gene transfer and drug resistance in mammalian cells and in mouse models (Williams et al., 1987
; Corey et al., 1990
; Li et al., 1994
; Budak-Alpdogan et al., 2004
; Capiaux et al., 2004
). However, clinical application of MTXr-DHFR expression will require the most effective means available to achieve gene transfer into hematopoietic cell targets. Lentivirus vectors have been shown to be highly effective in mediating gene transfer into HSCs, particularly within the context of ex vivo gene transfer into HSCs of dogs and nonhuman primates (Hanawa et al., 2004
; Horn et al., 2004
). Here, we report the generation of lentivirus vectors expressing murine MTXr-DHFR (Tyr22), and we demonstrate effective protection of mice from lethal doses of MTX by transplantation with congenic marrow after a single overnight vector transduction. These results suggest the development of a clinically applicable ex vivo DHFR gene transfer procedure for reduced toxicity associated with antifolate chemotherapy.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preparation of High-Titer Vector Stocks. Lentiviral vectors were packaged using a three-plasmid transient transfection procedure as described previously (Zufferey et al., 1997
). Lentivirus vector plasmids (pCSIIEG, pEFDIG, or pDL2G) were cotransfected with p
NRF to provide the gag, pol, and rev proteins and pMD.G for pseudotyping with vesicular stomatitis virus G protein envelope protein. In brief, 6 x 106 human embryonic kidney 293T cells were seeded onto poly-L-lysine-coated 15-cm2 plates 24 h before transfection in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin (P/S) (all from Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Atlas Biologicals, Fort Collins, CO) in a humidified atmosphere containing 3% CO2 in air at 37°C. For the production of vector particles, 8 µg of pMD.G, 30 µgofp
NRF packaging plasmid, and 25 µg of lentiviral vector plasmid were cotransfected into 293T cells using the DNA-calcium phosphate coprecipitation technique (Tiscornia et al., 2006
). After overnight transfection, cells were washed with PBS, provided with fresh DMEM plus 10% FBS, 1% P/S, and 10 mM sodium butyrate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), and incubated in a humidified atmosphere containing 10% CO2 in air at 37°C. Vector supernatants were collected 8 h later and replaced with DMEM plus 10% FBS and 1% P/S for two additional 12-h incubations. Supernatants from all three harvests were pooled, concentrated 100-fold by centrifugation at 23,000g, and resuspended in unsupplemented Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (Invitrogen). Concentrated supernatants were diluted and titrated on NIH3T3 TK– (lacking thymidine kinase) murine fibroblasts. Cells and virus were incubated for 48 h in the presence of 8 µg/ml polybrene (hexadimethrine bromide; Sigma-Aldrich) followed by fluorescence-activated cytometric analysis to determine the percentage of GFP+ cells using a FACSCalibur instrument (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Titer was also assessed by drug-resistant colony formation after subculturing transduced 3T3 TK– cells into selective medium containing 0.15 µM MTX (Vinh and McIvor, 1993
). After 2 weeks, colonies were stained with crystal violet, and the MTXr-DHFR titer was calculated as the number of colony-forming units per milliliter. Vector concentrations were increased approximately 100-fold with 70% recovery of transducing units, and final titers ranged between 107 and 108 transducing units per milliliter as assessed both by drug resistance (MTXr-DHFR) and flow cytometry (GFP).
Fluorescence Microscopy. 3T3 TK– fibroblasts were transduced with EFDIG or DL2G lentiviral vector and subcultured in 100 µM MTX. After 2 weeks, MTX-resistant clones were isolated and expanded in culture. For fluorescence microscopy, MTX-resistant clones and uninfected cells were subcultured onto coverslips coated with 0.002% poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich). Confluent monolayers were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich), washed with PBS, and mounted onto glass slides with VectaMount (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Fluorescence was visualized on an Olympus BX60 upright microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Western Blot Analysis. MTXr-clones (described in the preceding section) and uninfected cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Cambrex Bio Science, Walkersville, MD), and lysed with 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; Sigma-Aldrich). Cleared lysates were prepared by centrifugation at 15,000g for 20 min. Protein extracts (25 µg, quantified by Bradford assay; Pierce Chemical, Rockford, IL) were boiled for 5 min in the presence of sample loading buffer and electrophoresed through 12% polyacrylamide-SDS. Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes using the iBLOT Dry Blotting System (Invitrogen) and then incubated sequentially with either a polyclonal rabbit antibody raised against human DHFR (a kind gift from Dr. B. Dolnick, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, Buffalo, NY; Morris and McIvor, 1994
) or a monoclonal rabbit antibody against eGFP (Clontech, Mountain View, CA) followed by a secondary anti-rabbit IgG antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Invitrogen).
