JPET

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on February 8, 2007; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.106.117010


0022-3565/07/3212-784-790$20.00
JPET 321:784-790, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.106.117010v1
321/2/784    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ohizumi, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ohizumi, Y.

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY

Nobiletin, a Citrus Flavonoid, Reverses Learning Impairment Associated with N-Methyl-D-aspartate Receptor Antagonism by Activation of Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Signaling

Akira Nakajima, Tohru Yamakuni, Kentaro Matsuzaki, Norihito Nakata, Hiroshi Onozuka, Akihito Yokosuka, Yutaka Sashida, Yoshihiro Mimaki, and Yasushi Ohizumi

Department of Pharmaceutical Molecular Biology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (A.N., T.Y., K.M., N.N., H.O., Y.O.); Laboratory of Medicinal Plant Science, School of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Science, Tokyo, Japan (A.Y., Y.S., Y.M.); Yokohama College of Pharmacy, Yokohama, Japan (Y.O.); and Research Center of Supercritical Fluid Technology, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan (Y.O.)

Received for publication November 11, 2006
Accepted February 6, 2007.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Recent studies have indicated that learning-induced activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling via N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors is required for consolidation of the resultant learning. These findings raise an idea that control of ERK signaling may be a potential target for treatment of cognitive dysfunction. Our recent studies have demonstrated that nobiletin, a polymethoxylated flavone from Citrus depressa, enhances cAMP/protein kinase A/ERK signaling in cultured rat hippocampal neurons and PC12D cells. Here, we, for the first time, present the evidence that this natural compound reverses learning impairment associated with NMDA receptor antagonism by activation of ERK in the hippocampus. Treatment with 50 mg/kg nobiletin reversed the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (dizocilpine maleate)-induced learning impairment in mice. Western blot analysis also showed that nobiletin reversed MK-801-induced inhibition of learning-associated ERK activation in the hippocampus of the animals. Furthermore, consistent with these results, in cultured rat hippocampal neurons, nobiletin restored MK-801-induced impairment of NMDA-stimulated phosphorylation of ERK in a concentration-dependent manner. Taken together, the present study suggests that compounds that activate ERK signaling improve cognitive deficits associated with NMDA receptor hypofunction and that nobiletin may give us a new insight into therapeutic drug development for neurological disorders exhibiting cognitive impairment accompanied by a hypofunction of NMDA receptor-ERK signaling.


N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors are widely distributed in the brain, and their density is highest in the hippocampal CA1 region (Monyer et al., 1994Go). It has been shown that NMDA receptors are very important in the regulation of synaptic plasticity and the process of learning and memory (Riedel et al., 2003Go). Activation of NMDA receptors can initiate second messenger signaling pathways, including a cAMP-dependent signaling pathway that plays crucial roles in a positive regulation of neurite outgrowth via extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)/mitogen-activated protein kinase activation (Vossler et al., 1997Go), glutamatergic neurotransmission (Banke et al., 2000Go), and the hippocampal long-term potentiation associated with learning and memory (Abel et al., 1997Go). Recent studies indicate that learning-induced activation of ERK signaling via NMDA receptors is required for consolidation of the resultant learning (Atkins et al., 1998Go; Cammarota et al., 2000Go; Athos et al., 2002Go; Levenson et al., 2004Go; Chwang et al., 2006Go). Reversely, in vivo blockade of NMDA receptors or inhibition of ERK signaling results in impairment of associative learning (Kim et al., 1991Go; Atkins et al., 1998Go). Furthermore, long-lasting impairment of associative learning after repeated administration of phencyclidine, a noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist, is correlated with a dysfunction of ERK signaling (Enomoto et al., 2005Go). Accordingly, it is plausible that control of ERK signaling is a potential target for treatment of neurological disorders exhibiting cognitive dysfunction.

Large numbers of compounds from natural resources have provided not only useful pharmacological tools (Furukawa et al., 1993Go; Ohizumi, 1997Go; Obara et al., 2002Go) but also novel leading compounds for drug development (Liu, 1993Go). Flavonoids form a large family of natural products and are widely distributed in the plant kingdom. In the course of our survey of substances having the activity to potentiate cAMP/PKA/ERK signaling to repair dysregulated neuronal functions from natural resources, we successfully found nobiletin, a polymethoxylated flavone from Citrus depressa (Fig. 1), as a natural compound that enhances cAMP/PKA/ERK signaling in PC12D cells and cultured hippocampal neurons (Nagase et al., 2005aGo,bGo). Here, we describe the first evidence that nobiletin reverses the learning impairment associated with NMDA receptor antagonism by activation of ERK signaling.


Figure 1
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Chemical structure of nobiletin.

 

    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals. Male ddY mice (8 weeks old) were obtained from Nippon SLC (Hamamatsu, Japan). Animals were housed in cages with free access to food and water under the condition of constant temperature (23 ± 1°C) and humidity (55 ± 5%) and adapted to a standard 12-h light/12-h dark cycle (light cycle, 9:00 AM to 9:00 PM). The procedures used in this study were approved by the Committee on the Care and Use of Experimental Animals, Tohoku University in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the United States National Institutes of Health.

Drugs. Nobiletin was extracted and isolated as described previously (Nagase et al., 2005aGo) and suspended in 0.5% Tween 80 solution. MK-801 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was dissolved in saline.

Step-through Passive-Avoidance Task. The training trial and retention test of the passive avoidance task were conducted in a Plexiglas box that contained dark (25 x 25 x 25 cm) and light (14 x 10 x 25 cm) compartments. The floor rods in the dark compartment were connected to an electronic stimulator (Nihon Kohden, Tokyo, Japan). The training trial was started by placing the mouse on the light compartment of the box. When the mouse completely entered the dark compartment, an electric shock (0.4 mA, 1 s) was supplied to the floor bars. Twenty-four hours after training, each mouse was placed in the light compartment, and step-through latency was recorded until 300 s had elapsed (retention test). MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) was given 30 min before the training trial of the passive avoidance task. To examine the effects of single treatment with nobiletin, nobiletin (25–50 mg/kg i.p.) or vehicle (0.5% Tween 80) was injected 10 min before MK-801. To examine the effects of repeated treatment with nobiletin, nobiletin (50 mg/kg i.p.) was injected once daily for 6 or 7 consecutive days (i.e., days 1–6 or days 1–7). On day 7, vehicle or nobiletin (50 mg/kg) was injected 10 min prior to MK-801, which was given 30 min before training of the passive avoidance task. The dose of MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg) was selected on the basis of a previous study, which showed that MK-801 (0.03–0.1 mg/kg) dose-dependently impaired the passive avoidance performance (Maurice et al., 1994Go). The doses of nobiletin (25–50 mg/kg) and the administration route (i.p.) were chosen on the basis of our previous study showing the protective effect of nobiletin on beta-amyloid peptide (Abeta)-induced impairment of learning and memory (Matsuzaki et al., 2006Go).

Contextual Fear Conditioning. Animals were placed in the training chamber and allowed to explore for 2 min, after which they received an electric shock (2 s, 0.7 mA). The 2-min/2-s shock paradigm was repeated for a total of three shocks. After the last shock, animals were allowed to context for an additional 1 min prior to removal from the training chamber. During training, freezing behavior was measured for 1 min after each shock. To assess contextual learning and memory, the animals were placed back into the training context 24 h after fear conditioning and scored for freezing for 5 min. Freezing behavior was measured by observing the animals every 5 s. Nobiletin (50 mg/kg i.p.) was injected once daily for 7 consecutive days (days 1–7). On day 7, vehicle or nobiletin (50 mg/kg) was injected 10 min prior to saline or MK-801 (0.08 mg/kg s.c.), which was given 30 min before training of contextual fear conditioning paradigm. The dose used (0.08 mg/kg) was chosen on the basis of a previous study showing that MK-801 (0.08 mg/kg) reduced both contextual associative learning and activation of ERK during fear conditioning (Atkins et al., 1998Go).

To examine the effects of nobiletin on sensitivities to foot shocks, threshold values were determined by electrical stimulation intensity leading to stereotypic responses as described previously (Barad et al., 1998Go). Mice were injected with nobiletin (10–50 mg/kg i.p.) once daily for 7 consecutive days (i.e., days 1–7). On day 7, vehicle or nobiletin (10–50 mg/kg) was administered 10 min before MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg s.c.), which was given 30 min before the nociception test. Each mouse was placed in a chamber with a floor of metal bars and then exposed to 2-s shocks every 30 s in order of increasing intensity (shocks started at 0.05 mA and were increased by 0.05 after each interval). Mice were scored for their first visible response to the shock (flinch), their first extreme motor response (run/jump), and their first vocalized distress (vocalize).

Western Blot Analysis. Western blot analysis was performed as described previously (Thiels et al., 2002Go) with a minor modification. Mice were treated with nobiletin (50 mg/kg) once daily for 7 consecutive days (i.e., days 1–7). On day 7, nobiletin was administered 10 min prior to MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg s.c.), which was given 30 min before the training trial of the passive avoidance task. Immediately and 30 min after training, mice were killed by decapitation, and the brains were immediately removed. To examine the effects of nobiletin on the basal phospho-ERK levels, mice were killed before training. Hippocampi were homogenized in ice-cold homogenation buffer (10 mM HEPES-OH, pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin, 2 µg/ml antipain, and 2 µg/ml chymostatin). The homogenate was centrifuged at 2000g at 4°C for 10 min. The obtained nuclear pellet was resuspended in 40 µl of ice-cold extraction buffer (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.0, 450 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.05% SDS, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml pepstatin, 2 µg/ml antipain, and 2 µg/ml chymostatin) and incubated on ice for 15 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 12,000g for 10 min, and the supernatant was collected. Equal amounts of protein (20 µg) were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (12.5% gels), and the blotted membrane was blocked in Tris-buffered saline/Tween 20 buffer containing 5% skim milk for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was then incubated with anti-phospho-ERK (Thr202/Tyr204) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA) in 2% bovine serum albumin/Tris-buffered saline/Tween 20 buffer overnight at 4°C and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling Technology) for 2 h at room temperature. After stripping of the antibody, the membrane was reprobed with anti-ERK antibody (Promega, Madison, WI). Immunoreactivities were visualized with SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Pierce Chemical, Rockford, IL). The band intensities were quantitatively analyzed using SCION image software (Scion Corporation, Frederick, MD). To evaluate the ERK activation, the phospho-ERK levels were normalized to the total ERK levels in the same membranes.

Preparation of Neuronal Cultures. Hippocampal neuron culture was carried out as described previously (Matsuzaki et al., 2006Go). In brief, under ether anesthesia of an 18-day pregnant Sprague-Dawley rat (Japan SLC, Inc., Hamamatsu, Japan), embryos were immediately decapitated. The hippocampal neurons were dissociated according to the standard methods with Sumitomo Nerve Cell Culture System (Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), plated on 35-mm culture dish coated with poly-L-lysine at a density of 1 x 106 cells/dish in neurobasal medium without phenol red (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing B-27 supplement (Invitrogen), 500 µM L-glutamine, and 0.005% penicillin-streptomycin and cultured at 37°C in the medium described above. At 4 days in vitro, half of the medium was replaced by the medium containing a mitotic inhibitor, cytosine arabinofuranoside, to minimize glial proliferation. At 14 days in vitro, cultured neurons were treated with nobiletin (3–30 µM) or vehicle in the cytosine arabinofuranoside-containing medium without B-27 supplement and L-glutamine for 1 h; thereafter, 10 µM MK-801 was added to the medium. Following 30 min, cultured neurons were treated with 10 µM NMDA for 15 min and then subjected to Western blot analysis using anti-phospho-ERK (Thr202/Tyr204) and anti-phospho-(Ser/Thr) PKA substrate antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology) as described previously (Matsuzaki et al., 2006Go).

Statistical Analyses. The results are expressed as means ± S.E.M. The data for the freezing during training of contextual fear conditioning paradigm were analyzed by two-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Other data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance, followed by the Student-Newman-Keuls test. A level of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Nobiletin Reverses MK-801-Induced Learning Impairment. We used the passive avoidance task, in which animals learn to associate a location with an aversive stimulus (Stubley-Weatherly et al., 1996Go; Bernabeu et al., 1997Go; Taubenfeld et al., 2001Go). We first investigated the effects of a single treatment with nobiletin (25–50 mg/kg i.p.) on NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801-induced impairment of learning and memory in the passive avoidance test. The treatment with MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) resulted in a decrease in the step-through latency in the retention test performed 24 h after the training trial (Fig. 2A). Preadministration of nobiletin (50 mg/kg i.p.) led to a moderate but significant increase in the step-through latency (F2,47 = 4.4136, p = 0.0175) (Fig. 2A).


Figure 2
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Nobiletin reverses MK-801-induced learning impairment in the passive avoidance test. A, effects of a single treatment with nobiletin on MK-801-induced learning impairment in the passive avoidance test. Nobiletin (25 or 50 mg/kg i.p.) and MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) were administered 40 and 30 min before the training trial, respectively. The retention test was performed 24 h after the training trial. Values are means ± S.E.M. (Control, n = 9; MK-801, n = 17; MK-801 + 25 mg/kg nobiletin, n = 13; MK-801 + 50 mg/kg nobiletin, n = 20). **, p < 0.01 versus control. #, p < 0.05 versus MK-801. B, effects of repeated treatment with nobiletin on MK-801-induced learning impairment in the passive avoidance test. Nobiletin (50 mg/kg i.p.) was injected once daily for 6 or 7 consecutive days (i.e., days 1–6 or 1–7). On day 7, nobiletin (50 mg/kg i.p.) and MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) were administered 40 and 30 min before the training trial, respectively. The retention test was performed 24 h after the training trial. Values are means ± S.E.M. (control, n = 8; MK-801, n = 8; MK-801 + 50 mg/kg nobiletin (days 1–6), n = 9; MK-801 + 50 mg/kg nobiletin (days 1–7), n = 12). **, p < 0.01 versus control. #, p < 0.05; ##, p < 0.01 versus MK-801.

 
Next, we examined the effects of repeated treatment with nobiletin on MK-801-induced impairment of learning and memory. The training trial of the passive avoidance test was performed on day 7, and the retention test was performed on day 8. Repeated treatment with nobiletin (50 mg/kg i.p.) for 6 (i.e., days 1–6) or 7 (i.e., days 1–7) days reversed the MK-801-induced learning and memory deficits by 50 or 90%, respectively (F2,26 = 11.292, p = 0.0003) (Fig. 2B).

To ascertain the effects of repeated treatment with nobiletin on MK-801-induced impairment of learning and memory, we proceeded to study in another form of associative learning paradigm, contextual fear conditioning (Kim et al., 1991Go; Logue et al., 1997Go; Atkins et al., 1998Go). We first examined the effects of repeated treatment with nobiletin (10–50 mg/kg i.p. for 7 days) on contextual fear learning in naive mice. Mice injected with either vehicle or nobiletin (10–50 mg/kg) showed similar amounts of freezing behavior during both the training session and test session (treatment x shock event interaction, F2,54 = 0.314, p = 0.8675; F2,27 = 0.6433, p = 0.5334, respectively) (Fig. 3, A and B). Next, we examined the effects of repeated treatment with nobiletin (10–50 mg/kg i.p. for 7 days) on MK-801-induced impairment of contextual fear learning. The treatment with neither MK-801 nor nobiletin affected freezing behavior during training (treatment x shock event interaction, F2,88 = 0.946, p = 0.4664) (Fig. 3C). In the test session performed 24 h after training, mice injected with MK-801 showed less freezing behavior than control mice (Fig. 3D). Repeated treatment with nobiletin (10–50 mg/kg) dose-dependently reversed the MK-801-induced learning deficits (F2,32 = 5.2196, p = 0.0109) (Fig. 3D).


Figure 3
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Nobiletin reverses MK-801-induced learning impairment in the contextual fear conditioning paradigm. A and B, effects of repeated treatment with nobiletin (10–50 mg/kg i.p. for 7 days) on contextual fear conditioning in naive mice. Nobiletin (10–50 mg/kg i.p.) was injected once daily for 7 consecutive days (i.e., days 1–7). On day 7, nobiletin (10–50 mg/kg i.p.) was administered 40 min before training. The test session was performed 24 h after training. Values are means ± S.E.M. (control, n = 10; 10 mg/kg nobiletin, n = 9; 50 mg/kg nobiletin, n = 11). C and D, effects of repeated treatment with nobiletin (10–50 mg/kg i.p. for 7 days) on MK-801-induced learning impairment in the contextual fear conditioning paradigm. Nobiletin (10–50 mg/kg i.p.) was injected once daily for 7 consecutive days (i.e., days 1–7). On day 7, nobiletin (10–50 mg/kg i.p.) and MK-801 (0.08 mg/kg s.c.) were administered 40 and 30 min before training, respectively. The test session was performed 24 h after training. Values are means ± S.E.M. (control, n = 13; MK-801, n = 9; MK-801 + 10 mg/kg nobiletin, n = 13; MK-801 + 50 mg/kg nobiletin, n = 13). *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01 versus control. #, p < 0.05; ##, p < 0.01 versus MK-801.

 

Because these learning paradigms involved foot shock, which serves as an aversive stimulus, it was important to determine whether nobiletin-treated mice differed from vehicle-treated mice in their sensitivities to foot shocks of varying intensities. The stimulus thresholds for flinching, running/jumping, and vocalizing for vehicle- and nobiletin-treated mice were indistinguishable [stimulus threshold for flinching, running/jumping, vocalizing: control, 0.18 ± 0.02, 0.29 ± 0.03, and 0.33 ± 0.05 mA, respectively, n = 7; MK-801, 0.14 ± 0.03, 0.20 ± 0.03, and 0.24 ± 0.02 mA, respectively, n = 7; 10 mg/kg nobiletin + MK-801, 0.19 ± 0.01, 0.26 ± 0.03, and 0.29 ± 0.03 mA, respectively, n = 7; 50 mg/kg nobiletin + MK-801, 0.19 ± 0.02, 0.28 ± 0.01, and 0.31 ± 0.01 mA, respectively, n = 8; flinching, F2,19 = 2.5015, p = 0.1086; running/jumping, F2,19 = 2.5909, p = 0.1012; vocalizing, F2,19 = 2.3249, p = 0.1250]. These results suggest that any differences between vehicle- and nobiletin-treated mice in the passive avoidance test and contextual fear conditioning paradigm are not due to altered shock sensitivity.

Nobiletin Reverses MK-801-Induced Inhibition of Learning-Associated Activation of ERK in the Hippocampus. It has been reported that a single passive avoidance training event has been previously shown to activate hippocampal ERK, which is necessary for consolidation of the resultant learning (Cammarota et al., 2000Go; Alonso et al., 2002Go). Furthermore, treatment with MK-801 or AP5 blocks both the associative learning and the activation of ERK in the hippocampus (Atkins et al., 1998Go; Cammarota et al., 2000Go). Thus, we next examined the effects of nobiletin on the MK-801-induced inhibition of ERK activation in the hippocampus after the passive avoidance training in mice. The passive avoidance training increased levels of phospho-ERK when measured immediately after training (F3,14 = 7.9959, p = 0.0024) (Fig. 4, A and B), whereas the increase in phospho-ERK was not found 30 min after training, indicating that the activation of ERK appears to be rapid and transient following training (F3,8 = 1.4373, p = 0.3023) (Fig. 4, C and D). Treatment with MK-801 30 min before the passive avoidance training blocked the increase in phospho-ERK that was normally observed immediately after training (Fig. 4, A and B). These results demonstrate that the increase in phospho-ERK observed after the passive avoidance training requires activation of NMDA receptors. Notably, repeated administration of nobiletin (50 mg/kg i.p. for 7 days) completely reversed the MK-801-induced inhibition of ERK activation in the hippocampus normally observed immediately after the passive avoidance training (Fig. 4, A and B). In addition, repeated treatment with nobiletin did not affect the basal phospho-ERK levels (Fig. 4, E and F), suggesting that ERK activation in nobiletin-treated trained mice results from the passive avoidance training.


Figure 4
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Nobiletin reverses MK-801-induced inhibition of learning-associated activation of ERK in the hippocampus. A, representative data on phosphorylated ERK level for mice sacrificed immediately after training of the passive avoidance task. Following probing with the antibody specific to phosphorylated ERK, blots were reprobed with anti-ERK antibody. B, densitometric analysis of the changes in ERK phosphorylation for mice sacrificed immediately after training. Values are means ± S.E.M. [control, n = 4; vehicle (trained), n = 4; MK-801 (trained), n = 4; MK-801 + nobiletin (trained), n = 6]. *, p < 0.05 versus control. #, p < 0.05 versus vehicle-treated trained group. $$, p < 0.01 versus MK-801-treated trained group. C, representative data on phosphorylated ERK level for mice sacrificed 30 min after training of the passive avoidance task. D, densitometric analysis of the changes in ERK phosphorylation for mice sacrificed 30 min after training. Values are means ± S.E.M. [control, n = 3; vehicle (trained), n = 3; MK-801 (trained), n = 3; MK-801 + nobiletin (trained), n = 3]. E, representative data on basal phosphorylated ERK level for mice sacrificed before training of the passive avoidance task. F, densitometric analysis of the changes in ERK phosphorylation for mice sacrificed before training. Values are means ± S.E.M. (control, n = 4; nobiletin, n = 3).

 
Nobiletin Reverses MK-801-Induced Inhibition of NMDA-Stimulated Phosphorylation of ERK and PKA Substrates in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons. We further examined the effects of nobiletin on ERK activation in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Treatment with 10 µM NMDA for 15 min increased the level of phospho-ERK by 900% in cultured rat hippocampal neurons (Fig. 5, A and B). Pretreatment with 10 µM MK-801 completely prevented the 10 µM NMDA-induced increase in phospho-ERK (Fig. 5, A and B). When nobiletin was added before treatment with MK-801, the inhibitory effect of MK-801 was completely blocked by 10 or 30 µM of the natural compound, whereas it showed no effect on the inhibitory action of MK-801 at the concentration of 3 µM, suggesting the concentration dependence (F3,12 = 11.802, p = 0.0007) (Fig. 5, A and B). Furthermore, treatment with nobiletin (3–30 µM) concentration-dependently reversed MK-801-induced inhibition of NMDA-stimulated phosphorylation of PKA substrates in cultured rat hippocampal neurons (Fig. 5C).


Figure 5
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Nobiletin reverses MK-801-induced inhibition of NMDA-stimulated phosphorylation of ERK and PKA substrates in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. A, levels of phosphorylated ERK in hippocampal neurons were examined by Western blotting with the antibody specific to phosphorylated ERK. Blots were then stripped and reprobed with anti-ERK antibody. B, densitometric analysis of the levels of phosphorylated ERK in cultured neurons treated with NMDA or NMDA plus MK-801 in the absence and presence of nobiletin. Values are means ± S.E.M. (n = 4). **, p < 0.01 versus control. ##, p < 0.01 versus NMDA-treated group. $$, p < 0.01 versus NMDA plus MK-801-treated group. C, levels of phosphorylated PKA substrates in hippocampal neurons were examined by Western blotting using anti-phospho-PKA substrates antibody. Blots were then stripped and reprobed with anti-PKA{alpha} antibody to verify that equal amount of protein was present in each lane. Similar results were obtained from three independent experiments.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Learning-associated signaling begins at the plasma membrane, where activation of NMDA receptors leads to influx of Ca2+ and engagement of a variety of signaling pathways that ultimately converge on the ERK signaling cascade (Adams and Sweatt, 2002Go). Upon activation, ERK performs several functions relevant for establishing short- and long-term memory (Sweatt, 2004Go). Especially, ERK activation leads to a number of cellular changes associated with the development of long-term memory, such as alterations in gene expression and protein synthesis, dendritic spine stabilization, the modulation of ion channels, and changes in receptor trafficking. In the present study, we demonstrated that treatment with nobiletin improved the NMDA receptor antagonist-induced learning impairment, accompanied by preventing an inhibition of learning-associated ERK activation in the hippocampus of mice. It was also shown that nobiletin reversed MK-801-induced impairment of NMDA-stimulated phosphorylation of ERK in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Given that the activation of ERK in the hippocampus is necessary for consolidation of the resultant learning (Atkins et al., 1998Go; Cammarota et al., 2000Go; Athos et al., 2002Go; Levenson et al., 2004Go; Chwang et al., 2006Go), our results suggest that nobiletin reverses MK-801-induced learning deficits by activation of ERK in the hippocampus.

How could nobiletin reverse MK-801-induced inhibition of ERK activation in the hippocampus? We have recently reported that nobiletin inhibits the phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity catalyzing the hydrolysis of cAMP and thereby increases intracellular cAMP concentration to activate PKA in PC12D cells (Nagase et al., 2005bGo). Furthermore, nobiletin induces a sustained increase in phosphorylation of MEK and ERK in cultured hippocampal neurons as well as in PC12D cells (Nagase et al., 2005bGo). It is well known that cAMP activates Rap1, a small GTP-binding protein in the Ras family that serves as a selective activator of B-Raf, in a PKA-dependent manner, to stimulate B-Raf activity, leading to activation of ERK (Vossler et al., 1997Go; Yao et al., 1998Go; York et al., 1998Go). Also, this compound stimulates CREB phosphorylation and cAMP response element-mediated transcription in an MEK/ERK-dependent signaling cascade (Nagase et al., 2005aGo,bGo). Collectively, it is plausible that nobiletin inhibits PDE activity at least at the intracellular local region to activate cAMP/PKA/MEK/ERK signaling cascade and thereby reverses MK-801-induced inhibition of learning-associated ERK activation and subsequent learning deficits. In support of this interpretation, it was observed that, in cultured rat hippocampal neurons, nobiletin reversed MK-801-induced impairment of NMDA-stimulated phosphorylation of PKA substrates and ERK (Fig. 5).

Because nobiletin itself activates ERK signaling, one might argue that the effects of nobiletin in the present study might be independent of NMDA receptor signaling. Recently, we have found that treatment with 10 µM nobiletin increased the level of phospho-ERK by 300% at 90 min after treatment in cultured rat hippocampal neurons (K. Matsuzaki, T. Yamakuni, S. Moriguchi, K. Fukunaga, A. Yokosuka, Y. Sashida, Y. Mimaki, and Y. Ohizumi, unpublished data). However, it should be mentioned that, in the present study, treatment with 10 µM NMDA increased the level of phospho-ERK by 900%, and that 10 µM nobiletin completely reversed the inhibitory effect of MK-801, suggesting that nobiletin-induced ERK activation, at least in part, depends on NMDA receptor stimulation. The present findings are consistent with those of the previous study showing a functional interaction between PDE and NMDA receptors in the regulation of learning and memory (Zhang et al., 2000Go).

In the present study, in the passive avoidance test, both single and repeated administration of nobiletin improved the learning impairment induced by MK-801. It is important to mention here that mice treated with nobiletin for 6 days (i.e., days 1–6) did not receive nobiletin on the training day (i.e., day 7) of the passive avoidance task. Nevertheless, these mice showed increased step-through latency in the retention test performed 24 h after the training trial. This result indicates that nobiletin has not only acute effects but also chronic effects against MK-801-induced learning impairment. Considering the ability of nobiletin to trigger an increase in CREB phosphorylation and cAMP response element-dependent transcription via activation of a cAMP/PKA/ERK signaling pathway in cultured rat hippocampal neurons (K. Matsuzaki, T. Yamakuni, S. Moriguchi, K. Fukunaga, A. Yokosuka, Y. Sashida, Y. Mimaki, and Y. Ohizumi, unpublished data), it is possible that the chronic effects of nobiletin may result from alterations in transcription of target genes, including those involved in synapse formation, neuronal survival (brain-derived neurotrophic factor, Bcl-2), and long-term memory (CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein) (Shieh et al., 1998Go; Tao et al., 1998Go; Taubenfeld et al., 2001Go).

Cognitive impairment associated with NMDA receptor hypofunction is hypothesized in several neurological disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD) and schizophrenia. A recent study indicates that application of Abeta promotes endocytosis of NMDA receptors in cultured neurons accompanied by a persistent depression of NMDA-evoked currents and reduced signaling to CREB (Snyder et al., 2005Go). These findings suggest that prolonged depression of NMDA receptor-mediated transmission may initiate the pathological changes observed in AD. We have recently reported that nobiletin reverses sublethal concentration of Abeta1–42-induced reduction in the activity of PKA/CREB-dependent signaling pathway in cultured rat hippocampal neurons (Matsuzaki et al., 2006Go). This compound also ameliorates Abeta-induced impairment of memory in AD model rats (Matsuzaki et al., 2006Go). Furthermore, our preliminary results showed that nobiletin improved learning and memory deficits in human amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice that overexpress human amyloid precursor protein 695 harboring the double Swedish/London mutation (H. Onozuka, T. Yamakuni, A. Nakajima, K. Matsuzaki, R. W. Shin, K. Ogino, Y. Sashida, Y. Mimaki, T. Kitamoto, and Y. Ohizumi, unpublished data). Taken together, nobiletin may have the potential to become a novel lead compound for drug development for AD with novel mechanisms of the action.

In addition to its role in learning and memory, the glutamate system has been implicated in schizophrenia. NMDA receptor hypofunction may be critically involved in the etiology or symptoms associated with this disease. Thus, NMDA receptor antagonists, such as phencyclidine, MK-801, and ketamine, induce psychotic states in normal human volunteers and exacerbate symptoms in patients with schizophrenia (Javitt and Zukin, 1991Go; Olney et al., 1999Go). Based on the results of the present study and the previously reported finding that the phencyclidine-treated animal, a useful model of schizophrenia, induces a long-lasting impairment of associative learning accompanied by a decrease in learning-associated NMDA-ERK signaling (Enomoto et al., 2005Go), nobiletin might improve the cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia through activation of ERK signaling. Furthermore, it is necessary to investigate the beneficial effects of nobiletin on schizophrenia-like positive and negative symptoms in animal models of schizophrenia in the future study.

In conclusion, the present results demonstrate that nobiletin reverses the learning impairment associated with NMDA receptor antagonism by activation of ERK signaling. These data strengthen the idea that activation of ERK signaling in the hippocampus may improve cognitive dysfunction in neurological disorders associated with NMDA receptor hypofunction. The beneficial effects of nobiletin may thus give a new insight into therapeutic drug development for neurological disorders exhibiting cognitive impairment caused by a dysfunction of NMDA receptor-ERK signaling.


    Footnotes
 
This study was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (no. 18790040) and by a grant from the Takeda Science Foundation.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/jpet.106.117010.

ABBREVIATIONS: NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase; PKA, protein kinase A; MK-801, dizocilpine maleate; Abeta, beta-amyloid peptide; PDE, phosphodiesterase; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase; CREB, cAMP response element binding protein; AD, Alzheimer's disease; AP5, 2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid.

Address correspondence to: Dr. Yasushi Ohizumi, Research Center of Supercritical Fluid Technology, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University, 6-6-11-404 Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980–8579, Japan. E-mail: ohizumi{at}scf.chc.tohoku.ac.jp


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

Abel T, Nguyen PV, Barad M, Deuel TAS, and Kandel ER (1997) Genetic demonstration of a role for PKA in the late phase of LTP and in hippocampus-based long-term memory. Cell 88: 615–626.[CrossRef][Medline]
Adams JP and Sweatt JD (2002) Molecular psychology: roles for the ERK MAP kinase cascade in memory. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 42: 135–163.[CrossRef][Medline]
Alonso M, Viola H, Izquierdo I, and Medina JH (2002) Aversive experiences are associated with a rapid and transient activation of ERKs in the rat hippocampus. Neurobiol Learn Mem 77: 119–124.[CrossRef][Medline]
Athos J, Impey S, Pineda VV, Chen X, and Storm DR (2002) Hippocampal CRE-mediated gene expression is required for contextual memory formation. Nat Neurosci 5: 1119–1120.[CrossRef][Medline]
Atkins CM, Selcher JC, Petraitis JJ, Trzaskos JM, and Sweatt JD (1998) The MAPK cascade is required for mammalian associative learning. Nat Neurosci 1: 602–609.[CrossRef][Medline]
Banke TG, Bowie D, Lee H-K, Huganir RL, Schouseboe A, and Traynelis SF (2000) Control of GluR1 AMPA receptor function by cAMP-dependent protein kinase. J Neurosci 20: 89–102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Barad M, Bourtchouladze R, Winder DG, Golan H, and Kandel ER (1998) Rolipram, a type IV-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor, facilitates the establishment of long-lasting long-term potentiation and improves memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 15020–15025.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Bernabeu R, Bevilaqua L, Ardenghi P, Bromberg E, Schmitz P, Bianchin M, Izquierdo I, and Medina JH (1997) Involvement of hippocampal cAMP/cAMP-dependent protein kinase signaling pathways in a late memory consolidation phase of aversively motivated learning in rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 7041–7046.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Cammarota M, Bevilaqua LR, Ardenghi P, Paratcha G, Levi de Stein M, Izquierdo I, and Medina JH (2000) Learning-associated activation of nuclear MAPK, CREB and Elk-1, along with Fos production, in the rat hippocampus after a one-trial avoidance learning: abolition by NMDA receptor blockade. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 76: 36–46.[Medline]
Chwang WB, O'riordan KJ, Levenson JM, and Sweatt JD (2006) ERK/MAPK regulates hippocampal histone phosphorylation following contextual fear conditioning. Learn Mem 13: 322–328.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Enomoto T, Noda Y, Mouri A, Shin EJ, Wang D, Murai R, Hotta K, Furukawa H, Nitta A, Kim HC, et al. (2005) Long-lasting impairment of associative learning is correlated with a dysfunction of N-methyl-D-aspartate-extracellular signaling-regulated kinase signaling in mice after withdrawal from repeated administration of phencyclidine. Mol Pharmacol 68: 1765–1774.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Furukawa K-I, Sakai K, Watanabe S, Maruyama K, Murakami M, Yamaguchi K, and Ohizumi Y (1993) Goniodomin A induces modulation of actomyosin ATPase activity through conformational change of actin. J Biol Chem 268: 26026–26031.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Javitt DC and Zukin SR (1991) Recent advances in the phencyclidine model of schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 148: 1301–1308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kim JJ, DeCola JP, Landeria-Fernandez J, and Fanselow MS (1991) N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist APV blocks acquisition but not expression of fear conditioning. Behav Neurosci 105: 126–133.[CrossRef][Medline]
Levenson JM, O'Riordan KJ, Brown KD, Trinh MA, Molfese DL, and Sweatt JD (2004) Regulation of histone acetylation during memory formation in the hippocampus. J Biol Chem 279: 40545–40559.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Liu J (1993) FK506 and cyclosporin: molecular probes for studying intracellular signal transduction. Trends Pharmacol Sci 14: 182–188.[CrossRef][Medline]
Logue SF, Paylor R, and Wehner JM (1997) Hippocampal lesions cause learning deficits in inbred mice in the Morris water maze and conditioned-fear task. Behav Neurosci 111: 104–113.[CrossRef][Medline]
Matsuzaki K, Yamakuni T, Hashimoto M, Haque AM, Shido O, Mimaki Y, Sashida Y, and Ohizumi Y (2006) Nobiletin restoring beta-amyloid-impaired CREB phosphorylation rescues memory deterioration in Alzheimer's disease model rats. Neurosci Lett 400: 230–234.[CrossRef][Medline]
Maurice T, Hiramatsu M, Itoh J, Kameyama T, Hasegawa T, and Nabeshima T (1994) Behavioral evidence for a modulating role of sigma ligands in memory processes: I. Attenuation of dizocilpine (MK-801)-induced amnesia. Brain Res 647: 44–56.[CrossRef][Medline]
Monyer H, Burnashev N, Laurie D, Sakmann B, and Seeberg P (1994) Developmental and regional expression in the rat brain and functional properties of four NMDA receptors. Neuron 12: 529–540.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nagase H, Omae N, Omori A, Nakagawasai O, Tadano T, Yokosuka A, Sashida Y, Mimaki Y, Yamakuni T, and Ohizumi Y (2005a) Nobiletin and its related flavonoids with CRE-mediated transcription-stimulating and neuritegenic activities. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 337: 1330–1336.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nagase H, Yamakuni T, Matsuzaki K, Maruyama Y, Kasahara J, Hinohara Y, Kondo S, Mimaki Y, Sashida Y, Tank WA, et al. (2005b) Mechanism of neurotrophic action of nobiletin in PC12D cells. Biochemistry 44: 13683–13691.[CrossRef][Medline]
Obara Y, Aoki T, Kusano M, and Ohizumi Y (2002) beta-Eudesmol induces neurite outgrowth in rat pheochromocytoma cells accompanied by an activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 301: 803–811.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Ohizumi Y (1997) Application of physiologically active substances isolated from natural resources to pharmacological studies. Jpn J Pharmacol 73: 263–289.[Medline]
Olney JW, Newcomer JW, and Farber NB (1999) NMDA receptor hypofunction model of schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res 33: 523–533.[CrossRef][Medline]
Riedel G, Platt B, and Micheau J (2003) Glutamate receptor function in learning and memory. Behav Brain Res 140: 1–47.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shieh PB, Hu SC, Bobb K, Timmusk T, and Ghosh A (1998) Identification of a signaling pathway involved in calcium regulation of BDNF expression. Neuron 20: 727–740.[CrossRef][Medline]
Snyder EM, Nong Y, Almeida CG, Paul S, Moran T, Choi EY, Nairn AC, Salter MW, Lombroso PJ, Gouras GK, et al. (2005) Regulation of NMDA receptor trafficking by amyloid-beta. Nat Neurosci 8: 1051–1058.[CrossRef][Medline]
Stubley-Weatherly L, Harding JW, and Wright JW (1996) Effects of discrete kainic acid-induced hippocampal lesions on spatial and contextual learning and memory in rats. Brain Res 716: 29–38.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sweatt JD (2004) Mitogen-activated protein kinases in synaptic plasticity and memory. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14: 311–317.[CrossRef][Medline]
Tao X, Finkbeiner S, Arnold DB, Shaywitz AJ, and Greenberg ME (1998) Ca2+ influx regulates BDNF transcription by a CREB family transcription factor-dependent mechanism. Neuron 20: 709–726.[CrossRef][Medline]
Taubenfeld SM, Milekic MH, Monti B, and Alberini CM (2001) The consolidation of new but not reactivated memory requires hippocampal C/EBPbeta. Nat Neurosci 4: 813–818.[CrossRef][Medline]
Thiels E, Kanterewicz BI, Norman ED, Trzaskos JM, and Klann E (2002) Long-term depression in the adult hippocampus in vivo involves activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and phosphorylation of Elk-1. J Neurosci 22: 2054–2062.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Vossler MR, Yao H, York RD, Pan MG, Rim CS, and Strok PJ (1997) cAMP activates MAP kinase and Elk-1 through a B-Raf-and Rap1-dependent pathway. Cell 89: 73–82.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yao H, York RD, Misra-Press A, Carr DW, and Stork PJ (1998) The cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase (PKA) is required for the sustained activation of mitogen-activated kinases and gene expression by nerve growth factor. J Biol Chem 273: 8240–8247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
York RD, Yao H, Misra-Press A, Carr DW, and Stork PJ (1998) Rap1 mediates sustained MAP kinase activation induced by nerve growth factor. Nature (Lond) 392: 622–626.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zhang HT, Crissman AM, Dorairaj NR, Chandler LJ, and O'Donnell JM (2000) Inhibition of cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase (PDE4) reverses memory deficits associated with NMDA receptor antagonism. Neuropsychopharmacology 23: 198–204.[CrossRef][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
H. Onozuka, A. Nakajima, K. Matsuzaki, R.-W. Shin, K. Ogino, D. Saigusa, N. Tetsu, A. Yokosuka, Y. Sashida, Y. Mimaki, et al.
Nobiletin, a Citrus Flavonoid, Improves Memory Impairment and A{beta} Pathology in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., September 1, 2008; 326(3): 739 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.106.117010v1
321/2/784    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ohizumi, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakajima, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ohizumi, Y.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition