JPET Assistant Professor of Medicine (Clinician-Educator)

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Pharmacology And Experimental Therapeutics Fast Forward
First published on December 11, 2006; DOI: 10.1124/jpet.106.116004


0022-3565/07/3203-1078-1086$20.00
JPET 320:1078-1086, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.106.116004v1
320/3/1078    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carrasco, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Battaglia, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carrasco, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Battaglia, G.

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY

Single Exposure to a Serotonin 1A Receptor Agonist, (+)8-Hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin, Produces a Prolonged Heterologous Desensitization of Serotonin 2A Receptors in Neuroendocrine Neurons in Vivo

Gonzalo A. Carrasco, Louis D. Van de Kar, Cuihong Jia, Hao Xu, Zhuo Chen, Ritu Chadda, Francisca Garcia, Nancy A. Muma, and George Battaglia

Department of Pharmacology (G.A.C., L.D.V.d.K., H.X., Z.C., R.C., F.G., N.A.M., G.B.), Neuroscience Institute (G.A.C., L.D.V.d.K., C.J., N.A.M., G.B.), Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, Illinois

Received October 26, 2006; accepted December 8, 2006.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
We previously demonstrated colocalization of serotonin 1A (5-HT1A) and serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptors in oxytocin and corticotropin-releasing factor neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN). Because a functional imbalance between hypothalamic 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors has been implicated in several neuropsychiatric disorders, in this study we investigated whether acute in vivo activation of 5-HT1A receptors in the PVN results in desensitization of 5-HT2A receptor signaling. Functional desensitization of hypothalamic 5-HT2A receptors was assessed via a reduction in oxytocin and adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) responses to the 5-HT2A/2C receptor agonist (-)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane HCl [(-)DOI]. We report here that a single systemic injection of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist (+)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin [(+)8-OH-DPAT] (200 µg/kg) significantly reduced the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated oxytocin responses for at least 72 h. Direct intraparaventricular injection of (+)8-OH-DPAT (0.2 nmol) 24 h before a submaximal dose of (-)DOI (0.35 mg/kg) significantly inhibited the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated increases in both oxytocin and ACTH (-39 and -16%, respectively). In addition, the (+)8-OH-DPAT-induced desensitization of the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated oxytocin but not the ACTH response was inhibited in rats pretreated with either a systemic (0.1 mg/kg) or intraparaventricular (10 nmol) injection of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl)cyclohexanecarboxamide trihydrochloride (WAY100635). This is the first in vivo demonstration of a prolonged heterologous intracellular desensitization of 5-HT2A receptors after acute activation of 5-HT1A receptors. These findings may provide insight into the long-term heterologous interactions between 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor signaling that could occur in response to antidepressants, antipsychotics, or drugs of abuse that target these receptor subtypes.


Serotonin (5-HT), a known stimulator of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, plays an important role in mood disorders and impulse control (Carrasco and Van de Kar, 2003Go). Among the seven families of serotonin receptors, changes in hypothalamic serotonin 1A (5-HT1A) receptors and serotonin 2A (5-HT2A) receptors have been associated with the etiology of mood disorders, the therapeutic effect of antidepressants, and the effects of drugs of abuse (Levy et al., 1994Go; Stockmeier et al., 1997Go; Sargent et al., 2000Go; Carrasco and Van de Kar, 2003Go; Amargos-Bosch et al., 2004Go; Schiller et al., 2006Go).

5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors mediate opposing or compensatory functions in a variety of cellular and behavioral events (Araneda and Andrade, 1991Go; Hensler and Truett, 1998Go; Valdez et al., 2002Go; Amargos-Bosch et al., 2004Go). Indeed, several in vivo studies suggested that a two-way interaction exists between 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors (Darmani et al., 1990Go; Eison and Mullins, 1995Go; Maswood et al., 1996Go; Hensler and Truett, 1998Go; Krebs-Thomson and Geyer, 1998Go; Valdez et al., 2002Go). For example, 5-HT1A receptor-mediated behaviors, such as flattened posture and reciprocal forepaw treading, and hypothermia are attenuated by prior 5-HT2A receptor activation (Berendsen and Broekkamp, 1990Go; Hensler and Truett, 1998Go). On the other hand, chronic or subchronic treatment with full or partial 5-HT1A receptor agonists can reduce 5-HT2A receptor-mediated behaviors (Eison and Yocca, 1985Go; Yocca et al., 1990Go; Ootsuka and Blessing, 2006Go) and reduce 5-HT2A receptor density (Eison and Yocca, 1985Go; Schechter et al., 1990Go; Taylor and Hyslop, 1991Go). However, whether this effect is due to a direct interaction of 5-HT1A receptors with 5-HT2A receptors in cells that colocalize both receptors or is due to stimulation of somatodendritic 5-HT1A autoreceptors producing a general reduction of serotonergic neurotransmission remains unknown.

5-HT1A receptors and 5-HT2A receptors exhibit overlapping distributions in various brain regions (Araneda and Andrade, 1991Go; Burnet et al., 1996Go; Amargos-Bosch et al., 2004Go). Colocalization of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors has been demonstrated in frontal and prefrontal cortex (Araneda and Andrade, 1991Go; Amargos-Bosch et al., 2004Go). Likewise, we previously reported varying degrees of colocalization of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors in oxytocin and corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRF) neurons in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) (Zhang et al., 2004Go). Furthermore, we demonstrated that activation of 5-HT2A receptors in the PVN produced a delayed and reversible heterologous reduction in the ACTH and oxytocin responses to a 5-HT1A receptor agonist, (+)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin [(+)8-OH-DPAT] (Zhang et al., 2001Go, 2004Go). The maximal desensitization that occurred at 2 to 4 h appeared to recover by 24 h after the (-)DOI injection (Zhang et al., 2001Go, 2004Go).

Heterologous desensitization occurs between different receptor systems in which the responsiveness of one receptor system is regulated negatively by activation of another receptor system (Berg et al., 1998Go). However, homologous or heterologous receptor desensitization typically occurs after sustained exposure to agonists. The present study demonstrates a prolonged heterologous desensitization of 5-HT2A receptors by acute in vivo activation of 5-HT1A receptors in neuroendocrine neurons in the PVN. Functional desensitization of 5-HT2A receptors was assessed from reductions in the magnitude of increases in the plasma levels of oxytocin and ACTH after an injection of the 5-HT2A/2C receptor agonist (-)DOI (Van de Kar et al., 2001Go; Zhang et al., 2002Go). These findings, demonstrating cross-talk between 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors, may provide insight into the etiology of mood disorders or the effects of drugs of abuse and could provide novel strategies for their treatment.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Animals
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (225–275 g) were purchased from Harlan (Indianapolis, IN). The rats were housed two per cage in a temperature-, humidity-, and light-controlled room (12 h light/dark cycle, lights on at 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM). Food and water were available ad libitum. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH publication 85-23, revised 1996) as approved by Loyola University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Every effort was made to minimize suffering and discomfort to the animals. The number of rats per group was the minimum needed for statistically meaningful evaluation of the data.

Drugs
(+)8-OH-DPAT was purchased from Tocris Cookson Inc. (Ellisville, MO). (-)-1-(2,5-Dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane HCl [(-)DOI] and N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl)cyclohexanecarboxamide trihydrochloride (WAY100635) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). (+)8-OH-DPAT, WAY100635, and (-)DOI were dissolved in saline (0.9% NaCl). All solutions were made fresh before injections and injected at a volume of 1 ml/kg.

Experimental Protocols
After arrival, the rats were housed two per cage for at least 1 week, followed by 4 days of handling. Rats were randomly assigned to different experimental groups (n = 8/group) to receive drug treatments. Cage-mates were assigned to the same treatment group. After receiving different drug treatments, rats were sacrificed by decapitation. The trunk blood was collected in centrifuge tubes containing a 0.5-ml solution of 0.3 M EDTA (pH 7.4). After centrifugation, the plasma was aliquoted and stored at -30°C for radioimmunoassays of plasma hormone concentrations.

Surgery and Cannula Implantation. Cannula implantation and intraparaventricular injection were performed according to the procedures described previously in detail (Zhang et al., 2004Go). Rats were anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine and xylazine (100 mg/kg ketamine plus 7 mg/kg xylazine, 1.4 ml/kg i.p.). A double-barreled guide cannula (26 gauge, 1.2 mm center-to-center distance) with its corresponding dummy cannula inserted inside (Plastic One, Roanoke, VA) was implanted into the brain above both sides of the PVN according to the following stereotaxic coordinates: 1.8 mm caudal, ±0.6 mm lateral with respect to bregma, and 6.4 mm ventral from the skull surface. The cannulas were kept in place by dental cement attached to microscrews embedded in the skull. Postsurgery dehydration was prevented by injecting 1 ml of saline (s.c.) after surgery. To prevent postsurgical infection, all rats received ampicillin (50 mg/kg s.c.) immediately after surgery, followed by 3 days of administration of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim suspended in the drinking water. Twelve days after cannula implantation, the rats were handled for 4 consecutive days and then randomly assigned to different experimental groups (10 rats/group). After removal of the dummy cannula, an injection cannula (33 gauge, 1.2 mm center-to-center distance, 0.5 mm projection from the tip of the double guide cannula) was inserted through the implanted guide cannula to the top of the PVN.

Radioimmunoassay of Plasma Oxytocin and ACTH
Plasma oxytocin and ACTH were determined by radioimmunoassays as described in detail previously (Li et al., 1997Go). 125I-Oxytocin was purchased from PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences (Wellesley, MA), and 125I-ACTH was purchased from DiaSorin (Stillwater, MN).

Experiment 1: Time Course of the Effect of (+)8-OH-DPAT on Hormone Responses to a Subsequent (-)DOI Challenge. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were injected with either saline (1 ml/kg s.c.) or (+)8-OH-DPAT (200 µg/kg s.c.) at 1, 2, 4, 24, 48, or 72 h before a subsequent injection of either saline (1 ml/kg s.c.) or (-)DOI (1 mg/kg s.c.). The rats were sacrificed 30 min after the (-)DOI injection.

Experiment 2: Effects of One or Two Systemic Injections of (+)8-OH-DPAT on 5-HT2A Receptor-Mediated Hormone Responses. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (eight per group) were randomly assigned to each of the following groups. 1) Saline 24 h/saline 12 h: rats were injected with saline (1 ml/kg s.c.) 24 and 12 h before a subsequent challenge injection of either saline (1 ml/kg s.c.) or (-)DOI (0.35 mg/kg s.c.). (2) (+)8-OH-DPAT 24 h/saline 12 h: rats were injected with (+)8-OH-DPAT (200 µg/kg s.c.) 24 h and with saline (1 ml/kg s.c.) 12 h before a subsequent challenge injection of either saline (1 ml/kg s.c.) or (-)DOI (0.35 mg/kg s.c.). (3) (+)8-OH-DPAT 24 h/(+)8-OH-DPAT 12 h: rats were injected with (+)8-OH-DPAT (200 µg/kg s.c.) 24 and 12 h before a subsequent challenge injection with either saline (1 ml/kg s.c.) or (-)DOI (0.35 mg/kg s.c.). The rats were sacrificed by decapitation 30 min after the (-)DOI injection.

Experiment 3: Effect of a Direct Injection of (+)8-OH-DPAT into the PVN on 5-HT2A Receptor-Mediated Neuroendocrine Responses. Cannula implantation and intraparaventricular injection were performed according to the procedures described above. Saline (0.5 µl/side) or (+)8-OH-DPAT (0.2 nmol or 2 nmol, 0.5 µl/side) was injected directly into the PVN. Twenty-four hours after the intraparaventricular injections, the rats received a challenge injection of either (-)DOI (0.35 mg/kg s.c.) or saline (1 ml/kg s.c.). The rats were sacrificed by decapitation 30 min after the injection of (-)DOI.

Experiment 4: Effect of a Systemic Injection of WAY100635 on the (+)8-OH-DPAT-Induced Desensitization of 5-HT2A Receptor-Mediated Neuroendocrine Responses. Cannula implantation and intraparaventricular injection were performed according to the procedures described above. Rats were injected with either saline or WAY100635 (0.1 mg/kg s.c.), a highly specific 5-HT1A receptor antagonist (Forster et al., 1995Go; Chemel et al., 2006Go), 30 min before an intraparaventricular injection of either saline (0.5 µl/side) or (+)8-OH-DPAT (0.2 nmol, 0.5 µl/side). Twenty-four hours after the intraparaventricular injections, the rats received an injection of (-)DOI (0.35 mg/kg s.c.) or saline. The rats were sacrificed by decapitation 30 min after the challenge injection of (-)DOI.

Experiment 5: Effect of an Intraparaventricular Injection of WAY100635 on the (+)8-OH-DPAT-Induced Desensitization of 5-HT2A Receptor Signaling. Cannula implantation and intraparaventricular injection were performed according to the procedures described above. Rats received an intraparaventricular injection of either saline (0.5 µl/side) or WAY100635 (10 nmol, 0.5 µl/side), and 30 min later the rats received an injection of either saline (1 ml/kg s.c.) or (+)8-OH-DPAT (200 µg/kg s.c.). Twenty-four hours after the intraparaventricular injections, the rats received a challenge injection of (-)DOI (0.35 mg/kg s.c.) or saline and were sacrificed by decapitation 30 min later.

Statistics
All data are expressed as means ± S.E.M., where n indicates the number of rats per group. Hormone data were analyzed by two- or three-way analyses of variance (ANOVAs). Group means were compared by a Newman-Keuls multiple-range test (Steel and Torrie, 1960Go). GB-STAT software (Dynamic Microsystems, Inc., Silver Spring, MD) was used for all statistical analyses.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Time Course of the Effect of (+)8-OH-DPAT on Hormone Responses to a Subsequent (-)DOI Challenge
Figure 1 illustrates the effects of a single injection of either saline or (+)8-OH-DPAT on the basal and (-)DOI-stimulated increases in plasma levels of oxytocin. We previously demonstrated that the sensitivity of 5-HT2A receptors in hypothalamus can be measured from the magnitude of increases in the plasma levels of oxytocin and ACTH, after an injection of (-)DOI (Van de Kar et al., 2001Go; Zhang et al., 2002Go). Saline or the 5-HT1A receptor agonist (+)8-OH-DPAT (200 µg/kg s.c.) was injected at different time points (1, 2, 4, 24, 48, and 72 h) before a subsequent saline or (-)DOI challenge (1 mg/kg s.c.). Saline or (+)8-OH-DPAT pretreatment did not significantly alter plasma oxytocin levels to a subsequent saline injection at any of these time points. (-)DOI significantly increased plasma oxytocin levels in rats pretreated with either saline or (+)8-OH-DPAT (Fig. 1), but the magnitude of hormone responses to the subsequent challenge with (-)DOI was attenuated in rats pretreated with (+)8-OH-DPAT.


Figure 1
View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Time course of (+)8-OH-DPAT (200 µg/kg s.c.)-induced reduction of the oxytocin response to a (-)DOI (1.0 mg/kg s.c.) challenge. The data represent the means ± S.E.M. of six to eight rats per group. **, significant difference from the respective saline-challenged group (p < 0.01); ##, significant difference (p < 0.01) from the saline/(-)DOI group (three-way ANOVA and Newman-Keuls multiple-range test).

 

The three-way ANOVA for oxytocin indicated significant main effects of (+)8-OH-DPAT pretreatment [F1,149 = 173.38, p < 0.0001]) and the (-)DOI challenge [F1,149 = 750.86, p < 0.0001] but no significant main effect of time [F5,149 = 0.56974, p > 0.72]. There was a significant interaction between (+)8-OH-DPAT pretreatment and the (-)DOI challenge [F1,149 = 152.97, p < 0.0001], but there was no main interaction between (+)8-OH-DPAT pretreatment and time [F5,149 = 1.230, p > 0.29] and between the (-)DOI challenge and time [F5,149 = 0.30635, p > 0.90]. There was no significant interaction between (+)8-OH-DPAT pretreatment, time, and the (-)DOI challenge [F5,149 = 1.16399, p < 0.3296]. The Newman-Keuls test indicated that (+)8-OH-DPAT pretreatment significantly decreased plasma oxytocin responses to the (-)DOI challenge at all the points examined, 1, 2, 4, 24, 48, and 72 h, with a maximal effect between 24 and 72 h (~70% inhibition). However, there were no significant (p > 0.01) differences in the (+)8-OH-DPAT-induced desensitization of 5-HT2A-mediated oxytocin release at any of the time points studied. These data indicate that a single injection of (+)8-OH-DPAT produces a long-lasting inhibition of 5-HT2A receptor-mediated neuroendocrine responses.

Effects of One or Two Systemic Injections of (+)8-OH-DPAT on 5-HT2A Receptor-Mediated Hormone Responses
Oxytocin. Figure 2 illustrates basal and (-)DOI-stimulated increases in plasma levels of oxytocin (Fig. 2A) and ACTH (Fig. 2B) in rats pretreated 12 and 24 h previously with saline or (+)8-OH-DPAT. (+)8-OH-DPAT (200 µg/kg s.c.) pretreatment was administered once (24 h) or twice (24 and 12 h) before an injection of a submaximal dose of (-)DOI (0.35 mg/kg). Pretreatment with either one or two injections of (+)8-OH-DPAT did not significantly alter basal oxytocin levels. (-)DOI significantly increased oxytocin plasma levels in rats pretreated with saline and (+)8-OH-DPAT. The 5-HT2A receptor-mediated oxytocin (Fig. 2A) responses were inhibited (-66%) when (+)8-OH-DPAT was injected 24 h before the subsequent challenge with (-)DOI. A similar degree of inhibition (-72%) was observed in rats pretreated with (+)8-OH-DPAT 24 and 12 h before the subsequent challenge with (-)DOI.


Figure 2
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Inhibition of the (-)DOI (0.35 mg/kg s.c.)-induced (A) oxytocin and (B) ACTH neuroendocrine responses by one (12 h) or two (24 and 12 h) preadministrations of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist (+)8-OH-DPAT (200 µg/kg s.c.). The data represent the means ± S.E.M. of six to eight rats per group. **, significant difference (p < 0.01) from the respective saline-challenged groups; ##, significant difference (p < 0.01) from the saline 24 h/saline 12 h/(-)DOI group; #, significant difference (p < 0.05) from the saline 24 h/saline 12 h/(-)DOI group; &&, significant difference (p < 0.01) from the DPAT 24 h/saline 12 h/(-)DOI group (two-way ANOVA and Newman-Keuls multiple-range test).

 

The two-way ANOVA for oxytocin indicated a significant effect for the (-)DOI challenge [F1,50 = 177.009, p < 0.0001] and for (+)8-OH-DPAT pretreatment [F2,50 = 47.0975, p < 0.0001]. There was a significant interaction between the (-)DOI challenge and (+)8-OH-DPAT pretreatment [F2,50 = 46.2009, p < 0.0001]. The Newman-Keuls test indicated that (+)8-OH-DPAT administered once or twice significantly (p < 0.01) decreased the plasma oxytocin responses to (-)DOI. There were no significant differences in the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated release of oxytocin between rats pretreated with one or two injections of (+)8-OH-DPAT.

ACTH. Pretreatment with either one or two injections of (+)8-OH-DPAT did not significantly alter basal ACTH levels. (-)DOI significantly increased ACTH plasma levels in rats pretreated with either saline or (+)8-OH-DPAT. The 5-HT2A receptor-mediated ACTH (Fig. 2B) responses were inhibited (-17%) when (+)8-OH-DPAT was injected 24 h before the subsequent challenge with (-)DOI. This inhibition was significantly greater (-44%) in rats pretreated with (+)8-OH-DPAT at both 24 and 12 h before the subsequent injection of (-)DOI.

The two-way ANOVA for ACTH indicated a significant effect of (-)DOI [F1,49 = 258.979, p < 0.0001] and for (+)8-OH-DPAT pretreatment [F2,49 = 8.22037, p < 0.0009]. There was a significant interaction between the (-)DOI challenge and (+)8-OH-DPAT pretreatment [F2,49 = 7.98, p < 0.001]. The Newman-Keuls test indicated that (+)8-OH-DPAT administered once (24 h) significantly (p < 0.05) decreased plasma ACTH responses to (-)DOI. The inhibition of the (-)DOI-induced hormone responses was greater (p < 0.01) in rats pretreated with two injections (24 and 12 h) of (+)8-OH-DPAT than in rats that received a single administration. These data indicate a cumulative effect on the (+)8-OH-DPAT-mediated inhibition of 5-HT2A receptor-associated ACTH release.

Effect of a Direct Injection of (+)8-OH-DPAT into the PVN on the 5-HT2A Receptor-Mediated Neuroendocrine Responses
Oxytocin. Figure 3 illustrates the effect of the intraparaventricular administration of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist (+)8-OH-DPAT (0.2 and 2 nmol) on the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated neuroendocrine responses. (+)8-OH-DPAT was injected 24 h before the subsequent systemic injection of (-)DOI. (+)8-OH-DPAT (0.2 nmol) significantly inhibited (-39%) the (-)DOI-mediated release of oxytocin (Fig. 3A). A comparable attenuation (-43%) of the (-)DOI-mediated release of oxytocin was produced by a 10-fold higher dose (2 nmol) of (+)8-OH-DPAT (Fig. 3A).


Figure 3
View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Inhibition of (-)DOI (0.35 mg/kg s.c.)-induced (A) oxytocin, and (B) ACTH neuroendocrine responses by a direct injection of (+)8-OH-DPAT (0.2 or 2 nmol, 0.5 µl/side) into the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. The data represent the means ± S.E.M. of 8 to 10 rats/group. **, significant difference (p < 0.01) from the respective saline-challenged group; ##, significant difference (p < 0.01) from the saline/(-)DOI group; #, significant difference (p < 0.05) from the saline/(-)DOI group (two-way ANOVA and Newman-Keuls multiple-range test).

 
The two-way ANOVA for oxytocin showed a significant main effect of (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment [F1,51 = 13.33, p < 0.0001] and the (-)DOI challenge [F1,51 = 255.326, p < 0.0001]. There was also a significant interaction between (+)OH-DPAT treatment and the (-)DOI challenge [F1,51 = 13.85, p < 0.0001]. The Newman-Keuls test indicated that both doses of (+)8-OH-DPAT (0.2 and 2 nmol) significantly (p < 0.01) inhibited the (-)DOI-mediated oxytocin release.

ACTH. Intraparaventricular injection of (+)8-OH-DPAT (0.2 nmol) significantly inhibited (-16%) the (-)DOI-mediated release of ACTH (Fig. 3B). A comparable attenuation (-24%) of the (-)DOI-mediated release of ACTH was produced by a 10-fold higher dose (2 nmol) of (+)8-OH-DPAT (Fig. 3B).

The two-way ANOVA for ACTH showed a significant main effect of (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment [F1,46 = 3.2875, p < 0.05] and the (-)DOI challenge [F1,46 = 384.063, p < 0.0001]. There was also a significant interaction between (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment and the (-)DOI challenge (F1,46 = 3.4223, p < 0.05). The Newman-Keuls test indicated that both doses of (+)8-OH-DPAT (0.2 and 2 nmol) significantly (p < 0.05) inhibited the (-)DOI-mediated ACTH release.

Effect of a Systemic Injection of WAY100635 on the (+)8-OH-DPAT-Induced Desensitization of 5-HT2A Receptor-Mediated Neuroendocrine Responses
Oxytocin. Figure 4 illustrates the effect of a systemic administration of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY100635 on the (+)8-OH-DPAT-induced desensitization of the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated neuroendocrine responses. (+)8-OH-DPAT (0.2 nmol) was injected directly into the PVN 30 min after the WAY100635 pretreatment (0.1 mg/kg s.c.). Twenty-four hours later the rats were challenged with a submaximal dose of (-)DOI (0.35 mg/kg s.c.) and were sacrificed 30 min later. None of the pretreatment paradigms significantly altered basal oxytocin levels. (-)DOI significantly increased plasma oxytocin levels in rats pretreated with either saline or (+)8-OH-DPAT. The oxytocin responses were inhibited (-37%) in rats pretreated with (+)8-OH-DPAT 24 h before the subsequent challenge with (-)DOI (Fig. 4A). WAY100635 did not modify the (-)DOI-induced oxytocin release in saline-pretreated rats, but blocked the (+)8-OH-DPAT-induced inhibition of the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated oxytocin release (Fig. 4A).


Figure 4
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Effect of a systemic injection of WAY100635 (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) on the (+)8-OH-DPAT (0.2 nmol, 0.5 µl/side)-induced desensitization of 5-HT2A receptor-mediated (A) oxytocin and (B) ACTH neuroendocrine responses. The data represent the means ± S.E.M. of 8 to 10 rats/group. **, significant difference (p < 0.01) from the respective saline-challenged group; ##, significant difference (p < 0.01) from the saline/saline/(-)DOI group; #, significant difference (p < 0.05) from the saline/saline/(-)DOI group; &&, significant difference (p < 0.01) from the saline/DPAT/(-)DOI group (two-way ANOVA and Newman-Keuls multiple-range test).

 

The three-way ANOVA for oxytocin showed a significant main effect of (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment [F1,47 = 18.996, p < 0.0001] and the (-)DOI challenge]F1,47 = 531.4505, p < 0.0001] but not WAY100635 pretreatment [F1,47 = 3.1336, p < 0.08]. Significant main interactions were found between WAY100635 pretreatment and (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment [F1,47 = 3.9483, p < 0.05], between WAY100635 pretreatment and the (-)DOI challenge [F1,47 = 3.89456, p < 0.05], and between (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment and the (-)DOI challenge [F1,47 = 17.64105, p < 0.0001]. There was also a main interaction between WAY100635 pretreatment, (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment, and the (-)DOI challenge [F1,47 = 3.96844, p < 0.05]. The Newman-Keuls test indicated that (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment significantly (p < 0.01) inhibited the (-)DOI-mediated oxytocin release (Fig. 4A) and that in rats pretreated with WAY100635, the magnitude of (+)8-OH-DPAT-induced inhibition of 5-HT2A receptor stimulation of oxytocin (-19%) was significantly (p < 0.01) different from that of their respective counterparts that did not receive the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist (Fig. 4A).

ACTH. As shown in Fig. 4B, none of the pretreatment paradigms modified the basal ACTH levels. (-)DOI significantly increased plasma ACTH levels in rats pretreated with saline or (+)8-OH-DPAT. The ACTH responses were inhibited (-19%, p < 0.05) in rats pretreated with (+)8-OH-DPAT 24 h before the subsequent challenge with (-)DOI (Fig. 4B). WAY100635 did not modify the (-)DOI-induced ACTH release in saline-pretreated rats nor did it significantly block the (+)8-OH-DPAT-induced inhibition of the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated ACTH release (Fig. 4B).

The three-way ANOVA for ACTH showed a significant main effect of (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment [F1,47 = 4.6042, p < 0.03] and the (-)DOI challenge [F1,47 = 575.0295, p < 0.0001] but not WAY100635 pretreatment [F1,47 = 0.0782, p < 0.78]. Significant main interactions were found between (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment and the (-)DOI challenge [F1,47 = 4.6536, p < 0.03]. The Newman-Keuls test indicated that (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment significantly (p < 0.05) inhibited the (-)DOI-mediated ACTH release (Fig. 4B). However, there were no significant differences in the (-)DOI-mediated ACTH release between rats pretreated with saline and (+)8-OH-DPAT versus WAY100635 and (+)8-OH-DPAT.

Effect of an Intraparaventricular Injection of WAY100635 on the (+)8-OH-DPAT-Induced Desensitization of 5-HT2A Receptor Signaling
Oxytocin. Figure 5 illustrates the effect of intraparaventricular administration of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY100635 on the desensitization of the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated neuroendocrine responses produced by a systemic injection of (+)8-OH-DPAT. WAY100635 (10 nmol) was injected directly into the PVN 30 min before a single injection of (+)8-OH-DPAT (200 µg/kg s.c.). Twenty-four hours later the rats were challenged with (-)DOI (0.35 mg/kg s.c.) and were sacrificed 30 min after that. As shown in Fig. 5A, none of the pretreatment paradigms significantly altered basal oxytocin levels. (-)DOI significantly increased plasma oxytocin levels in rats pretreated with saline or (+)8-OH-DPAT. However, the oxytocin responses were inhibited (-63%) in rats pretreated with (+)8-OH-DPAT 24 h before the subsequent challenge with (-)DOI (Fig. 5A). WAY100635 did not modify the (-)DOI-induced oxytocin response in saline-pretreated rats. In contrast, WAY100635 injected directly into the PVN partially blocked the (+)8-OH-DPAT-induced inhibition of the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated oxytocin release.


Figure 5
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. An intraparaventricular injection of WAY100635 (10 nmol, 0.5 µl/side) partially blocked the (+)8-OH-DPAT (200 µg/kg s.c.) induced-desensitization of 5-HT2A receptor signaling. The data represent the means ± S.E.M. of 8 to 10 rats/group. **, significant difference (p < 0.01) from the respective saline-challenged group; ##, significant difference (p < 0.01) from the saline/saline/(-)DOI group; #, significant difference (p < 0.05) from the saline/saline/(-)DOI group; &, significant difference (p < 0.05) from the saline/DPAT/(-)DOI group (two-way ANOVA and Newman-Keuls multiple-range test).

 
The three-way ANOVA for oxytocin showed a significant main effect of (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment [F1,57 = 43.87, p < 0.0001] and the (-)DOI challenge [F1,57 = 332.656, p < 0.0001] but not WAY100635 pretreatment [F1,57 = 2.4204, p < 0.12]. Significant main interactions were found between WAY100635 pretreatment and (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment [F1,57 = 4.0403, p < 0.04] and between (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment and the (-)DOI challenge [F1,57 = 45.05108, p < 0.0001]. There was also a main interaction between WAY100635 pretreatment, (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment, and the (-)DOI challenge [F1,57 = 4.0003, p < 0.05]. The Newman-Keuls test indicated that pretreatment with (+)8-OH-DPAT significantly (p < 0.01) inhibited (-63%) the (-)DOI-mediated oxytocin release (Fig. 5A). This effect was partially blocked in rats that had WAY100635 injected directly into the PVN.

ACTH. As shown in Fig. 5B, none of the pretreatment paradigms significantly altered basal ACTH levels. (-)DOI significantly increased ACTH plasma levels in rats pretreated with saline or (+)8-OH-DPAT. The ACTH responses were inhibited (-25%) in rats pretreated with (+)8-OH-DPAT 24 h before the subsequent challenge with (-)DOI. Direct intraparaventricular injections of WAY100635 did not modify the (-)DOI-induced ACTH release in saline-pretreated rats nor did it significantly alter the (+)8-OH-DPAT-induced inhibition of the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated ACTH release.

The three-way ANOVA for ACTH showed a significant main effect of (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment [F1,60 = 3.9919, p < 0.05] and the (-)DOI challenge [F1,60 = 354.0162, p < 0.0001] but not WAY100635 pretreatment [F1,60 = 0.00416, p < 0.948]. Significant main interactions were found between (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment and the (-)DOI challenge [F1,60 = 4.7653, p < 0.03]. The Newman-Keuls test indicated that (+)8-OH-DPAT treatment significantly (p < 0.05) inhibited (-25%) the (-)DOI-mediated oxytocin release, and this effect was reduced (-14%) by WAY100635, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) (Fig. 5B).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study provides the first in vivo demonstration that acute activation of 5-HT1A receptors produces a prolonged functional heterologous desensitization of 5-HT2A receptors in neuroendocrine neurons of the PVN. Data from a variety of pharmacological approaches that support the 5-HT1A receptor-mediated heterologous desensitization of 5-HT2A receptor function include: 1) the attenuated 5-HT2A receptor-mediated release of oxytocin from 1 to 72 h after a single injection of (+)8-OH-DPAT (Fig. 1), 2) the reduced 5-HT2A receptor-mediated increases of both oxytocin and ACTH at 24 h after a single injection of (+)8-OH-DPAT (Fig. 2), 3) the greater reduction in the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated ACTH responses produced by two injections of (+)8-OH-DPAT (Fig. 2B), 4) the blunted (-)DOI-mediated increases in both oxytocin and ACTH by a prior direct intraparaventricular injection of (+)8-OH-DPAT (Fig. 3), 5) the blockade of intraparaventricular (+)8-OH-DPAT-induced desensitization of the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated oxytocin responses by pretreatment with WAY100635 (Fig. 4), and 6) the blockade of the (+)8-OH-DPAT-induced desensitization of the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated oxytocin responses by direct intraparaventricular administration of WAY100635 (Fig. 5).

We previously demonstrated that 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors are coexpressed in oxytocin and CRF-containing neurons in the PVN (Zhang et al., 2004Go). Immunohistochemical double labeling of 5-HT1A or 5-HT2A receptors and oxytocin revealed that a high percentage of oxytocin neurons in the PVN were immunopositive for 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors (94 and 97%, respectively) (Zhang et al., 2004Go). CRF-immunoreactive neurons in the PVN also expressed 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor immunoreactivity (Zhang et al., 2004Go), although we were unable to quantify the percentages of CRF neurons that coexpress 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors. Combined, these data suggest that 5-HT2A receptors might directly interact with 5-HT1A receptors through their signaling proteins to regulate hormone release. Consequently, the in vivo heterologous desensitization of 5-HT2A receptors after 5-HT1A receptor activation presumably is mediated via intracellular rather than transsynaptic mechanisms, although additional studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

We have previously demonstrated that activation of 5-HT2A receptors in the PVN induced a heterologous desensitization of 5-HT1A receptors within individual neuroendocrine cells (Zhang et al., 200, 2004Go). Activation of 5-HT2A receptors produced a delayed and reversible reduction of the ACTH and oxytocin responses to a 5-HT1A receptor agonist (Zhang et al., 2001Go). The maximal desensitization occurred at 2 to 4 h, with recovery back to control responses by 24 h after the (-)DOI injection. The desensitization was dose-dependent, and it shifted the oxytocin and ACTH dose-response curves of (+)8-OH-DPAT to the right (increased ED50) with no change in their maximal responses (Emax) (Zhang et al., 2001Go).

In contrast, the present studies indicated that activation of 5-HT1A receptors in the PVN produced a faster and more persistent inhibition of 5-HT2A receptor-mediated neuroendocrine responses. The heterologous desensitization of 5-HT2A receptors was evident at least 1 h after a single (+)8-OH-DPAT injection and persisted for at least 72 h, the last time point measured in this study. It is unlikely that the reduction of (-)DOI-mediated hormone responses after a (+)8-OH-DPAT injection is due to the hormone-depleting effect of 5-HT1A receptor activation as the desensitization of the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated neuroendocrine responses was found even 3 days after a single (+)8-OH-DPAT injection (Fig. 1). If the pretreatment with (+)8-OH-DPAT depleted the oxytocin, CRF, or ACTH stores, these would have been recovered during the first few hours after the single (+)8-OH-DPAT injection. Thus, the long-lasting (+)8-OH-DPAT-induced attenuation of hormone responses to the (-)DOI challenge is likely to be due to a persistent desensitization of hypothalamic 5-HT2A receptor signal transduction.

In the present studies, respective changes in 5-HT2A receptor-mediated oxytocin and ACTH neuroendocrine responses were determined as these are mediated by different neurons and use different postreceptor regulatory mechanisms and signaling cascades. The oxytocin cells located in the PVN send their axons directly to the posterior lobe of the pituitary and release oxytocin into the bloodstream (Carrasco and Van de Kar, 2003Go). Therefore, oxytocin is the most direct indicator of events occurring in the hypothalamus. On the other hand, the ACTH response represents a functional index that is amplified subsequent to hypothalamic activation of 5-HT receptors. ACTH is released by corticotrophs in the anterior lobe of the pituitary (Carrasco and Van de Kar, 2003Go). This difference in amplification may explain our observation that (+)8-OH-DPAT produced a greater attenuation of the oxytocin response to (-)DOI (Figs. 2 and 3), whereas the inhibition of the ACTH response to (-)DOI was less marked (Figs. 2 and 3). In addition, differences in the degree of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A colocalization on oxytocin- versus CRF-containing cells may be responsible for differences in the magnitude of reduction in oxytocin and ACTH after single versus repeated doses of (+)8-OH-DPAT. As there is a lower degree of colocalization of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors in CRF-containing neurons of the PVN compared with oxytocin-containing neurons (Zhang et al., 2004Go), repeated doses of (+)8-OH-DPAT may be needed to produce the greater reduction in the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated ACTH responses. Alternative explanations include the following: 1) systemic (-)DOI injection may also activate 5-HT2A receptors in other nuclei that are involved in ACTH release, such as the amygdala (Beaulieu et al., 1986Go; Feldman et al., 1998Go), which could mask the effects occurring in hypothalamic CRF neurons; and 2) 5-HT1A receptor-associated signaling pathways in oxytocin-containing cells in the PVN could be different from those found in CRF-containing cells. This hypothesis is supported by studies demonstrating that 5-HT1A receptors are coupled to different G-proteins within different brain areas (Lin et al., 2002Go; La Cour et al., 2006Go).

As (+)8-OH-DPAT injected directly into the PVN produces 5-HT2A receptor desensitization (Figs. 3 and 4), the activation of hypothalamic 5-HT1A receptors is required to produce long-term desensitization of 5-HT2A receptor-mediated neuroendocrine responses. WAY 100635, which exhibits a high affinity for 5-HT1A receptors (Ki = 2.2 nM) that is 10 to 100 times higher than its affinity for other 5-HT receptors or dopamine D1, D2, and D4 receptors (Forster et al., 1995Go; Chemel et al., 2006Go), was used to demonstrate the specificity of the effect of 5-HT1A receptors. Accordingly, the heterologous desensitization of the (-)DOI-mediated oxytocin responses was prevented when WAY100635 was injected systemically (Fig. 4) or directly into the PVN (Fig. 5). These observations suggest that 5-HT1A receptors interact directly with 5-HT2A receptors in the oxytocin containing-neurons of the hypothalamic PVN. Our previous immunocytochemical observations and the high degree of colocalization of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors in oxytocin-containing cells (Zhang et al., 2004Go) suggest that a direct intracellular interaction could occur between these receptor signaling systems.

On the other hand, pretreatment with (+)8-OH-DPAT has a less marked effect on 5-HT2A receptor-mediated ACTH responses. Furthermore, systemic (Fig. 4) or direct intraparaventricular (Fig. 5) administration of WAY100635 did not block the 5-HT1A receptor-induced reduction of the (-)DOI-mediated ACTH responses. The ACTH responses were inhibited (19%) (Fig. 4B) in rats pretreated with a direct intraparaventricular injection of (+)8-OH-DPAT 24 h before the subsequent challenge with (-)DOI. However, there were no significant differences in the 5-HT1A receptor-induced inhibition of the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated ACTH responses between rats pretreated with a systemic injection of either saline or WAY100635 (Fig. 4B). Likewise, (-)DOI-induced ACTH responses were inhibited (-25%) in rats pretreated with (+)8-OH-DPAT (Fig. 5B). However, there were no differences in the 5-HT1A receptor-induced inhibition of the 5-HT2A receptor-mediated ACTH responses between rats that received a direct intraparaventricular injection of either saline or WAY100635. Given the small magnitude of 5-HT2A receptor desensitization by 5-HT1A receptor activation and the partial blockade of this effect by WAY100365, the evidence of a direct cross-talk between 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors in CRF-containing cells in the PVN is inconclusive.

The mechanisms underlying the heterologous desensitization of 5-HT1A receptors by 5-HT2A receptors in PVN await further investigation. Our previous studies in vivo demonstrated that activation of 5-HT1A receptors in PVN activates mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, specifically the phosphorylation of p42/44 extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Sullivan et al., 2005Go). This effect was completely abolished by WAY100635 preadministration (Sullivan et al., 2005Go). The relatively rapid onset of the 5-HT1A receptor-mediated desensitization of hypothalamic 5-HT2A receptors (by 1 h after activation of 5-HT1A receptors) suggests that post-translational modification mechanisms may be involved. However, the long-lasting effects on 5-HT2A receptor signaling after activation of 5-HT1A receptors could involve activation of several transcription factors (Mazzucchelli and Brambilla, 2000Go; Sweatt, 2001Go; Milanini-Mongiat et al., 2002Go). We speculate that 5-HT1A receptor-induced activation of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase could participate in the signal transduction pathways involved in the intracellular regulation of 5-HT2A receptors.

Desensitization of 5-HT2A receptors has been proposed as the mechanism underlying the therapeutic efficacy of antipsychotic, anxiolytic, and antidepressant agents (Meltzer et al., 2003Go; Roth and Xia, 2004Go). Consequently, drugs with 5-HT2A receptor antagonist properties have been undergoing clinical evaluation for the treatment of several disorders such as schizophrenia, depression, anxiety, migraine, sleep disorders, and feeding disorders (Meltzer et al., 2003Go; Amargos-Bosch et al., 2004Go; Roth and Xia, 2004Go). If indeed, 5-HT1A receptor activation can negatively regulate 5-HT2A receptor function, then novel antidepressants and antipsychotics that stimulate 5-HT1A receptors may have a greater pharmacological impact in some neurons or brain regions.

In summary, the present studies provide in vivo pharmacological evidence that 5-HT1A receptors may directly cross-talk with 5-HT2A receptors to regulate neuroendocrine function. Because a functional imbalance between hypothalamic 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors could modify the organism's response to stressors (Berendsen, 1995Go; Zhang et al., 2004Go), antidepressants (Carrasco and Van de Kar, 2003Go), and drugs of abuse (Levy et al., 1994Go), elucidation of the specific mechanisms mediating interactions between hypothalamic 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors may lead to novel targets for the development of psychotherapeutic drugs.


    Footnotes
 
This work was supported in part by United States Public Health Service Grants NS034153, DA013669, and DA07741.

Dr. Louis D. Van de Kar, a good friend, colleague, and internationally recognized scientist, passed away on September 4, 2004. His contribution and memory will endure through all of those whose lives he enriched.

Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at http://jpet.aspetjournals.org.

doi:10.1124/jpet.106.116004.

ABBREVIATIONS: 5-HT, 5-hydroxytryptamine, serotonin; CRF, corticotropin-releasing factor; PVN, hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus; ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; (+)8-OH-DPAT, (+)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)-tetralin; (-)-DOI, (-)-1-(2,5 dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane HCl; WAY100635, N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl)cyclohexanecarboxamide trihydrochloride; ANOVA, analysis of variance.

Address correspondence to: Dr. George Battaglia, Department of Pharmacology, Loyola University of Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, 2160 S. First Ave., Maywood, IL 60153. E-mail: gbattag{at}lumc.edu


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

Amargos-Bosch M, Bortolozzi A, Puig MV, Serrats J, Adell A, Celada P, Toth M, Mengod G, and Artigas F (2004) Co-expression and in vivo interaction of serotonin1A and serotonin2A receptors in pyramidal neurons of prefrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 14: 281-299.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Araneda R and Andrade R (1991) 5-Hydroxytryptamine2 and 5-hydroxytryptamine1A receptors mediate opposing responses on membrane excitability in rat association cortex. Neuroscience 40: 399-412.[CrossRef][Medline]

Beaulieu S, DiPaolo T, and Barden N (1986) Control of ACTH secretion by the central nucleus of the amygdala: implication of the serotoninergic system and its relevance to the glucocorticoid delayed negative feedback mechanism. Neuroendocrinology 44: 247-254.[Medline]

Berendsen HHG (1995) Interactions between 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor subtypes: is a disturbed receptor balance contributing to the symptomatology of depression in humans. Pharmacol Ther 66: 17-37.[CrossRef][Medline]

Berendsen HHG and Broekkamp CLE (1990) Behavioural evidence for functional interactions between 5-HT-receptor subtypes in rats and mice. Br J Pharmacol 101: 667-673.[Medline]

Berg KA, Maayani S, and Clarke WP (1998) Interactions between effectors linked to serotonin receptors. Ann NY Acad Sci 861: 111-120.[CrossRef][Medline]

Burnet PWJ, Eastwood SL, and Harrison PJ (1996) 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptor mRNAs and binding site densities are differentially altered in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology 15: 442-455.[CrossRef][Medline]

Carrasco GA and Van de Kar LD (2003) Neuroendocrine pharmacology of stress. Eur J Pharmacol 463: 235-272.[CrossRef][Medline]

Chemel BR, Roth BL, Armbruster B, Watts VJ, and Nichols DE (2006) WAY-100635 is a potent dopamine D4 receptor agonist. Psychopharmacology 188: 244-251.[CrossRef][Medline]

Darmani NA, Martin BR, Pandey U, and Glennon RA (1990) Do functional relationships exist between 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptors? Pharmacol Biochem Behav 36: 901-906.[CrossRef][Medline]

Eison AS and Mullins UL (1995) Regulation of central 5-HT2A receptors: a review of in vivo studies. Behav Brain Res 73: 177-181.[CrossRef]

Eison AS and Yocca FD (1985) Reduction in cortical 5HT2 receptor sensitivity after continuous gepirone treatment. Eur J Pharmacol 111: 389-392.[CrossRef][Medline]

Feldman S, Newman ME, Gur E, and Weidenfeld J (1998) Role of serotonin in the amygdala in hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical responses. Neuroreport 9: 2007-2009.[Medline]

Forster EA, Cliffe IA, Bill DJ, Dover GM, Jones D, Reilly Y, and Fletcher A (1995) A pharmacological profile of the selective silent 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY-100635. Eur J Pharmacol 281: 81-88.[CrossRef][Medline]

Hensler JG and Truett KA (1998) Effect of chronic serotonin-2 receptor agonist or antagonist administration on serotonin-1A receptor sensitivity. Neuropsychopharmacology 19: 354-364.[CrossRef][Medline]

Krebs-Thomson K and Geyer MA (1998) Evidence for a functional interaction between 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptors in rats. Psychopharmacology 140: 69-74.[CrossRef][Medline]

La Cour CM, El MS, Hanoun N, Hamon M, and Lanfumey L (2006) Regional differences in the coupling of 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A receptors to G proteins in the rat brain. Mol Pharmacol 70: 1013-1021.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Levy AD, Baumann MH, and Van de Kar LD (1994) Monoaminergic regulation of neuroendocrine function and its modification by cocaine. Front Neuroendocrinol 15: 1-72.[Medline]

Li Q, Muma NA, Battaglia G, and Van de Kar LD (1997) A desensitization of hypothalamic 5-HT1A receptors by repeated injections of paroxetine: reduction in the levels of Gi and Go proteins and neuroendocrine responses, but not in the density of 5-HT1A receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 282: 1581-1590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Lin SL, Setya S, Johnson-Farley NN, and Cowen DS (2002) Differential coupling of 5-HT1 receptors to G proteins of the Gi family. Br J Pharmacol 136: 1072-1078.[CrossRef][Medline]

Maswood S, Andrade M, Caldarola-Pastuszka M, and Uphouse L (1996) Protective actions of the 5-HT2A/2C, receptor agonist, DOI, on 5-HT1A receptor-mediated inhibition of lordosis behavior. Neuropharmacology 35: 497-501.[CrossRef][Medline]

Mazzucchelli C and Brambilla R (2000) Ras-related and MAPK signalling in neuronal plasticity and memory formation. Cell Mol Life Sci 57: 604-611.[CrossRef][Medline]

Meltzer HY, Li Z, Kaneda Y, and Ichikawa J (2003) Serotonin receptors: their key role in drugs to treat schizophrenia. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 27: 1159-1172.[CrossRef][Medline]

Milanini-Mongiat J, Pouyssegur J, and Pages G (2002) Identification of two Sp1 phosphorylation sites for p42/p44 mitogen-activated protein kinases: their implication in vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription. J Biol Chem 277: 20631-20639.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ootsuka Y and Blessing WW (2006) Thermogenesis in brown adipose tissue: increase by 5-HT2A receptor activation and decrease by 5-HT1A receptor activation in conscious rats. Neurosci Lett 395: 170-174.[CrossRef][Medline]

Roth BL and Xia Z (2004) Molecular and cellular mechanisms for the polarized sorting of serotonin receptors: relevance for genesis and treatment of psychosis. Crit Rev Neurobiol 16: 229-236.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sargent PA, Kjaer KH, Bench CJ, Rabiner EA, Messa C, Meyer J, Gunn RN, Grasby PM, and Cowen PJ (2000) Brain serotonin1A receptor binding measured by positron emission tomography with [11C]WAY-100635: effects of depression and antidepressant treatment. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57: 174-180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schechter LE, Bolaños FJ, Gozlan H, Lanfumey L, Haj-Dahmane S, Laporte A-M, Fattaccini C-M, and Hamon M (1990) Alterations of central serotoninergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission in rats chronically treated with ipsapirone: biochemical and electrophysiological studies. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 255: 1335-1347.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schiller L, Donix M, Jahkel M, and Oehler J (2006) Serotonin 1A and 2A receptor densities, neurochemical and behavioural characteristics in two closely related mice strains after long-term isolation. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 30: 492-503.[CrossRef][Medline]

Steel RGD and Torrie JH (1960) Principles and Procedures of Statistics with Special Reference to the Biological Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York

Stockmeier CA, Dilley GE, Shapiro LA, Overholser JC, Thompson PA, and Meltzer HY (1997) Serotonin receptors in suicide victims with major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 16: 162-173.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sullivan NR, Crane JW, Damjanoska KJ, Carrasco GA, D'Souza DN, Garcia F, and Van de Kar LD (2005) Tandospirone activates neuroendocrine and ERK (MAP kinase) signaling pathways specifically through 5-HT1A receptor mechanisms in vivo. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol 371: 18-26.[CrossRef][Medline]

Sweatt JD (2001) The neuronal MAP kinase cascade: a biochemical signal integration system subserving synaptic plasticity and memory. J Neurochem 76: 1-10.[CrossRef][Medline]

Taylor DP and Hyslop DK (1991) Chronic administration of buspirone down-regulates 5-HT2 receptor binding sites. Drug Dev Res 24: 93-105.[CrossRef]

Valdez A, Burke TF, and Hensler JG (2002) Selective heterologous regulation of 5-HT1A receptor-stimulated [35S]GTP{gamma}S binding in the anterior cingulate cortex as a result of 5-HT2 receptor activation. Brain Research 957: 174-182.[CrossRef][Medline]

Van de Kar LD, Javed A, Zhang YH, Serres F, Raap DK, and Gray TS (2001) 5-HT2A receptors stimulate ACTH, corticosterone, oxytocin, renin, and prolactin release and activate hypothalamic CRF and oxytocin-expressing cells. J Neurosci 21: 3572-3579.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yocca FD, Wright RN, Margraf RR, and Eison AS (1990) 8-OH-DPAT and buspirone analogs inhibit the ketanserin-sensitive quipazine-induced head shake response in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 35: 251-254.[CrossRef][Medline]

Zhang Y, Damjanoska KJ, Carrasco GA, Dudas B, D'Souza DN, Tetzlaff J, Garcia F, Hanley NR, Scripathirathan K, Petersen BR, et al. (2002) Evidence that 5-HT2A receptors in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus mediate neuroendocrine responses to (-)DOI. J Neurosci 22: 9635-9642.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang Y, D'Souza D, Raap DK, Garcia F, Battaglia G, Muma NA, and Van de Kar LD (2001) Characterization of the functional heterologous desensitization of hypothalamic 5-HT1A receptors after 5-HT2A receptor activation. J Neurosci 21: 7919-7927.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhang Y, Gray TS, D'Souza DN, Carrsco GA, Damjanoska KJ, Dudas B, Garcia F, Zainelli GM, Sullivan NR, Battaglia G, et al. (2004) Desensitization of 5-HT1A receptors by 5-HT2A receptors in neuroendocrine neurons in vivo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 310: 59-66.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jpet.106.116004v1
320/3/1078    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carrasco, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Battaglia, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carrasco, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Battaglia, G.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
All ASPET Journals Molecular Pharmacology Pharmacological Reviews
 Molecular Interventions Drug Metabolism and Disposition