DHFR Enzyme Assay. 3T3 TK– cells were transduced with CSIIEG, EFDIG, or DL2G lentivirus vector at a multiplicity of infection of 1, harvested by trypsinization, washed with PBS, and then resuspended in lysis buffer [50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, and 25 mM MgCl2 (all from Sigma-Aldrich), 10 mM
-mercaptoethanol (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA)]. The cells were then sonicated with a Branson 250/450 Sonifier at a setting of 5 for 20 s using a microtip and cleared by centrifugation (16,000g for 30 min at 4°C). Extracts were diluted into reaction buffer (100 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.5, 150 mM KCl, and 10 mM
-mercaptoethanol). When including MTX in the reaction, samples were incubated with drug at room temperature for 10 min before enzyme assay. Reactions were started by adding NADPH (
-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate reduced tetrasodium salt) and dihydrofolic acid (both from Sigma-Aldrich) to final concentrations of 120 and 30 µM, respectively, following the change in absorbance at 340 nm on a DU40 spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). One unit was defined as the amount of enzyme required to reduce 1 nmol of dihydrofolic acid per minute (
= 12,300 M–1 cm–1) (Carr et al., 1983
).
Mouse Bone Marrow Transplantation, ex Vivo Transduction, and Methotrexate Administration. All procedures were reviewed and approved by the University of Minnesota Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Six-week-old C57BL/6 CD45.2 and CD45.1 female mice were obtained from the National Cancer Institute (Frederick, MD) and provided with food and water ad libitum. Donor CD45.2 mice were administered 150 mg/kg 5-fluorouracil (Sigma-Aldrich) 2 days before marrow harvest. Bone marrow was flushed from the hind limbs of donor mice and processed to a single-cell suspension in DMEM plus 10 U/ml heparin and 10% FBS. Cell suspensions were quantitated and assayed for viability by trypan blue exclusion. Following marrow harvest and processing, cells were resuspended in complete Stempro medium supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Invitrogen), cytokines (20 ng/ml human IL-3, 50 ng/ml human IL-6, 100 ng/ml murine SCF; all from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and 8 µg/ml polybrene (Sigma-Aldrich). All transductions were carried out as 12-h vector exposures following the addition of 100-fold concentrated vector to 2.25 x 108 cells plated in three 15-cm2 tissue culture plates. Concentrated vector was added to a final volume of 15 ml/plate at a multiplicity of infection of 10 (MTXr CFU/marrow cell). Transduced cells were washed, enumerated, and resuspended at a final concentration of 1 to 2 x 107/ml DMEM, and then equal numbers (2 or 3 x 106) were injected through the lateral tail vein into 12- to 16-week-old sublethally irradiated (700 cGy) congenic recipients (CD45.1). Mice that received MTX (+ amethopterin; Bedford Laboratories, Bedford, OH) were injected intraperitoneally with 0.25 mg/kg MTX on days 1 to 4, 0.5 mg/kg MTX on days 5 to 8, 1 mg/kg MTX on days 9 to 25, and 1 to 2 mg/kg on days 26 to 35 or until recovery of hematocrit to the normal range. Control mice were injected with equivalent volumes of PBS. For secondary transplant, marrow harvested from primary recipients was injected into lethally irradiated (800–850 cGy) CD45.1 secondary recipients, which were allowed to recover for 4 months before analysis of engraftment and transduction.
Hematology and Flow Cytometry. Blood was obtained from animals at regular intervals for determination of hematocrit and for flow cytometric analysis. Whole blood samples were resuspended in hemolysis buffer (0.15 M NH4Cl, 1 M NaHCO3, and 0.1 M Na2EDTA, pH 7.2), and leukocytes were pelleted by low-speed centrifugation, washed with PBS, and stained with fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies for determination of immunophenotype. GFP expression was analyzed as described previously (Kurre et al., 2004
). Engraftment and leukocyte immunophenotyping were conducted using anti-mouse monoclonal antibodies: allophycocyanin-conjugated CD45.2, phycoerythrin-conjugated CD3e (T lymphocytes), B220 (B lymphocytes), CD11b and Gr-1 (myeloid lineages) (all purchased from eBiosciences, San Diego, CA). Data were collected on a FACS-Calibur instrument (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using CellQuest Pro (BD Biosciences) and FlowJo (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR) software, respectively.
Histopathologic Analysis. Animals were euthanized, and tissue samples were harvested, including sternum and ileum. Tissues were fixed in 10% formalin (further decalcifying bones in 1% formic acid; both from Sigma-Aldrich), embedded in paraffin, sectioned, mounted, stained (hematoxylin and eosin), and analyzed microscopically without prior knowledge of sample identity.
Real-Time Quantitative PCR. DNA was extracted from samples using the Puregene DNA Purification System (Gentra Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN) and quantitated spectrophotometrically (A260). Reactions were run in duplicate under the following conditions: 60 ng of DNA, 200 nM forward (5'-CACATGAAGCAGCACGACTT-3') and reverse (5'-GGTCTTGTAGTTGCCGTCGT-3') GFP-specific primers, 100 nM GFP-specific probe (5'/56-5-carboxyfluorescein/AGCGCACCATCTTCTTCAAG/3BHQ_1/-3'), and 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich) in a 10-µl final reaction volume. The LightCycler 2.0 System (Roche Applied Science) was used for amplification of the target sequence with the following cycling parameters: 95°C for 10 min, 1 cycle; 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 20 s, 45 cycles; and 40°C for 30 s, 1 cycle). Results were analyzed using LightCycler software, version 3.5, and copy number was determined by the second derivative maximal analysis method (i.e., the cycle number at which sample fluorescence is first detected above background fluorescence). A standard curve was generated by first isolating a HeLa cell clone in selective medium containing 0.2 µM MTX after exposure to DHFR lentivirus vector CCDG (see above) at low multiplicity as a source of DNA containing a single copy integrant. CCDG/HeLa DNA was mixed with unexposed HeLa cell DNA in 10-fold serial dilutions to generate a standard curve covering a range of 104 copies to 1 copy of the integrated vector sequence per 60 ng of template DNA. Negative controls for each reaction included no template control, HeLa cell DNA, and DNA extracted from C57BL/6 mouse bone marrow.
Statistical Analysis. Animal survival in response to MTX administration was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier product limit method (Kaplan and Meier, 1958
). The log rank statistic was determined using Prism 4 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA) to test for differences among recipient cohorts (Peto and Peto, 1972
). Data from other experiments were evaluated by unpaired t test analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(EF-1
) promoter. The Tyr22DHFR and eGFP coding sequences were inserted as part of a bicistronic expression cassette (pEFDIG) or as a genetic fusion (pDL2G) (Fig. 1). The EFDIG and DL2G vectors were packaged into vesicular stomatitis virus G protein pseudotyped virions and concentrated 100-fold. Titer was assessed in comparison with the eGFP-encoding vector CSIIEG (Fig. 1). Vector titers ranged between 107 and 108 IU/ml (Table 1), with reasonably good correlation between titer assessed by flow cytometry for GFP expression and by MTXr colony formation for DHFR expression. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of GFP-positive 3T3 TK– cells transduced at a multiplicity of infection of 0.2 or less was higher for the DL2G fusion in comparison with the EFDIG-infected cells, indicating that DL2G may be a more reliable vector design to achieve GFP marking of transduced cell populations.
|
|
To characterize Tyr22DHFR and eGFP protein expressed in transduced cells, clones resistant to a high level of MTX (100 µM, to select for clones expressing a high level of DHFR) were isolated for examination by fluorescence microscopy, and extracts were prepared for Western blot analysis (Fig. 2). Tyr22DHFR and eGFP proteins were clearly identifiable in Western blots (Fig. 2A). The presence of a 48-kDa band in MTXr-DL2G lysates immunoreactive with both anti-eGFP and anti-DHFR antibodies confirmed successful generation of the Tyr22DHFR-eGFP fusion protein, consistent with the molecular masses of eGFP (27 kDa), DHFR (21 kDa), and the glycine-serine linker (0.8 kDa). In contrast, a 21-kDa band was detected in EFDIG-transduced cell lysates probed with anti-DHFR antibody, consistent with the molecular weight of endogenous murine DHFR. A 27-kDa band was also detected in GFP-probed EFDIG lysates, consistent with the molecular mass of eGFP. In uninfected and DL2G-transduced cells, endogenous DHFR was detected at greater exposure times (data not shown). Fluorescence microscopy of MTXr-clones showed a higher level of fluorescence in DL2G-positive cells in comparison with EFDIG-positive cells (Fig. 2B).
|
|
Transplantation with EFDIG-Transduced Marrow Protects Recipients from Lethal Doses of MTX. To determine the level of chemoprotection conferred by lentivirus-mediated Tyr22DHFR gene transfer, we conducted dose-escalation studies in animals that had received either CSIIEG- or EFDIG-transduced marrow. Following overnight transduction in the presence of IL-3, IL-6, and SCF, 3 x 106 transduced, unfractionated marrow cells were infused into sublethally irradiated (700 cGy) recipients. Animals were then administered either PBS or MTX at ascending doses, from 0.25 mg/kg/day on day 1 up to 2 mg/kg/day on day 35. Mice that were transplanted with GFP-transduced marrow and subsequently administered MTX did not survive dose escalation to 2 mg/kg/day (Fig. 3A). Two of the CSIIEG-marrow recipients administered MTX that survived until day 35 exhibited poor health, as indicated by 25% loss of body weight, lethargy, and hematocrits below 15 (Fig. 3B). In contrast, animals transplanted with EFDIG-transduced marrow exhibited a significant survival advantage (p = 0.0102), and most of these animals survived escalation of the MTX dose up to 2 mg/kg/day. EFDIG-marrow recipients recovered to healthy hematocrit levels by day 20, exhibiting a similar hematocrit recovery pattern as that observed for the PBS-administered control cohort. Histopathological analysis of marrow from MTX-treated control (GFP-transduced) recipients revealed severe hypoplasia, consistent with myelosuppression. In contrast, bone marrow from the EFDIG/MTX and CSIIEG/PBS cohorts showed marrow hyperplasia. Histopathological analysis of samples from the ileum revealed normal crypt/villus ratios and a lack of lesions (data not shown).
|
Donor cell engraftment levels were assessed in recipient animals by flow cytometric analysis for CD45.2+ leukocytes in peripheral blood at 4 and 8 weeks post-transplantation. For PBS-administered control animals, donor engraftment increased from 60% at 4 weeks to 82% at 8 weeks (Table 3). Lower levels of engraftment were observed in MTX-treated EFDIG-marrow recipients 4 weeks post transplantation (30%). By week 8, engraftment increased to 82%. GFP marking was higher in MTX-treated EFDIG marrow recipients (36%) compared with PBS-treated animals (15%) during the dose escalation, but marking decreased to 9 to 10% in both cohorts 1 month after MTX withdrawal. These data show selective expansion of Tyr22DHFR-expressing cells resulting from MTX administration.
|
MTX Dose-Escalation Studies in DL2G-Transduced BMT Recipients. To assess whether the Tyr22DHFR-GFP fusion protein protects recipients from MTX-toxicity, we conducted MTX dose-escalation studies in mice transplanted with 2 x 106 DL2G-transduced marrow cells. Donor CD45.2 marrow cells were harvested and transduced overnight with DL2G or CSIIEG in the presence of IL-3, IL-6, and SCF as described under Materials and Methods. In comparison with the EFDIG-transduced marrow transplant experiment described above, fewer cells were infused due to decreased viable cell yield after overnight transduction. After transplantation, recipient animals were administered either PBS or MTX at an initial dose of 0.25 mg/kg, subsequently increasing the dose to 0.5 mg/kg and then 1.0 mg/kg on day 9 post-transplant. Control CSIIEG-transduced marrow recipients did not survive MTX dose escalation to 1 mg/kg/day and succumbed by day 16 (p = 0.0398) (Fig. 3C). Declining health of all animals, including PBS-treated controls, necessitated a 5-day suspension of MTX administration, from day 13 to 17 post-transplant. Once the animals regained their health based on weight, appearance, and behavior, treatment was resumed and continued until the end of the 30-day dose escalation. We observed that DL2G marrow recipients survived MTX dose escalation to 1 mg/kg/day. In comparison with the MTX-treated CSIIEG-marrow recipients, MTX- and PBS-treated DL2G-marrow recipients recovered to normal hematocrit levels by day 21 (Fig. 3D). Histopathological analysis of marrow and small intestine (ileum) sections from MTX-treated CSIIEG-marrow recipients revealed severe marrow hypoplasia but no evidence of GI atrophy, respectively (data not shown). In contrast, DL2G-transduced marrow recipients treated with MTX or PBS exhibited hyperplastic marrow and normal GI histology.
MTX- and PBS-treated DL2G-marrow recipients exhibited 9 and 14% CD45.2 donor cell marking, respectively, in peripheral blood at the endpoint of drug administration (31 days). By 8 weeks after marrow transplantation, donor cell engraftment increased to 59 and 60% for these cohorts, respectively (Table 3). In PBS-administered control animals, GFP marking in peripheral blood was stable between 4 and 8 weeks (3% GFP-positive PBMCs). In contrast, GFP marking in MTX-treated DL2G-marrow recipients decreased by 8 weeks (from 13 to 2% GFP-positive PBMCs). GFP marking was observed in donor myeloid and lymphoid lineages at mean frequencies from 10 to 60% (Table 4). The greater level of GFP marking in MTX-treated animals implies a selective advantage for Tyr22DHFR-expressing donor hematopoietic cells over untransduced donor cells during MTX administration. Although antifolate administration alone is not sufficient for in vivo selection of hematopoietic stem cells (Allay et al., 1998
), Tyr22DHFR-myeloid and lymphoid progeny seem to be less sensitive to MTX toxicity; therefore, they may have a survival advantage over their untransduced counterparts.
|
Proviral integrant frequencies (determined by real-time quantitative PCR) in the bone marrow of primary transplant recipients were similar among those animals within each experiment (Table 3). The higher proviral integrant frequency in experiment 1 compared with experiment 2, in combination with the reduced number of marrow cells transplanted in experiment 2, may account for the decreased recovery time and higher level of chemoprotection achieved in MTX-treated EFDIG-marrow recipients (2 versus 1 mg/kg/day).
Repopulation of Secondary Recipients with Lentiviral Vector-Transduced Hematopoietic Stem Cells. To confirm transduction of long-term repopulating stem cells, bone marrow was harvested from primary recipients, and 5 x 106 cells were transplanted into each of three lethally irradiated CD45.1 secondary recipients. Peripheral blood from the secondary recipients was analyzed for CD45.2 donor and GFP+ marking by flow cytometry at 8 and 16 weeks post-transplantation. By 16 weeks, the mean engraftment level of CD45.2+ cells in the peripheral blood of secondary recipients was not significantly different between cohorts (p < 0.05). GFP marking was stable over the 4-month period and similar to the GFP-marking level observed for EFDIG-transduced primary marrow transplant recipients (Fig. 4A). By comparison, engraftment of CD45.2+ cells in DL2G-marrow recipients was lower, probably due to the fact that 1 million fewer cells were transplanted into primary recipients. GFP marking in secondary DL2G-marrow recipients was substantially lower (1% GFP+), likely due to reduced stem cell marking (Fig. 4B). The level of GFP expression persisted in secondary recipients, as revealed by stable mean fluorescence intensity over time observed in secondary recipients of EFDIG-, DL2G-, and CSIIEG-transduced marrow. These results allow us to conclude that: 1) EFDIG and DL2G LV treatment of unfractionated marrow supported the transduction of hematopoietic stem cells; 2) primitive hematopoietic cells engrafted, repopulated, and gave rise to MTX-resistant progeny in primary recipients sufficient to provide significant chemoprotection and prolonged animal survival during MTX dose escalation; and 3) genetically marked hematopoietic stem cells reconstituted the bone marrow of lethally irradiated secondary recipients, giving rise to progeny that persisted in the peripheral blood.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-retrovirus encoding human MTXr-DHFR conferred significant chemoprotection to transplant recipients (May et al., 1995
To facilitate vector titering and the tracking of DHFR-transduced hematopoietic cells, we included a GFP coding sequence in both of the vectors tested in our study. For vector EFDIG, expression of the downstream eGFP sequence relies on internal translation from a picornavirus IRES sequence positioned between the DHFR and eGFP coding sequence. Although there is ample evidence in the literature for the effectiveness of this strategy for expression of two genes from the same vector, maintenance of expression can be problematic, particularly for the downstream coding sequence. Persons et al. (1997
) solved this problem for DHFR-expressing Moloney murine leukemia virus vector by placing the GFP coding sequence in the upstream position of a GFP-IRES-DHFR transcript, thereby forcing expression of both genes due to the selective pressure exerted on DHFR in the downstream position. In this study, we generated a Tyr22DHFR-eGFP fusion protein so as to more intimately link GFP expression to drug-resistant DHFR function. Similar use of a human Phe22/Ser31 DHFR-GFP fusion protein was previously reported by Mayer-Kuckuk et al. (2002
). We verified the predicted size of the DHFR-GFP fusion protein by Western blot using both anti-GFP and anti-DHFR antibodies, as well as maintained GFP fluorescence and DHFR enzyme activity in cell extracts. Direct comparison of cells transduced with EF-1
-regulated vectors (EFDIG versus CSIIEG; Table 1) revealed a 1.8-fold reduction in GFP mean fluorescence intensity resulting from the DHFR-GFP fusion (175 versus 322, respectively). However, GFP fluorescence of the IRES regulated construct EFDIG was reduced 3.3-fold (MFI = 98) compared with CSIIEG, thus exemplifying our motivation in seeking a more reliable strategy for GFP coexpression in these vectors. The effectiveness of the fusion design was also apparent in the maintenance of MFI in DL2G transduced peripheral blood cells of secondary transplant recipients (Fig. 4B), the low level of stem cell transduction in this experiment notwithstanding.
Therapeutic application of antifolates such as MTX is limited by systemic toxicity and tumor-acquired drug resistance (Bertino, 1993
). Low- and intermediate-dose MTX therapy causes cytopenia among hematopoietic lineages, thereby compromising overall patient health. The primary acute toxicities associated with high-dose MTX treatment are myelosuppression and mucositis (Moe and Holen, 2000
). This is especially limiting in applications where GI sensitivity to MTX precludes dose escalation to a level that would improve the likelihood for patient relapse-free survival. As an approach to protect against antifolate toxicities, ex vivo
-retroviral transduction studies in mice have shown that virus-mediated MTXr-DHFR gene transfer supports higher dose antifolate administration while limiting myelotoxicity. Protection of animals from lethal doses of methotrexate by ex vivo retroviral vector-mediated transduction of hematopoietic stem cells was demonstrated by Williams (Corey et al., 1990
) and also by Bertino (Capiaux et al., 2003
). Our laboratory reported similar protection against lethal doses of MTX in animals transplanted with transgenic marrow expressing one of several MTX-resistant DHFR variants (May et al., 1995
, 1996
; Morris et al., 1996
; James et al., 1997
, 2000
). Sorrentino's group demonstrated selective protection against the antifolate trimetrexate mediated by Tyr22DHFR transduction at the stem cell level (Allay et al., 1998
). Here, we have extended these chemoprotection studies to include a lentiviral vector-mediated approach with the intention of providing a more potent means of achieving Tyr22DHFR gene transfer into hematopoietic targets.
There are several hematological observations that were made as a part of this study. The evidence from our study supports transduction of hematopoietic stem cells. GFP+ donor leukocytes of both myeloid and lymphoid lineages observed at 8 weeks post-transplant could have resulted from transduction of stem cells or of more committed myeloid and lymphoid progenitors. Drug resistance gene expression in committed progenitors is important, in fact, to confer chemoprotection in the period soon after bone marrow transplant (in mice, the first 2–3 weeks) (James et al., 1999
). However, the data from our secondary transplant recipients indicate that gene transfer into primitive stem cells was achieved in the primary-transplanted animals, most probably giving rise to at least some transduced cells in the peripheral blood starting 3 to 4 weeks post-transplant. We also observed that transgene expression based on GFP marking in the peripheral blood was significantly increased during MTX treatment and then subsided 1 month after drug withdrawal (p < 0.05). In contrast, GFP marking did not decrease significantly in PBS-treated animals after cessation of injections (p > 0.05). This is consistent with a survival advantage imparted on more differentiated cells during MTX administration, but not on more primitive stem cells. This is also consistent with previous reports that selection of DHFR-transduced stem cells requires the use of a more specific DHFR inhibitor (i.e., trimetrexate) in combination with a nucleoside transport inhibitor (Allay et al., 1997
). Temporary expansion of more differentiated cell types has also been reported for nonhuman primates transplanted with DHFR-transduced marrow upon administration of trimetrexate (Persons et al., 2004
). Such temporary expansion of DHFR+ peripheral blood lymphocytes nonetheless implies a certain degree of chemoprotection achieved, with potential therapeutic benefit. Finally, gene transfer was achieved after a simple overnight exposure of marrow cells to DHFR lentivirus vector at an infection multiplicity of 10, resulting in a moderate overall proviral copy number in peripheral blood cells (0.5 copies/cell in expt 1 and 0.2–0.3 copies/cell in expt 2). Nonetheless, the low gene transfer frequency into stem cells observed in these experiments (11% in expt 1 and 1% in expt 2) was sufficient to protect transplant recipients from myelosuppression and to support MTX dose escalation to 2 and 1 mg/kg per day, respectively. Such chemoprotection was previously observed in mice engrafted at low levels (down to 1%) with transgenic marrow expressing drug-resistant DHFR (James et al., 2000
).
Clinical testing of drug-resistance genes has included introduction of the MDR1 gene as a means of protecting against the toxicity of paclitaxel chemotherapy (Abonour et al., 2000
, and references therein) and introduction of the methylguanine methyltransferase gene to confer resistance to alkylating agents (Cornetta et al., 2006
). These studies have targeted human CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells using retroviral vectors for introduction of the MDR1 or O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase genes. In particular, Abonour et al. (2000
) reported successful MDR gene transfer into CD34+ cells engrafted in recipient patients, with a transient increase in MDR1-positive cells observed in the peripheral blood after a course of paclitaxel chemotherapy. These results imply protection against the toxicity of chemotherapy brought about by introduction of the MDR gene. We suggest that effective protection against antifolate toxicity may similarly be brought about by introduction of DHFR genes that encode antifolate-resistant enzyme activity, and at the higher frequency afforded by the use of lentivirus rather than murine retrovirus vectors. The studies described herein show that ex vivo lentiviral transduction of mouse bone marrow supports DHFR gene transfer into HSCs and more differentiated hematopoietic lineages, providing short- and long-term chemoprotection to marrow transplant recipients during MTX dose escalation. These studies also demonstrate the effectiveness of lentivirus vectors for this purpose, using ex vivo transduction conditions (i.e., short-term exposure) that are relevant to the clinical setting. Systemic chemoprotection coupled with antifolate chemotherapy may thus provide more effective treatment of antifolate-responsive tumors.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.
ABBREVIATIONS: MTX, methotrexate; DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase; MTXr, methotrexate-resistant; HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; IRES/ires, internal ribosomal entry site; GFP, green fluorescent protein; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; eGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium; P/S, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin; FBS, fetal bovine serum; TK–, lacking thymidine kinase; LV, lentivirus vector; Rx, treatment; BMT, bone marrow transplant; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; IL, interleukin; SCF, stem cell factor; cGy, centiGray; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; GI, gastrointestinal; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; expt, experiment; MDR, multidrug resistance; CFU, colony-forming unit.
Address correspondence to: Dr. R. Scott McIvor, Department of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, 6-160 Jackson Hall, 321 Church St. SE, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail: mcivor{at}mail.med.umn.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abonour R, Williams DA, Einhorn L, Hall KM, Chen J, Coffman J, Traycoff CM, Bank A, Kato I, Ward M, et al. (2000) Efficient retrovirus-mediated gene transfer of the multidrug resistance 1 gene into autologous human long-term repopulating hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med 6: 652–658.[CrossRef][Medline]
Agarwal S, Nikolai B, Yamaguchi T, Lech P, and Somia NV (2006) Construction and use of retroviral vectors encoding the toxic gene barnase. Mol Ther 14: 555–563.[CrossRef][Medline]
Allay JA, Persons DA, Galipeau J, Riberdy JM, Ashmun RA, Blakley RL, and Sorrentino BP (1998) In vivo selection of retrovirally transduced hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Med 4: 1136–1143.[CrossRef][Medline]
Allay JA, Spencer HT, Wilkinson SL, Belt JA, Blakely RL, and Sorrentino BP (1997) Sensitization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells to trimetrexate using nucleoside transport inhibitors. Blood 90: 3546–3554.
Bertino JR (1993) Ode to methotrexate. J Clin Oncol 11: 5–14.[Medline]
Blakley RL and Benkovic SJ (1984) Folates and pterins, in Volume 1, Chemistry and Biochemistry of Folates, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.
Budak-Alpdogan T, Alpdogan O, Banerjee D, Wang E, Moore MAS, and Bertino JR (2004) Methotrexate and cytarabine inhibit progression of human lymphoma in NOD/SCID mice carrying a mutant dihydrofolate reductase and cytidine deaminase fusion gene. Mol Ther 10: 574–584.[CrossRef][Medline]
Capiaux GM, Budak-Alpdogan T, Alpdogan O, Bornmann W, Takebe N, Banerjee D, Maley F, and Bertino JR (2004) Protection of hematopoietic stem cells from pemetrexed toxicity by retroviral gene transfer with a mutant dihydrofolate reductase-mutant thymidylate synthase fusion gene. Cancer Gene Ther 11: 767–773.[CrossRef][Medline]
Capiaux GM, Budak-Alpdogan T, Takebe N, Mayer-Kuckuk P, Banerjee D, Maley F, and Bertino J (2003) Retroviral transduction of a mutant dihydrofolate reductase-thymidylate synthase fusion gene into murine marrow cells confers resistance to both methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil. Hum Gene Ther 14: 435–446.[CrossRef][Medline]
Carr F, Medina WD, Dube S, and Bertino JR (1983) Genetic transformation of murine bone marrow cells to methotrexate resistance. Blood 62: 180–185.
Corey CA, DeSilva AD, Holland CA, and Williams DA (1990) Serial transplantation of methotrexate-resistant bone marrow: protection of murine recipients from drug toxicity by progeny of transduced stem cells. Blood 75: 337–343.
Cornetta K, Croop J, Dropcho E, Abonour R, Kieran MW, Kreissman S, Reeves L, Erickson LC, and Williams DA (2006) A pilot study of dose-intensified procarbazine, CCNU, vincristine for poor prognosis brain tumors utilizing fibronectin-assisted retroviral-mediated modification of CD34+ peripheral blood cells with O6-methylguaninine DNA methytransferase. Cancer Gene Ther 13: 886–895.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gori JL, Podetz-Pedersen K, Swanson D, Karlen AD, Somia NV, and McIvor RS (2006a) Chemoprotection of mouse marrow transplant recipients by ex vivo lentiviral transduction of murine tyr22 dihydrofolate reductase conferring resistance to methotrexate. Mol Ther 13: S299.
Gori JL, Podetz-Pedersen K, Swanson D, Karlen AD, Somia NV, and McIvor RS (2006b) Lentiviral transduction of murine tyr22 dihydrofolate reductase protects against methotrexate toxicity in mouse marrow transplant recipients. Exp Hematol 34: 49.
Hanawa H, Hematti P, Keyvanfar K, Metzger ME, Krouse A, Donoahue RE, Kepes S, Gray J, Dunbar CE, Persons DA, et al. (2004) Efficient gene transfer into rhesus repopulating hematopoietic stem cells using a simian immunodeficiency virus-based lentiviral vector system. Blood 103: 4062–4069.
Horn PA, Keyser KA, Peterson LJ, Neff T, Thomasson BM, Thompson J, and Kiem HP (2004) Efficient lentiviral gene transfer to canine repopulating cells using an overnight transduction protocol. Blood 103: 3710–3716.
James RI, Diers MD, Wagner JE, and McIvor RS (1999) Methotrexate resistance conferred by transplantation of drug-resistant transgenic marrow cells fractionated by counterflow elutriation. Bone Marrow Transplant 24: 815–821.[CrossRef][Medline]
James RI, May C, Vagt MD, Studebaker R, and McIvor RS (1997) Transgenic mice expressing the tyr22 variant of murine DHFR: protection of transgenic marrow transplant recipients from lethal doses of methotrexate. Exp Hematol 25: 1286–1295.[Medline]
James RI, Warlick CA, Diers MD, Gunther R, and McIvor RS (2000) Mild preconditioning and low-level engraftment confer methotrexate resistance in mice transplanted with marrow expressing drug-resistant dihydrofolate reductase activity. Blood 96: 1334–1341.
Kurre P, Anandakumar P, Harkey MA, Thomasson B, and Kiem HP (2004) Efficient marking of murine long-term repopulating stem cells targeting unseparated marrow cells at low lentiviral vector particle concentration. Mol Ther 9: 914–922.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kaplan EL and Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53: 457–481.[CrossRef]
Lewis VA, Basso L, Blake N, Salo J, Lund TC, McIvor RS, and Orchard PJ (2003) Human nerve growth factor receptor and cytosine deaminase fusion genes. Hum Gene Ther 14: 1009–1016.[CrossRef][Medline]
Li MX, Banerjee D, Zhao SC, Schweitzer BI, Mineishi S, Gilboa E, and Bertino JR (1994) Development of a retroviral construct containing a human mutated dihydrofolate reductase cDNA for hematopoietic stem cell transduction. Blood 83: 3403–3408.
May C, Gunther R, and McIvor RS (1995) Protection of mice from lethal doses of methotrexate by transplantation with transgenic marrow expressing drug-resistant dihydrofolate reductase activity. Blood 86: 2439–2448.
May C, James RI, Gunther R, and McIvor RS (1996) Methotrexate dose-escalation studies in transgenic mice and marrow transplant recipients expressing drug-resistant dihydrofolate reductase activity. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 278: 1444–1451.
Mayer-Kuckuk P, Banerjee D, Malhotra S, Doubrovin M, Iwamoto M, Akhurst T, Balatoni J, Bornmann W, Finn R, Larson S, et al. (2002) Cells exposed to antifolates show increased cellular levels of proteins fused to dihydrofolate reductase: a method to modulate gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 3400–3405.
Mizuguchi H, Xu Z, Ishii-Watabe A, Uchida E, and Hayakawa T (2000) IRES-dependent second gene expression is significantly lower than cap-dependent first gene expression in a bicistronic vector. Mol Ther 1: 376–382.[CrossRef][Medline]
Moe PJ and Holen A (2000) High dose methotrexate in childhood ALL. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 17: 615–622.[CrossRef][Medline]
Morris JA and McIvor RS (1994) Saturation mutagenesis at dihydrofolate reductase codons 22 and 31. Biochem Pharmacol 47: 1207–1222.[CrossRef][Medline]
Morris JA, May C, Kim HS, Ismail R, Wagner JE, Gunther R, and McIvor RS (1996) Comparative methotrexate resistance of transgenic mice expressing two distinct dihydrofolate reductase variants. Transgenics 2: 53–67.
Persons DA, Allay JA, Allay ER, Smeyne RJ, Ashmun RA, Sorrentino BP, and Nienhuis AW (1997) Retroviral mediated transfer of the green fluorescent protein gene into murine hematopoietic cells facilitate scoring and selection of the transduced progenitors in vitro and identification of genetically modified cells in vivo. Blood 90: 1777–1786.
Persons DA, Allay JA, Bonifacino A, Lu T, Agricola B, Metzger ME, Donahue RE, Dunbar CE, and Sorrentino BP (2004) Transient in vivo selection of transduced peripheral blood cells using antifolate drug selection in rhesus macaques that received transplants with hematopoietic stem cells expressing dihydrofolate reductase vectors. Blood 103: 796–802.
Peto R and Peto J (1972) Asymptotically efficient rank invariant procedures. J R Stat Soc A135: 185–207.
Rivera GK, Evans WE, Kalwinsky DK, Mirro J, Ochs J, Dow LW, Abromowitch M, Pui CH, Dahl GV, Look AT, et al. (1985) Unexpectedly severe toxicity from intensive early treatment of childhood lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 3: 201–206.[Abstract]
Sirotnak FM and Moccio DM (1980) Pharmacokinetic basis for differences in methotrexate sensitivity of normal proliferative tissues in the mouse. Cancer Res 40: 1230–1234.
Sweeney CL, Frandsen JL, Verfaillie CM, and McIvor RS (2003) Trimetrexate inhibits progression of the murine 32Dp210 model of chronic myeloid leukemia in animals expressing drug-resistant dihydrofolate reductase. Cancer Res 63: 1304–1310.
Tiscornia G, Singer O, and Verma IM (2006) Production and purification of lentiviral vectors. Nat Protoc 1: 241–245.[CrossRef][Medline]
Vinh DB and McIvor RS (1993) Selective expression of methotrexate-resistant dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) activity in mice transduced with DHFR retrovirus and administered methotrexate. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 267: 989–996.
Williams DA, Hsieh K, DeSilva A, and Mulligan RC (1987) Protection of bone marrow transplant recipients from lethal doses of methotrexate by the generation of methotrexate-resistant bone marrow. J Exp Med 166: 210–218.
Yu X, Zhan X, D'Costa J, Tanavde VM, Ye Z, Peng T, Malehorn MT, Yang X, Civin CI, and Cheng L (2003) Lentiviral vectors with two independent internal promoters transfer high-level expression of multiple transgenes to human hematopoietic stem-progenitor cells. Mol Ther 7: 827–838.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhao RCH, McIvor RS, Griffin JD, and Verfaillie CM (1997) Gene therapy for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML): a retroviral vector that renders hematopoietic progenitors methotrexate-resistant and CML progenitors functionally normal and nontumorigenic in vivo. Blood 90: 4687–4698.
Zufferey R, Nagy D, Mandel RJ, Naldini L, and Trono D (1997) Multiply attenuated lentiviral vector achieves efficient gene delivery in vivo. Nat Biotechnol 15: 871–875.[CrossRef][Medline]
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||