![]() |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
INFLAMMATION, IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, AND ASTHMA
Agonist, Modulates Carrageenan-Induced Paw Edema in MiceDepartment of Experimental Pharmacology, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy (G.D., G.L.R., R.R., O.S., A.I., E.E., G.M.R., R.M., A.C.); Istituiti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo", University of Messina, Messina, Italy (E.E., S.C.); Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy (S.C.); and Department of Pharmacology, University of California, Irvine, California (J.L.V., D.P.)
Received March 27, 2007; accepted June 11, 2007.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is a nuclear transcription factor. Although the presence of this receptor in different areas of central nervous system (CNS) has been reported, its role remains unclear. Palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), a member of the fatty-acid ethanolamide family, acts peripherally as an endogenous PPAR-
ligand, exerting analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. High levels of PEA in the CNS have been found, but the specific function of this lipid remains to be clarified. Using carrageenan-induced paw edema in mice, we show that i.c.v. administration of PEA may control peripheral inflammation through central PPAR-
activation. A single i.c.v. administration of 0.01 to 1 µg of PEA, 30 min before carrageenan injection, reduced edema formation in the mouse carrageenan test. This effect was mimicked by 0.01 to 1 µg of GW7647 [2-[[4-[2-[[(cyclohexylamino)carbonyl](4-cyclohexylbutyl)amino]ethyl]phenyl]thio]-2-methylpropanoic acid], a synthetic PPAR-
agonist. Moreover, central PEA administration significantly reduced the expression of the proinflammatory enzymes cyclooxygenase-2 and inducible nitric-oxide synthase, and it significantly restored carrageenan-induced PPAR-
reduction in the spinal cord. To investigate the mechanism by which i.c.v. PEA attenuated the development of carrageenan-induced paw edema, we evaluated inhibitor
B-
(I
B-
) degradation and nuclear factor-
B (NF-
B) p65 activation in the cytosolic or nuclear extracts from spinal cord tissue. PEA prevented IkB-
degradation and NF-
B nuclear translocation, confirming the involvement of this transcriptional factor in the control of peripheral inflammation. The obligatory role of PPAR-
in mediating the effects of PEA was confirmed by the lack of the compounds anti-inflammatory effects in mutant mice lacking PPAR-
. In conclusion, our data show for the first time that PPAR-
activation in the CNS can control peripheral inflammation.
,
/
, and
) have been described, all of which display distinct physiological functions dependent on their differential ligand activation profiles and tissue distribution (Kliewer et al., 1994
and PPAR-
receptor subtypes have been reported to regulate in vivo and in vitro inflammatory responses (Devchand et al., 1996
in modulating inflammation was demonstrated by that the ability of leukotriene B4, a potent chemotactic inflammatory eicosanoid, to bind PPAR-
and induce gene transcription of enzymes involved in
- and
-oxidation pathways that metabolize leukotriene B4. Moreover, mutant mice lacking PPAR-
(PPAR-
–/–) showed a prolonged inflammatory response when challenged with leukotriene B4 or arachidonic acid (Devchand et al., 1996
-mediated control of inflammation, probably through the suppression of NF-
B activity (Poynter and Daynes, 1998
It has also been postulated that activation of PPAR-
by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents contributes to the anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and analgesic properties of these drugs through stimulation of oxidative pathways involved in the catabolism of eicosanoids (Desvergne and Wahli 1999
). In the CNS, the expression of PPAR-
has been described in brain (Moreno et al., 2004
) and spinal cord (Benani et al., 2004
; Moreno et al., 2004
); however, the receptor-specific role in these areas is currently unknown.
Previous data suggest that palmitoylethanolamide (PEA) can be considered an endogenous activator of PPAR-
. PEA interacts with this receptor to inhibit inflammatory response with a potency comparable with that of the synthetic PPAR-
agonist GW7647, without activating PPAR-
/
or PPAR-
(Lo Verme et al., 2005
). More recently, we have identified PPAR-
as the molecular target responsible for the analgesic effects of PEA (Lo Verme et al., 2006
).
