JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on May 4, 2007; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.107.123133


0022-3565/07/3222-494-500$20.00
JPET 322:494-500, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.107.123133v1
322/2/494    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katz, I.
Right arrow Articles by Kondratyev, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katz, I.
Right arrow Articles by Kondratyev, A.

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY

Effects of Lamotrigine Alone and in Combination with MK-801, Phenobarbital, or Phenytoin on Cell Death in the Neonatal Rat Brain

Irina Katz, Jinsook Kim, Karen Gale, and Alexei Kondratyev

Departments of Pediatrics (I.K., A.K.) and Pharmacology (J.K., K.G., A.K.) and Interdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience (J.K., K.G., A.K.), Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC

Received March 20, 2007; accepted May 3, 2007.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The neonatal rat brain is vulnerable to neuronal apoptosis induced by antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), especially when given in combination. This study evaluated lamotrigine alone or in combination with phenobarbital, phenytoin, or the glutamate antagonist (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine hydrogen maleate (MK-801) for a proapoptotic action in the developing rat brain. Cell death was assessed in brain regions (striatum, thalamus, and cortical areas) of rat pups (postnatal day 8) by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay, 24 h after acute drug treatment. Lamotrigine alone did not increase neuronal apoptosis when given in doses up to 50 mg/kg; a significant increase in cell death occurred after 100 mg/kg. Combination of 20 mg/kg lamotrigine with 0.5 mg/kg MK-801 or 75 mg/kg phenobarbital resulted in a significant increase in TUNEL-positive cells, compared with MK-801 or phenobarbital treatment alone. A similar enhancement of phenytoin-induced cell death occurred after 30 mg/kg lamotrigine. In contrast, 20 mg/kg lamotrigine significantly attenuated phenytoin-induced cell death. Lamotrigine at 10 mg/kg was without effect on apoptosis induced by phenytoin. Although the functional and clinical implications of AED-induced developmental neuronal apoptosis remain to be elucidated, our finding that lamotrigine alone is devoid of this effect makes this drug attractive as monotherapy for the treatment of women during pregnancy, and for preterm or neonatal infants. However, because AEDs are often introduced as add-on medication, careful selection of drug combinations and doses may be required to avoid developmental neurotoxicity when lamotrigine is used in polytherapy.


Many traditional ("first generation") antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), such as phenytoin and phenobarbital, induce pronounced amplification of apoptotic neuronal death in specific brain regions during the first two postnatal weeks in rats (Bittigau et al., 2002Go; Olney, 2002Go; Olney et al., 2004Go). This proapoptotic action in the developing brain resembles that produced by the NMDA antagonist MK-801 (Ikonomidou et al., 1999Go), alcohol (Ikonomidou et al., 2000Go), and anesthetic agents (Jevtovic-Todorovic et al., 2003Go). The developmental period that exhibits vulnerability to proapoptotic activity is characterized by a high rate of synaptogenesis and developmental apoptosis in the brain. The corresponding period in humans extends from late gestation through early infancy (Olney, 2002Go). After exposure of otherwise normal immature rats to proapoptotic agents (i.e., NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 and certain AEDs), long-term behavioral deficits have been observed (Olney, 2002Go; Lema Tomé et al., 2006bGo). However, in the clinical setting, AEDs are given to infants who are already compromised by seizures and other neurological co-morbidities. In fact, seizures themselves predispose to behavioral and cognitive abnormalities later in life (Ben-Ari and Holmes, 2006Go). Giving these drugs in the context of an already compromised brain may serve to exacerbate deleterious outcomes and/or retard repair mechanisms.

Because excessive neuronal loss in the late prenatal or early postnatal development may contribute to long-term adverse effects, it is important to identify treatment regimens that are devoid of this deleterious action. Because neonatal seizures are aggressively treated with AEDs and AEDs cannot be given to healthy infants to serve as controls, AED-induced neuronal apoptosis in the neonatal rat represents an ideal animal model for addressing this challenge. Using this model, several second generation AEDs (i.e., topiramate and levetiracetam) have been recently examined for their effects in the immature rat brain following acute administration (Glier et al., 2004Go; Manthey et al., 2005Go; Kim et al., 2006Go, 2007Go). The results in this animal model are relevant not only to neonates but also to the third trimester of human gestation.

One of the second generation AEDs of particular interest is lamotrigine (LTG). LTG is a widely used, well tolerated AED that is effective against most types of seizures (for review, see Bialer et al., 2007Go). LTG has been recently introduced as an effective treatment for bipolar mood disorders (Hahn et al., 2004Go; Gao and Calabrese, 2005Go). LTG exerts its action by blocking voltage-gated sodium channels, thereby modulating presynaptic excitatory neurotransmitter release (White, 1999Go). LTG has been reported to have neuroprotective capacity (Willmore, 2005Go). To date, the effect of LTG on neuronal cell death in neonatal rats has not been determined. Accordingly, in the current study, we examined the effect of single administration of LTG (10–100 mg/kg) on neurodegeneration in several brain regions of neonatal rats. In addition to examining the effect of LTG when given alone, we also determined whether it can exacerbate the cell death induced by traditional AEDs. This is an important issue because AEDs in combination have been found to exert a synergistic effect on cell death in the immature brain (Bittigau et al., 2002Go; Kim et al., 2006Go). Therefore, we also examined the effects of LTG given in combination with phenytoin, phenobarbital, or MK-801. These drugs were selected because they act through different mechanisms of action: phenytoin by blocking sodium channels, phenobarbital by enhancing GABAA receptor function, and MK-801 by noncompetitive blockade of NMDA-type glutamate receptors. We report that acute administration of LTG alone in the therapeutic range of doses does not induce neuronal cell death in rat pups. However, combination of LTG with certain doses of phenytoin, phenobarbital, or MK-801 resulted in amplification of neurodegeneration.


Figure 1
View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Areas of the brain examined for drug-induced neurodegeneration are marked by rectangles.

 

    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals. Postnatal day (PD)7 Sprague-Dawley rat pups (Harlan, Indianapolis, IN) were used. Pups were born to timed pregnant rats housed in individual cages. Rat pups were maintained with their dam in a temperature-controlled (21°C) room with a 12-h light cycle. All experiments were performed in compliance with the American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care standards, and they were approved by the Georgetown University Animal Care and Use Committee. All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their discomfort. For all experiments, brain and body weights were recorded as well as acute behavioral signs.

Experimental Design. Effects of LTG [Lamictal, 3,5-diamino-6-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)-as-triazine; GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC] alone on cell death were examined. The following drug combinations were also tested: LTG + MK-801, LTG + phenobarbital (Luminal, 5-ethyl-5-phenyl-1,3-diazinane-2,4,6-trione), and LTG + phenytoin (sodium diphenylhydantoin, 5,5-diphenylimidazolidine-2,4-dione) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). MK-801, phenobarbital, and phenytoin given alone were also evaluated. Each experimental and control group was made up of pups from at least two different litters; pups from a given litter were distributed across each of the different experimental groups (controls, individual drugs, and drug combinations). Male and female pups likewise were distributed across groups to create as much balance as possible. Cell death was evaluated in coronal brain sections by TUNEL assay (see below) in several brain areas, including striatum, thalamus, multiple cortical regions, and the hippocampus (refer to Fig. 1 for the location of the brain areas examined).

Drug Treatment. All drugs were administered i.p. to pups at PD7, the age of peak vulnerability to drug-induced cell death. LTG (10, 20, 30, 50, or 100 mg/kg; n = 2, 13, 8, 7, and 4 rats/group, respectively) was administered in saline containing 1% polysorbate 80, polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (Tween 80). Control groups received saline containing 1% Tween 80. MK-801 (0.5 mg/kg; n = 4; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), phenytoin (50 mg/kg; n = 9; SigmaAldrich), and phenobarbital (75 mg/kg; n = 6; Sigma-Aldrich) were injected in saline, except for phenytoin, which was dissolved in alkalinized saline, pH 9 to 11.

For drug combination studies, MK-801, phenobarbital, or phenytoin was given at T =–2 h, LTG was given as above at T = 0 h, and animals were sacrificed and brain samples were collected on PD8 at T = 24 h. Control groups for drug combination studies received appropriate vehicle injections (normal or alkalinized saline) at T = –2 h and a second injection of normal saline containing 1% Tween 80 at T = 0 h. The numbers of animals used for the drug combinations are indicated in Table 1; the number of litters that contributed to each group is indicated in parentheses.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
TABLE 1 The number of animals in the drug combination studies

The number of litters that contributed to each group is indicated in parentheses.