PEA, the endogenous amide of palmitic acid and ethanolamine, belongs to the superfamily of acylethanolamides, a class of lipid mediators. PEA exerts antinociceptive effects (Calignano et al., 1998
, 2001
), and it inhibits peripheral inflammation and mast cell degranulation in rats and mice (Mazzari et al., 1996
; Berdyshev et al., 1998
). The antiinflammatory effects of PEA have been demonstrated in the carrageenan-induced rat paw edema model when intraperitoneally administered. In this model, PEA markedly reduces the expression of proinflammatory mediators such as cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, nitric-oxide synthase, and malondialdehyde (Costa et al., 2002
). Carrageenan-induced paw edema is widely used as a model for inflammation, and it is well characterized in rats (Garcia Leme et al., 1973
; Di Rosa, 1974
) and mice (Posadas et al., 2004
).
The aim of the present study was to investigate a possible role for PPAR-
receptor at the CNS level in mediating peripheral inflammation. Therefore, we have studied the effects of i.c.v. administration of PPAR-
agonists, including PEA at 0.01 to 1 µg and GW7647 at 0.01 to 1 µg, in mice subjected to carrageenan-induced paw edema. To further characterize the involvement of PPAR-
in this model by its agonists, we evaluated the modulation of PPAR-
, COX-2, and iNOS expression in the spinal cord, which represents the main relay station of the neural firing between the inflamed area and the CNS. The involvement of NF-
B, a well known transcription factor involved in the inflammatory process, was also investigated.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gene (PPAR-
knockout) and their wild-type littermate controls (PPAR-
wild type) were purchased from Jackson Laboratories (Harlan Nossan, Italy). Mice homozygous for the PparatniJGonz-targeted mutation are viable, fertile, and they seem normal in appearance and behavior (Genovese et al., 2005
Chemicals. PEA, GW7647, GW0742, and ciglitazone were purchased from Tocris Cookson Inc. (Bristol, UK).
-Carrageenan, xylazine, and ketamine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy).
Intracerebroventricular Injections. Animals were briefly anesthetized with enflurane. Drugs were dissolved in sterile distilled water with 10% polyethylene glycol and 5% Tween 80. They were administered in a volume of 2 µl per mouse by using a 25-µl glass Hamilton syringe Hamilton Co. (Reno, NV) with a stainless steel needle modified with a shaft to control the depth of injection at 2 mm. The injection was made into the lateral ventricle 2 mm caudal and 2 mm lateral from the bregma. Drug solutions were freshly prepared immediately before use.
Paw Edema. Paw edema was induced by a subplantar injection of 50 µl of sterile saline containing 1%
-carrageenan into the right hind paw. Paw volumes were measured by a plethysmometer (Ugo Basile, Milan, Italy) at different time intervals. The increase in paw volume was evaluated as the difference between the paw volume measured at each time point and the basal paw volume measured immediately before carrageenan injection.
Rotarod Test. In a pivotal experiment, integrity of motor function was assessed in treated mice using an accelerating rotarod (Ugo Basile). The animals were acclimated to acceleration in three training runs. Mean performance time (seconds) determined on the fourth and fifth run served as control value. Performance time was measured the day before i.c.v. injection and at all the time points observed for paw edema evaluation.
Preparation of Nuclear and Cytosolic Protein Extracts from Spinal Cord. All the extraction procedures were performed on ice using ice-cold reagents. In brief, spinal cord tissues collected at 5 h after paw edema induction were suspended in extraction buffer (0.32 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM EDTA, 5mMNaN3, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 50 mM NaF, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.15 µM pepstatin A, 20 µM leupeptin, and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate), and then they were homogenized at the highest setting for 2 min in a Polytron PT 3000 tissue homogenizer (Kinematica, Littau-Lucerne, Switzerland). The homogenates were chilled on ice for 15 min and then centrifuged at 1000g for 10 min at 4°C. The pellets were suspended in the supplied complete lysis buffer containing 1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20 µM leupeptin, and 0.2 mM sodium orthovanadate, and then they were centrifuged for 30 min at 15,000g at 4°C to yield the nuclear fraction for the NF-
B p65 level determination.
Preparation of Total Tissue Protein Extracts from Spinal Cord. Spinal cords were obtained from each animal 6 h after carrageenan or saline injection, and they were homogenized on ice in lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM pH 7.5, 10 mM NaF, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml trypsin inhibitor; 0.25 ml/50-mg tissue). After 1 h, tissue lysates were centrifuged at 100,000g for 15 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was stored at –80°C until use.
Western Blot Analysis. Protein content was measured using bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich) as a standard. Total extract (for iNOS, COX-2, and PPAR-
) or cytosolic (for I
B-
) or nuclear (NF-
B) fractions containing equal amounts of protein were separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide minigels and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Protran nitrocellulose transfer membrane; Whatman Schleicher and Schuell, Dassel, Germany), blocked with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 5% nonfat dried milk for 45 min at room temperature, and incubated at 4°C overnight in the presence of commercial antibodies for iNOS (dilution 1:2000; BD Biosciences Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY); COX-2 (dilution 1:1500; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI), PPAR-
(1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA), I
B-
(1:1000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), or NF-
B p65 (1:500; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) in PBS containing 5% nonfat dried milk and 0.1% Tween 20. The secondary antibody (anti-mouse IgG, anti-rabbit IgG, or anti-goat IgG peroxidase conjugate) was incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Blots were washed with PBS, developed using enhanced chemiluminescence detection reagents (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ) following manufacturer's instructions, and exposed to X-Omat film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). Protein bands for iNOS (
130 kDa), COX-2 (
72 kDa), PPAR-
(
55 kDa), I
B-
(
37 kDa), and NF-
B p65 (
65 kDa) were quantified using a model GS-700 imaging densitometer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).
-Tubulin protein (dilution 1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich) was performed to ensure equal sample loading.
Statistical Analyses. Results are expressed as the mean ± S.E.M. of n experiments. All analyses were conducted using Graph-Pad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). The significance of differences between groups was determined by one-way (for ex vivo experiments) and two-way (for in vivo experiments) analyses of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests for multiple comparisons.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Activation on Carrageenan-Induced Paw Edema. Confirming a previous characterization of the model (Posadas et al., 2004
agonist GW7647 at 0.01 to 1 µg, 30 min before carrageenan, resulted in a reduction of paw edema in a time-dependent manner (p < 0.001; Fig. 2). Twenty-four hours after carrageenan injection, the effect of GW7647 at a dose of 0.1 µg was less evident (p < 0.05), whereas the effect of the highest dose, 1 µg, was persistent and significant until 48 h (p < 0.001).
|
|
in the anti-inflammatory effects of i.c.v. PEA was demonstrated by two different findings. First, the anti-inflammatory effects of 1 µg of PEA or 1 µg of GW7647, evaluated as area under the curve, were absent in mutant mice lacking the PPAR-
receptor (PPAR-
–/–; Fig. 3). Second, the selective PPAR-
agonist GW0742 or the PPAR-
agonist ciglitazone at the same dose of 1 µg did not modify paw edema development (Fig. 4). Even when these compounds were administered at doses up to 10 times higher (10 µg) than those of PEA or GW7647, they were still ineffective (data not shown). To exclude a possible glucocorticoid involvement in the antiinflammatory effects of PPAR-
agonists, we also tested 0.01 to 1 µg i.c.v. PEA in adrenalectomized mice, and our results demonstrate that PEA was still active (data not shown).
|
|
Effects of Intracerebroventricular Administration of PEA or GW7647 on Motor Coordination. To evaluate a possible sedative or muscle-relaxant effects after i.c.v. administration of 1 µg of PEA or 1 µg of GW7647, treated mice were tested on rotarod. Neither PEA nor GW7647, given 30 min before testing, affected motor responses in mice (performance times: vehicle, 60 ± 0.0 s; PEA, 59.5 ± 2.3 s; and GW7647, 57.8 ± 3.3 s). Moreover, at the same doses, PPAR-
agonists significantly (**, p < 0.01 versus carrageenan) enhanced the motor performances reduced in mice treated with carrageenan (carrageenan, 37.2 ± 2.2 s; PEA, 50.0 ± 2.8 s; and GW7647, 44.8 ± 1.6 s).
Effect of Intracerebroventricular Administration of PEA on Spinal PPAR-
, COX-2, and iNOS Expression. Carrageenan significantly reduced the levels of PPAR-
in the spinal cords of vehicle (i.c.v.)-treated animals (##, p < 0.01 versus untreated group; Fig. 5). A single i.c.v. administration of 1 µg of PEA, 30 min before edema induction, significantly reversed the spinal PPAR-
levels down-regulated by carrageenan (*, p < 0.05 versus carrageenan), as determined by densitometric analysis (Fig. 5).
|
|
|
Effect of Intracerebroventricular Administration of PEA on I
B-
Degradation and NF-
B p65 Nuclear Translocation. To investigate the mechanism by which i.c.v. administration of PEA may attenuate the development of carrageenan paw edema, we evaluated, using Western blot analysis, I
B-
degradation, and NF-
B p65 activation in the cytosolic or nuclear extracts from spinal cord, respectively. Basal level of I
B-
was detected in the cytosolic fraction from untreated mice, whereas carrageenan induced a decrease of I
B-
5 h after paw edema induction, compared with untreated group (#, p < 0.05 versus untreated group; Fig. 8A). A single i.c.v. administration of 1 µg of PEA, 30 min before paw edema induction, significantly prevented I
B-
degradation (*, p < 0.05 versus carrageenan group). Moreover, the translocation of the p65 subunit of NF-
B into the nucleus (Fig. 8B) was dramatically increased 5 h after carrageenan injection (##, p < 0.01 versus untreated group). PEA significantly reduced the level of NF-
B p65 in the nuclear fraction (**, p < 0.01 versus carrageenan group).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in lipid metabolism, inflammation, and feeding, the effects of pharmacological activation of the nuclear receptors in the CNS have remained unclear (Benani et al., 2004
agonist, PEA, or a synthetic PPAR-
agonist, GW7647, reduces carrageenan-induced paw edema in mice. In treated animals, central PEA administration restores the physiological expression of spinal PPAR-
content reduced by carrageenan. Recently, we have shown that PEA activates the nuclear receptor PPAR-
with a potency comparable with those of the synthetic agonists GW7647 and Wy-14,643 (Lo Verme et al., 2005
–/– mice (Lo Verme et al., 2005
Nanomolar-to-micromolar levels of PEA have been found in the CNS (Cadas et al., 1997
), but the physiological roles for PEA in the brain remain an open question. Likewise, the physiological roles of PPAR-
, whose expression has been described in the adult rat CNS (Moreno et al., 2004
), remain unknown.
Here, we found that a single i.c.v. administration of PEA, 30 min before carrageenan, markedly reduced paw edema formation. During the first phase, PEA showed a significant reduction in paw edema with a maximal inhibition of inflammation of
50%. Likewise, the synthetic PPAR-
agonist GW7647 reduced mouse paw edema as a function of time. We used this synthetic agonist as a reference drug, to confirm that the central anti-inflammatory activity of PEA is mediated by PPAR-
, as we have found in peripheral tissue (Lo Verme et al., 2005
). We demonstrated the obligatory role of PPAR-
in the anti-inflammatory effects of centrally administered PEA by two additional experiments. First, mutant PPAR-
–/– mice failed to respond either to GW7647 or PEA. Second, the selective PPAR-
agonist GW0742 and PPAR-
agonist ciglitazone did not modify carrageenan-induced paw edema development, even when administered at doses up to 10 times higher than those needed for PEA to exert paw edema reduction. Notably, the central administration of PEA or GW7647 does not cause sedation or other central effects, because it is not accompanied by an impairment of motor activity, as demonstrated in the rotarod test. Moreover, at the same doses, PPAR-
agonists significantly enhanced motor performances reduced in mice with paw inflammation.
The CNS usually reacts to peripheral stimuli in several ways. It is well known that peripheral damage can activate thalamic and cortical areas that in turn activate a descending inhibition, resulting in spinal opioid release that can in turn modulate afferent stimuli (Iversen et al., 1980
; Hammond and Yaksh, 1981
). Recent studies indicate that persistent pain after tissue or nerve injury is linked to an enhanced activation of descending modulatory circuits. A net increase in descending facilitatory drive leads to an amplification and spread of the pain (Urban and Gebhart, 1999
; Vanegas and Schaible, 2004
). Likewise, peripheral damage causes an increase in COX-2 and iNOS, which are involved in inflammatory signaling to the CNS (Ichitani et al., 1997
; Samad et al., 2001
). Indeed, experimental evidence indicates that COX-2-mediated (but not COX-1-mediated) increase in prostaglandin E2 production in the CNS contributes to the severity of the inflammatory and pain peripheral responses in rat (Ichitani et al., 1997
). COX-2 is rapidly induced in the spinal cord and other regions of the CNS following carrageenan injection in the paw (Ichitani et al., 1997
), and it plays a pivotal role in sustaining pain and peripheral inflammation (Dolan et al., 2000
; Samad et al., 2001
). Moreover, it has been reported that in mice peripheral inflammation results in a dramatic increase of COX-2 expression in neurons of laminae I–VI and X in the dorsal horn (Maihöfner et al., 2000
). Here, we reported that i.c.v. injection of PEA reduced COX-2 and iNOS levels in the spinal cord, resulting in a reduction of paw edema. The involvement of spinal PPAR-
in modulating peripheral inflammation is strongly indicated by our data demonstrating a down-regulation of the receptor after subplantar carrageenan administration. Intracerebroventricular administration of PEA restored PPAR-
receptor levels in the spinal cord. Thus, the increased PPAR-
levels and the reduced expression of COX-2 and iNOS are the major effects observed after i.c.v. injection of PEA, and they support the antiedemigenic effects observed in the carrageenan-induced paw edema. The possibility that i.c.v. PEA, administered at the low doses used in the present study, could reach the spinal cord is unlikely. PEA inactivation primarily consists of its intracellular hydrolysis by lipid hydrolases (Schmid et al., 1985
). Indeed, PEA undergoes active and rapid metabolism (Cravatt et al., 1996
; Ueda et al., 2001
; Bracey et al., 2002
). Thus, a possible interpretation of our results is that central PPAR-
stimulation results in a PPAR-
-mediated effect at the spinal level, which is able to control carrageenan-induced COX-2 and iNOS synthesis. Glucocorticoids are potent hormones in regulating COX-2 and iNOS expression during inflammatory process. Therefore, we explored the possibility that adrenal-derived glucocorticoids could be involved in the anti-inflammatory effects of PEA. However, our results demonstrate that in adrenalectomized mice, PEA was still active, excluding the possible involvement of glucocorticoid release in controlling COX-2 and iNOS expression.
Many different stimuli, such as proinflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-1
, can activate NF-
B, causing this nuclear factor to regulate the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and factors such as iNOS and COX-2 (Auphan et al., 1995
; George et al., 2000
). To further characterize the anti-inflammatory activity of PEA in the spinal cord, we asked whether the activation of PPAR-
by PEA could be related to the inhibition of NF-
B activity. We focused our attention on I
B-
phosphorylation and degradation (Grilli et al., 1996
; DiDonato et al., 1997
). The appearance of I
B-
and NF-
B p65 in cytosolic or nuclear fractions of spinal cord was investigated by Western blot assay. We found that the anti-inflammatory effects of PEA occurred, at least in part, via prevention of carrageenan-mediated I
B-
degradation 5 h after paw inflammation induction. In accordance with this result, the appearance of NF-
B p65 in the nuclear fractions was also significantly reduced by PEA, and it supports our finding of the roles of COX-2 and iNOS expression in the spinal cord 6 h after carrageenan injection. Accordingly, it has been reported that activated NF-
B in the spinal cord affects pain behavior and the expressions of COX-2 mRNA following peripheral inflammation (Lee et al., 2004
).
However, the role played by spinal iNOS during peripheral inflammation is controversial (Dolan et al., 2000
; Tao et al., 2003
; Sekiguchi et al., 2004
). Our result clearly indicates that iNOS increases about 3-fold versus control 6 h following carrageenan administration. It is likely that spinal iNOS could be a preferential isoform in spinal signaling of peripheral damage. Nevertheless, the question requires further study.
Our results indicate that central PPAR-
is involved in the control of proinflammatory enzymes at the spinal level, which is the first neural structure in which primary afferent stimuli are processed before reaching the CNS. Our data add further support to the broad spectrum of anti-inflammatory effects induced by PPAR-
agonists, by demonstrating a centrally mediated component for these drugs.
| Acknowledgements |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.
ABBREVIATIONS: PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; NF-
B, nuclear factor-
B; CNS, central nervous system; PEA, palmitoylethanolamide; COX, cyclooxygenase; iNOS, inducible nitric-oxide synthase; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; I
B-
, inhibitor
B-
; Wy-14,643, pirinixic acid; 4-chloro-6-(2,3-xylidino)-2-pyrimidinyl)thioacetic acid; GW7647, 2-[[4-[2-[[(cyclohexylamino)carbonyl](4-cyclohexylbutyl)amino]ethyl]-phenyl]thio]-2-methylpropanoic acid; GW0742, [4-[[[2-[3-fluoro-4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]-4-methyl-5-thiazolyl]methyl]thio]-2-methylphenoxy]acetic acid.
Address correspondence to: Dr. Antonio Calignano, Department of Experimental Pharmacology, University of Naples "Federico II", via D. Montesano 49, 80131 Naples, Italy. E-mail: calignan{at}unina.it
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Auphan N, DiDonato JA, Rosette C, Helmberg A, and Karin M (1995) Immunosuppression by glucocorticoids: inhibition of NF-kappa B activity through induction of I kappa B synthesis. Science 270: 286–290.
Benani A, Heurtaux T, Netter P, and Minn A (2004) Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha in rat spinal cord after peripheral noxious stimulation. Neurosci Lett 369: 59–63.[CrossRef][Medline]
Berdyshev E, Boichot E, Corbel M, Germain N, and Lagente V (1998) Effects of cannabinoid receptor ligands on LPS-induced pulmonary inflammation in mice. Life Sci 63: PL125–PL129.[CrossRef][Medline]
Bracey MH, Hanson MA, Masuda KR, Stevens RC, and Cravatt BF (2002) Structural adaptations in a membrane enzyme that terminates endocannabinoid signaling. Science 298: 1793–1796.
Cadas H, di Tomaso E, and Piomelli D (1997) Occurrence and biosynthesis of endogenous cannabinoid precursor, N-arachidonyl phosphatidylethanolamine, in rat brain. J Neurosci 17: 1226–1242.
Calignano A, La Rana G, Giuffrida A, and Piomelli D (1998) Control of pain initiation by endogenous cannabinoids. Nature 394: 277–281.[CrossRef][Medline]
Calignano A, La Rana G, and Piomelli D (2001) Antinociceptive activity of the endogenous fatty acid amide, palmitoylethanolamide. Eur J Pharmacol 419: 191–198.[CrossRef][Medline]
Costa B, Conti S, Giagnoni G, and Colleoni M (2002) Therapeutic effect of the endogenous fatty acid amide, palmitoylethanolamide, in rat acute inflammation: inhibition of nitric oxide and cyclo-oxygenase systems. Br J Pharmacol 137: 413–420.[CrossRef][Medline]
Cravatt BF, Giang DK, Mayfield SP, Boger DL, Lerner RA, and Gilula NB (1996) Molecular characterization of an enzyme that degrades neuromodulatory fatty-acid amides. Nature 384: 83–87.[CrossRef][Medline]
Delerive P, Fruchart JC, and Staels B (2001) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors in inflammation control. J Endocrinol 169: 453–459.[Abstract]
Desvergne B and Wahli W (1999) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: nuclear control of metabolism. Endocr Rev 20: 649–688.
Devchand P, Keller H, Peters J, Vazquez M, Gonzalez F, and Wahli W (1996) The PPARalpha-leukotriene B4 pathway to inflammation control. Nature 384: 39–43.[CrossRef][Medline]
DiDonato JA, Hayakawa M, Rothwarf DM, Zandi E, and Karin M (1997) A cytokine-responsive IkappaB kinase that activates the transcription factor NF-kappaB. Nature 388: 548–554.[CrossRef][Medline]
Di Rosa M (1974) Prostaglandins, leukocytes and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Pol J Pharmacol Pharm 26: 25–36.[Medline]
Dolan S, Field LC, and Nolan AM (2000) The role of nitric oxide and prostaglandin signaling pathways in spinal nociceptive processing in chronic inflammation. Pain 86: 311–320.[CrossRef][Medline]
Forman BM, Chen J, and Evans RM (1997) Hypolipidemic drugs, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and eicosanoids are ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and delta. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA 94: 4312–4327.
Garcia Leme J, Hamamura L, Leite MP, Rocha E, and Silva M (1973) Pharmacological analysis of the acute inflammatory process induced in the rat's paw by local injection of carrageenin and by heating. Br J Pharmacol 48: 88–96.[Medline]
George A, Marziniak M, Schafers M, Toyka KV, and Sommer C (2000) Thalidomide treatment in chronic constrictive neuropathy decreases endoneurial tumor necrosis factor-alpha, increases interleukin-10 and has long-term effects on spinal cord dorsal horn met-enkephalin. Pain 88: 267–275.[CrossRef][Medline]
Genovese T, Mazzon E, Di Paola R, Cannavo G, Muia C, Bramanti P, and Cuzzocrea S (2005) Role of endogenous ligands for the peroxisome proliferators activated receptors alpha in the secondary damage in experimental spinal cord trauma. Exp Neurol 194: 267–278.[CrossRef][Medline]
Grilli M, Pizzi M, Memo M, and Spano P (1996) Neuroprotection by aspirin and sodium salicylate through blockade of NF-kappaB activation. Science 274: 1383–1385.
Hammond DL and Yaksh TL (1981) Peripheral and central pathways in pain. Pharmacol Ther 14: 459–475.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ichitani Y, Shi T, Haeggstrom JZ, Samuelsson B, and Hokfelt T (1997) Increased levels of cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA in the rat spinal cord after peripheral inflammation: an in situ hybridization study. Neuroreport 8: 2949–2952.[Medline]
Iversen LL, Lee CM, Gilbert RF, Hunt S, and Emson PC (1980) Regulation of neuropeptide release. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 210: 91–111.[Medline]
Kliewer SA, Forman BM, Blumberg B, Ong ES, Borgmeyer U, Mangelsdorf DJ, Umesono K, and Evans RM (1994) Differential expression and activation of a family of murine peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U SA 91: 7355–7359.
Kostadinova R, Wahli W, and Michalik L (2005) PPARs in diseases: control mechanisms of inflammation. Curr Med Chem 12: 2995–3009.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lee KM, Kang BS, Lee HL, Son SJ, Hwang SH, Kim DS, Park JS, and Cho HJ (2004) Spinal NF-kB activation induces COX-2 upregulation and contributes to inflammatory pain hypersensitivity. Eur J Neurosci 19: 3375–3381.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lo Verme J, Fu J, Astarita G, La Rana G, Russo R, Calignano A, and Piomelli D (2005) The nuclear receptor peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha mediates the anti-inflammatory actions of palmitoylethanolamide. Mol Pharmacol 67: 15–29.
Lo Verme J, Russo R, La Rana G, Fu J, Farthing J, Raso G, Meli R, Hohmann A, Calignano A, and Piomelli D (2006) Rapid broad-spectrum analgesia through activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-
. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 319: 1051–1061.
Maihöfner C, Tegeder I, Euchenhofer C, deWitt D, Brune K, Bang R, Neuhuber W, and Geisslinger G (2000) Localization and regulation of cyclo-oxygenase-1 and -2 and neuronal nitric oxide synthase in mouse spinal cord. Neuroscience 101: 1093–1108.[CrossRef][Medline]
Mazzari S, Canella R, Petrelli L, Marcolongo G, and Leon A (1996) N-(2-Hydroxyethyl)hexadecanamide is orally active in reducing edema formation and inflammatory hyperalgesia by down-modulating mast cell activation. Eur J Pharmacol 300: 227–236.[CrossRef][Medline]
Moreno S, Farioli-Vecchioli S, and Ceru MP (2004) Immunolocalization of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors and retinoid X receptors in the adult rat CNS. Neuroscience 123: 131–145.[CrossRef][Medline]
Posadas I, Bucci M, Roviezzo F, Rossi A, Parente L, Sautebin L, and Cirino G (2004) Carrageenan-induced mouse paw oedema is biphasic, age-weight dependent and displays differential nitric oxide cyclooxygenase-2 expression. Br J Pharmacol 142: 331–338.[CrossRef][Medline]
Poynter M and Daynes R (1998) Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha activation modulates cellular redox status, represses nuclear factor-
B signaling, and reduces inflammatory cytokine production in aging. J Biol Chem 273: 32833–32841.
Samad TA, Moore KA, Sapirstein A, Billet S, Allchorne A, Poole S, Bonventre JV, and Woolf CJ (2001) Interleukin-1beta-mediated induction of Cox-2 in the CNS contributes to inflammatory pain hypersensitivity. Nature 410: 471–475.[CrossRef][Medline]
Schmid PC, Zuzarte-Augustin ML, and Schmid HH (1985) Properties of rat liver N-acylethanolamine amidohydrolase. J Biol Chem 260: 14145–14149.
Sekiguchi F, Mita Y, Kamanaka Y, Kawao N, Matsuya H, Taga C, and Kawabata A (2004) The potent inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitor ONO-1714 inhibits neuronal NOS and exerts antinociception in rats. Neurosci Lett 365: 111–115.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tao F, Tao YX, Mao P, Zhao C, Li D, Liaw WJ, Raja SN, and Johns RA (2003) Intact carrageenan-induced thermal hyperalgesia in mice lacking inducible nitric oxide synthase. Neuroscience 120: 847–854.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ueda N, Yamanaka K, and Yamamoto S (2001) Purification and characterization of an acid amidase selective for N-palmitoylethanolamine, a putative endogenous anti-inflammatory substance. J Biol Chem 276: 35552–35557.
Urban M and Gebhart GF (1999) Supraspinal contributions to hyperalgesia. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA 69: 7687–7692.
Vanegas H and Schaible H-G (2004) Descending control of persistent pain: inhibitory or facilitatory. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 46: 295–309.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Melis, G. Pillolla, A. Luchicchi, A. L. Muntoni, S. Yasar, S. R. Goldberg, and M. Pistis Endogenous Fatty Acid Ethanolamides Suppress Nicotine-Induced Activation of Mesolimbic Dopamine Neurons through Nuclear Receptors J. Neurosci., December 17, 2008; 28(51): 13985 - 13994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||