 

Tissue Preparation. Brains were rapidly removed, they were quickly frozen in isopentane, and then they were stored at –80°C until further processing. Coronal cryostat sections (20 µm) were prepared throughout the brain and examined for cell death using TUNEL assay (see below).

Histology and Quantification. To measure apoptotic cell death, TUNEL staining was performed using the Apoptag peroxidase in situ apoptosis detection kit (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA) as described previously (Kim et al., 2006Go). Staining was examined in photomicrographs (10x) of three sequential sections at 200-µm intervals taken from several brain areas; quantification of cell death was performed in the brain areas that exhibited the greatest degeneration across treatments. These areas included ventromedial and dorsolateral portions of thalamus, the dorsomedial portion of anterior striatum, and the cortex (frontal, parietal, or retrosplenial) of each animal. Except for the hippocampus, TUNEL-positive cells were counted within 1.00 mm2 regardless of size and shape. In the hippocampus, the total number of TUNEL positive cells within each section was counted. Quantification was performed by an observer blinded to the treatment conditions.


Figure 2
View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. A, effect of LTG on cell death as indicated by the number of TUNEL-positive cells 24 h following administration of LTG (10, 20, 30 50, or 100 mg/kg) to PD7 rat pups. LTG (0 mg/kg) indicates vehicle-treated control. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. per tissue section. Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference, compared with vehicle-treated control (ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test; p < 0.05). B, representative photomicrographs taken in the area of dorsomedial striatum 24 h following vehicle injection (a), 20 mg/kg LTG (b), 30 mg/kg LTG (c), and 100 mg/kg LTG (d). TUNEL-positive cells are seen as brown spots on a blue-gray background. Scale bar, 100 µm.

 
Fluoro-Jade B Staining. For detecting neuronal degeneration, Fluoro-Jade B staining was performed according to the procedures described previously (Schmued and Hopkins, 2000Go).

Statistics. Statistical comparisons were performed by ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey's test with p < 0.05 indicating significant difference.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Administration of LTG Alone. LTG alone administered at doses of 10 to 30 mg/kg did not induce significant cell death in any of the brain areas examined (Fig. 2), as assessed by TUNEL assay. At a dose of 50 mg/kg, 43% of the animals showed increased cell death in lateral thalamus. Administration of 100 mg/kg resulted in significant increase in cell death in all brain areas examined except frontal cortex. We also evaluated the tissue using Fluoro-Jade B staining, which selectively detects neuronal degeneration. The Fluoro-Jade B staining profiles were consistent with TUNEL assay results (data not shown).

Administration of LTG in doses of 10 to 50 mg/kg did not affect growth of the pups during the 24 h after drug injection, and was the pups were devoid of acute behavioral effects except for occasional signs of ataxia immediately after a 50-mg/kg dose. A dose of 100 mg/kg resulted in weight loss 24 h after the injection (weight change: +2.0 ± 0.23 g, vehicle-treated controls; –1.3 ± 0.19 g, LTG; p < 0.05).

Combined Administration of LTG with MK-801. To determine whether LTG can modify the cell death-promoting effect of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (Ikonomidou et al., 1999Go), we administered 20 mg/kg LTG in combination with 0.5 mg/kg MK-801. We selected a dose of 20 mg/kg, which is equivalent to the upper end of the therapeutic range of LTG for pediatric applications (GlaxoSmithKline, 2006Go). This combination caused significantly more cell death in striatum and frontal cortex than that induced by MK-801 alone (Fig. 3). A trend toward such potentiation was observed in the ventral and lateral thalamus.


Figure 3
View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. A, amplification of MK-801-induced cell death following combined administration of 0.5 mg/kg MK-801 with 20 mg/kg LTG. MK-801 was administered 2 h before LTG as described under Materials and Methods. Cell death is indicated by the number of TUNEL-positive cells 24 h following administration of 20 mg/kg LTG to PD7 rat pups. VEH, vehicle-treated control. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. in 1.0 mm2 per tissue section. Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference, compared with vehicle-treated control; {dagger}, significant difference, compared with 20 mg/kg LTG alone; and #, significant difference, compared with 0.5 mg/kg MK-801 alone (ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test; p < 0.05). B, representative photomicrographs taken in the area of dorsomedial striatum 24 h following vehicle injection (a), 20 mg/kg LTG (b), 0.5 mg/kg MK-801 (c), 0.5 mg/kg MK-801 + 20 mg/kg LTG (d), 75 mg/kg phenobarbital (e), and 75 mg/kg phenobarbital + 20 mg/kg LTG (f). TUNEL-positive cells are seen as brown spots on a blue-gray background. Scale bar, 100 µm.

 
Combined treatment with LTG and MK-801 or with MK-801 alone resulted in a significantly (p < 0.05) slower rate of weight gain during the 24-h postinjection (+0.4 ± 0.27 g for combination; +0.8 ± 0.42 g for MK-801 alone), compared with vehicle-treated controls (+2.2 ± 0.45 g). These animals exhibited slowed movements and ataxia, which wore off by 24 h.

Combined Administration of LTG with Phenobarbital. To determine whether LTG potentiates cell death induced by a traditional AED, we examined the effect of 20 mg/kg LTG on the proapoptotic action of phenobarbital.

Combined treatment with 20 mg/kg LTG and 75 mg/kg phenobarbital resulted in a significantly greater number of TUNEL-positive cells in striatum and lateral thalamus, compared with that seen after phenobarbital alone (Fig. 4). A trend toward similar potentiation was observed in the ventral thalamus, frontal cortex, and retrosplenial cortex.


Figure 4
View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Amplification of phenobarbital-induced cell death following combined administration of 75 mg/kg phenobarbital (PB) with 20 mg/kg LTG. Phenobarbital was administered 2 h before LTG as described under Materials and Methods. Cell death is indicated by the number of TUNEL-positive cells 24 h following administration of 20 mg/kg LTG to PD7 rat pups. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. in 1.0 mm2 per tissue section. Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference, compared with vehicle-treated control; {dagger}, significant difference, compared with 20 mg/kg LTG alone; #, significant difference, compared with 75 mg/kg phenobarbital alone (ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test; p < 0.05). B, representative photomicrographs taken in the area of dorsomedial striatum 24 h following vehicle injection (a), 20 mg/kg LTG (b), 75 mg/kg phenobarbital (c), and 75 mg/kg phenobarbital + 20 mg/kg LTG (d). TUNEL-positive cells are seen as brown spots on a blue-gray background. Scale bar, 100 µm.

 
Administration of phenobarbital alone resulted in a significant decrease in weight gain 24 h after drug injection (+1.3 ± 0.19 g), compared with vehicle-treated controls (+2.6 ± 0.38 g). Combined application of LTG with phenobarbital resulted in weight loss at 24 h postinjection (–0.1 ± 0.14 g). After treatment with phenobarbital alone or in combination with LTG, the animals were acutely sluggish, and they exhibited mild ataxia 24 h following drug administration.

Combined Administration of LTG with Phenytoin. In contrast to the combined action with phenobarbital and MK-801, combined application of 20 mg/kg LTG with 50 mg/kg phenytoin attenuated the phenytoin-induced cell death. Whereas phenytoin alone enhanced significantly the number of TUNEL-positive cells in striatum, ventral and lateral thalamus, and retrosplenial cortex, the presence of 20 mg/kg LTG prevented this phenytoin-induced enhancement of cell death (Fig. 5).


Figure 5
View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Effect of combined application of 10, 20, or 30 mg/kg lamotrigine on phenytoin-induced cell death. Phenytoin (PHE; 50 mg/kg) was administered 2 h before LTG as described under Materials and Methods. Cell death is indicated by the number of TUNEL-positive cells 24 h following administration of 20 mg/kg LTG to PD7 rat pups. Values are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. in 1.0 mm2 per tissue section. Asterisk (*) indicates significant difference, compared with vehicle-treated control; #, significant difference, compared with 50 mg/kg phenytoin alone (ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test; p < 0.05). B, representative photomicrographs taken in the area of dorsomedial striatum 24 h following 20 mg/kg LTG (a), 50 mg/kg phenytoin (b), 50 mg/kg phenytoin + 20 mg/kg LTG (c), and 50 mg/kg phenytoin + 30 mg/kg LTG (d). TUNEL positive cells are seen as brown spots on a blue-gray background. Scale bar, 100 µm.

 
To further explore this unanticipated effect of LTG, we extended our analysis to an additional brain area, the hippocampus. A similar protective effect of LTG was observed in the hippocampus: phenytoin alone resulted in an 80% increase in the number of TUNEL-positive cells, compared with vehicle-treated controls (number of TUNEL-positive cells, 46.62 ± 2.88 for control animals, n = 7 rats/group; and 83.95 ± 7.45 for animals treated with drug combination, n = 7 rats/group). Combination treatment with 20 mg/kg LTG resulted in a significant decrease in the number of TUNEL-positive cells, to 55.23 ± 7.99 (n = 8 rats/group).

Lower and higher doses of LTG (10 and 30 mg/kg, respectively) did not attenuate the phenytoin-induced cell death effect in any region examined. In contrast, there was a trend for 30 mg/kg LTG to potentiate the action of phenytoin in most of the brain areas examined.

Administration of phenytoin alone or in combination with LTG (10 or 20 mg/kg) did not result in significant changes in animal weight gain and behavior; phenytoin in combination with a high dose (30 mg/kg) of LTG impaired weight gain (0.0 ± 0.28 g), compared with vehicle-treated controls (+2.0 ± 0.23 g), and it caused occasional ataxia.

Comparison of Male and Female Pups. When collapsed across the various drug treatments that induced significant apoptotic cell death, there was no significant difference between response in male and female pups. The one case in which a tendency toward sex differences was noted was in the combination 20 mg/kg LTG + phenytoin (four females, four males) in which the reduction in cell death due to LTG seemed to be largely due to an effect on females (70% reduction of the phenytoin-induced increase in striatum, 81% reduction of the phenytoin-induced increase in lateral thalamus, and 79% reduction of the phenytoin-induced increase in ventral thalamus).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In this study, we have demonstrated that single administration of LTG does not induce apoptotic neurodegeneration in the neonatal rats when administered alone in doses at or above those effective for preventing seizures in a variety of rodent models (Dalby and Nielsen, 1997Go; Yamashita et al., 2004Go; Shannon et al., 2005Go) and equivalent to doses at or above the therapeutic range in humans (GlaxoSmithKline, 2006Go). Although higher doses of LTG (i.e., 50 and 100 mg/kg) caused widespread neuronal cell death, these doses are not likely to be used therapeutically.

Of particular importance is our observation that combined application of LTG with phenobarbital results in a significant enhancement of the proapoptotic action of phenobarbital. The observation of a synergistic effect of combined AED administration in the neonatal rats on apoptotic neuronal death is reminiscent of previously reported findings with other AED combinations. In particular, diazepam enhanced neonatal neuronal apoptosis induced by phenobarbital or phenytoin when given in subthreshold doses (Bittigau et al., 2002Go). We have shown recently that doses of topiramate and carbamazepine that were without toxicity when given alone potentiated neurodegeneration induced by phenytoin (Kim et al., 2006Go). Thus, that an individual AED does not induce neonatal apoptotic cell death when given alone does not predict that the drug will be devoid of toxicity when given in combination with additional AEDs.

Our finding that combined application of LTG with MK-801 causes an enhancement of the proapoptotic action of MK-801 as well as that of phenobarbital suggests that the potentiation of proapoptotic action by LTG is not dependent on the specific mechanism of action of the proapoptotic compound. This is consistent with the "underactivation" hypothesis of developmental apoptosis, which predicts that suppression of neuronal activity predisposes to cell death during a critical developmental period. This suppression can be achieved either by inhibition of NMDA-type glutamate receptors (e.g., by MK-801) or by overactivation of the GABAergic system (achieved by a GABA mimetics) (Olney, 2002Go). The fact that enhanced sedation and slower growth were associated with the combined drug application is consistent with the possibility that LTG potentiated the suppression of neuronal activity by MK-801 and phenobarbital.

An unexpected finding in the present study is the effect of 20 mg/kg LTG on the phenytoin-induced apoptosis. The apparent protective action of LTG was unusual in that it was highly dose-specific; the effect was seen neither with 10 or 30 mg/kg. Moreover, the effect tended to be more pronounced in female than male pups, raising the possibility that our data underestimate the maximal potential for this apparent neuroprotection. It is possible that LTG may have a biphasic effect on neuronal apoptosis: a mild antiapoptotic property, which is insufficient to be detected at low doses of LTG (e.g., 10 mg/kg), and a proapoptotic property, which becomes detectable at doses equal to (when given in combination with phenytoin) or above (when given alone) a dose of 30 mg/kg. This proposition is supported by the fact that we have found a trend toward lowering the baseline apoptosis in several brain regions following treatment with 10 and 20 mg/kg LTG alone, whereas the trend toward enhancing baseline apoptosis has been observed following 30 mg/kg LTG regimen. The trend toward enhancing phenytoin effects with 30 mg/kg LTG also supports this possibility. It is tempting to speculate that the protective action of LTG could be mediated by interfering with phenytoin-induced impairment of calcium entry (Lacinova, 2005Go) (low intracellular calcium levels have been shown to contribute to neonatal neuronal apoptosis; Lema Tomé et al., 2006aGo; Turner et al., 2007Go). At higher doses of LTG, the inhibition of sodium channels may exacerbate the similar action of phenytoin, further suppressing neuronal activity and stimulating cell death.

Although the spectrum of clinical consequences of AED-induced neuronal apoptosis remains to be elucidated, our observation that LTG alone does not exhibit neonatal neuronal toxicity serves as an argument in favor of monotherapy during pregnancy and in neonates. Moreover, from the data presented here, the combination of LTG with phenytoin is preferable to a combination with phenobarbital, in terms of developmental neurotoxicity. Our findings also underscore the need for testing a range of doses of a given drug in combination with a variety of different drugs before making a conclusion regarding the relative risk for developmental neurotoxicity for the given AED.


    Acknowledgements
 
We thank Susanna Tsukerman for technical assistance.


    Footnotes
 
This study was supported by the research grant from GlaxoSmithKline, Epilepsy Foundation and National Institutes of Health Grants MH02040 and HD047890.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/jpet.107.123133.

ABBREVIATIONS: AED, antiepileptic drug; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; MK-801, (+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine hydrogen maleate; LTG, lamotrigine; PD, postnatal day; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling; ANOVA, analysis of variance; VEH, vehicle.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Alexei Kondratyev, Georgetown University, W208 Research Bldg., 3970 Reservoir Rd., N.W., Washington, DC 20057. E-mail: kondrata{at}georgetown.edu


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

Ben-Ari Y and Holmes GL (2006) Effects of seizures on developmental processes in the immature brain. Lancet Neurol 5: 1055–1063.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bialer M, Johannessen SI, Kupferberg HJ, Levy RH, Perucca E, and Tomson T (2007) Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the Eighth Eilat Conference (EILAT VIII). Epilepsy Res 73: 1–52.[CrossRef][Medline]

Bittigau P, Sifringer M, Genz K, Reith E, Pospischil D, Govindarajalu S, Dzietko M, Pesditschek S, Mai I, Dikranian K, et al. (2002) Antiepileptic drugs and apoptotic neurodegeneration in the developing brain. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA 99: 15089–15094.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Dalby NO and Nielsen EB (1997) Comparison of the preclinical anticonvulsant profiles of tiagabine, lamotrigine, gabapentin and vigabatrin. Epilepsy Res 28: 63–72.[CrossRef][Medline]

Gao K and Calabrese JR. (2005) Newer treatment studies for bipolar depression. Bipolar Disord 7 (Suppl 5): 13–23.[Medline]

GlaxoSmithKline (2006) Prescribing information for Lamictal® (lamotrigine) tablets and chewable dispersible tablets. GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC.

Glier C, Dzietko M, Bittigau P, Jarosz B, Korobowicz E, and Ikonomidou C (2004) Therapeutic doses of topiramate are not toxic to the developing rat brain. Exp Neurol 187: 403–409.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hahn CG, Gyulai L, Baldassano CF, and Lenox RH (2004) The current understanding of lamotrigine as a mood stabilizer. J Clin Psychiatry 65: 791–804.[Medline]

Ikonomidou C, Bittigau P, Ishimaru MJ, Wozniak DF, Koch C, Genz K, Price MT, Stefovska V, Horster F, Tenkova T, et al. (2000) Ethanol-induced apoptotic neurodegeneration and fetal alcohol syndrome. Science 287: 1056–1060.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ikonomidou C, Bosch F, Miksa M, Bittigau P, Vockler J, Dikranian K, Tenkova TI, Stefovska V, Turski L, and Olney JW (1999) Blockade of NMDA receptors and apoptotic neurodegeneration in the developing brain. Science 283: 70–74.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Hartman RE, Izumi Y, Benshoff ND, Dikranian K, Zorumski CF, Olney JW, and Wozniak DF (2003) Early exposure to common anesthetic agents causes widespread neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain and persistent learning deficits. J Neurosci 23: 876–882.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kim J, Kondratyev A, and Gale K (2006) Enhancement of phenytoin-induced neuronal death in neonatal rats by AEDs that do not induce neuronal death when given alone. Epilepsia 47 (Suppl 4): 119–204, abstract 2.182.[Medline]

Kim J, Kondratyev A, Tomita Y, and Gale K (2007) Neurodevelopmental impact of antiepileptic drugs and seizures in the immature brain. Workshop on the neurobiology of epilepsy VIII (Bertram EH and Bernard C eds). Epilepsia, in press.

Lacinova L (2005) Voltage-dependent calcium channels. Gen Physiol Biophys 24 (Suppl 1): 1–78.[Medline]

Lema Tomé CM, Bauer C, Nottingham C, Smith C, Blackstone K, Brown L, Hlavaty C, Nelson C, Daker R, Sola R, et al. (2006a) MK801-induced caspase-3 in the postnatal brain: inverse relationship with calcium binding proteins. Neuroscience 141: 1351–1363.[CrossRef][Medline]

Lema Tomé CM, Nottingham CU, Smith CM, Beauchamp AS, Leung PW, and Turner CP (2006b) Neonatal exposure to MK801 induces structural reorganization of the central nervous system. Neuroreport 17: 779–783.[CrossRef][Medline]

Manthey D, Asimiadou S, Stefovska V, Kaindl AM, Fassbender J, Ikonomidou C, and Bittigau P (2005) Sulthiame but not levetiracetam exerts neurotoxic effect in the developing rat brain. Exp Neurol 193: 497–503.[CrossRef][Medline]

Olney JW (2002) New insights and new issues in developmental neurotoxicology. Neurotoxicology 23: 659–668.[CrossRef][Medline]

Olney JW, Young C, Wozniak DF, Jevtovic-Todorovic V, and Ikonomidou C (2004) Do pediatric drugs cause developing neurons to commit suicide? Trends Pharmacol Sci 25: 135–139.[CrossRef][Medline]

Schmued LC and Hopkins KJ (2000) Fluoro-Jade B: a high affinity fluorescent marker for the localization of neuronal degeneration. Brain Res 874: 123–130.[CrossRef][Medline]

Shannon HE, Eberle EL, and Peters SC (2005) Comparison of the effects of anticonvulsant drugs with diverse mechanisms of action in the formalin test in rats. Neuropharmacology 48: 1012–1020.[CrossRef][Medline]

Turner CP, Miller R, Smith C, Brown L, Blackstone K, Dunham SR, Strehlow R, Manfredi M, Slocum P, Iverson K, et al. (2007) Widespread neonatal brain damage following calcium channel blockade. Dev Neurosci 29: 213–231.[CrossRef][Medline]

White HS (1999) Comparative anticonvulsant and mechanistic profile of the established and newer antiepileptic drugs. Epilepsia 40 (Suppl 5): S2–S10.

Willmore LJ (2005) Antiepileptic drugs and neuroprotection: current status and future roles. Epilepsy Behav 7 (Suppl 3): S25–S28.[CrossRef][Medline]

Yamashita H, Ohno K, Amada Y, Hattori H, Ozawa-Funatsu Y, Toya T, Inami H, Shishikura J, Sakamoto S, Okada M, et al. (2004) Effects of 2-[N-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-methylamino]-4H-pyrido[3.2-e]-1,3-thiazin-4-one (YM928), an orally active alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor antagonist, in models of generalized epileptic seizure in mice and rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 308: 127–133.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.107.123133v1
322/2/494    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katz, I.
Right arrow Articles by Kondratyev, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katz, I.
Right arrow Articles by Kondratyev, A.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition